How the Women’s March & the Dissatisfied can seize Trump’s justiceship nomination to “move forward” to a new constitution by We the People
|
Feb 4 (2 days ago)
 | | ||
| ||||
NOTE: See the note below on “joinedwords” and interferencewith this email’s formatting, which is intended to be easy on the eye and professional,not odd and shocking.
.
How the Women’s March
and The Dissatisfied With The Establishment
can seize the opportunity of
P. Trump’s nomination of a judge to the Supreme Court
to set in motion an investigation of
connivance between politicians and
the wrongdoing judges that they nominate and confirm,
whose findings can so outrage the public as to provide
and The Dissatisfied With The Establishment
can seize the opportunity of
P. Trump’s nomination of a judge to the Supreme Court
to set in motion an investigation of
connivance between politicians and
the wrongdoing judges that they nominate and confirm,
whose findings can so outrage the public as to provide
the public impetus for Marchers andThe Dissatisfied
to “move forward”
to “move forward”
to a new constitution by We the People
.
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City http://Judicial-Discipline-
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
.M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City http://Judicial-Discipline-
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
NOTE:If youagree with this open letter and its supporting article below, forward them tothe Women's March co-chairs at tamika@womensmarch.com, carmen@womensmarch.com, Linda@womensmarch.com, bob@womensmarch.com,sisters@wo
.
Ms. Tamika D. Mallory
Ms. Carmen Perez
Ms. Linda Sarsour
Ms. Bob Bland
Women’s March Co-Chairsand Members of the National Committee
.Ms. Carmen Perez
Ms. Linda Sarsour
Ms. Bob Bland
Women’s March Co-Chairsand Members of the National Committee
NOTE ON THIS EMAIL’S FORMATTING: The formatting of this email is normal (14pt Bookman font), consistent, and intended to be pleasant to the readers, rather than odd, disconcerting, and dissuade them from reading it. If in spite of all the effort to circumvent the glitch in software or interference with communications that creates “joinedwords” in Dr. Cordero’s emails(†>ol2:426§C),
.
Dear Misses. Bland, Sarsour, Perez, andMallory, and National Committee Members,
.
I would like to praise your valuesand objectives, as expressed by Ms. Perez and Ms. Bland in their interview onPBS Newshour on January 20; your superb organization of the January 21 Women’sMarch; and the principles that you have stated on your website.
.
We have harmonious interests thatmake us advocates of a common cause: to enjoy, assert, and acquire the rightsof women, of The Dissatisfied With The Establishment, in general, and of thedissatisfied with the judicial and legal system, in particular, and ofeverybody else who makes up We the People.
.
Therefore, I want to join forceswith you.
.
To that end, I bring to the tablea concrete, realistic, and feasible answer to the question that you asked onyour website:
.
We are confronted with the question of how to move forward inthe face of national and international concern and fear.
.
I respectfully submit this answer: We “move forward” to anew constitution.
.
This answer is realistic: 34 states have demanded Congress since April2014, to convene a constitutional convention. Thus, the requirement of ArticleV of the Constitution that two thirds of the states demand that Congressconvene a constitutional convention has been met.
.
A new constitution is a concrete rallying cry.
.
More importantly, a new constitution is the embodiment of an inspiring idealas well as of the foundational terms of a new relation between the people andtheir government to emerge after breaking with the Establishment:
.
We “move forward” to a new constitution
under which people need not march to beg the Establishment for permits,
but rather in which We the People
assert our status as the sovereign source of all political power
and as such the masters of government,
who hire public servants
to safeguard and facilitate our enjoyment of what are our rights,
and who retain and exercise the power
to hold our servants accountable
and liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
.under which people need not march to beg the Establishment for permits,
but rather in which We the People
assert our status as the sovereign source of all political power
and as such the masters of government,
who hire public servants
to safeguard and facilitate our enjoyment of what are our rights,
and who retain and exercise the power
to hold our servants accountable
and liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
The “move forward” to anew constitution is feasible by applying the inform and outrage strategy. Ideveloped it in my study ofjudges in connivance with politicians, which is titled and downloadable thus.
.
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting*†
.Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting*†
* Volume 1: http://Judicial-Discipline-
.
† Volume 2: http://Judicial-Discipline-
.
The inform and outrage strategy isnon-partisan, non-denominational, and non-violent.
.
It is the product of strategicthinking: We analyze the interests of people and entities to determine who hasharmonious and conflicting interests(†>ol2:465§1), which if strengthened orweakened can allow us to form or break up explicit or implicit alliances sothat we may become stronger or clear the way to advance our cause(*>ol2:445§B,475§D).
.
Strategic thinking allows us toobtain in practice support from unwitting sources that we need not approve andare not part of.
.
A public dominated by TheDissatisfied With The Establishment; a President who has promised to “drain the swamp of corruption of the Establishment” and totransfer power from the self-enriching Establishment to the people, whom it hasharmed; and the two thirds of the states that have formally demanded Congress tocall a constitutional convention, are our main ‘allies’. Their interests areharmonious with ours. They render us stronger; render the concrete goal of the“move forward” to anew constitution realistic; and render the inform and outrage strategy to attainit all the more feasible.
.
I offer to make a presentation onthe “move forward” andthe strategy to you and your colleagues here in New York City or at a videoconference or elsewhere on a paid trip.
.
The article below previews mypresentation. It shows that my answer to your question is indeed concrete,realistic, and feasible. Just as my above-mentioned study, it also shows mythoughtful commitment to our common cause and the value that I can add to youreffort to advance it. We are implicit allies; my presentation can contribute toturning us into explicit allies.
.
Consequently, I look forward tohearing from you at your earliest convenience, for the most opportune occasionfor launching the strategy to “moveforward” to a new constitution is during the investigation of thejusticeship nominee that the media will naturally launch upon President Trumpannouncing his or her name.
.
Visit the website at, and subscribe to its series of articles thus:www.Judicial-Discipline-
.
Dare trigger history!(*>jur:7§5)...
* http://Judicial-Discipline-
.* http://Judicial-Discipline-
Sincerely,
.
Dr. RichardCordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
tel. (718)827-9521
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
tel. (718)827-9521
.
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
..
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
******************************
.
How the Women’s March and
The Dissatisfied With The Establishment
can “moveforward”
thanks to a concrete, realistic, and feasible strategy
implemented in the context of
President Trump’s justiceship nomination
by informing the public about
two unique national stories of
swamp politicians conniving with
federal judges ‒who are
life-tenured and unaccountable, and consequently are
the most established of the corrupt Establishment and
engage risklessly in routine, widespread, and grave wrongdoing‒
and thereby so outraging the public
as to increase the ranks of Marchers and The Dissatisfied
and make them strong enough
to force Congress to call the constitutional convention
that has been demanded by 34 states since April 2014,
and to emerge therefrom witha newconstitution
under which people need not march to beg theEstablishment for permits,
but rather in which We the People
assert our status as the sovereign source of all political power
and as such the masters of government:
We hire public servants
to safeguard and facilitate our enjoyment of what are our rights, and
retain and exercise the power
to hold our servants accountable
and liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing
.The Dissatisfied With The Establishment
can “moveforward”
thanks to a concrete, realistic, and feasible strategy
implemented in the context of
President Trump’s justiceship nomination
by informing the public about
two unique national stories of
swamp politicians conniving with
federal judges ‒who are
life-tenured and unaccountable, and consequently are
the most established of the corrupt Establishment and
engage risklessly in routine, widespread, and grave wrongdoing‒
and thereby so outraging the public
as to increase the ranks of Marchers and The Dissatisfied
and make them strong enough
to force Congress to call the constitutional convention
that has been demanded by 34 states since April 2014,
and to emerge therefrom witha newconstitution
under which people need not march to beg theEstablishment for permits,
but rather in which We the People
assert our status as the sovereign source of all political power
and as such the masters of government:
We hire public servants
to safeguard and facilitate our enjoyment of what are our rights, and
retain and exercise the power
to hold our servants accountable
and liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing
ByDr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial Discipline ReformNew York Cityhttp://Judicial-Discipline-
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial Discipline ReformNew York Cityhttp://Judicial-Discipline-
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
DrRCordero@Judicial-
.
NOTE:If youagree with this open letter and its supporting article below, forward them tothe Women's March co-chairs at tamika@womensmarch.com, carmen@womensmarch.com, Linda@womensmarch.com, bob@womensmarch.com,sisters@wo
,
A. The “move forward” toward a newconstitution that We the People livingtoday give ourselves for a radically different world
.
1. Proposing that the Women’s March and The DissatisfiedWith The Establishment “moveforward” to a heavily amended or formally new constitution may appearright now inconceivable, the product, not of strategic thinking, but rather ofwishful thinking.
.
2. However, hundreds of years ago, the 13 colonies alsodeemed inconceivable having a constitution. But they managed to give themselvesone. It required them to wage a war.
.
3. Giving ourselves a new constitution that corresponds tothe demands of a radically different world requires us to devise and implementa reasonable strategy. Its objective is not to take up arms or become partisansupporters of a person or an entity. Rather, it aims to form or break upexplicit or implicit alliances of result that in effect advance our cause.
.
4. More importantly, the objective of the strategy requiresa justification, that is, a theoretical explanation of why we need a newconstitution. The justification must convince the mind and inspire people so profoundlythat they commit their soul and body to achieving the objective. It mustmotivate people to coalesce into a movement that they energize and that energizesthem. Reason and passion are indispendable to realize a great objective. Thatway it becomes an inspiring ideal.
.
5. Without the inspiring ideal of freedom andself-determination that found its expression in the motto ‘not taxation withoutrepresentation’, we would be paying taxes to the queen of England for the teathat we drink.
.
6. We, Women’s Marchers and The Dissatisfied With TheEstablishment, also need and want an ideal: We want a country where instead of havingto march with our hands stretched out begging the King-like Establishment togive us permits , we “moveforward” to give ourselves a constitution that is the expression of the rightsthat we the living today, assemble in a constitutional convention, decide thatwe have in today’s radically different world.
.
7. We want to give ourselves a constitution where we assertand which reflects the fact that:
.
a. We are the People in reality, not merely a character in a bookishdescription of democracy.
.
b. We are the sovereign source of all political power. We do not drawour power from any constitution. We are not subservient to the constitutionthat we received from the past. We are not bound to preseve its futureexistence at the cost of the life that we want to live in the present. We holdthe sovereign power, not Congress or the states, to decide when the time hascome for us to change or do away with an old constitution in order to giveourselves a new constitution.
.
c. In our new constitution,we will assert our status as masters. We will exercise the fundamental right tohire public servants to safeguard the existence and facilitate our enjoyment ofour rights. As masters of all our public servants, we will retain the right andprovide for the way to hold all our servants accountable for the service thatthey render and fail to render and everything else that they do that affectsthe service for which we hired them, and therefore, we will hold them liable tocompensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
.
8. By giving ourselves a new constitution, we will throwover board a constitution imposed upon us by the male Establishment of 228years ago, i.e. 1789, when
.
a. women could not even read, never mind vote on aconstitution, and could only live to raise children and work in the kitchen ortheir husbands’ farms;
.
b. only white men with property could vote; and
.
c. nobody could or would have dare think of rightsconcerning abortion, illegal immigration, universal health care, gun violence, samesex marriage, minorities voting, equal pay, campaign financing, LBTG,environmental protection, public education, big corporations, consumers, jobsecurity, emancipation of slaves, workplace safety, drugs, overincarceration, redistricting,stalking, the Internet, digital profiles, unaccountable judges’ consequent risklesswrongdoing, etc.
.
9. As a result, since then nine unelected,Establishment-
.
10. That is why Wethe People living today want to give ourselves a new constitution where weassert the rights by which we want to live our lives in today’s world.
.
B. A demand by 34 states for a constitutional conventionis before Congress, whose members have disregarded it in the interest of preservingtheir power and privileges and avoiding accountability and liability for theirwrongdoing
.
11. Realistically, we can “move forward” toward a new constitution given thatsince April 2014, the constitutional requirement of Article V that aconstitutional convention be demanded by two thirds of the states -currently 34-has been met.
.
12. But the members of Congress have disregarded thatdemand because the Establishment abhors a process that is bound to escape itscontrol and strip it of its privileges and, worse yet, expose its wrongdoing. Only if forced to will politicians cause Congressto vote to convene a convention.
.
13. That is the justification for the inform andoutrage strategy: the public, informed of the routineness, extent, and gravityof politicians’ and judges’ wrongdoing, will be so outraged that it will bestirred up to “move forward”in an unconventional, imaginative way to force politicians to do what they andCongress abhor.
.
14. To that end, the inform and outrage strategyprovides that we should confront politicians with the only “concern and fear” that theyrespond to, i.e., that the public, informed of, and outraged at, public wrongdoing,may vote those politicians out of, or not into, office, if they fail tocondemn, investigate, expose, and punish such wrongdoing. We play onpoliticians’ paramount “concernand fear”: their political survival.
.
15. The precedent for this tactical element is the “concern and fear” that caused politiciansin the 2012 presidential campaign to reject reasonable compromises and embrace extremistpositions, lest they be terminated politically by the Tea Party supporters.
.
16. The confirmation of this “concern and fear” came in the2014 mid-term primaries in Virginia when no less prominent a politician than HouseRepublican Majority Leader Eric Cantor was defeated by a newcomer, Dave Brat, forsupporting positions on immigration and other subjects that though seeminglyreasonable, outraged the Tea Party.
.
17. Consequently, from now on, we “move forward” to generate inpoliticians “concern and fear”that they may not survive next year’s mid-term election if they do not supportour demands in their public statements, in practice, and effectively.
.
C. Informing and outraging the public by takingadvantage of President Trump’s nomination of a justice on February 2
.
1. This is the most opportune time for implementing thestrategy
.
18. The inform and outrage strategy takes advantageof the fact that Trump ran his presidential campaign on the promise to “drain the swamp of corruption of theEstablishment”.
.
19. What is more, in his inaugural speech, he beratedboth Republicans and Democrats as abusers of their position for self-enrichmentat the expense of the people; and promised to transfer power from Congress tothe people. Thereby he announced that he does not feel committed to protectingand covering up corrupt politicians even if they are Republican. He will governin effect as the president of a third party: the Trump Populist Party.
.
2. Informing of wrongdoing through the investigation oftwo unique national stories of politicians’ and judges’ wrongdoing that canoutrage most intensely
.
20. The first step of the inform and outragestrategy is for us:
.
a. to seize the opportunityof P. Trump’s nomination of a justice to the Supreme Court and theinvestigation of the nominee by the media that will naturally follow;
.
b. to call a press conferenceand/or discreetly make private presentations to journalists to persuade them toinvestigate the two unique national stories of President Obama-JusticeSotomayor and Federal Judiciary-NSA, described below, which will reveal politiciansconniving with judges engaged in wrongdoing(ol:154¶3; jur:5¶3) sothat:
.
c. the public:
.
1) composed of:
.
a) the millions who participated in the historic andindepensable Women’s March on January 21, 2017;
.
b) the scores of millions of The Dissatisfied With TheEstablishment who elected Trump president;
.
c) the segment thereof that is dissatisfied with thejudicial and legal system and made up of:
.
(1) the more than 100 million people that every year goor are taken to court(jur:8fn4,5);
.
(2) plus the scores of millions who are parties tolawsuits pending or deemed to have been wrongly or wrongfully decided,
.
(3) plus the scores of millions of related people, suchas their family, friends, peers, employees, customers, employers, etc.; and
.
d) the rest of Wethe People;
.
2) informed through themedia and us of:
.
a) politicians who for the benefit of their own politicalcareers and the avoidance of judges’ retaliation, have condoned and heldunaccountable
.
b) “their menand women on the bench”, who for their own gain and convenience abuse theirpower to dispose of the property, liberty, and all the rights that litigantsand the rest of the public have;
.
(1) To understand judges’ abuse consider this: If you hadpower to dispose of the property, liberty, and all the rights and duties that shapethe life of everybody in the Women’s March, would you be tempted to abuse itfor your benefit if you could do so risklessly? If instead you were so abusedby the co-chairs of the March, would you be dissatisfied?
.
(2) Federal judges do wrong because they know that theyare unaccountable: Whereas 2,293 of them were in office on September 30, 2015,the number of them impeached and removed in the last 228 years since thecreation of the Federal Judiciary in 1789 is 8!(jur:22fn13,14). This historic record shows that once a person becomes a member ofthat Judiciary, he or she can do any wrong without risking any adverseconsequences. They do wrong with the assurance of impunity. This makes itunderstandable why judges dare wield abusively their decision-making power.
.
3) outraged, the public
[Message clipped] View entire message
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.