Showing posts with label Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police. Show all posts

Friday, February 6, 2015

No Police Accountability in Police Shooting of Illinois 95-Year-Old WWII Vet

Editor's note: Your ProbateShark cannot comment on this sad shameful affair!  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com


No Police Accountability in Police Shooting of Illinois 95-Year-Old WWII Vet
By John Kass
IF you've ever heard the sound of a broom on a shop floor, sweeping up right before closing time, you would have heard it in the raspy voice of Cook County Associate Judge Luciano Panici reading his decision in the Wrana case. 

It wasn't crumbs or dust bits or sawdust from under the chopping block. Instead, he was sweeping accountability for one human life, and perhaps saving another life in the process. 

That was the effect of his decision in the case of Park Forest police Officer Craig Taylor, charged with felony reckless conduct in the July 2013 shooting of John Wrana, the 95-year-old World War II veteran who died after being shot four times at close range with beanbag rounds from a 12-gauge shotgun.

"It is a tragedy whenever there is loss of life that follows a confrontation," Panici began, reading from his papers in a South Side voice, a voice like my own, our vowels aligned by neighborhood. 

Panici had frowned from the moment he began presiding over the case. But on Wednesday he'd stopped frowning. He offered no admonition to the police officers involved.

And Taylor walked. 

"The force used by Craig Taylor was not excessive," Panici said. "There was nothing reckless. There was nothing criminal about his actions." 

There were five cops in Wrana's room at the Victory Centre assisted living facility. Wrana had a knife and a shoehorn and a cane. They had guns and a riot shield and Tasers and muscle and youth and that 12-gauge Mossberg pump-action police shotgun loaded with beanbag rounds.       

They're called "less-lethal" rounds, since the rounds aren't designed to penetrate the skin and explode, but merely to thump the body and put it down. Police in Ferguson, Mo., are experimenting with similar technology, where anger and fire and protests and looting erupted after the police killing of Michael Brown. 

But there were no protests for John Wrana, were there? World War II veterans didn't form up and scream. That's not their way. They're old and dying every day. And then there was that bit from Taylor's defense counsel, Terry Ekl, who said he was sick and tired of hearing about Wrana's war service. 

Ekl is an excellent lawyer, one of the best around, with amazing skills of argument. He's so good he could argue a 5-pound chunk of bologna right through the smallest buttonhole on your lapel, and you wouldn't even taste it.

"I've heard enough about World War II," Ekl said during the trial. "It's nothing but an attempt to create more sympathy for Mr. Wrana." 

But John Wrana didn't get any sympathy, did he? Not really.

He was old and delirious, suffering from a suspected urinary tract infection, which can lead to delusions. He didn't want to be taken to the hospital. He waved a knife and a shoehorn at cops. He swore at them. And they said they were afraid for their very lives. 

They didn't give him sympathy. They didn't give him respect. And at trial, his service to his country was deemed irrelevant. 

But they did give John Wrana something: 

They gave him four beanbag rounds to the abdomen, chest and arms at a range of 6 to 8 feet, with Taylor racking rounds and pulling the trigger, pumping and firing and pumping and firing. 

Part of the old man's intestinal wall ruptured, and he bled out. 

In his decision, it was clear Judge Panici bought into the defense's argument that Wrana prompted his own death by refusing surgery that could have repaired the rupture.

True, Wrana refused it, personally and through his stepdaughter. But focusing on that alone is dealing with only half the truth of the situation. 

Wrana had asked the doctor if he could be guaranteed he wouldn't end up on a ventilator in a vegetative state, and the stepdaughter has told me that the doctor would not make that guarantee. 

So John Wrana said to let him go. And that's what they did. They let him go. He didn't want it that way. But he didn't want to end his days with tubes down his throat. 

But in court and out of it, I got the sense from the legal experts that Wrana had killed himself. 

If only he'd obeyed officers. If only he hadn't become angry when they shot the Taser at him and failed. If only he hadn't waved that knife or the shoehorn that the terrified cops thought was the machete of a jungle ninja warrior. 

If only. If only. 

Then maybe they wouldn't have shot him down in his own room and then handcuff him to a chair and taken photos of him bleeding on the carpet. 

The problem with this case from the beginning was that Taylor was alone in court. But he wasn't alone in Wrana's room. 

They were other cops with him, formed up in "stack" formation behind the guy with the riot shield, so they could rush the old man two weeks shy of his 96th birthday, that deadly ninja who terrified them so. 

By charging only Taylor, and not his superior, the whole thing seemed unfair. 

I didn't want Taylor to go to prison. 

But I don't think he should be a police officer — any more than the commander who set up the stupid attack plan. 

A guilty verdict could have ruined Taylor's life, and those of his wife and children, and I didn't want that either. 

But there's got to be some accountability for what happened to John Wrana. 

And there is none. 

All accountability, all official shame, all official sorrow, it was all just swept away, by those broom stalks in Judge Panici's voice. And that's the tragedy.
 

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Explanations needed in Webber/Goodwin case

Explanations needed in Webber/Goodwin case

  

1 of 3 clicks used this month
LOGIN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE

In 2012, longtime Portsmouth resident, 92-year-old Geraldine Webber, changed her will to make then 33-year-old officer Aaron Goodwin the primary beneficiary of her estate and it is the year she died. Also, in 2012, the state of New Hampshire earned a "D" on the New Hampshire Corruption Risk Report Card (www.stateintegrity.org/new_hampshire) by the State Integrity Investigation (a joint project of the Center for Public Integrity, Global Integrity and Public Radio International.)
Police Sgt. Goodwin claims he received ethical clearance from his "superiors" to pursue a personal relationship with a woman in her 90s afflicted with dementia, enabling him to become the primary beneficiary of her $2.7 million estate, which resulted in the disinheritance of her only surviving relative (a disabled grandson) and of her long-term local friends who took her for meals and provided rides, structure and socialization for her for more than a decade, and also reduced inheritances for esteemed health care and educational institutions, and our own Portsmouth Police and Fire Departments (that is, the taxpaying citizens who employ Goodwin).
Ironically, as can be seen in Webber's 2012 estate planning DVD prepared by attorney Gary Holmes, Webber laments that she does not know how to reach Whitey Bulger, a career criminal linked to corrupt law enforcement in the 1970s. She would like to hire him to knock off anyone who tries to interfere in her plans to change her will. In addition to noting her questionable mental status on the DVD, one can only speculate about why Webber dwelled on the memory of a criminal noteworthy for his links to corrupt law enforcement during the process to revise her will.
The public needs to know if Goodwin is accurate in his claim that the leadership of the Portsmouth Police Department "cleared" him of "any ethical conflicts" when he pursued a relationship with Webber, as reported in the Portsmouth Herald's July 9 publication. The public also needs to know on what basis Goodwin's "superiors" make their ethical decisions.
The impact of questionable ethical guidance must not be swept under the rug through a mediated out-of-court settlement as is being advocated by the legal representation for Goodwin, attorney Chuck Doleac, and for attorney Gary Holmes who revised Webber's will in 2012; defense of this 2012 will is being provided by attorney Ralph Holmes.
Because the Goodwin/Webber case is being managed through probate court, much ado is being made about the funds Webber has left behind. However, for the citizens of Portsmouth this case is primarily about potential police corruption, the conduct of our public servants, and about public safety. The public deserves transparency in the determination if undue influence led to the creation of the 2012 revised will and transparency in confronting the possibility that Webber was emotionally abused and endangered by a public safety officer. Transparency can only be achieved through a hearing — not mediation.
Webber's social supports fell away under Goodwin's influence. She was nearly blind. She became socially isolated. She broke her hip. She died of inanition (slow, progressive starvation) without her longtime allies, friends, grandson and former daughter-in-law at her side. Does anyone care about what her life was like in the year prior to her death or do we only care about her money?
An investigation about the leadership of our Police Department seems essential, specifically its management of ethical issues that involve potential conflicts of interest, cronyism and the impartial treatment of all Portsmouth residents — particularly the elderly, disabled and financially destitute who could truly benefit from a more watchful eye by local law enforcement. Not one elderly Portsmouth resident, family member or caregiver has stepped forward to defend Goodwin or to demonstrate that his interest in Webber was consistent with the attention he showed other elderly Portsmouth residents, regardless of their financial status. It seems that Webber is the only elderly resident Goodwin befriended.
In New Hampshire a third of us are over the age of 50. If the Goodwin/Webber case ends in a behind-the-scenes settlement rather than in court, what will be the takeaway meaning to those of us who will spend our twilight years in New Hampshire when our vulnerability increases and life becomes more challenging, particularly those of us without children or with children who've moved away? For this population, their friends and family members, a settlement means the following: "You're not important anymore, maybe never were, and are not worthy of the protection of the community." For our taxpayer-funded public servants a mediated settlement means this: "Try to get away with whatever you can. You may not get it all but you'll get something and will be able to keep your job and get promoted, too."
A mediated settlement will mean that Goodwin and his associates will financially benefit from the elderly woman's estate. Before we consider such an unjust resolution and one that will perpetuate a culture of low expectations for our public servants, we need the Portsmouth Police Department to formally explain the code of ethics expected of our police officers and how this code squares with Goodwin's actions in the Webber case. We need to also hear from the Portsmouth Police Commission, the body that oversees Police Department actions, about the ethical principles that inform their leadership of a very powerful city department. The state attorney general's office and the Portsmouth City Council also need to make clear their expectations for the ethical conduct of public servants and explain their laissez faire approach to this case.
The public deserves an explanation of the ethical principles that guide the leadership of our state, community and the day-to-day judgment of police officers. Webber's closest friends have made it clear they do not care about the money; instead, they want the citizens of Portsmouth to know what happened to their good friend. It has taken enormous courage on their part to address the failure by the Police Department to police its own. These whistleblowers, many of them elderly, deserve a hearing and full inquiry into the case, and gratitude from our community for courageously bringing this case forward. Public safety, as well as the integrity and reputation of the Portsmouth Police Department, the Police Commission, the City Council, and the town itself deserve nothing less.
Jane Zill is a Portsmouth resident.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Non-Sequiturs: 01.15.14

  • Editor's note: Your ProbateShark suggests that you click on Andrew Mancilla, Esq.    A most interesting post...   Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
  • 15 Jan 2014 at 5:03 PM
  • 9th Circuit, Drugs, Food, Non-Sequiturs, Parties, Police, Technology, Wal-Mart
  • Non-Sequiturs: 01.15.14


    * Wal-Mart may recall loads of donkey meat from their stores. Not because they sold donkey meat — they intended to do that — but because there was fox meat mixed in. What does the Fox Say? Nothing, because it was ground into donkey meat. The end. [MSN Money]
    * Of course Colorado got rid of mile marker 420. But it’s not because they don’t like weed — it’s legal there, after all — check out the real reason. [Lowering the Bar]
    * Judges are reading briefs on iPads now? Here’s how you write a brief for a judge who has an app for “law.” [Columbia Business Law Review]
    * A listing of this lawyer’s previous representations. In the words of our tipster: “Don’t know what’s worse: Courtney Love or the Gambino crime family.” [Andrew Mancilla, Esq.]
    * The Ninth Circuit gave the go-ahead for about 60,000 tech workers to sue Google, Apple, and other companies for artificially driving down wages by agreeing not to poach each others’ employees. Hey, give these folks some love, not every one of them is going to go start a new video game company. [Reuters]
    * A lot of Cuban-American families in Miami blow a lot of money on quinceaƱeras. Here’s a way to recoup some funds: throw a completely innocent party and wait for the cops to come by and commit police brutality. This guy netted $90,000 that way. [Miami New Times]

    Tuesday, September 17, 2013

    Crashing Your Car and Seeking Help While Black Is Apparently A Capital Offense

  • 16 Sep 2013 at 12:59 PM
  • Guns / Firearms, Minority Issues, Police, Racism
  • Crashing Your Car and Seeking Help While Black Is Apparently A Capital Offense


    This weekend, a black man got into a car accident, climbed out of the wreckage through the back window of his vehicle, went looking for help, and was shot to death by the police. I should also mention that the black guy was unarmed.
    In a surprise twist, the police officer has been charged with voluntary manslaughter. I’m sure that the people who think it’s okay when black people get shot to death will find a way to defend the officer, and they’ll deny that race played a role in the shooting. But I’d like to think that even the people who don’t think this guy was killed because he was black can at least agree that the police can’t be allowed to gun people down in this fashion.
    The police are supposed to protect and serve, not shoot to kill…

    Here’s the situation, as reported by Charlotte-Mecklenburg police Chief Rodney Monroe in the Charlotte Observer:
    [Jonathan A.] Ferrell was driving a vehicle that crashed into the woods near Reedy Creek Road in northeast Charlotte.
    Monroe called the accident severe, adding that Ferrell would have been forced to climb out of the back window to get out. Monroe didn’t know the cause of the crash, and he didn’t say whether Ferrell had injuries from it.
    Ferrell apparently walked to the nearest house, about a half-mile from the accident, and was “banging on the door viciously,” Monroe said. The woman who lives there thought the man at her door was her husband coming home late from work.
    But when she saw Ferrell instead, she shut the door and called police because she thought he was trying to rob her.
    Officers received a call shortly after 2:30 a.m. about an attempted break-in at a residence in the 7500 block of Reedy Creek Road.
    The three officers from the Hickory Grove division who responded to the scene came across a man matching the description of the possible suspect, and they surrounded him. The man “immediately charged” at the police, Monroe said.
    One officer attempted to Tase Ferrell, but apparently he missed. A second officer, Randall Kerrick, then shot at Ferrell, hitting him multiple times, and killing him.
    I’m not going to jump up and down on the woman in the house. I mean, she probably isn’t getting a humanitarian award, but she was put in a tough spot. It’s late at night, her husband isn’t home, a stranger is at her door claiming that he’s been in a car accident and needs help, but she has no way of knowing that for sure. I’d like to think that I could distinguish between intruder and car accident victim, but whatever. The way people are in this country, I’m just happy the lady didn’t pull out a shotgun and blow Ferrell away. It seems to me that she did the right thing by calling 911. Law enforcement is supposed to be able to distinguish friend or foe in this situation.
    I’m saving my “this racism is killing me inside” outrage for the cops, of course, but also for Ferrell’s former football coach. Ferrell used to play at Florida A&M, and so Deadspin got a reaction from his former coach, Earl Holmes:
    “I was saddened when they told me.” Holmes said. “They told me he was murdered. I said, ‘What? Murder? That doesn’t sound like him. Not the Jonathan I remembered.’ The Jonathan I remembered was a soft-spoken kid, quiet and to himself.”
    Come on, man. Only boisterous, loud-mouth black people get murdered? Holmes is black, by the way. And the statement reminds me that the fundamental problem here is that a lot of people — black and white people — think that there is some “way of acting” that will keep you from getting racially profiled to death. I can hear the apologists now: Maybe if he had politely “knocked” on the door, instead of “banging” on it “viciously.” Maybe if he had calmly “walked” towards the officers instead of “immediately charging” them. Maybe if he had just stayed in his vehicle screaming, “Oh Lawd, massa I needs some hep,” then this white cop wouldn’t have had to shoot him to death.
    I’m not sure what Randall Kerrick’s defense will be, and I’m not sure how many people will buy it. But regardless of how the legal process plays out, I’m just don’t know what black people are supposed to do to protect themselves from police officers.
    CMPD officer charged in fatal shooting [Charlotte Observer]
    Unarmed Former Florida A&M Player Shot Dead By Police [Deadspin]