Showing posts with label Cefalu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cefalu. Show all posts

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Judge Kawamoto -

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Judge Kawamoto -




Editor's Note:  When Judge Kawamoto of the Probate Court of Cook County selected a court documented psychotic person to to be guardian of a 99 year old disabled great-grandmother, your ProbateShark truly questioned the judge's judgement. Now Judge Lynne Kawamoto has outdone her own previous poor judgement by not preventing the unfortunate 86 year old Mrs. Cefalu from being brutally beaten twice by the same monster at a local nursing home. Judge, view your work on the photo's  by clicking on the link below. Documentation on the cover up to follow in future postings. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com




http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15658009/2011-07-13-%20Second%20revision.pdf

KawamotoDragon.com

No comments:

Sunday, October 19, 2014

The Choir is united


The Choir is united in having great desire to deal with the problem; however, the congregation just nods it head.   

The statement on Isolation you make is extremely important and I've colored it in red. In just about every single elder cleansing case the First step is "isolation."    In the Isolationcase Guardian ad Litem is memorialized is telling the Court about how Mary Sykes was agitated when she had contact with her siblings and younger daughter.   The reaction of Judge Connors was classic and isolation was decreed.    

A moment of common sense by Judge Connors would have revealed that Mary being agitated was demonstrating her competency and the wrongful nature of the motivation for the isolation.    Any competent human who is removed from his/her prior life wrongfully and is allowed limited contact with it will be quite agitated.    The quest for justice will create an agitation!    Had Judge Connors done her job and held a real hearing in which there was a cogent attempt at compliance with the statute 755 ILCS 5/11a - 1 et seq, and in particular 11a - 3, she would have discovered the fraud on day one and Mary's civil rights, property right, human rights and civil rights would have been protected.   Instead a corrupt judge joined with an appointed miscreant to commence a program of elder abuse and elder cleansing.

Unfortunately, this scenario is repeated across the United States on a daily basis.   Janet and Barbara had similar stories to tell.   Janet was so harassed that she is now in exile, and Barbara is facing jail time for doing exactly what society demands that she do!    She tried to rescue her mother from what only can be described as murderous plot!   Barbara, Janet, Gloria, and many other citizens have had to suffer extreme retaliation for standing up to the corrupt judges, their appointees and those who aid and abet this criminal conspiracy and war against the elderly and the disabled.   

Attempts to obtain an intelligent HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation and prosecution of the discriminatory action of elder cleansing have on balance been unsuccessful,   Intimidation is a key weapon of the elder cleansers.  Here in Illinois Jerome Larkin has been open and notorious in his efforts.    JoAnne Denison's blog is his current target and as an overt assault on the Bill of Rights, Illinois statutes, Federal Statutes and the core values of America he uses public money to attempt to silence her.   His weapon ultra vires disciplinary proceedings!    Against me he was able to suspend me for 4 years for writing the Attorney General of the United States concerning this problem.  (Had I stolen Mary's money I would have received a much lesser suspension!).    My suspension was a warning to other lawyers - comply with 18 USCA 4 and you get your ticket punched!

We know what the problem is!    We can identify it.   Legislation is in place to deal with the problem and prevent it in the future; however, the real issue is how do we get law enforcement to stop this criminal conflagration do intelligent HONEST complete and comprehensive investigations and prosecutions of the elder cleansers.   

Tim has pointed out the Americans with Disabilities Act (Title 2) has been clearly violated by the corrupt judges, their appointees and those who aid and abet them.    Justice Department has been given the duty to enforce the ADA.    Criminal laws have been violated right and left and law enforcement has the duty to enforce these laws.   As the breach of a fiduciary relationship  creates taxable events, taxing authorities have a treasure trove of uncollected and undeclared taxes due.    The thieves who entered Mary Sykes' safety deposit box and stole a gold coin collection are known!   There are State and Federal taxes due on not only this money but on the other funds taken.   Indeed, even the gold removed from Alice Gore's mouth must be reported and the taxes paid!   Why have taxing authorities been reluctant to collect these taxes? There is nothing in the tax law that give exemption to corrupt Judges, their appointees and/or those who aid and abet them!   Illinois is on the verge of insolvency and the financial situation of the USA is nothing to write home about.   Collecting the taxes that the government is entitled to in Sykes, Wyman, Tyler, Gore, **** goes along way toward paying for important government programs! 
 
Ken Ditkowsky

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Ken's "cheat Sheet"

i prepared a 'cheat sheet' just like we used to in our school days.   You may publish it and share even with the miscreants.   The Illinois Statute was designed by our legislature to diligently protect the rights of senior citizens and the disabled.   Cases like Sykes, Gore, Wyman, Tyler et al should never have occurred.    My hope is that by sharing this document we can obviate any inadvertent "elder cleansing."    



Statutory criterion
I. Basis for appointing a Guardian or declaring a person in need:
1.      Demonstration of need for Guardian;
 
a.        if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning the care of his person,   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-3 (West)  
b.         if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he is unable to manage his estate or financial affairs   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-3 (West)
 
2.          Venue:   Venue. If the alleged ward is a resident of this State, the proceeding shall be instituted in the court of the county in which he resides.    755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-7 (West)
 
3.          Petition:    The petition for adjudication of disability and for the appointment of a guardian of the estate or the person or both of an alleged disabled person must state, if known or reasonably ascertainable: (a) the relationship and interest of the petitioner to the respondent; (b) the name, date of birth, and place of residence of the respondent; (c) the reasons for the guardianship; (d) the name and post office address of the respondent's guardian, if any, or of the respondent's agent or agents appointed under the Illinois Power of Attorney Act,1 if any; (e) the name and post office addresses of the nearest relatives of the respondent in the following order: (1) the spouse and adult children, parents and adult brothers and sisters, if any; if none, (2) nearest adult kindred known to the petitioner; (f) the name and address of the person with whom or the facility in which the respondent is residing; (g) the approximate value of the personal and real estate; (h) the amount of the anticipated annual gross income and other receipts; (i) the name, post office address and in case of an individual, the age, relationship to the respondent and occupation of the proposed guardian    755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-8 (West)
  
4.        Procedure:       Upon the filing of a petition pursuant to Section 11a-8, the court shall set a date and place for hearing to take place within 30 days. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to report to the court concerning the respondent's best interests consistent with the provisions of this Section,   55 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
5.          Payment of Fees:     “the court may enter an order for the petitioner to pay all such fees or such amounts as the respondent or the respondent's estate may be unable to pay   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
 
 
 
2.   Right of alleged disabled person to trial.
Respondent is entitled to be represented by counsel, to demand a jury of 6 persons, to present evidence, and to confront and cross-examine all witnesses. The hearing may be closed to the public on request of the respondent, the guardian ad litem, or appointed or other counsel for the respondent. Unless excused by the court upon a showing that the respondent refuses to be present or will suffer harm if required to attend, the respondent shall be present at the hearing.  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-11 (West)
Right to Counsel   “b) The court (1) may appoint counsel for the respondent, if the court finds that the interests of the respondent will be best served by the appointment, and (2) shall appoint counsel upon respondent's request or if the respondent takes a position adverse to that of the guardian ad litem. The respondent shall be permitted to obtain the appointment of counsel either at the hearing or by any written or oral request communicated to the court prior to the hearing. The summons shall inform the respondent of this right to obtain appointed counsel. The court may allow counsel for the respondent reasonable compensation. “  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
3.    Criterion for the form of Summons
 
The summons shall be printed in LARGE, BOLD TYPE and shall include the following notice:
NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
You have been named as a respondent in a guardianship petition asking that you be declared a disabled person. If the court grants the petition, a guardian will be appointed for you. A copy of the guardianship petition is attached for your convenience.
The date and time of the hearing are:
The place where the hearing will occur is:
The Judge's name and phone number is:   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
4.   Utilization of the  Statutory authority..
 
(b) Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the disabled person, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual's actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations.   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-3 (West)
 
 
5.    Right to Counsel:
“(b) The court (1) may appoint counsel for the respondent, if the court finds that the interests of the respondent will be best served by the appointment, and (2) shall appoint counsel upon respondent's request or if the respondent takes a position adverse to that of the guardian ad litem. THE RESPONDENT SHALL BE PERMITTED TO OBTAIN THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL EITHER AT THE HEARING OR BY ANY WRITTEN OR ORAL REQUEST COMMUNICATED TO THE COURT PRIOR TO THE HEARING. The summons shall inform the respondent of this right to obtain appointed counsel. The court may allow counsel for the respondent reasonable compensation.”  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
6.    Appointment Temporary and Notice to the disabled person.
§ 11a-19. Notice of right to seek modification. At the time of the appointment of a guardian the court shall inform the ward of his right under Section 11a-20 to petition for termination of adjudication of disability, revocation of the letters of guardianship of the estate or person, or both, or modification of the duties of the guardian and shall give the ward a written statement explaining this right and the procedures for petitioning the court. The notice shall be in large, bold type and shall be in a format similar to the notice of rights required under subsection (e) of Section 11a-10 of this Act.  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-19 (West)
7.    Service of Summons on the alleged disabled person[1]:
the respondent shall be personally served with a copy of the petition and a summons not less than 14 days before the hearing. The summons shall be printed in large, bold typeand shall include the following notice:
NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
You have been named as a respondent in a guardianship petition asking that you be declared a disabled person. If the court grants the petition, a guardian will be appointed for you. A copy of the guardianship petition is attached for your convenience.
The date and time of the hearing are:
The place where the hearing will occur is:
The Judge's name and phone number is:
If a guardian is appointed for you, the guardian may be given the right to make all important personal decisions for you, such as where you may live, what medical treatment you may receive, what places you may visit, and who may visit you. A guardian may also be given the right to control and manage your money and other property, including your home, if you own one. You may lose the right to make these decisions for yourself.
You have the following legal rights:
 
(1) You have the right to be present at the court hearing.
(2) You have the right to be represented by a lawyer, either one that you retain, or one appointed by the Judge.
(3) You have the right to ask for a jury of six persons to hear your case.
(4) You have the right to present evidence to the court and to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
(5) You have the right to ask the Judge to appoint an independent expert to examine you and give an opinion about your need for a guardian.
(6) You have the right to ask that the court hearing be closed to the public.
(7) You have the right to tell the court whom you prefer to have for your guardian.
 
8.   Sodini Notices[2]:
 
(f) Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by the petitioner by mail or in person to those persons, including the proposed guardian, whose names and addresses appear in the petition and who do not waive notice, not less than 14 days before the hearing.   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
 
 
 
 




[1] Paragraph  11a- 10 also requires the following warning, to with:
 
You do not have to attend the court hearing if you do not want to be there. If you do not attend, the Judge may appoint a guardian if the Judge finds that a guardian would be of benefit to you. The hearing will not be postponed or canceled if you do not attend.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THE HEARING IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OR IF YOU WANT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED IN THE GUARDIANSHIP PETITION TO BE YOUR GUARDIAN. IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OF IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER PROBLEMS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR COME TO COURT AND TELL THE JUDGE.    755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
[2] The court acquires jurisdiction over the allegedly disabled person by personal service upon him of a copy of the petition and summons not less than 14 days before the hearing. (Ill.Rev.Stat.1989, ch. 110½, par. 11a–10(e); see McCormick v. Blaine (1931), 345 Ill. 461, 178 N.E. 195.) It is also a jurisdictional requirement that the petitioner give notice of the time and place of the hearing by mail or in person to the nearest living relatives of the allegedly disabled person not less than 14 days before the hearing. Ill.Rev.Stat.1989, ch. 110½, par. 11a–10(f); see In re Guardianship of Sodini (1988), 172 Ill.App.3d 1055, 123 Ill.Dec. 67, 527 N.E.2d 530.  In re Estate of Steinfeld, 158 Ill. 2d 1, 13, 630 N.E.2d 801, 807 (1994)
 
 
Just about everything above is a quote.  The Illinois legislature did themselves proud with this statutory plan; however, as it was virtually ignored in so many cases it makes one wonder if legislation is necessary at all.    Certainly in the Sykes case no one read it and for four years Mary Sykes was robbed of all her liberty and property rights.  In Gore a 1.5 million dollar estate (and a few pennies in gold filings) was dissipated by ignoring these statutory rights.    


Ken Ditkowsky

Friday, April 19, 2013

Swirls Heard in the Shark Tank...

Swirls Heard in the Shark Tank...

Rumor has it that officials are allegedly considering the process of "Alkaline Hydrolysis" also known as liquid cremation. This liquefies and thus simplifies the disposal of old folks from nursing homes, who can be meerly flushed down the toilet like dead goldfish. From what your ProbateShark has witnessed with the brutality to Wyman, Gore, Sykes, Cefalu and Tyler, the Probate Court of Cook County would be a prime resource for this chemical process. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com