Showing posts with label wyman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wyman. Show all posts

Friday, April 8, 2016

From the NASGA blog - Another example of why we need HONEST INVESTIGATIONS & Why we need to defend our core values

The Sykes, Gore, Wyman, Smith, **** cases are horrific and terrorist assaults on America's core values.  Like the Lahrman case in Indiana the assault if successful puts a stake into America's basic Civil and Human liberties that is irrevocable.

The MaryGSykes, Probate Sykes, NASGA blogs (protected by 47 USCA 230) reference literally hundreds of cases of criminal guardianship abuse that cannot be tolerated in a free society.   The blogs point out not only judicial corruption but a well organized cover-up 18 USCA 371 and a fraud the jeopardizes the future of every single American.   

The Tim Lahrman affair is a direct attack on Equal Protection of the Law and if not re-mediated by the United States of America renders the legacy of the last three National administrations naked words - coupled by the deed of burning our Constitution by tolerating systemic corruption reasonably designed to foster profiteering and exploitation of our elderly and disabled.

In Florida the Col Smith case stands out as a murder of due process by corrupt judges and judicial authorities.   The NASGA blog points out:

by John Pacenti
Glenda Martinez-Smith found the love of her life as a senior citizen.
Martinez-Smith, 68, said she felt like she hit the lottery when she met retired Army Col. J. Alan Smith of Boynton Beach through a senior dating website. “It was like a fairy tale,” she recalls.
But the retired school teacher said their bliss was destroyed when a judge found her husband incapacitated after a car crash and appointed a professional guardian..
With the blessing of two Palm Beach County circuit court judges, the guardian put Smith, who had suffered a traumatic brain injury, in a nursing home, got Martinez-Smith banned from ever seeing him again and annulled the couple’s marriage.
“That was the most horrible day of my life, the day my marriage was annulled,” she said.
Besides annulling her marriage, one judge kicked her out of court and another threatened her with arrest. Still, Martinez-Smith persevered, winning appeal after appeal and wresting control back from the professional guardian.
Professional guardians are the subject of several bills moving rapidly through the Florida Legislature. Critics and lawmakers themselves say many guardians are siphoning the assets of wards to pay for their exorbitant fees.
$200,000 in legal fees
Business is also very good for the attorneys who flock around these guardians.
Every professional guardian employs at least one attorney to traverse the landscape of social services, nursing homes and liquidating assets. These lawyers come at a steep price, charging hundreds of dollars an hour in addition to the guardians’ fees.
Martinez-Smith has spent a good part of her life savings — $200,000 and counting — in legal fees fighting guardian John Cramer and orders by judges on his behalf. She got three rulings reversed on appeal and the annulment to her marriage is pending.
Smith’s assets paid Cramer $16,500 a month, said Martinez-Smith, who has not seen an accounting of how the money is spent. Cramer liquidated two of Smith’s life insurance policies for $145,000 recently, she said.
“According to anyone’s observation, this is a legal form of grand theft and robbery. It’s exploitation of the elderly,” Martinez said. “These guardians have to be stopped.”
The Florida Bar president, West Palm Beach attorney Greg Coleman, supports the legislation, saying there is a need to address the “bad actors,” whether they be guardians or their attorneys.
“The population is aging and this is something that is going to be more and more of an issue. The more protection the better,” he said.
In the meantime, the retired Army colonel’s health deteriorated without the necessary physical therapy at the nursing home. Today, the 83-year-old is nearly completely paralyzed and cannot speak.
Before the guardian put him in the nursing home, he was walking and talking, Martinez-Smith said. “How could they do this to him?”
Cramer, the guardian, did not return a calls for comment and his attorney Ellen Morris of Boca Raton declined to comment.
Jack Halpern, CEO of Elder Care in New York City, runs a company that offers an alternative to professional guardians by helping seniors navigate health care and the legal system. He says the problems are larger than just reining in the professional guardians, calling the proposed Florida legislation “a Band-Aid on an elephant.”
“The problem involves judges, guardianship attorneys, adult protective services employees, and not-for-profit religious and secular agencies, who are profiting from these guardianship cases,” he said.
Martinez-Smith doesn’t want to talk about the judges in her case. But the appellate court has supported her three times so far by reversing Palm Beach County Circuit Judges Martin Colin and David French, who sit in the Delray Beach courthouse.
Smith had ended up in the clutches of a guardianship when the couple were still engaged. After the car accident in 2010, one of Smith’s children petitioned a judge to find him incapacitated. Colin appointed Cramer as a temporary guardian and Martinez-Smith initially retained control of her husband’s medical care.
But Cramer asked Colin to cut out Martinez-Smith altogether. At a hearing on the matter, Colin kicked Martinez-Smith out of the courtroom “on the basis of a perceived insult to him,” according to a 4th District Court of Appeal opinion.
Colin told Martinez-Smith that her entire demeanor, including “her face, her voice, her sound, may be unpleasant to everyone else” but her husband. The appellate court told Colin to recuse himself, saying “that would lead any reasonably prudent person to fear that she would not receive a fair hearing before the judge.”
But Martinez-Smith found little solace when the case was transferred to French.
Judge threatens arrest
Cramer had complained that Martinez-Smith was abusive to the staff over the lack of her husband’s care at the nursing home. French removed her as a health-surrogate and banned her from seeing her husband. In the courtroom, French pointed his finger at Martinez-Smith and said he would have her arrested if she even went near her husband at the nursing home.
At a subsequent hearing, French also granted the guardian’s request to annul the marriage. “I was crying in his courtroom,” Martinez-Smith said.
Again, the appellate court reversed, ousting Cramer as guardian on March 18. It said French abused his discretion in not following Smith’s wishes that his wife be in control of his medical care and assets.
“It’s not surprising that someone strongly advocating for excellent care for their loved one would be at odds with staff which may be less than diligent in delivering such care,” the opinion written by appellate court Judge Martha Warner stated.
Martinez-Smith’s attorney, Jennifer Carroll of Palm Beach Gardens, said the recent opinion is precedent-setting because the court said the wishes of the ward are paramount.
“The most important thing about this is that each individual has a fundamental right to choose their guardian or medical caregiver,” Carroll said.
Now that Cramer is out, Martinez-Smith is again her husband’s health-care surrogate. On Wednesday, she had him transported to Holy Cross Hospital in Fort Lauderdale to be examined. He arrived in a wheelchair, alert but also unresponsive, dehydrated and with sores all over his body.
She comforted him, rubbing his chest in the wheelchair. “We are going to do everything we can to make you better,” she told him.  
 
I understand that the criminals did not stop their assaults !    Florida's law enforcement people are still doing nothing.   The Helen Stone case ***** all start as tributes to the fact that it is UNSAFE to get old in Florida!

Ken Ditkowsky

Friday, October 2, 2015

Janet,, You got me thinking

Janet,

You got me thinking when you suggested that democracy has an average life of about two or three centuries and maybe America as a 'free society' was not in the cards for much longer.

Of course, I rejected your statement - America will live forever as the land of hope, freedom and justice ======= maybe!    Then I listened the Prime Minister of Israel and his moment of silence.   Politics aside, the silence that accompanies injustice in today's world is so loud that it is deafening.    Political correctness is apparently more important than political honesty, transparency, integrity, and justice in America.    Racial discrimination by the "right people" is ignored and thus a Man who has a dark skin can lose his law license in Illinois for making the same claim that the prestigious Crain's Chicago business publishes.   Or a gracious soft spoke icon of the Civil Rights movement (including the March on Selma) can be denied equal access to a public accommodation at a public office of the IARDC (Illinois Disciplinary Commission) open disciplinary hearing.   Or calls for an HONEST investigation are characterized and public funds are used to assault the Civil and Human rights of the calling lawyers.  Or elderly senior citizens are openly and notoriously elder cleansed.    Or as has happened in California a politically clouted guardian is able to marshall the resources of the the State of California to give her access to estates of potential victims of fiduciary abuse for her own profit *****

The lack of outrage exhibited by the 2nd oldest profession in reference to the JoAnne Denison suspension and the article appearing in the American Bar Association journal blog is scary.   Are Lawyers afraid to protest the violation of Civil Rights?   Apparently so - it has been almost a week and no hue and cry has been heard!   No one appeared at the office of Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary commission with a bucket of tar and a bag of feathers.  Marshalls have no subpoenaed Jerome Larkin's financial records to ascertain his pecuniary relationship with the Sykes, Gore, Wyman, Tyler miscreants.   Indeed, it is business as usual and the domestic terrorists who are threatening our liberty live another day.

Ms. Phelan - maybe I was too quick to reject your observation.   Believe me I want you to be wrong, but it is also very clear that if lawyers are afraid to stand up be counted as being in favor of the Rule of Law, the Constitution, and preventing elder cleansing ****

It was pointed out to me by your e-mail that if our credo degenerates to that exhibited by the 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators of Jerome Larkin we can expect our lives to be quite different.  Maybe the following article will represent something that happened in Chicago rather than India, to wit:

Muslim man beaten to death over rumours he had eaten beef in India

Mohammad Akhlaq was attacked by around 100 people and despite being taken to hospital, police said "his life could not be saved"

15K
2K
0
1
16K
Email
Six people have been arrested in connection with the murder of Mohammad Akhlaq
Six people have been arrested in connection with the murder of Mohammad Akhlaq Photo: AP
By 
9:47AM BST 30 Sep 2015
A 50-year-old Muslim man was beaten to death over rumours he had eaten beef, a taboo in India, a Hindu-majority nation.
Mohammad Akhlaq was dragged from his house on the outskirts of the capital and attacked by around 100 people on Monday night, a police officer told AFP.
"When our team reached the spot a crowd was there outside his house. They (police) managed to rescue him and take him to the hospital, but his life could not be saved," said senior police superintendent Kiran S.
Indian police said on Wednesday they had arrested six people and "deployed additional personnel to contain any further repercussions".
Mr Akhlaq's 22-year-old son was also seriously injured in the attack and was in intensive care at a nearby hospital.
Killing cows is banned in many states of India, a majority-Hindu country that also has sizeable Muslim, Christian and Buddhist minorities.
In March, the state of Maharashtra toughened its ban to make even possessing beef illegal, a move seen by religious minorities as a sign of the growing power of hardline Hindus since nationalist prime minister Narendra Modi came to power.
The rumours that the family had eaten beef began when a calf was reported missing in Dadri village, 22 miles from New Delhi.
"An announcement about the family consuming beef was made at a temple, after which the mob descended on the man's house," said Kiran.
The Indian Express quoted Mr Akhlaq's daughter Sajida as saying the family had mutton in the fridge and not beef.

Sunday, October 19, 2014

The Choir is united


The Choir is united in having great desire to deal with the problem; however, the congregation just nods it head.   

The statement on Isolation you make is extremely important and I've colored it in red. In just about every single elder cleansing case the First step is "isolation."    In the Isolationcase Guardian ad Litem is memorialized is telling the Court about how Mary Sykes was agitated when she had contact with her siblings and younger daughter.   The reaction of Judge Connors was classic and isolation was decreed.    

A moment of common sense by Judge Connors would have revealed that Mary being agitated was demonstrating her competency and the wrongful nature of the motivation for the isolation.    Any competent human who is removed from his/her prior life wrongfully and is allowed limited contact with it will be quite agitated.    The quest for justice will create an agitation!    Had Judge Connors done her job and held a real hearing in which there was a cogent attempt at compliance with the statute 755 ILCS 5/11a - 1 et seq, and in particular 11a - 3, she would have discovered the fraud on day one and Mary's civil rights, property right, human rights and civil rights would have been protected.   Instead a corrupt judge joined with an appointed miscreant to commence a program of elder abuse and elder cleansing.

Unfortunately, this scenario is repeated across the United States on a daily basis.   Janet and Barbara had similar stories to tell.   Janet was so harassed that she is now in exile, and Barbara is facing jail time for doing exactly what society demands that she do!    She tried to rescue her mother from what only can be described as murderous plot!   Barbara, Janet, Gloria, and many other citizens have had to suffer extreme retaliation for standing up to the corrupt judges, their appointees and those who aid and abet this criminal conspiracy and war against the elderly and the disabled.   

Attempts to obtain an intelligent HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation and prosecution of the discriminatory action of elder cleansing have on balance been unsuccessful,   Intimidation is a key weapon of the elder cleansers.  Here in Illinois Jerome Larkin has been open and notorious in his efforts.    JoAnne Denison's blog is his current target and as an overt assault on the Bill of Rights, Illinois statutes, Federal Statutes and the core values of America he uses public money to attempt to silence her.   His weapon ultra vires disciplinary proceedings!    Against me he was able to suspend me for 4 years for writing the Attorney General of the United States concerning this problem.  (Had I stolen Mary's money I would have received a much lesser suspension!).    My suspension was a warning to other lawyers - comply with 18 USCA 4 and you get your ticket punched!

We know what the problem is!    We can identify it.   Legislation is in place to deal with the problem and prevent it in the future; however, the real issue is how do we get law enforcement to stop this criminal conflagration do intelligent HONEST complete and comprehensive investigations and prosecutions of the elder cleansers.   

Tim has pointed out the Americans with Disabilities Act (Title 2) has been clearly violated by the corrupt judges, their appointees and those who aid and abet them.    Justice Department has been given the duty to enforce the ADA.    Criminal laws have been violated right and left and law enforcement has the duty to enforce these laws.   As the breach of a fiduciary relationship  creates taxable events, taxing authorities have a treasure trove of uncollected and undeclared taxes due.    The thieves who entered Mary Sykes' safety deposit box and stole a gold coin collection are known!   There are State and Federal taxes due on not only this money but on the other funds taken.   Indeed, even the gold removed from Alice Gore's mouth must be reported and the taxes paid!   Why have taxing authorities been reluctant to collect these taxes? There is nothing in the tax law that give exemption to corrupt Judges, their appointees and/or those who aid and abet them!   Illinois is on the verge of insolvency and the financial situation of the USA is nothing to write home about.   Collecting the taxes that the government is entitled to in Sykes, Wyman, Tyler, Gore, **** goes along way toward paying for important government programs! 
 
Ken Ditkowsky

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Ken's "cheat Sheet"

i prepared a 'cheat sheet' just like we used to in our school days.   You may publish it and share even with the miscreants.   The Illinois Statute was designed by our legislature to diligently protect the rights of senior citizens and the disabled.   Cases like Sykes, Gore, Wyman, Tyler et al should never have occurred.    My hope is that by sharing this document we can obviate any inadvertent "elder cleansing."    



Statutory criterion
I. Basis for appointing a Guardian or declaring a person in need:
1.      Demonstration of need for Guardian;
 
a.        if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning the care of his person,   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-3 (West)  
b.         if it has been demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that because of his disability he is unable to manage his estate or financial affairs   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-3 (West)
 
2.          Venue:   Venue. If the alleged ward is a resident of this State, the proceeding shall be instituted in the court of the county in which he resides.    755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-7 (West)
 
3.          Petition:    The petition for adjudication of disability and for the appointment of a guardian of the estate or the person or both of an alleged disabled person must state, if known or reasonably ascertainable: (a) the relationship and interest of the petitioner to the respondent; (b) the name, date of birth, and place of residence of the respondent; (c) the reasons for the guardianship; (d) the name and post office address of the respondent's guardian, if any, or of the respondent's agent or agents appointed under the Illinois Power of Attorney Act,1 if any; (e) the name and post office addresses of the nearest relatives of the respondent in the following order: (1) the spouse and adult children, parents and adult brothers and sisters, if any; if none, (2) nearest adult kindred known to the petitioner; (f) the name and address of the person with whom or the facility in which the respondent is residing; (g) the approximate value of the personal and real estate; (h) the amount of the anticipated annual gross income and other receipts; (i) the name, post office address and in case of an individual, the age, relationship to the respondent and occupation of the proposed guardian    755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-8 (West)
  
4.        Procedure:       Upon the filing of a petition pursuant to Section 11a-8, the court shall set a date and place for hearing to take place within 30 days. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to report to the court concerning the respondent's best interests consistent with the provisions of this Section,   55 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
5.          Payment of Fees:     “the court may enter an order for the petitioner to pay all such fees or such amounts as the respondent or the respondent's estate may be unable to pay   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
 
 
 
2.   Right of alleged disabled person to trial.
Respondent is entitled to be represented by counsel, to demand a jury of 6 persons, to present evidence, and to confront and cross-examine all witnesses. The hearing may be closed to the public on request of the respondent, the guardian ad litem, or appointed or other counsel for the respondent. Unless excused by the court upon a showing that the respondent refuses to be present or will suffer harm if required to attend, the respondent shall be present at the hearing.  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-11 (West)
Right to Counsel   “b) The court (1) may appoint counsel for the respondent, if the court finds that the interests of the respondent will be best served by the appointment, and (2) shall appoint counsel upon respondent's request or if the respondent takes a position adverse to that of the guardian ad litem. The respondent shall be permitted to obtain the appointment of counsel either at the hearing or by any written or oral request communicated to the court prior to the hearing. The summons shall inform the respondent of this right to obtain appointed counsel. The court may allow counsel for the respondent reasonable compensation. “  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
3.    Criterion for the form of Summons
 
The summons shall be printed in LARGE, BOLD TYPE and shall include the following notice:
NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
You have been named as a respondent in a guardianship petition asking that you be declared a disabled person. If the court grants the petition, a guardian will be appointed for you. A copy of the guardianship petition is attached for your convenience.
The date and time of the hearing are:
The place where the hearing will occur is:
The Judge's name and phone number is:   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
4.   Utilization of the  Statutory authority..
 
(b) Guardianship shall be utilized only as is necessary to promote the well-being of the disabled person, to protect him from neglect, exploitation, or abuse, and to encourage development of his maximum self-reliance and independence. Guardianship shall be ordered only to the extent necessitated by the individual's actual mental, physical and adaptive limitations.   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-3 (West)
 
 
5.    Right to Counsel:
“(b) The court (1) may appoint counsel for the respondent, if the court finds that the interests of the respondent will be best served by the appointment, and (2) shall appoint counsel upon respondent's request or if the respondent takes a position adverse to that of the guardian ad litem. THE RESPONDENT SHALL BE PERMITTED TO OBTAIN THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL EITHER AT THE HEARING OR BY ANY WRITTEN OR ORAL REQUEST COMMUNICATED TO THE COURT PRIOR TO THE HEARING. The summons shall inform the respondent of this right to obtain appointed counsel. The court may allow counsel for the respondent reasonable compensation.”  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
6.    Appointment Temporary and Notice to the disabled person.
§ 11a-19. Notice of right to seek modification. At the time of the appointment of a guardian the court shall inform the ward of his right under Section 11a-20 to petition for termination of adjudication of disability, revocation of the letters of guardianship of the estate or person, or both, or modification of the duties of the guardian and shall give the ward a written statement explaining this right and the procedures for petitioning the court. The notice shall be in large, bold type and shall be in a format similar to the notice of rights required under subsection (e) of Section 11a-10 of this Act.  755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-19 (West)
7.    Service of Summons on the alleged disabled person[1]:
the respondent shall be personally served with a copy of the petition and a summons not less than 14 days before the hearing. The summons shall be printed in large, bold typeand shall include the following notice:
NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
You have been named as a respondent in a guardianship petition asking that you be declared a disabled person. If the court grants the petition, a guardian will be appointed for you. A copy of the guardianship petition is attached for your convenience.
The date and time of the hearing are:
The place where the hearing will occur is:
The Judge's name and phone number is:
If a guardian is appointed for you, the guardian may be given the right to make all important personal decisions for you, such as where you may live, what medical treatment you may receive, what places you may visit, and who may visit you. A guardian may also be given the right to control and manage your money and other property, including your home, if you own one. You may lose the right to make these decisions for yourself.
You have the following legal rights:
 
(1) You have the right to be present at the court hearing.
(2) You have the right to be represented by a lawyer, either one that you retain, or one appointed by the Judge.
(3) You have the right to ask for a jury of six persons to hear your case.
(4) You have the right to present evidence to the court and to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
(5) You have the right to ask the Judge to appoint an independent expert to examine you and give an opinion about your need for a guardian.
(6) You have the right to ask that the court hearing be closed to the public.
(7) You have the right to tell the court whom you prefer to have for your guardian.
 
8.   Sodini Notices[2]:
 
(f) Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by the petitioner by mail or in person to those persons, including the proposed guardian, whose names and addresses appear in the petition and who do not waive notice, not less than 14 days before the hearing.   755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
 
 
 
 




[1] Paragraph  11a- 10 also requires the following warning, to with:
 
You do not have to attend the court hearing if you do not want to be there. If you do not attend, the Judge may appoint a guardian if the Judge finds that a guardian would be of benefit to you. The hearing will not be postponed or canceled if you do not attend.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THE HEARING IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OR IF YOU WANT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED IN THE GUARDIANSHIP PETITION TO BE YOUR GUARDIAN. IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OF IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER PROBLEMS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR COME TO COURT AND TELL THE JUDGE.    755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
 
[2] The court acquires jurisdiction over the allegedly disabled person by personal service upon him of a copy of the petition and summons not less than 14 days before the hearing. (Ill.Rev.Stat.1989, ch. 110½, par. 11a–10(e); see McCormick v. Blaine (1931), 345 Ill. 461, 178 N.E. 195.) It is also a jurisdictional requirement that the petitioner give notice of the time and place of the hearing by mail or in person to the nearest living relatives of the allegedly disabled person not less than 14 days before the hearing. Ill.Rev.Stat.1989, ch. 110½, par. 11a–10(f); see In re Guardianship of Sodini (1988), 172 Ill.App.3d 1055, 123 Ill.Dec. 67, 527 N.E.2d 530.  In re Estate of Steinfeld, 158 Ill. 2d 1, 13, 630 N.E.2d 801, 807 (1994)
 
 
Just about everything above is a quote.  The Illinois legislature did themselves proud with this statutory plan; however, as it was virtually ignored in so many cases it makes one wonder if legislation is necessary at all.    Certainly in the Sykes case no one read it and for four years Mary Sykes was robbed of all her liberty and property rights.  In Gore a 1.5 million dollar estate (and a few pennies in gold filings) was dissipated by ignoring these statutory rights.    


Ken Ditkowsky