Showing posts with label nursing home inspections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nursing home inspections. Show all posts

Monday, March 16, 2015

Bill would ban nursing home inspections in court cases

Editor's note: This Shark wonders how big of a pay off from the "Judicial-Nursing Home Complex" was required for this travesty of justice? Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

Bill would ban nursing home inspections in court cases

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — One patient choked to death, another claimed he was raped. WREG has uncovered new and very disturbing details about problems at a local nursing home.
The On Your Side Investigators also discovered these same details could be kept secret.
An inspection report from federal and state health surveyors shows Signature Healthcare at St. Peter Villa in MidTown Memphis was hit with more than 20 deficiencies in August of 2014.
Read full report here.
The survey shows one resident choked to death after the facility failed to provide the proper diet, neglected to monitor the patient during meals, and never even attempted a maneuver to stop the choking.
It also reveals Signature Healthcare at St. Peter Villa “failed to thoroughly investigate” an alleged rape.
The resident wasn’t sent to the ER for a rape kit, and the nursing home never even notified police.
The On Your Side Investigators recently uncovered problems at another Memphis nursing home owned by the same company.
Dozens of viewers contacted WREG after our report on Signature Healthcare at Saint Francis.
One wrote in an email, “My grandfather died in the care of the staff at Signature Nursing home.”
Another said in a Facebook message, “My mother was Resident #5 in the story you did last night about Signature Healthcare. So glad you have put this out there.”
However, details like the horrific ones in the surveys we revealed could soon be kept secret, if a bill sponsored by Tennessee State Senator Brian Kelsey and Representative Leigh Wilburn becomes law.
Senate Bill 889 would prohibit survey and investigation results from being used as evidence in malpractice cases.
Read bill here.
Cameron Jehl is a Memphis Attorney who has sued nursing homes before. He opposes the proposed legislation.
“If the nursing homes violates federal law and federal regulations, they’re required to comply with in order to keep and take care of the elderly, then they should be held accountable for their actions,” Jehl said.
However, Senator Kelsey says attorneys will sometimes misuse negative survey results to paint nursing homes with a broad brush, rather than focusing on a single incident that led to a injury or fatality.
“I think we have to look at the instances when this information should be available and what are the instances in which it’s being used in a way that’s not exactly the full and 100 percent truth,” Kelsey said.
The bill also addresses ads that law firms often run in newspapers about problems at nursing homes.
It stipulates that if the ad mentions a deficiency, it also must be noted if and when the deficiency was corrected.
Proponents say the advertisements, often run by out of state law firms, don’t always include timely information.
When asked about using inspections in court cases, and how such evidence could be used on behalf of a plaintiff to reveal a pattern of problems that the nursing home has been made aware of, Senator Kelsey told WREG, “This is really just the beginning of the conversation. This bill will be amended when it goes through the committee process. It will get a full hearing.”
Jehl added, “These nursing homes, when they neglect and abuse the elderly, they have to be held accountable.”
The Senate version of the bill heads to the Senate Judiciary Committee.  The house version is going to the Health Subcommittee.
To check out inspections for nursing homes or compare facilities in the Memphis area, go here.
Inspections can also be found at this state site.
WREG reached out to the administrator of Signature Healthcare at St. Peter Villa but we have yet to receive a response.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

California sued over lagging nursing home inspections

California sued over lagging nursing home inspections

Published: Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2013 - 9:56 pm
Last Modified: Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2013 - 10:47 am


A Sacramento advocate for the elderly is suing the state for allegedly endangering vulnerable residents by failing to promptly investigate nursing home complaints, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday in San Francisco.
The suit, brought by the Sacramento-based Foundation Aiding the Elderly, accuses state regulators of “taking months and sometimes years” to complete investigations of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities. Filed in San Francisco Superior Court, the lawsuit names the California Department of Public Health and two top administrators.
“This is jeopardizing all patients,” said Carole Herman, president of FATE. “The industry is not afraid of the regulators, they are so lax in their responsibilities.”
Corey Egel, spokesman for the Department of Public Health, said the department could not comment on pending litigation.
The lawsuit, filed by the Lexington Law Group, a San Francisco public interest law firm, seeks a court order requiring the state to “complete complaint investigations and the complaint appeal process in a timely manner.” The lawsuit asks the court to impose deadlines or enforce existing ones on the complaint process. And, it asks that the court compel the department to prepare an annual report detailing the timeliness of its complaint investigations.
Herman said she pursued legal action because “it’s the only way the state is going to pay attention.”
The lawsuit cites Herman’s personal experiences with the department in filing complaints on behalf of nursing-home clients. One case filed by Herman in October 2011, which involves “serious allegations of negligent medical treatment,” remains unresolved, the lawsuit states. Two other investigations involving “serious allegations of sexual and/or physical abuse against an elder” have been pending since February 2012, according to the suit.
According to the lawsuit, the delays endanger residents and make it less likely a facility’s underlying problems will be addressed. The issues raised often need to be resolved quickly, before more harm can occur, witnesses’ memories fade – or witnesses die, the suit states.
Herman founded her nonprofit organization after her 79-year-old aunt died in 1982 in a Sacramento nursing home, amid allegations of abuse and neglect.
The California Department of Public Health is responsible for ensuring that nursing homes comply with state laws and regulations, and that those receiving Medicare and Medi-Cal money meet federal requirements. The state currently licenses 1,286 nursing homes, or skilled nursing facilities.
The state’s job likely will get even bigger as the population ages and more Californians move into long-term care. The number of Californians age 65 and older is projected to triple between 2000 and 2050, with the group 85 and older experiencing the largest increase, according to projections from the California Department of Finance.
The Department of Public Health says it inspects nursing homes at least once every nine to 15.9 months, with a statewide average of once a year.
It is the consumer complaint process that is now under scrutiny, as the lawsuit charges that “DPH and its personnel have been extremely delinquent” by dragging complaint cases out for months and even years.
“… In the meantime, the underlying conduct raised by the complaint can continue unabated, exposing elderly and infirm residents of skilled nursing homes and other long-term care facilities to real and substantial harm, including neglect, suffering and avoidable injury or death,” the suit states.
Under the state’s Health and Safety Code, the department is required to make an on-site investigation “within 10 working days” after receiving a complaint, or within 24 hours if the complaint “involves a threat of imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm.” The latter is considered “imminent and serious” by the department, or an “I & S” complaint.
The state’s own record-keeping showed that its timely management of complaints had been steadily worsening before the department stopped reporting that data altogether, the lawsuit states. According to the suit, the state reported that it completed 69 percent of its imminent and serious complaint investigations within 10 days and 79 percent of its non-urgent probes within 40 days in fiscal 2007-08.
In fiscal 2009-10, the last period for which the department reported data, the department reported it completed 47 percent of its “I & S” investigations within 40 days and 54 percent of the non-emergency cases within 60 days.
The department’s most recent annual reports contain no information on timeliness of complaint investigations, the suit notes. The reports do show that complaints requiring investigations among all facilities went from 8,915 in 2010-11 to 9,281 the following year.
Attorney Howard Hirsch of the Lexington Law Group said the legal team requested timeliness data from the state but “they claimed they don’t have it.”
Hirsch said if the state has the information but simply won’t provide it, it is in violation of the California Public Records Act. If the state has failed to track its performance and has no current data, it is violating a Health and Safety Code requirement to make that information public via a report to the Legislature.
In addition to the Department of Public Health, the lawsuit also names as defendants Dr. Ronald W. Chapman, the department’s director, and Debby Rogers, deputy director of DPH’s Center for Health Care Quality.

Call The Bee’s Marjie Lundstrom, (916) 321-1055.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/10/29/5864023/california-sued-over-lagging-nursing.html#storylink=cpy