Showing posts with label Real Estate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Real Estate. Show all posts

Monday, June 6, 2016

Will Your Heirs Have to Pay Up When You Die With Debt?

Will Your Heirs Have to Pay Up When You Die With Debt?

Much of your unpaid bills will be subtracted from any inheritance you leave your spouse or children.

Tombstones On Grassy Field In Cemetery Against Sky
You should consult a probate attorney and contact creditors when a loved one dies.
By + More
The number of senior households with debt increased from about 44 percent in 1989 to just over 61 percent in 2013, according to the Federal Reserve Board's Survey of Consumer Finances. The median debt in households headed by people 60 or older rose from $9,038 in 1989 to $40,900 in 2013.
With seniors' debt burden rising, many are likely to die with debts still unpaid. While not all that debt will pass to their heirs, much of it will come out of any inheritance they expect to leave behind.
"Do you have heirs or not, and what are you trying to leave to your heirs and charities?" says Stein Olavsrud, portfolio manager at FBB Capital Partners in the District of Columbia metro area. "Most of us don't know when we're going to die, and a lot of us die with mortgages and other debt."
[See: 10 Easy Ways to Pay Off Debt.]
If you don't have any assets, most of these debts will typically die with you. "In most cases, your debt belongs to you, and it isn't passed to anybody else," says Lisa LaMarche, president and co-founder of Milestone Wealth Advisors in Greenville, Delaware. "It doesn't go to your children."
But if you have any assets at all, your creditors will get first dibs on those assets during the probate process. That means that your children or other heirs effectively will pay your debts because they will be subtracted before any inheritance is transferred.
"I don't think that dying with debt is a terrible thing, but there has to be a succession plan," Olavsrud says. If you die with a mortgage, for example, that mortgage will have to be paid off if your heirs want to keep the home. If you die with additional debt, including credit card debt, the house may have to be sold to pay those debts.
"There are circumstances were dying with debt can be a very, very bad decision," Olavsrud says. "If the spouse is unable to service that debt, the spouse could have a liquidation event." That could mean selling a house at a low price during a market downtown or forcing the surviving spouse, partner or children out of the home if they can't qualify for a mortgage.
Exactly how debts and assets are handled after a loved one dies depends on state laws. In the nine states known as "community property" states (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin, with some aspects applying to Alaska), a spouse is responsible for debt incurred during the marriage. In other states, a spouse would not be responsible for bills in a husband's or wife's name only. "Medical debt or even a car loan, that could stay with the person," LaMarche says. "It really depends on the state laws.
Some types of assets, such as retirement accounts and life insurance payouts, do not go through the probate process and usually can't be claimed by creditors.
If you're handling the affairs of a deceased loved one, you should call and cancel credit cards immediately. That freezes fees and keeps any additional charges from being made. Some creditors may get aggressive with families, seeking to make them pay off the debt, even if they are not legally responsible. If a credit card company calls you, you're best off refusing to answer any questions and referring all inquiries to the estate attorney or executor. "There's not a requirement for children to pay that off," Olavsrud says.
In the case of a mortgage, you might be smart to continue paying and not mention the death until the house is ready to be sold or transferred to a new owner.
[Read: 11 Tips for Paying Off More Than $100,000 in Debt.]
Knowing that your children aren't responsible for your debts isn't a license to run up huge debts in life. If you don't pay it, someone eventually will.
"Debt in itself is not OK," says John C. Lindsey, president of Lindsey and Lindsey Wealth Management in suburban Los Angeles and a certified Kingdom Advisor, which mean he is part of a program that incorporates Christian faith in financial planning. "Debt is the last thing you want to have when you die. … For those that have the means and plan to die with debt, I think that's a flawed plan."
Running up credit card bills can also cause you considerable headaches while you're still alive, as required minimum payments rise and missed payments can lead to waves of collection calls.
Elderly people who can't make ends meet should swallow their pride and seek help, Lindsey says, from Meals on Wheels to free clinics, food stamps and church pantries. "Do they have to be resourceful? Yes," Lindsey says. "They've got to go and let people know they need the help. They're just too proud to do that."
Here are six things to do if someone you love dies with debt:
Consult a probate attorney. Even if there will be no official probate case, you may need some professional advice to sort out how best to handle the deceased loved one's affairs. Bring the will, if there is one, and documentation of any trusts.
Notify creditors of the death. You will probably need multiple copies of the death certificate, and some creditors will require official copies. Once you notify creditors that someone has died, those accounts are frozen, so know that notifying the bank of your father's death will effectively freeze his accounts.
Catalog your loved one's assets. You can only hope that your father, mother or spouse left everything in good financial order, which will allow you to easily find brokerage accounts, bank accounts, credit cards accounts and mortgage documents.
Determine what your loved one owes. Ask credit card companies, car loan firms and other creditors for a written statement of what's owed. That will help you determine what, if anything, needs to be sold to pay the debt. If there is an estate, the creditors will need to make official claims for repayment with the estate.
Have beneficiaries file for assets that pass without probate. Retirement accounts, life insurance and some other assets are not considered part of the estate, but pass directly to the designated beneficiaries. Those beneficiaries can start filing immediately after the death.
[See: 10 Images That Will Motivate You to Save for Retirement.]
File tax returns. Your loved one may owe income tax or may be entitled to a refund. Either way, his or her tax returns need to be filed on time or the estate will incur penalties.


Friday, October 10, 2014

Lawyerly Lairs: From A Big House To The Big House And Back Again — Mel Weiss’s $19 Million Mansion

Art, Lawyerly Lairs, Melvyn Weiss, Milberg Weiss, Money, Plaintiffs Firms, Real Estate

Lawyerly Lairs: From A Big House To The Big House And Back Again — Mel Weiss’s $19 Million Mansion


Melvyn Weiss
The rise and fall of Melvyn Weiss is one of the most dramatic stories within the legal profession. The Bronx-born Weiss, a graduate of NYU Law School, founded Milberg Weiss, which went on to become the nation’s top class-action securities firm. Weiss and his partners became millionaires many times over.
But it turned out that the firm rested on shaky ground. In 2008, Mel Weiss pleaded guilty to participating in a kickback scheme that helped him get clients and cases. Weiss got sentenced to two and a half years in federal prison and had to pay more than $10 million in forfeitures and fines. Milberg Weiss itself had to pay $75 million to settle charges relating to the racketeering conspiracy.
Too bad Weiss had to do prison time. House arrest would have been pretty sweet in his waterfront mansion on Long Island’s Gold Coast, now on the market for $18.8 million….

As it turns out, Weiss is putting more than just his house on the auction block, as reported by Bloomberg:
Melvyn Weiss, the millionaire class-action attorney who was felled by illegal kickbacks, is selling more than 140 lithographs, etchings and other works of art by Pablo Picasso.
Weiss and his wife, Barbara, have pledged the artwork to the financial services unit of New York-based Sotheby’s, according to a Sept. 23 New York state regulatory filing. Barbara Weiss, in an interview last week, said the couple planned to put the art up for auction.
The news of Weiss’s house going on sale was reported by the American Lawyer. Weiss told Am Law, “I’m going to be 80 years old — I’m downsizing.”
There’s a lot to downsize from; according to the listing, the house sits on five acres and boasts 7 bedrooms, 8.5 baths, and more than 12,000 square feet of living space. Here’s the facade:

But I actually think the house looks more impressive from other angles….

Monday, February 17, 2014

Disbarred Lawyer Is Indicted in $1 Million Escrow Theft

Disbarred Lawyer Is Indicted in $1 Million Escrow Theft


, New York Law Journal    |0 Comments
A former attorney arrested last week by state police after an upstate traffic stop has been indicted for stealing the proceeds of a $1 million real estate transaction in Brooklyn from a client. Robert Fontanelli, 48, was charged by a grand jury with first-degree and second-degree grand larceny, both felonies, and faces up to 8 1/3 to 25 years in prison if convicted, according to the Brooklyn District Attorney's office.
Fontanelli is accused of draining the funds from the escrow account in which he deposited the proceeds of the sale of the mixed residential and commercial property at 798 St. John's Place in Crown Heights.
Authorities in Brooklyn said Fontanelli's client, Jean Apolon, never received any money from the December 2012 transaction.
"A lawyer's escrow account represents a sacred trust between himself and his client," Brooklyn District Attorney Kenneth Thompson said in a statement. "Stealing from that account violates that trust and is a stain on the profession."
Financial crime investigators in the Brooklyn D.A.'s office said Fontanelli, who had been a solo practitioner, used the money from the escrow account to pay the rent on an office at 32 Court St. in Brooklyn and to operate his business.
Fontanelli was stopped on Feb. 5 in East Fishkill, Dutchess County, for having an expired inspection sticker. After becoming "nervous" during the stop, troopers said he ran away but was apprehended a short time later. He faces charges of resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration stemming from the incident upstate (NYLJ, Feb. 7).
Fontanelli was arraigned before Acting Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Danny Chun and ordered held on $250,000 bail.
Fontanelli was disbarred by an Appellate Division, Second Department panel on Oct. 18, 2013, for withholding money from clients after financial transactions, including the sale the Apolon property.


Read more: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202642375557/Disbarred-Lawyer-Is-Indicted-in-%241-Million-Escrow-Theft#ixzz2ta4lF7Az

Sunday, January 26, 2014

I-Team: Experts say court-approved sale was below market value

I-Team: Experts say court-approved sale was below market value

Guardianship attorney buys home from ward

 
ITeam I-Team graphic

Photographer: WFTS
Copyright 2012 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
advertisement
Posted: 01/24/2014
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, Fla. -  The I-Team has uncovered a real estate transaction, done with the court’s approval, potentially benefiting an officer of the court.
 The purchase involved an attorney hired to represent a woman who had been incapacitated and placed in Florida’s guardianship system.
 Experts say the attorney didn't pay a fair price for the property and walked away with a big real estate bargain.
 Jacqueline Harwood, now 77-years-old,  lived in the home from the time it was built in the 1940's until last June.
 “This is a good lot here. It's deep and it has water access to the Inland Waterway,” said Arthur Goetz, describing his neighbor’s home. “It’s a nice piece of property.”
 Filled with a lifetime of belongings, it needs updating, but it meets the number one rule in real estate.... location.
 “It's a quiet little street, tucked away in its own private oasis where you can put your boat dock, mangrove lined canals, and when you look out, you can see the Gulf of Mexico. It's something unique,” said Jeff Beggins, a broker for Century 21 who oversees 300 agents in 11 offices.
 The sale of the home was approved by a Pinellas County Probate judge in December for $165,000.
 “I just think that’s way under market value,” said Goetz.
 Harwood was declared incapacitated by a court in June of 2013 after showing signs of dementia, like repeatedly locking herself out of her home and walking down the street in her bathrobe during the day.
 Patricia Johnson was appointed as her professional guardian after she told us she was contacted about the case by the Florida Department of Children and Families.
 The I-Team has referred to some of Johnson’s other cases as part of our series of reports on Florida’s guardianship system.
 Johnson moved Harwood into an assisted living center and hired attorney Gary Fernald to serve as Harwood’s guardianship attorney.
 “Typically the lawyer has a relationship with the guardian, but they're both paid out of the assets of the ward,” said retired Hillsborough County Judge Susan Sexton, who has overseen thousands of guardianship cases.
 Sexton says part of the attorney's role is to make sure every transaction involving the ward's assets is done by the book.
 “Absolutely, that is the attorney's role,” she said.
 The sale of Harwood's home would help pay for her future care, but the house was never put on the market by a realtor.
 Court records show, however, that a company called Rebecca Jane and Associates, LLC., which is not a registered company in Florida, offered to buy the home in November.
 Attorney Gretchen-Elizabeth filed that petition to sell the home on Johnson’s behalf.
 When the I-team questioned the transaction, both Gretchen-Elizabeth and Johnson resigned.
 “Shortly after the hearing was set, Mrs. Johnson made the decision to resign as Mrs. Harwood’s guardian,” said Fernald, in an e-mail sent to the I-Team. “At that point Gretchen-Elizabeth canceled the hearing and withdrew her appearance.  Judge St. Arnold signed the first order approving the sale on November 20, 2013.   Mrs. Johnson filed her petition for discharge on November 27, 2013.”
 It turns out the original buyer was actually Gary Fernald, the attorney who asked for Harwood to be incapacitated.
 In December, Judge Jack St. Arnold signed an order allowing Fernald to buy his former client's home for $165,000.

When asked about her involvement in the original petition, Johnson, in a statement, said she was not aware that Rebecca Jane & Associates, LLC. wasn’t a registered corporation.
 “I did not prepare the petition, nor did I sign the petition,” Johnson said.
 “The petition correctly alleged that that judge had actual knowledge of the relationship between the buyer and the guardian. When Judge St. Arnold approved the transaction, he had actual knowledge that Mr. Fernald was the buyer. I am sure that if he felt the transaction was inappropriate, he would not have approved it,” Johnson responded.
  The county appraiser's office listed the property’s value at $229,000.
 Broker Jeff Beggins, using data from 15 similar properties, believes it is worth even more.
  “As a tear-down lot, I think you'll get in the $250,000 range for that property and then some,” Beggins said.
 Three other realtors the I-Team spoke with believe the home was undervalued.
 A unit in a triplex on the same block, which is newer but of similar size, is listed for $360,000.
 Gary Fernald, who declined an interview, said he consulted the Florida Bar Association's ethics hotline and made sure the purchase price was equal to or above its fair market value.
 He gave us a copy of the appraisal report he filed with the court, which valued Harwood's home at $61,000.
 “This particular appraisal doesn't meet the smell test, and anybody that shops for anything can see that just by reading the report one time,” said Francois Gregoire.
 Certified Appraiser Gregoire served four terms as Chairman of the Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board and has nearly 40 years


Read more: http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/i-team-experts-say-court-approved-sale-was-below-market-value#ixzz2rVk53yg6

Monday, January 20, 2014

Lawyer Makes Millions After Sleeping With His Paralegal. What Happened Next Is… Totally Believable.

  • 17 Jan 2014 at 2:53 PM
  • Attorney Misconduct, Crime, Drinking, Paralegals, Quote of the Day, Real Estate, Sex, Sex Scandals
  • Lawyer Makes Millions After Sleeping With His Paralegal. What Happened Next Is… Totally Believable.


    [T]he defendant’s practice basically consisted of him showing up at the office every now and again to do a closing and then leaving to go drinking or sleep with his paralegal. You can’t do $33 million in business in real estate closings if that’s what your practice consists of.
    – Rhode Island Assistant Attorney General Ron Gendron, commenting on former state Sen. Patrick Timothy McDonald’s conviction for conspiring with his paralegal and sometimes mistress, Kimberly Porter, to embezzle more than $160,000 from his real estate clients.

    Tuesday, December 24, 2013

    Realtors Sued for Using New Jersey Home As Sex Pad

  • 12/22/2013 at 11:52 PM

  • 16Comments

  • Realtors Sued for Using New Jersey Home As Sex Pad

    A New Jersey couple is suing pair of horny realtors they say intentionally listed their Wayne home at $650,000, above market value, so that it would stay empty and available for the agents to have sex in. But what agents Robert Lindsay and Jeannemarie Phelan did not know, according to the suit, was that the home had security cameras, which filmed them doing it. When one homeowner saw some activity, she called police. "The police opened the door to the house and found Lindsay pulling up his pants." Always awkward.
    Photo: Kevork Djansezian/Getty

    Wednesday, December 11, 2013

    A Partner Accused Strikes Back

  • 10 Dec 2013 at 4:01 PM
  • Biglaw, Crime, Gay, Oral Sex / Blow Jobs, Partner Issues, Quote of the Day, Rape, Real Estate, Sex
  • A Partner Accused Strikes Back


    Stanley B. Stallworth
    The allegation is completely unfounded, and we look forward to defending vigorously Stan’s good name and reputation. Stan is a pillar of the community, and he has tirelessly worked on behalf of young people for the past 25 years.
    – The Stallworth family, in a statement issued to Am Law Daily regarding the sexual assault charges filed against Stanley Stallworth, a real estate partner in the Chicago office of Sidley Austin, and his nephew, Therrie Miller.
    (The full statement and additional commentary, after the jump.)

    Here is the rest of the statement from the Stallworth family:
    As a former teacher, current member of several nonprofit organizations focused on improving the circumstances of underserved youth and their families, and a major university scholarship donor, Stan remains undaunted in his commitment to improving society by creating more educational, cultural and social opportunities for underserved segments of his community. We are confident that justice will prevail and Stan can resume his normal life.
    When we first reported about the story on Friday, Sidley Austin informed us that Stallworth would be taking a leave from the firm so he could fight the charges. And it looks like he’s fighting them vigorously, if his choice of counsel says anything: Am Law reports that he has hired Henderson Adam, a well-known criminal defense boutique in Chicago that is led by former Holland & Knight partner Victor Henderson and local trial attorney Sam Adam Jr..
    Victor Henderson used to lead Holland & Knight’s Chicago office. Sam Adam Jr. received his law degree from the University of Wisconsin, which happens to be Stan Stallworth’s alma mater. Their firm, Henderson Adam, has grown to six attorneys since its founding in 2011.
    Sam Adam Jr., working together with his father, a prominent Chicago trial lawyer, has experience getting high-profile figures out of legal hot water:
    The father-and-son legal team represented disgraced Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich at his first corruption trial, which ended before a hung jury. The two Adams stepped back from the ex-governor’s defense in late 2010 after their client ran out of money to pay his legal fees. (Blagojevich is currently appealing his conviction on corruption charges at a second trial.)
    The duo also helped Chicago native and R&B singer R. Kelly win an acquittal on child pornography charges in 2008.
    If Adam’s good enough for R. Kelly, he’s good enough for S. Stallworth. There are some similarities between the cases: both involve rich and successful African-Americans accused of naughtiness involving young people.
    As noted in our earlier story, the Sidley sources we’ve heard from have expressed shock at the charges against Stan Stallworth. If you have information to share with us about the case or about Stallworth, feel free to email us or text us (646-820-8477). Thanks.
    Sidley Partner Hires Prominent Lawyer in Sex Assault Case [Am Law Daily via Morning Docket]
    Earlier: A Biglaw Partner In Big Trouble, Charged With Sexual Assault — Along With His Nephew

    Sunday, December 8, 2013

    A Biglaw Partner In Big Trouble, Charged With Gay Sexual Assault — Along With His Nephew!

  • 06 Dec 2013 at 10:52 PM
  • Biglaw, Crime, Gay, Oral Sex / Blow Jobs, Partner Issues, Real Estate, Sex
  • A Biglaw Partner In Big Trouble, Charged With Gay Sexual Assault — Along With His Nephew!


    It’s almost law school exam time, so let’s run through some hypotheticals. An uncle having sex with his niece: should that constitute illegal incest?
    What about an uncle having sex with his nephew? Does the fact that it’s “gay incest,” with no possibility of procreation, make it less troubling?
    What about an uncle and his nephew allegedly getting a teenage male drunk and tag-teaming him? Whether or not it’s “incest,” it sounds problematic.
    According to Chicago prosecutors, such a situation unfolded last week. And the oldest man in the threesome is a partner at one of the world’s leading law firms….

    Here’s a report from the Chicago Tribune:
    A real estate attorney at a major Chicago law firm and his nephew were charged with sexually assaulting an 18-year-old man who told authorities he blacked out after consuming one-and-a-half drinks at the attorney’s South Side home last week.
    Bail was set at $150,000 each for Stanley Stallworth, 50, a partner at Sidley Austin [and a lawyer there] for more than 20 years, and his nephew, Therrie Miller, 22, of Dolton.
    The alleged victim told authorities he met Miller at a South Holland barbershop on Nov. 27 and that the next day Miller texted him and asked if he wanted to hang out at his uncle’s home, said Assistant State’s Attorney Elizabeth Dibler.
    At Stallworth’s Bronzeville home in the 3300 block of South Calumet Avenue, the teen alleged he was pressured into consuming a drink, Dibler said. After drinking one and part of another, he lost consciousness and woke up to find Miller performing a sex act on him, she said. The teen alleged he tried to fight off the assault but then Stallworth performed a sex act on him as well, she said.
    Wow — those are quite the claims. Additional allegations appear in the Chicago Sun-Times:
    The victim woke up the next morning naked, prosecutors said.
    Miller then drove the victim, where he informed his mother and was taken to St. Margaret Hospital in Hammond, Ind., where a rape kit was performed, according to court records.
    Stallworth and Miller are charged with one count each of criminal sexual assault, according to court records.
    The Tribune and the Sun-Times are annoyingly coy about the specifics. But according to DNAinfo (via the ABA Journal), Stallworth and Miller allegedly performed oral sex on the victim.
    Stallworth’s lawyer described his client as an attorney with “strong ties to the community” and told Judge Israel Desierto that Stallworth would promptly post bail. As a longtime partner at Sidley, Stallworth should have no problem posting the $300,000 in bail for himself and his nephew (a student at St. Xavier University and employee of Harris Bank).
    We reached out to Sidley Austin, which issued the following statement through a spokesperson:
    The Firm just became aware of certain criminal charges filed today concerning Stan Stallworth, a partner in the Firm. We understand that Stan has entered a plea of not guilty and intends to vigorously contest those allegations.
    While the charges do not relate to the Firm or the practice of law, Stan has requested and has been granted leave from the Firm to devote his full attention to addressing these charges.
    The Firm will have no further comments.
    Stanley B. Stallworth
    According to Chambers and Partners, Sidley has one of the top real estate practices in Chicago (Band 1). But some of the individual partners in the practice group have had… issues. Remember the tale of Lee Smolen, former head of the practice group, who got hit with legal ethics charges concerning more than $100,000 in allegedly improper reimbursement requests. (Smolen, who’s now a DLA Piper partner, is challenging the charges.)
    Back to Stanley Stallworth. As you can see from his Sidley bio — already updated to note that he’s “on leave” — he is an impressive and accomplished individual. After graduating from Alabama A&M (summa cum laude) and the University of Wisconsin Law School, he joined Sidley in 1990, where he has spent his entire career. He served as firm-wide co-chair of the firm’s Diversity Committee and also served on the firm’s Diversity Task Force and on the Recruitment Committee.
    The Sidley sources we’ve heard from so far expressed shock at the charges against Stan Stallworth. “He’s very nice,” one tipster told us. “Very involved in the summer program. Would never have expected this.”
    Remember that right now we’re dealing with mere allegations. And given how lurid and surprising the charges are, my own suspicion is that we’re missing some big pieces of the puzzle.
    We’ll continue to monitor this story. If you have additional information to share about Stanley Stallworth, please email us or text us (646-820-8477). Thank you.
    UPDATE (11:45 p.m.): The website of the Minority Corporate Counsel Association (MCCA) contains an interesting profile of Stallworth. The story, from the November/December 2007 issue of Diversity & The Bar, doesn’t mention him having a spouse or partner or kids, but it does provide some background about his upbringing:
    The product of small town Evergreen, Alabama, Stallworth was encouraged to succeed by his parents. His mother was a high school librarian, and his father was a high school coach and principal with business interests on the side. Stallworth graduated salutatorian from the local high school and went on to attend his father’s alma mater, Alabama A&M University, in Huntsville, on an academic scholarship. At the historically black college, Stallworth was elected student body president and became a member of Alpha Phi Alpha, the nation’s first fraternity for African American men, and later graduated summa cum laude with degrees in English and biology.
    He entered law school at the largely white University of Wisconsin in 1987 with plans for returning to Evergreen soon after graduation to help his father grow the family’s successful slaughtering business. Preparing for a lifetime of corporate law and billion-dollar deals was not on his radar, but real estate law struck him as something practical — even in a small town, he could always buy and sell property. (Today, he owns more than 160 acres of real estate in Evergreen, including a home where he displays more than 20 pieces of African American art.)
    The profile focuses on Stallworth’s interest in the art world. He’s an avid collector, part-owner of an art gallery, and a painter himself.
    UPDATE (12/7/2013, 12:10 a.m.): A commenter’s dismissive attitude towards Stallworth’s Bronzeville neighborhood piqued my curiosity about his lawyerly lair, so I did some snooping. It appears that Stallworth purchased it in March 2005 for $170,000, Cook County estimates its value at $465,250, and Zillow estimates its value at $685,370. So this real estate lawyer sounds like a savvy real estate investor. But even assuming a value at the high end of the range, a $700,000 home is not particularly impressive, at least by Biglaw partner standards. Perhaps more of his net worth is tied up in his art collection and his real estate holdings in Alabama.
    Chicago attorney, nephew charged in sexual assault [Chicago Tribune]
    Attorney, nephew charged with sexually assaulting man [Chicago Sun-Times]
    Chicago Lawyer, Nephew Charged With Sexual Assault [DNAinfo Chicago]
    BigLaw partner charged in rape case [ABA Journal]
    Earlier: Mystery Departure Solved: Ex-Sidley Austin Partner Hit With Ethics Charges
    Sidley Austin Turned DLA Piper Partner Responds To Ethics Charges

    Tuesday, November 5, 2013

    Families question Fla. guardian program


    The ABC Action News I-Team first started looking into Florida’s Guardianship Program after we learned 99-year-old William Berchau had been placed in an Alzheimer’s unit by his guardian, despite strong evidence from those who know him best that he didn’t belong there.

    We soon began looking at more than 50 other cases involving his guardian, Patricia Johnson, and Florida’s guardianship system.

    The I-Team discovered a system that claims to look after wards’ best interests, but has very little oversight outside of the courtroom.

    In Florida, guardians are not required to get appraisals before selling wards’ homes, leading to homes often selling far below their actual values (meaning less money is available for wards’ care). Guardians also aren’t required to be accompanied while doing initial inventories of personal possessions. Often, relatives aren’t allowed to review what reportedly came out of their loved ones’ homes.

    Guardians use the “honor system” when submitting bills.

    Judges, in some cases, have disregarded signed legal documents that delegated powers-of-attorney, medical decision-making and other legal authorities to their relatives before wards were incapacitated.

    The I-Team interviewed friends and family members of wards, experts in the guardian field and others to get a deeper sense of what’s going on within this system that remains invisible to most members of the public.
    • I-Team Stories
    1. assisted living facility

      Families question Fla. guardian program

      Earlier this week, the I-Team introduced you to Patricia Johnson, a court-appointed guardian whose 99-year-old ward said she wrongly placed him in a lock-down Alzheimer's unit.


    Read more: http://www.abcactionnews.com/generic/news/Incapacitated-Floridas-Guardianship-Program#ixzz2jlr5I9Lx

    Questionable guardianship real estate transactions

    Questionable guardianship real estate transactions

     
    advertisement
    Posted: 10/28/2013
    When we started looking at real estate transactions in guardianship cases in Pinellas County, FL, we found some disturbing trends.
    We discovered that judges routinely approved the sale of wards' homes (in most cases, their largest asset) without obtaining appraisals from a certified appraiser.
    Guardian Patricia Johnson has used fellow Pinellas Park City Council member Richard Butler (who was her campaign manager) to conduct nearly all of the sales of ward's homes since 2010.
    Records show Butler has sold 14 of Johnson's ward's homes for a total of $1,252,500.
    On Sept. 13, 2013, Richard Butler listed Jennie Shabych's home located at 2863 26th Ave N., St. Petersburg and got a contract on it the same day. Shabych, however, was not incapacitated by the judge's order until September 16th, 2013.
    Claudette Batton's home 216 54th St. N., St. Petersburg sold twice on Nov. 8, 2012. The first time, it sold for $52,500, then again for $58,500.
    Rebie Jimenez's home at 5965 15th St N., St. Petersburg sold for $85,100 on Oct. 5, 2012 and was resold on Feb. 28, 2013 for $170,000.
    Ronald Till's home at 6141 26th Ave N., St. Petersburg sold for $69,000 on Sept. 27, 2012. It was resold for $132,000 on Mar. 22, 2013.


    Read more: http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/newswildcard1/questionable-guardianship-real-estate-transactions#ixzz2jlq1W8lR

    Wednesday, October 30, 2013

    Questionable guardianship real estate transactions

    Questionable guardianship real estate transactions

    advertisement
    Posted: 10/28/2013
    When we started looking at real estate transactions in guardianship cases in Pinellas County, FL, we found some disturbing trends.
    We discovered that judges routinely approved the sale of wards' homes (in most cases, their largest asset) without obtaining appraisals from a certified appraiser.
    Guardian Patricia Johnson has used fellow Pinellas Park City Council member Richard Butler (who was her campaign manager) to conduct nearly all of the sales of ward's homes since 2010.
    Records show Butler has sold 14 of Johnson's ward's homes for a total of $1,252,500.
    On Sept. 13, 2013, Richard Butler listed Jennie Shabych's home located at 2863 26th Ave N., St. Petersburg and got a contract on it the same day. Shabych, however, was not incapacitated by the judge's order until September 16th, 2013.
    Claudette Batton's home 216 54th St. N., St. Petersburg sold twice on Nov. 8, 2012. The first time, it sold for $52,500, then again for $58,500.
    Rebie Jimenez's home at 5965 15th St N., St. Petersburg sold for $85,100 on Oct. 5, 2012 and was resold on Feb. 28, 2013 for $170,000.
    Ronald Till's home at 6141 26th Ave N., St. Petersburg sold for $69,000 on Sept. 27, 2012. It was resold for $132,000 on Mar. 22, 2013.


    Read more: http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/newswildcard1/questionable-guardianship-real-estate-transactions#ixzz2jCyaQr00

    Friday, August 23, 2013

    Lawyers Complaining About Being Held To ‘Basic Standards of Professionalism’

  • 22 Aug 2013 at 4:51 PM
  • Real Estate, S.D.N.Y.
  • Lawyers Complaining About Being Held To ‘Basic Standards of Professionalism’


    Most folks think lawyers exist to screw over “widows and orphans.” According to a federal judge, one law firm made that reputation a reality and now owes an elderly man $130,000.
    Did every other lawyer decry the injustice and declare that the firm was acting beyond the bounds of common dignity? If you guessed in the negative, congratulations.
    Fellow lawyers, this is why we can’t have nice things…

    The New York firm of Kucker & Bruh (not, as far as we can tell, pronounced Cocker and Bro, even if that might describe their behavior) dutifully tried to evict an 82-year-old man on behalf of its client, Mall Properties Inc. Unfortunately for Kucker & Bruh, Mall Properties Inc. had faulty records that failed to account for the rent exemption due the tenant.
    Kucker & Bruh halted the eviction proceedings once it recognized the error, but not before running an 82-year-old man unsophisticated in the law through a legal wringer for awhile. No harm, no foul, right?
    Judge Lorna G. Schofield of the S.D.N.Y. disagreed and held the law firm itself liable for the tenant’s ordeal. In her decision, Judge Schofield found that Kucher & Bruh “blindly” relied on the faulty documents from the landlord and generally decided to hold the law firm to a higher standard in scrutinizing the “law and facts” of a situation before they start dragging people out of apartments by their hair. She ordered a trial to determine the extent of the damages. The firm promptly settled.
    With a case like this, you’d expect even lawyers secretly on Kucher & Bruh’s side to keep their mouths shut for P.R. purposes. Nope:
    “Are we supposed to be the attorneys for the landlord and the accountants?” asked David Skaller, a partner at Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, which represents many landlords but wasn’t involved in the case. “It has a potential chilling effect.”
    ****
    Adam Leitman Bailey, who represents many landlords and isn’t connected with the Lee case, said it was a “very dangerous decision for lawyers” by a federal judge “who could not possibly understand the halls of housing court and the landlord-tenant industry.”
    He noted that the same printouts of rent records that the judge found inadequate were routinely accepted as evidence in housing court. “We would be unable to practice law in any field, unless we rely on information from our clients,” he said.
    Doesn’t this more accurately suggest that the “halls of housing court” have been turning a blind eye to shady legal practices for far too long? In every other court in the country a lawyer can turn up liable for at least hefty sanctions for prosecuting claims based on recklessly trusting false information. Lawyers don’t get excused from diligent inquiry just because judges have hitherto let the bar get away with it.
    We’re only days removed from another NYC lawyer pleading guilty because he thought he could get away with forging documents to convert buildings into condos and toss the tenants. This is an area of law in New York where a little extra scrutiny wouldn’t be out of place.
    In the end, some firms will have to work a little later to prove they adequately covered their bases, and if they don’t, they may have to pay some money. It sucks to lose money, but what sucks much worse is being an elderly retiree and getting told you have to live on the street.
    Maybe a little perspective is in order for these lawyers.
    Eviction-Case Settlement Worries Landlord Lawyers [Wall Street Journal Law Blog]
    Law firm held liable for trying to evict elderly tenant based on incorrect client records [ABA Journal]
    Brooklyn attorney pleads guilty to forging NYS condo documents