Showing posts with label New Hampshire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Hampshire. Show all posts

Monday, March 28, 2016

The Webber estate case is about probate piracy

The Webber estate case is about probate piracy

Editor's note: Exploitation of the elderly, disabled and dying is an everyday occurrence in the Probate Court of Cook County.  The same crooks who fleeced the Gore, Tyler, Sykes, Trask and Cefalu estates are still working at this theft on the 18th floor. The FEDs are aware of this criminal activity and do nothing to punish the perps.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com



    • email print
      Comment
      7
       0
  •  


  • Posted Mar. 24, 2016 at 2:01 AM

    March 22 — To the Editor:
    Councilor Lown believes that the Webber estate case should have ended in a settlement rather than a trial in order to preserve the value of the estate and avoid “condemnation or admission” of those involved in the financial abuse of an elderly woman. (Portsmouth Herald, March 22, 2016).
    But, as former Commissioner Gerry Howe aptly stated when he voted against the mediated settlement in August 2014, “I think that's selling the reputation of the city pretty low.” (Police Commission rejects Webber estate settlement. Seacoastonline, August 13, 2014). Yet, even after the commission voted to refuse to settle, Councilor Lown persisted, along with other city officials, to settle the case to prevent it from going to trial. Ironically, by doing so, attorney charges accrued unnecessarily.
    Back in August 2014 Judge Maher, who was paid over $20,000 to help settle the case as a mediator, cited concern over the cost of litigation when he told the Police Commission and citizens, “Attorney Eby’s charges are over $400K right now; his office has taken five depositions. They have 17 more to take; add that to several weeks of trial costs.” (Portsmouth Police Commission Meeting Notes, August 2014)
    Attorney Eby’s final 2016 bill is $579,240. This means that prior to August 2014, 70 percent of his charges were accrued with the intent to settle the case (that would have allowed the offending officer to receive $425,000.) If one looks at the entire bill, it appears that a good portion of it, before and after August 2014, is due to efforts to settle the case.
    Settlement of this case would not have served the public – but only a select few who did not want the transparency achieved through the probate trial.
    Simply understood, the Webber case is about an elderly woman with dementia who became unduly influenced by a young Portsmouth police officer in order for him to gain control of her substantial estate.
    But it’s about so much more; it’s about the community’s failure in both the public and private sphere to protect an elderly, wealthy resident of Portsmouth from financial exploitation and physical neglect. Specifically, it’s about the failure of local officials – both elected and appointed - to “police” their own and promote the well-being of Portsmouth residents, not only Webber but the community she had intended to benefit from a $1.2 million bequest for police and fire safety equipment - that is, until the young officer befriended her. In fact, one of the lessons of this case is that there seems to have been an almost blatant disregard for the public by those sworn to serve the public.
    Probate piracy has been described as:
    “Uncannily similar to organized crime defined in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (RICO), probate piracy can involve the involuntary redistribution of assets, which is also known as property poaching, with the elderly person becoming the enterprise that is defrauded.”
    (https://www.mainstreet.com/article/heres-how-the-great-41-million-generational-wealth-transfer-is-intercepted-by-probate-pirates).
    Exploited elders share the plight of other vulnerable populations that are victims of human trafficking, which has been defined as, “a form of modern slavery where people profit from the control and exploitation of others.” http://www.polarisproject.org/human-trafficking/overview.
    The Webber case continues to alert us to the fact that the national epidemic of probate piracy and elder financial exploitation (and its disturbing aftermath for victims and their families) impacts residents of New Hampshire.
    Jane Zill
    Portsmouth
  • Tuesday, May 5, 2015

    Officer's $2.7M benefactor had dementia, doctor testifies

    Officer's $2.7M benefactor had dementia, doctor testifies

    Doctor: Officer's $2.7M benefactor had dementia



    • email print
      Comment
      3
       8


  • Geraldine Webber's physician, Dr.Geraldine Webber's physician, Dr. Ira Schwartz, of Portsmouth, is questioned by attorney Ralph Holmes as the doctor is first to take the stand on the first day of the probate hearing Monday, to contest Webber's last will and trust at the 7th Circuit Court - Probate Division - in Dover. Photo by Rich Beauchesne/Seacoastonline

  • Geraldine Webber's physician, Dr.Geraldine Webber's physician, Dr.Portsmouth Attorney James Ritzo raises his right hand as he takes the witness stand during the first day of the probate hearing to contest Webber's last will and trust.  Photo by Rich Beauchesne/SeacoastonlineAttorney David Eby, who is representing two medical groups contesting Geraldine Webber's last will and trust questions a witness on the first day of the probate hearing Monday.  Photo by Rich Beauchesne/SeacoastonlineDr.
    • By Elizabeth Dinan
      edinan@seacoastonline.com

      Posted Apr. 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM
      Updated Apr 27, 2015 at 7:50 PM


      DOVER — Geraldine Webber had dementia, had fallen several times and broken bones, and lost her ability to tell a dirty joke, said her physician, Dr. Ira Schwartz, on the first day of the hearing to contest Webber's last will and trust.
      The hearing is being held at the 7th Circuit Court – Probate Division – in Dover, where multiple parties allege police Sgt. Aaron Goodwin exerted undue influence over Webber, while she was impaired by dementia, to inherit her waterfront home, stocks, bonds and a Cadillac. Through his attorney, Chuck Doleac, Goodwin denies the allegations and asserts that he provided Webber comfort and care.
      Goodwin did not appear in the court on Monday, but Portsmouth Police Chief Stephen DuBois attended the first day of trial.
      Dr. Schwartz was questioned most of the day by attorney David Eby, who represents the Shriner's Hospital for Children and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, both of which saw diminished inheritances when Webber's will was re-written to benefit Goodwin. 
      Schwartz said he was Webber's physician for about 20 years and reported concerns about her to the state Bureau of Elderly and Adult Services several times during the later part of her life. He said he had only made that kind of report about 10 times, for three to seven patients, during his entire medical career.
      Schwartz said Webber was diagnosed with dementia "at least" by 2008. She signed documents to leave the majority of her estate to Goodwin in May of 2012.
      In 2008, Schwartz testified, he gave Webber a "mini mental test," because she expressed concern about her memory and some of his nurses thought she'd been confused. Her score indicated she had "mild cognitive impairment," he said.
      Goodwin became Webber's medical contact in February 2011, said Schwartz and notes from his office staff described Goodwin as a friend, neighbor and police officer. Webber lived on Shaw Road in Portsmouth at the time, while court records show Goodwin lived in Dover.
      The physician said that on Feb. 24, 2011, Webber was admitted to Portsmouth Regional Hospital for bleeding, due to her blood-thinning medication being "out of control." He said she received a psychiatric evaluation that day because of her inability to understand the impact of her health problems.
      "I already had concerns about her cognitive status," Schwartz said, adding that he was concerned about her returning home with potentially "life-threatening" medical problems.
      Dr. Simon Eison, the psychiatrist who examined Webber, reported that she did not know the day or date, Schwartz said, while calling that consistent with his knowledge of Webber at the time.
      "In my opinion, it was more than mild dementia," he said, adding that he had concerns about the fact that Webber lived alone. "She was incompetent to make medical decisions." 
      Schwartz said that over the years, Webber would tell him an off-color joke at the start of their appointments, but when those jokes stopped, he considered it one indication of her mental decline. He said he was most concerned about her inability to understand her medical problems.
      In April 2011, Schwartz testified, he was contacted by attorney David Mulhern who sought an opinion about whether Webber was competent to sign a legal document. The physician said he left a voice mail for Mulhern saying he could "not attest to her competence."
      A 30-year practicing attorney, Mulhern was deposed Feb. 17 when he said Goodwin called him in early 2011 and asked him to revise Webber's will. He said five things concerned him: that he was initially contacted about changing a will by a potential beneficiary, that the potential beneficiary was a police officer, that Webber was of advanced age, that she may not have known the true value of her property, and that she was dissatisfied with her longtime lawyer.
      Schwartz testified Monday that he called the state Bureau of Elderly and Adult Services (BEAS) in August 2011 to dispute a report one of its staff members had filed that said there was nothing of concern involving Webber's care.
      "I called and said, 'I disagree,'" he said. "My concern was that their evaluation was inaccurate."
      In the fall of 2011, he said, he met with attorney Gary Holmes who also inquired about Webber's ability to endorse a new will. Schwartz said he told Holmes that not only did he think she was incapable of doing so, a psychiatrist had already made that determination.
      Holmes prepared the disputed will and trust in May of 2012.
      In March 2012, Schwartz said, he reported to BEAS that Webber had significant dementia and needed protection. In April of that year, she told him that someone had stolen a painting from her, but when he questioned her about it, "the answers never made it clear what the circumstances were," he said.
      From the witness stand, Schwartz verified that in April 2012, Dr. John Hopkins wrote that Webber was "vulnerable for exploitation of many types."  
      Schwartz said that in November 2012, Webber fell, broke her hip and was unable to remember that it happened, even after being told several times.
      The following January, Schwartz said, he wrote to the BEAS saying it was possible that Webber was being exploited.
      "On multiple occasions we reported that no one was taking care of this woman, there are problems here and they apparently didn't see it the way I saw it," he said.
      Gary Holmes' lawyer, Ralph Holmes, cross examined Schwartz, while eliciting affirmative answers to questions about the value of Goodwin's companionship and care for Webber. He said Goodwin set up Webber's medications and conferred with her medical providers.
      If not for Goodwin, Schwartz acknowledged, Webber may have ended up in a nursing home.
      Eby later noted that Schwartz's records show Goodwin only contacted Webber's physician once during the last eight months of her life. To that, Doleac countered that Webber had home health care providers and they were in regular contact with Schwartz, so Goodwin did not need to. 
      Holmes asked Schwartz about Webber having no one else in her life at the time to help her, at which point Portsmouth attorney Paul McEachern objected and said Webber had a "support system" before Goodwin became involved. Schwartz confirmed that was the case. 
      Portsmouth attorney James Ritzo was later called to the witness stand and described how he worked as Webber's lawyer since the late 1980s, or early 1990s and had written multiple wills for her; all of them remaining fairly consistent. He said he also helped her with household problems, presided over one of her three weddings, one of her divorces and would call her daily to ensure she was okay.
      If she didn't answer the phone, he said, he'd go to her home, often to pick her up off the floor.

      In early 2010, Ritzo said, Webber began reporting prowlers, she thought a paint-by-numbers painting she made was worth $3 million and she began crashing her car. She lost her eyesight and her driver's license and thought her third husband would return one day, Ritzo said.

      "She went downhill very quickly," he testified. "She was really slipping fast."
      During a previous deposition, Ritzo said he had known Webber for 25 to 30 years before her death in December 2012, at age 94. He maintains that she asked him to change her will to leave "everything" to Goodwin, shortly after meeting the officer, but that he had declined to do so because she had dementia.
      McEachern is representing four of Webber's friends and has called the case "a matter of public corruption."
      The hearing is scheduled to resume on Tuesday.
    • Thursday, March 26, 2015

      Police officer: 'I was watching a crime'

      Police officer: 'I was watching a crime'

      John Connors
      PORTSMOUTH – John Connors said he told two police chiefs, one deputy chief and two police commissioners that a fellow officer was making daily visits to his wealthy neighbor with dementia and that he thought "it was wrong."

      Their responses, he said, ranged from a "smirk" and a warning to stay out of it, to an explanation about an "ax to grind" that police officials had at the time. One commissioner said "good for them" if the officer and his lawyer could get some of the neighbor's "ton of money," Connors said.

      A 42-year member of the Portsmouth Police Department, Connors made these remarks during a Feb. 26 deposition, as part of a probate dispute contesting the $2.1 million estate of the late Geraldine Webber, who left most of her wealth to Portsmouth police Sgt. Aaron Goodwin. A judge will decide whether Webber was competent to endorse her last will and trust and whether or not Goodwin exerted undue influence over her.

      Connors said during his deposition that he told one police commissioner he thought Goodwin was "ripping off" Webber. He said he talked about his suspicions daily at the police station and that he advised Webber's former lawyer, Jim Ritzo, to get a restraining order against Goodwin because "he's up to no good."

      "When I made my complaints to the Police Department and the higher ups," Connors said, "nobody would listen to me."

      "I didn't go public or talk to anybody for like two-and-a-half, three years, not until this past August, because I tried to get the guys at the PD to get this taken care of by themselves," Connors is quoted in a transcript of his deposition. "I didn't want this going public. I didn't want this on the PD, as bad as it was looking, because 95 percent of the guys that work there are the greatest guys in the world. You got a handful that aren't OK, and that's what this is all about."

      Connors was introduced at his deposition as a Portsmouth police officer who retired in 1995 and continues to work as a sergeant in the auxiliary division.

      "This is something that I've been living every day of my life for the last four-and-a-half years," said Connors, who told lawyers at the deposition that he kept detailed notes about what he saw at Webber's house next door.

      He said it began in late 2010, when he was at the police station, where a couple of officers mentioned they were at Webber's house the prior night for a call about a prowler. Connors said he told the officers he was sure there was no prowler, because Webber had dementia and was seeing things that weren't there.

      "Well, the next thing I know," Connors said, "police cruisers are coming down every day, more than once."

      He said he saw Goodwin visit Webber, in an unmarked cruiser, daily and sometimes twice daily, for the next five or six months. About two weeks after Goodwin met Webber, Connors said, the 90-something-year-old woman was driving her Cadillac to her mailbox when she stopped to tell Connors she was in love with Goodwin, was going to marry him and that he was going to leave his wife and children to move in with her.

      Webber also said "I'm going to give him everything," said Connors.

      Soon after, he said, "She stopped talking to everybody."

      Connors said Webber was friends with his parents before he was born and that was the connection that led to his buying the home next to hers and "why we look out for her." He said he made sure Goodwin and/or attorney Gary Holmes (who wrote Webber's disputed will to largely benefit Goodwin) knew he saw them coming and going, and "knew what they were doing was wrong."

      Connors said he "wanted them to know they were being watched and they weren't getting away with it."He said he sometimes reported what he saw to Webber's then-attorney, Jim Ritzo, because Ritzo used to be there "every day and he took good care of her."

      Connors said he saw Ritzo visit Webber daily for 10 years and that Ritzo "did nothing but good things for her and helped her out and she adored him."

      "That changed when Aaron (Goodwin) came into the picture," he said.

      Allegations surfaced at that time that Ritzo was exploiting Webber, but police never pressed any charges and the state determined the complaints were unfounded, according to public records.

      After Webber endorsed her last will and trust (in May 2012), Connors said, Goodwin's visits lessened to "once a week for 10 or 15 minutes after work."

      "He used to come down - I think it was Fridays because all the neighbors used to call it pay day when he showed up," Connors said. "It was a joke around the neighborhood for a while. It was sad, but it was a joke."

      The veteran police officer said he began reporting his observations to police officials more than four years ago. He said that on Oct. 18, 2010, he was at a police function at the Ice House when he told then-police chief Lou Ferland about his concerns involving Goodwin and his elderly neighbor.

      "(Ferland) said, 'Trust me, you don't want to get involved in this one,'" Connors said. "Those were his exact words." (Continue Reading)

      Full Article & Source:
      Police officer: 'I was watching a crime'

      See Also:
      Conflict of Interest? Explanations Needed! 

      Portsmouth officer to be deposed about $2.7M inheritance

      Police Commission Authorizes Probe of Shady Inheritance

      Police brass caught in cop's disputed inheritance case

      Wednesday, November 19, 2014

      Police brass caught in cop's disputed inheritance case

      WEBBER WILL DISPUTE

      Police brass caught in cop's disputed inheritance case

      Estate lawyer noted information sharing



      • email print
         2



    • A photograph shows some notes taken by Hampton Attorney Gary Holmes on April 20, 2012 regarding the contested estate of the late Geraldine Webber.  Photo by Rich Beauchesne/Seacoastonline
       Zoom
      A photograph shows some notes taken by Hampton Attorney Gary Holmes on April 20, 2012 regarding the contested estate of the late Geraldine Webber. Photo by Rich Beauchesne/Seacoastonline
      • By Elizabeth Dinan
        edinan@seacoastonline.com

        Posted Oct. 28, 2014 @ 5:40 pm
        Updated Oct 28, 2014 at 6:28 PM


        PORTSMOUTH — A lawyer who helped an elderly resident leave most of her $2.7 million estate to police Sgt. Aaron Goodwin, kept notes that say the deputy police chief shared information about the case with Goodwin’s defense attorney and that the police commissioners were told how to respond to media questions about the case.
        The notes were written by attorney Gary Holmes and made public after his Oct. 16 deposition. Holmes wrote a last will and trust for the late Geraldine Webber, which is now disputed by multiple parties alleging Goodwin exerted undue influence over Webber, while she had dementia, to inherit most of her wealth.  
        More than 100 pages of Holmes’ handwritten notes about the case were obtained by the Herald and one of them, dated April 12, 2012, states Holmes learned from Goodwin’s attorney, Chuck Doleac, that a Herald reporter called Webber and that Deputy Police Chief Corey MacDonald “had off record conversations” with the reporter. The Herald did on that date have a 25-minute conversation with Webber, as well as an off-record discussion with MacDonald about the situation, in general terms, for background information.
        Holmes’ notes dated Sept. 21, 2012, document a conversation he had with the Herald. He wrote he told the Herald there were “many sides” to the story and he was “sure” the Herald had heard “of other facts” that involved Portsmouth attorney James Ritzo, who wrote Webber’s 2009 will that did not name Goodwin as a beneficiary.
        Holmes, who authored Webber’s last will and trust, made notes saying the Herald responded it had not heard the “other facts” about Ritzo, “in spite of (Holmes) being told by Chuck (Doleac) yesterday that Corey MacDonald had off-record conversation about Ritzo.” In other words, MacDonald told Goodwin’s lawyer he had an off-record discussion with the Herald about the controversy and somehow that was communicated to the lawyer who drafted Webber’s contested will the next day.
        Attorney Paul McEachern, who is representing four of Webber’s former friends contesting her last will and trust, said Holmes’ notes, showing communications among MacDonald and lawyers for Goodwin and Webber’s estate, “support my original instinct that this is official corruption and they support it.”
        MacDonald explained one of his jobs as deputy chief is to monitor ongoing litigation that could affect the Police Department. He said he contacted Doleac at that time “to gauge the status of” Goodwin’s case, “its impact on the department, and (Doleac’s) observations as to its impact on Aaron Goodwin, as he was under extreme stress by all accounts, and was serving as a police officer for the department.”
        “During my conversation with attorney Doleac, I may have also included a statement that I provided the Herald an “off the record” perspective on the department’s take on the Goodwin-Webber matter at that time,” said the deputy chief. “My goal in providing the Herald that information was so that our newspaper would have a better understanding of what the department was doing and why, though I could not officially comment at that time. Though I have no recollection of it, I equally have no reason to believe I would not have mentioned to attorney Doleac that I had expressed the department’s position to the Herald as ‘background.’”
        Chief Stephen DuBois said MacDonald has “above average” communication skills and for that reason, he interacted with Doleac, which “is exactly what this administration and prior administrations have expected of him.”
        By letters dated Sept. 18, 2012, and sent by certified mail to the Police Commission and DuBois, the Herald first inquired about the allegations against Goodwin. According to his handwritten notes dated the following day, Holmes wrote that the Herald had written to the Police Commission for comment and that “police will respond — Aaron will not.” Holmes’ notes for that date also say, “the police commissioners have been told they support Aaron but no comment.”
        Police Commission Chairman John Golumb denied the commissioners were told how to respond to the inquiry. “Nobody told us how to respond,” he said.
        If someone had suggested how the Police Commission should answer a media inquiry, Golumb said,  the commission would acknowledge the suggestion politely, but then act on its own. “But I can make it clear that did not happen,” he said.
        Commissioner Jerry Howe concurred that the commission was never instructed about how to respond to the Herald’s questions about the case. “The commission reached its response on its own,” he said.
        Howe added that Holmes had no way of knowing how the commission decided to respond because he wasn’t there.
        By letter dated Sept. 19, 2012, the commission answered the Herald’s inquiry stating that Chief DuBois was keeping the commission informed and that the commission “supports the manner in which Chief DuBois is handling this matter.”
        DuBois responded to the Herald by letter, also dated Sept. 19, 2012, stating that the allegations against Goodwin “concern off-duty personal issues which do not involve the Portsmouth Police Department.” He said the department conducted a “thorough investigation” of Goodwin’s contacts with Webber and “is convinced that there was no violation of law or departmental regulations committed by” Goodwin. DuBois also noted that outside agencies were looking into the situation and “resolutions of those issues will be the responsibility of those agencies.”
        Howe said the Police Commission supported Goodwin in 2012 because it received reports from the state Bureau of Elder Services in response to allegations that Goodwin unduly influenced Webber that concluded with no findings based on available information.
        MacDonald reminded that the Police Department and he “are not now, nor have we ever been involved in determining who gets what out of Ms. Webber’s will.”
        “We have not coordinated a response for attorney Holmes, attorney Doleac, or any of the others engaged in the litigation,” he said. “Our priority, area of responsibility and sole concern is the honest and effective operation of the department, in spite of the pressures that this matter has brought to bear on our community.”
        He added he expects he’ll “get the chance, under oath, to answer any other questions that exist on what the department did and for what reasons in this matter.”    
        MacDonald said the Police Department often can’t make a public comment, due to various restrictions, but “when possible, we try to provide the newspaper an answer as to why we are taking policy or issue positions.”
        “Taking a strict “’no comment’ policy position lends itself to conspiracy theories and speculation,” he said. “I do not believe in a no-comment approach and I think when possible the more light you can shed, even if at times it is in the form of “background off-record” comments, is worthwhile in providing the press with our perspective or position.” 
      • Saturday, October 4, 2014

        Portsmouth officer to be deposed about $2.7M inheritance

        Portsmouth officer to be deposed about $2.7M inheritance

        Sgt. Aaron Goodwin to face lawyers on both sides



        • email print
           0



      • Portsmouth police Sgt. Aaron Goodwin is set to be deposed Oct. 27 on his $2.7 million inheritance. Photo by Deb Cram/Seacoastonline.com, file
         Zoom
        |
         
        Portsmouth police Sgt. Aaron Goodwin is set to be deposed Oct. 27 on his $2.7 million inheritance. Photo by Deb Cram/Seacoastonline.com, file
        • By Elizabeth Dinan
          edinan@seacoastonline.com

          Posted Sep. 30, 2014 @ 10:55 am

          PORTSMOUTH — A police officer accused of exploiting an elderly woman with dementia to inherit her $2.7 million estate is scheduled to be deposed Oct. 27 by multiple lawyers on both sides of the debate.
          The officer, Sgt. Aaron Goodwin, is accused in the Rockingham County probate court of exerting undue influence over the late Geraldine Webber, who died at age 94 on Dec. 11, 2012. Seven months before her death, Webber endorsed a new will and trust, naming Goodwin as the primary beneficiary of her waterfront home, stocks, bonds and a Cadillac.
          Goodwin, who is being represented by attorney Chuck Doleac, has consistently denied the allegations. Webber’s neighbor, retired officer John Connors, previously told the Herald that he saw Goodwin visit Webber’s home, in a police cruiser, more than 100 times.
          According to court records, several lawyers declined to rewrite Webber’s 2009 will, while citing concerns about her mental capacity, before Hampton attorney Ralph Holmes agreed to do so. Parties involved in the estate dispute were notified this week that Holmes is also scheduled to be deposed in October.
          The depositions were scheduled by Manchester attorney David Eby, who is representing the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Society and The Shriners Hospital for Children. Eby’s clients were each $500,000 beneficiaries under a 2009 will Webber had written by Portsmouth attorney Jim Ritzo, then were named as $80,000 beneficiaries under the 2012 estate plans drafted by Holmes.
          Eby alleges Goodwin befriended Webber, who was diagnosed with dementia in 2010, before helping her visit "more than one attorney for the purpose of changing her estate plan."
          During a Sept. 4 deposition, Webber’s physician, Dr. Ira Schwartz, testified that Holmes met with him in January 2012 to ask about Webber’s mental competency and that he told Holmes, “not only do I consider her unable to make an informed decision, but I believe she was judged to be that way by psychiatrists during a prior admission (at Portsmouth Regional Hospital).
          Retired Judge Stephen Roberts was recently selected by the Portsmouth Police Commission to lead a panel to investigate Goodwin’s relationship with Webber, his hours and frequency of contact with her and what role the police department played in the case. Roberts selected retired police chief William Baker and Dr. Kathryn Lynch to serve with him. All three panelists are conducting the investigation on an unpaid voluntary basis.
           A probate court trial to hear evidence in the dispute over Webber’s last will and trust is scheduled for January 2015.
        • Thursday, July 24, 2014

          Explanations needed in Webber/Goodwin case

          Explanations needed in Webber/Goodwin case

            

          1 of 3 clicks used this month
          LOGIN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE

          In 2012, longtime Portsmouth resident, 92-year-old Geraldine Webber, changed her will to make then 33-year-old officer Aaron Goodwin the primary beneficiary of her estate and it is the year she died. Also, in 2012, the state of New Hampshire earned a "D" on the New Hampshire Corruption Risk Report Card (www.stateintegrity.org/new_hampshire) by the State Integrity Investigation (a joint project of the Center for Public Integrity, Global Integrity and Public Radio International.)
          Police Sgt. Goodwin claims he received ethical clearance from his "superiors" to pursue a personal relationship with a woman in her 90s afflicted with dementia, enabling him to become the primary beneficiary of her $2.7 million estate, which resulted in the disinheritance of her only surviving relative (a disabled grandson) and of her long-term local friends who took her for meals and provided rides, structure and socialization for her for more than a decade, and also reduced inheritances for esteemed health care and educational institutions, and our own Portsmouth Police and Fire Departments (that is, the taxpaying citizens who employ Goodwin).
          Ironically, as can be seen in Webber's 2012 estate planning DVD prepared by attorney Gary Holmes, Webber laments that she does not know how to reach Whitey Bulger, a career criminal linked to corrupt law enforcement in the 1970s. She would like to hire him to knock off anyone who tries to interfere in her plans to change her will. In addition to noting her questionable mental status on the DVD, one can only speculate about why Webber dwelled on the memory of a criminal noteworthy for his links to corrupt law enforcement during the process to revise her will.
          The public needs to know if Goodwin is accurate in his claim that the leadership of the Portsmouth Police Department "cleared" him of "any ethical conflicts" when he pursued a relationship with Webber, as reported in the Portsmouth Herald's July 9 publication. The public also needs to know on what basis Goodwin's "superiors" make their ethical decisions.
          The impact of questionable ethical guidance must not be swept under the rug through a mediated out-of-court settlement as is being advocated by the legal representation for Goodwin, attorney Chuck Doleac, and for attorney Gary Holmes who revised Webber's will in 2012; defense of this 2012 will is being provided by attorney Ralph Holmes.
          Because the Goodwin/Webber case is being managed through probate court, much ado is being made about the funds Webber has left behind. However, for the citizens of Portsmouth this case is primarily about potential police corruption, the conduct of our public servants, and about public safety. The public deserves transparency in the determination if undue influence led to the creation of the 2012 revised will and transparency in confronting the possibility that Webber was emotionally abused and endangered by a public safety officer. Transparency can only be achieved through a hearing — not mediation.
          Webber's social supports fell away under Goodwin's influence. She was nearly blind. She became socially isolated. She broke her hip. She died of inanition (slow, progressive starvation) without her longtime allies, friends, grandson and former daughter-in-law at her side. Does anyone care about what her life was like in the year prior to her death or do we only care about her money?
          An investigation about the leadership of our Police Department seems essential, specifically its management of ethical issues that involve potential conflicts of interest, cronyism and the impartial treatment of all Portsmouth residents — particularly the elderly, disabled and financially destitute who could truly benefit from a more watchful eye by local law enforcement. Not one elderly Portsmouth resident, family member or caregiver has stepped forward to defend Goodwin or to demonstrate that his interest in Webber was consistent with the attention he showed other elderly Portsmouth residents, regardless of their financial status. It seems that Webber is the only elderly resident Goodwin befriended.
          In New Hampshire a third of us are over the age of 50. If the Goodwin/Webber case ends in a behind-the-scenes settlement rather than in court, what will be the takeaway meaning to those of us who will spend our twilight years in New Hampshire when our vulnerability increases and life becomes more challenging, particularly those of us without children or with children who've moved away? For this population, their friends and family members, a settlement means the following: "You're not important anymore, maybe never were, and are not worthy of the protection of the community." For our taxpayer-funded public servants a mediated settlement means this: "Try to get away with whatever you can. You may not get it all but you'll get something and will be able to keep your job and get promoted, too."
          A mediated settlement will mean that Goodwin and his associates will financially benefit from the elderly woman's estate. Before we consider such an unjust resolution and one that will perpetuate a culture of low expectations for our public servants, we need the Portsmouth Police Department to formally explain the code of ethics expected of our police officers and how this code squares with Goodwin's actions in the Webber case. We need to also hear from the Portsmouth Police Commission, the body that oversees Police Department actions, about the ethical principles that inform their leadership of a very powerful city department. The state attorney general's office and the Portsmouth City Council also need to make clear their expectations for the ethical conduct of public servants and explain their laissez faire approach to this case.
          The public deserves an explanation of the ethical principles that guide the leadership of our state, community and the day-to-day judgment of police officers. Webber's closest friends have made it clear they do not care about the money; instead, they want the citizens of Portsmouth to know what happened to their good friend. It has taken enormous courage on their part to address the failure by the Police Department to police its own. These whistleblowers, many of them elderly, deserve a hearing and full inquiry into the case, and gratitude from our community for courageously bringing this case forward. Public safety, as well as the integrity and reputation of the Portsmouth Police Department, the Police Commission, the City Council, and the town itself deserve nothing less.
          Jane Zill is a Portsmouth resident.

          Tuesday, March 18, 2014

          Banker feared exploitation of elderly woman

          Banker feared exploitation of elderly woman

          Executive offered testimony in case of Geraldine Webber
               

          Buy This Photo
          Top Photo
          Portsmouth police Sgt. Aaron Goodwin is involved in a court case alleging he took advantage of an elderly woman to inherit her valuable estate. Goodwin has said “allegations that I exploited a member of our community are completely untrue.”Deb Cram file photo

          1 of 3 clicks used this month
          LOGIN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE

          During a 27-year banking career, a Portsmouth bank executive only once called state officials to report a possible case of financial exploitation. The person she thought might be "taking advantage of" an elderly and wealthy bank customer was Portsmouth police Sgt. Aaron Goodwin.
          That testimony was offered by a senior executive for a downtown Portsmouth bank during a sworn deposition on Feb. 11 in the Shaines and McEachern law office. The deposition was taken as part of a dispute over the last will and trust for the late Geraldine Webber, who changed her estate plans shortly before her December 2012 death, so Goodwin would inherit her riverfront home, stocks, bonds and Cadillac.
          Multiple parties are alleging Goodwin exerted undue influence over Webber, who had been diagnosed with dementia.
          During her deposition last month, the Portsmouth banker said she and another bank employee phoned the New Hampshire Bureau of Elderly & Adult Services because they were "concerned" about possible "financial abuse" of Webber by Goodwin. The banker said Webber had a checking account, savings account, certificates of deposit worth about $350,000 and a safe deposit box with unknown contents.
          Webber's "financial capacity" had diminished, said the banker, who explained that Webber had lost the keys to her safe deposit box, forgot to cash checks, lost checks and was carrying large amounts of cash.
          Webber, who was in her 90s when the bank executive began keeping notes about her, had also "lost her attention for dealing with money," the banker said. When asked during her deposition why she thought that, the banker explained, "I just felt she was losing her patience with dealing with her finances, her money."
          Webber had also told someone at the bank that she'd gone to junior high school with the deposed banker, who said that was untrue and "just strange."
          "She was not making good decisions," the banker is quoted as saying in the deposition.
          The banker and the bank are named in the deposition, but are not in this story because neither is accused of wrongdoing.
          Goodwin said "allegations that I exploited a member of our community are completely untrue."
          During her deposition with several lawyers last month, the Portsmouth bank executive said she first met Goodwin on Jan. 25, 2011, when he went to the bank with Webber, who introduced him as "her new friend and someone that would be helping her." Goodwin was not in uniform and introduced himself "as a Portsmouth police detective, but he said he wasn't calling in that capacity," the banker said during her deposition.
          Webber talked about wanting to find a new lawyer, made a deposit and canceled the contract for her safe deposit box, while opening a new account for a new box, the banker said. Webber's longtime lawyer, James Ritzo, had conducted prior banking transactions for her and was her power of attorney at the time, according to the deposition.
          On Jan. 10, 2010, the bank executive said, she had a telephone conversation with Goodwin, who said he was concerned about a banking transaction that was made for Webber by Ritzo the previous July.
          The banker said that transaction was "not an unusual transaction" and another bank official had confirmed with Webber at the time that Ritzo conducted it the way she wanted him to.
          Goodwin asked for copies of notes about that transaction, but the bank did not comply because Ritzo had power of attorney and bank officials decided "not to leak confidential information," according to the deposition.
          Goodwin's telephone inquiry, said the banker, began with him saying he was a Portsmouth police detective who was "not calling in that capacity," instead as "a friend of Geraldine's."
          While being deposed, the banker said Goodwin went to the bank with Webber on Feb. 15, 2011, "to do some banking and they were still looking for the safe deposit key" Webber lost. Ritzo was named as co-owner of her safe deposit box, but if he ever had one of two keys issued to unlock it, bank records show he never used it, according to the deposition.
          On July 29, 2011, Goodwin and Webber again went to the bank and had the safe deposit box drilled open, the bank executive said. According to the deposition, Goodwin signed a card indicating he went into a private room with Webber to examine the contents of the safe deposit box.
          The banker said she was "concerned" because Webber "had always trusted" Ritzo and the banker was "uncomfortable with the relationship" Webber had formed with Goodwin.
          "It concerned me that she was putting a lot of trust into Aaron, you know, so quickly," the banker said. "It was a new relationship for us at the bank; whether she had known him prior to her introducing him to us, I can't say."
          The banker said Webber also mentioned wanting to leave Goodwin her house and that Goodwin said she didn't have to do that. According to the banker's deposition, she and a colleague were concerned Webber was being financially exploited and when asked by whom, the banker answered "Aaron Goodwin."
          The two bankers called the state Bureau of Elderly & Adult Services and reported their concerns, but never heard anything from the state office in response, according to the deposition.
          Goodwin previously provided Seacoast Media Group with two letters from the bureau saying investigations were conducted with regard to allegations that he exploited Webber financially and the bureau determined the allegations were "unfounded." The letters are dated June 12, 2012, and Sept. 19, 2012.
          Webber died Dec. 11, 2012, at age 93. A trial to hear evidence in the dispute over her last will and trust is scheduled for January 2015.
          Goodwin is being represented by attorney Charles Doleac, while attorney Gary Holmes, who drafted Webber's final will and trust, is being represented by attorney Ralph Holmes.
          When Webber signed her final estate documents, she was video-recorded and made sexual comments about Goodwin.
          Portsmouth attorney Paul McEachern has called the estate dispute "a matter of official corruption" and successfully argued for the case to be heard in public. McEachern is representing several people who were named in a will Ritzo wrote for Webber in 2009, but were cut, or named as lesser beneficiaries in her last will and trust.
          Manchester attorney David Eby is representing the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Society and The Shriner's Hospital for Children. His clients were each $500,000 beneficiaries under the 2009 will Ritzo wrote for Webber, then named as $80,000 beneficiaries under the 2012 estate plans drafted by Holmes.
          Eby alleges Goodwin befriended Webber, who was diagnosed with dementia in 2010, before helping her visit "more than one attorney for the purpose of changing her estate plan."
          Portsmouth City Attorney Robert Sullivan has represented the city's police and fire departments. By terms of Webber's 2009 will, the departments were each designated to receive one-quarter of Webber's estate, after the sale of her home and assets. In the will and trust Webber endorsed in 2012, the departments are each named as $25,000 beneficiaries.
          Webber's disabled grandson Brett is represented by attorney Lisa Bellanti. Webber's only living heir, he was excluded from the 2012 will and trust.