Showing posts with label Ponzi scheme. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ponzi scheme. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Attorney Targeted Elderly in Ponzi, Says SEC


Tuesday, April 19, 2016Last Update: 12:02 PM PT

Attorney Targeted Elderly in Ponzi, Says SEC
     LOS ANGELES (CN) — Using ads in USA Today, an attorney and a businessman defrauded 250 people, mostly retirees, of nearly $12 million by promising huge returns from investing in lawsuits, the SEC claims in court.
     The SEC accused Michigan tax attorney James A. Catipay, Washington state legal marketer David A. Aldridge, and their California-based company Prometheus Law of four counts of securities fraud, in an April 15 lawsuit in Federal Court.
     The scheme capitalized on the growing business of "litigation funding," in which investors underwrite attorneys' high-dollar commercial lawsuits, in hope of profiting from settlements.
     Catipay and Aldridge took money from small investors, allegedly to fund personal injury and mass tort cases, but the SEC says it was a Ponzi scheme.
     "Catipay and Aldrich spent millions of dollars on personal items, including a million-dollar loft in downtown Los Angeles and paying Aldrich's personal income taxes. So when the first approximately $120,000 of investor returns came due, the defendants used money raised from new investors to pay the existing investors — payments that both Catipay and Aldrich admitted were, in fact, Ponzi payments," the SEC says in the lengthy complaint.
     They defrauded investors "by repeatedly downplaying the risks associated with their investments and the fact that their entire business model was unrealistic to afford the exorbitant returns promised," Michele Layne, the head of the SEC's Los Angeles office, said in a statement.
     Catipay and Aldridge told victims their money "is never at risk," the SEC says, citing the defendants' 2014 "information packet." They promised to spend the money lining up plaintiffs to bring class actions against drug companies and medical device makers, and guaranteed returns of 100 to 300 percent, according to the complaint.
     They offered what they called "forward contracts" that would pay off after a specific number of months, and said the mass tort cases "had settlement funds just waiting in escrow to be claimed," the SEC says. But "In fact, the investments were highly speculative and risky."
     Also, the SEC says, it is illegal for an attorney and a non-lawyer — such as Aldridge and the 250 investors — to share legal fees. Such fee-splitting "is widely prohibited, and therefore potentially unenforceable."
     Aldridge came up with the idea to market investments in medical litigation in mid-2013, but had trouble finding a lawyer to join him. Before meeting Catipay, he interviewed approximately 100 attorneys, who all "declined because of the ethical prohibition against fee-sharing with non-lawyers," according the complaint.
     After beginning in October 2013, Aldridge and Catipay's venture attracted $11.7 million, generally in small investments ranging from $5,000 to $10,000. The two struck a deal with a personal injury lawyer in Seattle — called "Attorney A" in the complaint — to represent any tort plaintiffs they found and to give their company one-third of any fees he collected.
     But they spent only about a third of the investors' money on looking for tort plaintiffs. And by early this year, those marketing efforts had returned less than $10,000 in attorneys' fees from the plaintiffs, the SEC said.
     The men spent most of the money on themselves. Aldridge withdrew $3.7 million of the investors' money, including $1 million to buy a condo and another $1 million to pay state and federal taxes, the SEC says.
     Catipay took $1.87 million for himself. After a dispute and lawsuit between the partners, Catipay acquired Aldridge's condo in a settlement.
     The SEC seeks freezing of assets, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and civil penalties.
     Attorneys representing Catipay and Aldridge did not return calls seeking comment Monday. 

Thursday, July 31, 2014

Former Rothstein partner Russell Adler gets 2 1/2 years in prison

Former Rothstein partner Russell Adler gets 2 1/2 years in prison

  • print
  • Email
    Share
    81
    Pinterest
    0
Up Next: Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo
River otters were hitting the water slides to beat the summer heatwave on Wednesday at Ichikawa City's Zoological and Botanical Garden. (July 30)

Starts In:

2

Just Watched

Ponzi schemer's partner sentenced to 30 months in prison
Disbarred lawyer and former Scott Rothstein law partner Russell Adler was sentenced to 30 months in prison for making illegal political campaign donations and must surrender in 90 days.
When Russell Adler joined Scott Rothstein's growing Fort Lauderdale practice ten years ago, he insisted the law firm change its name – making it Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, or RRA.
As a judge sentenced him to 2 1/2 years in federal prison on Friday, Adler said the name change was the first of a series of decisions he deeply regrets.
"Being the A in RRA turned into an ironic curse that has ruined my name and haunts and humiliates me to this day," he told the judge.
The law firm went bankrupt in late 2009 when Rothstein's $1.4 billion Ponzi scheme was exposed and all three name partners have now pleaded guilty to committing federal crimes.
Adler, 52, who admitted he illegally funneled campaign donations to Republican presidential and Senate campaigns on Rothstein's behalf, began visibly shaking in court as U.S. District Judge James Cohn announced his punishment.
 
He put his fingers to his eyes and sighed deeply.
When the law firm was "awash with cash" in 2008 and 2009, Judge Cohn wondered aloud what exactly Adler – an experienced attorney and name partner – thought was happening.

Photos: 75 life hacks you need to try immediately

"Mr. Adler was at the epicenter, he was at ground zero. Was he blind and deaf as to what was going on?" the judge asked. "The public needs to see that there is a price to pay for conduct such as this."
The former lawyer, who was permanently disbarred last week, must begin serving his prison term on Sept. 29. Sentencing guidelines recommended a prison term of two to 2 1/2 years, followed by two years of supervised release.
Adler, of Delray Beach and Fort Lauderdale, apologized for his crimes and said he was devastated his 27-year career as a lawyer ended with disbarment.
"I leave my profession in shame and disgrace ... But my wounds are self-inflicted," he said.
The judge asked prosecutors Friday if he should consider Rothstein's Ponzi scheme activities at the law firm in sentencing Adler.
Rothstein gave sworn statements alleging that Adler knew about his investment fraud scheme and helped Rothstein keep it afloat. Adler has always denied those claims.
Adler could not "legally be held responsible for the activities of the Ponzi," said Assistant U.S. Attorney Lawrence LaVecchio. But he noted Adler was involved in other misconduct – including lying to a co-op board in New York City about borrowing money from the law firm to buy an apartment.
Supporters, including Senior Broward Circuit Judge Richard Eade, spoke on Adler's behalf and praised his professionalism, ethics and generosity.
One former client, Mary Haig, told the judge Adler charged no fee when he won a $1.8 million settlement for her daughter, who suffered a traumatic brain injury.
"He treated my daughter like his own," Haig said.
Adler stayed with her daughter in the hospital in 2003 and held her hand when the parents had to briefly leave her side, Haig said.
And a formerly homeless man, Michael Gudewicz, told the judge Adler saved his life when he invited him to be his roommate in the Point of Americas condo on Fort Lauderdale beach where they lived for months, before moving together to Delray Beach.
Those acts of compassion and charity were laudable, the judge said, but there was other issues about Adler's behavior in recent years that caused him concern.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Chicago-based investment adviser Neal Goyal has been charged with defrauding at least 35 investors

Neal Goyal
Chicago-based investment adviser Neal Goyal has been charged with defrauding at least 35 investors out of more than $11.4 million in a Ponzi scheme. (May 28, 2014)
 

The Securities and Exchange Commission has accused Chicago-based investment adviser Neal Goyal of defrauding at least 35 investors out of more than $11.4 million in a Ponzi scheme.

A suit filed Wednesday in Northern District Court alleges that Goyal, who owns Blue Horizon Asset Management LLC and Caldera Advisors LLC never invested the vast majority of the money he raised from investors and the limited trading he did, resulted in losses. 

The SEC also alleges that Goyal used the funds to support his lavish lifestyle and pay business expenses, including a staff trip to the Caribbean, a $1.4 million home and funding for his wife Marti’s clothing boutique, Urba Baby. 

The boutique’s Lincoln Park location closed Tuesday, while the Wicker Park location, on Division St. remains open. 

According to the suit, Goyal raised more than 7.3 million on behalf of the Blue Horizon Funds between January 2007 and May 2014. Caldera’s other investment vehicle, known as the Caldera Fund, raised at least $3.2 million from investors until February. 

The suit alleges that Goyal employed what is known as a “long-short” trading strategy, meaning that the funds would purchase certain equity securities while selling short other equity securities. 

The suit claims that Caldera represented that the funds consistently outperformed the stock market.

The suit alleges that Goyal created and sent investors fictitious account statements for the funds they invested in. In 2007, when investors sought to cash out of the fund, the SEC claims that Goyal made payments to investors based on inflated amounts represented in account statement. 

The SEC is requesting a jury trial and that Goyal return the money to investors and appropriate penalties. 

Goyal, nor his wife, could not immediately be reached for comment. His attorney, Howard Rosenburg, said that Goyal "has been cooperating with the SEC since the beginning of its inquiry and he expects to continue to cooperate.”

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Madoff employees found guilty in conspiracy case

Editor's note: Your ProbateShark would like the FEDs to go after the Ponzi Scheme used by the Probate Court of Cook County. This Shark will provide a ready list of prime guilty suspects.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Madoff employees found guilty in conspiracy case

  •                        

Five former aides to investment manager Bernard Madoff were convicted on Monday of charges that they helped their boss conceal his multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme for years. A federal jury in New York found back-office director Daniel Bonventre, portfolio managers Annette Bongiorno and Joann Crupi, and computer programmers Jerome O'Hara and George Perez guilty on all counts, including securities fraud and conspiracy to defraud clients.
The trial lasted more than five months. The five defendants will be sentenced in late July.
"'These five defendants played crucial roles in constructing and maintaining the house of cards that was the Madoff investment fraud," U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement. "The scheme these defendants helped perpetrate cost innumerable investors their life savings. Now it likely will cost the defendants their freedom."
Madoff, 75, is serving a 150-year-prison sentence after pleading guilty in March 2009 to charges stemming from a Ponzi scheme that is estimated to have cost investors more than $17 billion of principal. He was arrested in December 2008.
Nine other people have pleaded guilty in connection with Madoff's fraud, some of whom testified at the trial as cooperating government witnesses.
As the verdict was read in court, there was no visible reaction from the defendants, who faced among them a total of 31 counts from securities fraud to tax evasion.
The list of Bernard Madoff's victims now includes these five former employees, Andrew Frisch, a lawyer for Bonventre, said after the verdict, adding that he plans to appeal.
At the trial, prosecutors introduced as evidence thousands of pages of internal documents seized from Madoff's investment firm and called dozens of witnesses.
Madoff's right-hand man, Frank DiPascali, testified as part of a plea deal with the government and implicated each of the five defendants in the fraud. Defense lawyers urged the jury to disregard his testimony, calling him an inveterate liar desperate to avoid a lifelong prison term.
But several jurors interviewed after the verdict said they found DiPascali credible. <> "It was pretty captivating," said Sheila Amato, an art teacher.
Jurors scoffed at the testimony of Bongiorno and Bonventre, who surprised trail watchers by taking the stand in their own defense and denying knowing about any fraud.
"They should be embarrassed," said Nancy Goldberg, an instructional assistant for at-risk public school students. She said their testimony was simply not believable.
While there was little dispute that various defendants engaged in activities such as backdating fake trades and creating false documents, the case turned on whether they knew at the time that they were aiding Madoff's fraud.
The defendants had said Madoff duped them into becoming unwitting accomplices. Madoff, they said, created silos inside the firm to ensure that no aide could see the entire picture and used his considerable charm to keep them in the dark.
"Why wouldn't she believe him?' Roland Riopelle, the lawyer for Bongiorno, said during his closing argument, arguing that Madoff convinced her that backdating trades was allowed. "He was the head of the firm and the chairman of NASDAQ. She was by design, by Mr. Madoff's design, living in her own little bubble."
But prosecutors pointed to reams of documents, many featuring handwritten notes from the defendants, as clear evidence the defendants knew what was happening.
The notion that these defendants didn't know the trading was fake is an absurdity, Assistant U.S. Attorney Randall Jackson said at the end of the trial.
Asked whether the defense could have anything differently, Eric Breslin, a lawyer for Crupi, said, "Madoff was a tall mountain to climb."

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Rothstein Estate Gets Revenue From Versace Mansion Auction

Rothstein Estate Gets Revenue From Versace Mansion Auction

Law360, Miami (September 18, 2013, 4:39 PM ET) -- Almost $700,000 of the $41.5 million sale price of Gianni Versace's former South Beach mansion will go toward the estate of Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein's law firm, an attorney for the mansion's owner told a Florida bankruptcy court Wednesday.

Lawrence Pecan of Marshall Socarras Grant PL told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Laurel M. Isicoff that the estate of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA would receive $692,109 of the auction proceeds under a deal hammered out in January settling a $4.92 million secured claim asserted by the law firm's...

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Madoff was in 'love triangle' with employee: U.S. prosecutors

Editor's note: FEDs: Maybe if you pinch one or two of the crooked Probate Court of Cook County judges involved in the ongoing fraud...?  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Madoff was in 'love triangle' with employee: U.S. prosecutors

  •        
  • Email
    Share
    17
Bernard Madoff arrives home after a hearing at Federal Court, in New York
"Bernie" Madoff arrives home after a hearing at Federal Court in New York in 2009. (Chip East/Reuters / January 5, 2009)
 

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Bernard Madoff was in a "love triangle" involving one of five former employees who are about to go on trial for helping him run his multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme, prosecutors said.

Madoff pleaded guilty in March 2009 to running a fraud of up to $65 billion at his investment firm and is serving a 150-year prison sentence.

While Madoff said he acted alone, prosecutors have since charged 13 individuals in connection with the fraud. Five of them - two women and three men - are set to go on trial in federal court in New York on October 7.

In a filing with the court on Thursday, prosecutors said the married Madoff was involved with one of the five but did not give a name.

All but one of the defendants were at one time involved in relationships with each other, and one had a relationship with Madoff, the prosecutors said.

"For example, one of the defendants was in a love triangle with Bernard Madoff himself," prosecutors said.

In the filing, the office of Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney for Manhattan, said prosecutors had gathered "inflammatory" evidence of romantic and sexual relationships between employees and customers, including between defendants and witnesses in the upcoming trial.

If the judge finds evidence of past relationships are admissible, defendants and witnesses should be prepared for details to be elicited during the government's case, the motion said.

A former lawyer for Madoff declined to comment.

Eric Breslin, a lawyer for former investment advisory employee Joann Crupi, said he didn't know which defendant was in the purported "love triangle."

"It's just kind of strange," Breslin said of the filing.

Besides Crupi, the defendants include former operations manager Daniel Bonventre, former investment advisory employee Annette Bongiorno, and former computer programmers Jerome O'Hara and George Perez.

Lawyers for the other defendants either did not respond to requests for comment or declined to comment. A spokeswoman for Bharara did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a hearing on Friday, Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied a request by lawyers for the five former employees to delay the trial for two months because of a new indictment filed by prosecutors last week.

The case is USA v. O'Hara et al, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 10-0228.

(Reporting by Nate Raymond; Editing by Kenneth Barry)

Friday, May 17, 2013

Dan Harkey Fraud Trial in Progress

Dan Harkey Fraud Trial in Progress
[Note:  Feb. 18, 2009: Orange County Real Estate Lender Dan Harkey is accused of bilking investors,alleging he "exaggerated the value of properties used as collateral by borrowers," bilking dozens of investors out of more than $15 million.   Harkey denied wrongdoing, blaming the downturn in the real estate and financial markets. 

Many victims of this scheme were elderly.]

Harkey:  Investor Losses Caused by "Catastrophic Change in Market"
Point Center Financial continued collecting millions of dollars in fees on foreclosed loans while refusing to let investors withdraw their money, founder Dan Harkey admitted on the witness stand this week.

Harkey blamed a "catastrophic change in the market" for massive losses that landed him in court.

Investors are suing Harkey, his wife, Assemblywoman Diane Harkey, R-Dana Point, and his Aliso Viejo company, Point Center Financial, for $43 million in Orange County Superior Court.

The fraud trial, now in its fourth week, is expected to last into June.

Full Article and Source:
Harkey:Investor Losses Caused by "Catastrophic Change in Market

Source and for more information:
PointCenterInvestigation.com

READ the complaint


Friday, April 5, 2013

Midwest City estate planner sentenced to 10 years in prison for role in Ponzi scheme

Editor’s note: FEDs; Where is the Sheriff of LaSalle Street? In the kleptocracy formed by the coalition of crooked judges, greedy lawyers, medical whores and unethical nursing homes in the Probate Court of Cook County, these ideas are neutralized. The new cottage industry of the 21th Century is looting the estates of the disabled, the infirm, the elderly and then 'killing them off' while the 'judicial officials reap the benefits of public employment. This new industry is in full production in the Probate Court of Cook County. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

Midwest City estate planner sentenced to 10 years in prison for role in Ponzi scheme

Defendant, who fled to Philippines after 2011 federal indictment, was arrested in Manila last year.

By Brianna Bailey | Published: March 28, 2013
 
A federal judge has sentenced a Midwest City man who conned seniors out of their savings to serve nearly 10 years in prison and pay $4.6 million in restitution for his role in the Ponzi scheme.


Joe Don Johnson, 43, was an estate planner who drew up wills for his elder clients. He would convince the seniors to invest their life savings with the now-defunct Oklahoma City-based company Global West Funding Ltd., operated by Brian McKye.
Johnson promised his clients returns as high as 20 percent, but the bulk of the money went to pay off earlier investors, commissions to Johnson and other salesmen, as well as McKye's personal expenses, according to court documents.
While Johnson's victims said they were happy on Tuesday that Johnson had received a lengthy prison sentence, they have little hope they ever will receive restitution.
Moore resident Bonnie Cory, 73, a retired computer assembly worker, lost $45,000 she invested with Johnson and McKye. Since the Ponzi scheme was uncovered, Cory has had only about $900 returned to her through a receiver after the Oklahoma Securities Department froze all of McKye's assets.
“I'm sure I won't get nothing more out of it — I won't live that long,” Cory said.
Oklahoma City resident Vaden Wheeler, 95, invested about $200,000 with Johnson, but has received only about $4,000 back.

http://newsok.com/midwest-city-estate-planner-sentenced-to-10-years-in-prison-for-role-in-ponzi-scheme/article/3774995

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Lawyer strikes plea deal in bilking of widow


Lawyer strikes plea deal in bilking of widow

Posted: March 14, 2013
Cherry Hill lawyer Michael Kwasnik, under federal investigation in an alleged $8.5 million Ponzi scheme, has pleaded guilty to state money-laundering charges in the theft of $1.1 million from a 96-year-old widow.
The New Jersey Attorney General's Office said that under the plea agreement, signed quietly in late January, Kwasnik will repay the estate of the Cherry Hill woman, who died sometime after he was indicted on Nov. 7, 2011.
Kwasnik remains the focus of a federal criminal probe into the scheme that authorities say was used to bilk dozens of elderly victims.
"The plea agreement does not in any way affect any potential criminal charges that would be filed in connection with the Ponzi scheme," said Peter Aseltine, a spokesman for Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa.
Kwasnik is scheduled for sentencing May 10 before Superior Court Judge Irvin J. Snyder. He will serve no time beyond the five months he spent in the Camden County Jail after his arrest. He agreed to repay the estate by the end of his up-to-five-year probationary period, the Attorney General's Office said.
Kwasnik also pleaded guilty to charges of money laundering in connection with the misappropriation of $112,000 from an insurance settlement for a Williamstown couple. The couple were clients of Kwasnik's firm, Kwasnik, Kanowitz & Associates. He agreed to repay that amount by the time of his 10 sentencing.
Kwasnik was an unsuccessful candidate for the New Jersey Assembly in the 1995 general election as a Democrat.
A few days after his indictment, he was arrested Nov. 10, 2011, at a bus station in Dothan, Ala.
Kwasnik's arrest closely followed a report in The Inquirer detailing allegations by former legal clients that he had misappropriated millions of dollars that they had invested with him. In many instances, the former clients and investors said they had given Kwasnik virtually all the money they had.
Kwasnik had long been on the radar of securities and attorney regulators in New Jersey.
Clients had filed ethics complaints against him as early as 2007, and the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics had completed preliminary investigations of Kwasnik's conduct and concluded he had engaged in "fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, and dishonesty."
Officials of Liberty Bell Bank, a community bank in Evesham where Kwasnik was one of a group of founding investors, concluded that he used client funds deposited at the bank to cover shortfalls at his law firm. The officials reported the transactions to the Office of Attorney Ethics.
In a civil suit filed shortly before Kwasnik's indictment, state Attorney General Paula Dow accused Kwasnik and several associates of running a Ponzi scheme through a company named Liberty State Benefits. The suit charged that of the $13.5 million raised for investments in the company, millions were paid directly to Kwasnik, his law firm, or members of his family. Those transactions are at the heart of the federal investigation.


Contact Chris Mondics at 215-854-5957 or cmondics@phillynews.com.

http://articles.philly.com/2013-03-14/business/37717209_1_liberty-state-benefits-michael-kwasnik-ponzi-scheme

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Former Chicagoan gets 12 years in stock, tax fraud

Editor’s note: FEDs, why do you indict Cho and let the criminals in the Probate Court of Cook County continue to rob the dead, dying, disabled and aged every day??? Why don’t you at least question the victims? Take statements? You know who the victims are. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

Former Chicagoan gets 12 years in stock, tax fraud

By Samantha Bomkamp
Tribune reporter
2:59 PM CST, January 18, 2013
 
A former Chicago man was sentenced to 12 years in federal prison Friday for running an investment scheme that officials say defrauded investors out of millions of dollars.

The Acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois said Randy M. Cho, most recently of Seattle, tricked 57 investors out of about $8 million through phony stock investments from 2001 to 2009. Cho, claiming to be a self-employed securities trader, took $9.6 million from investors and made about $1.7 million in Ponzi scheme-type payments to previous investors, officials said.

Cho claimed to have access to stocks in many well-known companies before their initial public offerings, officials said, including AOL/Time Warner Inc., Google Inc. and Facebook Inc.

Officials also said he failed to report additional income between 2004 and 2007, underpaying federal income taxes by about $1.5 million.

Cho pleaded guilty to wire and tax fraud in August after being indicted in December 2010.

sbomkamp@tribune.com | @SamWillTravel

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-former-chicagoan-gets-12-years-in-stock-tax-fraud-20130118,0,5298392.story

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Prominent Milwaukee lawyer loses license for misuse of funds

Prominent Milwaukee lawyer loses license for misuse of funds



After practicing law for more than a half century and being president of one Milwaukee's better known law firms, Joseph W. Weigel will be leaving the profession next year as a disbarred lawyer.
The state Supreme Court Wednesday unanimously agreed to revoke Weigel's law license for misusing client funds by using the money to pay vendors or other clients. Special prosecutor Paul Schwarzenbart has argued that Weigel ran the firm's client trust account like a Ponzi scheme. That is, Weigel, 77, ran hundreds of millions of dollars through the fund and used money won in new cases to pay off clients in older cases. Others, such as consultants and experts who assisted in cases, went unpaid.
"A six or seven figure deficit in an account that holds client funds is an ethical failure of epic proportions," the court said in its 37-page decision.
Schwarzenbart has handled the case since 2006 because Weigel's son, William Weigel, is a top official at the court's Office of Lawyer Regulation and he often is involved in prosecutions of lawyers who violate ethical rules. Schwarzenbart made all decisions in the Joseph Weigel case and did not consult William Weigel or other agency officials, said Keith Sellen, agency director.
The Journal Sentinel first reported on the sluggish pace of the Weigel investigation in April 2011 as part of its Bar None series of stories about Wisconsin's slow-moving and often lenient attorney disciplinary system. This year, a committee appointed by the Supreme Court called for toughening the disciplinary rules to allow for attorneys who commit felonies or other egregious acts to be disbarred for life. There has been no action taken as a result of the committee recommendation, however.
Currently, revoked or disbarred attorneys can apply to be readmitted to the bar after five years. The Supreme Court last rejected a call for lifetime disbarments in 2010.
As a result of the revocation, Weigel will not be able to receive any profits generated by his firm - Weigel, Carlson, Blau & Clemens - after Feb. 1, the date that his disbarment takes effect, according to court rules. The west side personal injury firm aggressively markets itself to central city residents for much of its business. It uses former Green Bay Packers safety LeRoy Butler as a celebrity spokesman to promote its tagline, "Don't drop the ball. Make the call."
The court's action makes it unclear whether Weigel's name could even remain on the firm's masthead.
Weigel owns about one-third of the law firm, which he purchased with two other lawyers in about 1990.
Earlier this year, the court reprimanded Weigel for continuing to use the name Eisenberg in his firm's title long after Alvin Eisenberg, the firm's founder, had been pushed out by Weigel and his partners. The court found that Weigel hired an attorney by the name of Donald Eisenberg as a pretext for keeping the Eisenberg moniker in the firm's title.
Weigel did not return calls left at his home and law firm Wednesday, and Terry Johnson, his attorney, declined to comment. Other partners at the firm also did not return calls for comment.
The action against Weigel is unusual both because of Weigel's prominence and the level of wrongdoing the court said occurred.
"It's a rare phenomenon for a name partner of a midsized law firm to have his or her license revoked," said Peter Rofes, a Marquette University law professor and an expert in legal ethics.
The court rejected Weigel's arguments that his motives in running the trust account were selfless and that he was attempting to remedy a situation he inherited when he bought into the firm. Weigel argued he was trying to gradually pay off the deficit.
But the court said that "profit motives as well as selfish motives led to Attorney Weigel's decision to try to hide the trust account problems for many years rather than acknowledging the problems and dealing with them in an appropriate fashion."
The court concluded "any sanctions less than revocation would undermine the public's confidence in the honesty and integrity of the bar."
Weigel tried to avoid the disciplinary action, asking the court in 2008 to allow him to voluntarily revoke his license. The court rejected the petition in April 2009.
"He knew he would be here someday," Johnson told the court last fall in explaining why his client filed the petition. "He knew he would face discipline. At his age given everything else . . . he was prepared to . . . simply surrender his license."
In addition to disbarring Weigel, the court ordered him to pay the $24,309 in costs incurred since Schwarzenbart filed the revocation complaint last year.

© 2013, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/weigel20-fh83k1i-184189041.html