The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the appeal of former Luzerne County Judge Mark A. Ciavarella Jr., according to an order posted Monday morning on the high court’s website.
Ciavarella, jailed for 28 years on corruption charges, has now exhausted all his appeals options. The only thing he and his attorneys can do now is ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision, something his attorneys don't plan to do.
ARCHIVE: Stories, documents, videos from Ciavarella's trial The ex-judge’s appeal was a long shot and denial was likely, Ciavarella’s attorneys previously said, since the Supreme Court only hears about 75 of the 10,000 cases each year it is asked to consider.
The court did not give a reason for denying the appeal. Ciavarella case was just listed under a heading of "CERTIORARI DENIED."
“Are we disappointed? Sure we are. But we understand the Supreme Court takes very few cases in the course of the year,” said attorney Al Flora Jr., who represented Ciavarella along with attorney William Ruzzo. “I know it’s very difficult to get cases before the court. We gave it our best effort, and that’s all that could be expected.”
Flora said he sent Ciavarella an email notifying him of the decision. Ciavarella remains jailed at Federal Correctional Institution at Pekin, a medium security facility in Pekin, Ill.
U.S. Attorney Peter J. Smith, whose office prosecuted Ciavarella, said the U.S. Supreme Court's denial of the ex-judge’s appeal validated a solid prosecution.
“We’re very pleased with the Supreme Court decision not to hear his appeal. We thought his case was very well presented and the outcome was appropriate,” Smith said in a telephone call Monday afternoon.
“This was a terrible experience for Luzerne County and the community, but we think the outcome as far as the verdict, sentence and outcome of the appeal are appropriate under all the circumstances.”
While Ciavarella’s direct appeals are over, he can still mount post-conviction appeals with the U.S. District Court, which heard his trial in 2011, Flora said.
But he’d likely be doing so with new attorneys, Flora said.
“For all practical purposes, in terms of filling our obligation, our obligation is complete,” Flora said. “Billy Ruzzo and I did our best to advocate on his behalf. That’s why we stayed on this case from the beginning.’’
A jury convicted Ciavarella in February 2011 on 12 of 39 counts, including racketeering and conspiracy, on allegations he conspired with a former colleague to shutter a county-run juvenile detention center and funnel youths to for-profit detention centers while accepting cash payments.
Ciavarella, 63, and former judge Michael T. Conahan were accused of failing to report $2.1 million paid by Robert K. Mericle, whose construction company built the detention centers in Pittston Township and Butler County, and accused of taking $770,000 in kickbacks from attorney Robert Powell, who co-owned the facilities.
The rules of the Supreme Court detail what happens when it declines to hear an appeal or, as it's legally known, denies a writ of certiorari:
“Whenever the Court denies a petition for a writ of certiorari, the Clerk will prepare, sign, and enter an order to that effect and will notify forthwith counsel of record and the court whose judgment was sought to be reviewed,” the rules say. “The order of denial will not be suspended pending disposition of a petition for rehearing except by order of the Court or a Justice.”
After Ciavarella was convicted at trial in federal court in Scranton, he appealed to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeals court declined to overturn the ex-judge’s conviction or sentence in May 2013. Attorneys for the disgraced judge appealed to the nation’s highest court in October.
In a 32-page document filed with the Supreme Court, Ciavarella’s attorneys had listed three reasons why the justices should hear Ciavarella’s case:
> U.S. District Court Judge Edwin M. Kosik, who rejected Ciavarella’s initial plea agreement that called for an 87-month prison sentence and later hammered him with 28 years after a trial, was biased toward Ciavarella as evidenced in letters he wrote to citizens and comments he made to a reporter.
> Ciavarella’s racketeering convictions all relate to a single January 2003 payment by Mericle, which fell outside of the five-year statute of limitation. The attorneys say U.S. District Court and the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, both of which rejected past appeals on the matter, erred in ruling Ciavarella waived this as an appellate issue because it wasn’t addressed at trial.
> Although a jury acquitted Ciavarella on a majority of the charges, Kosik considered all the alleged crimes for sentencing purposes by using the “preponderance of the evidence” threshold, which doubled the sentencing guidelines Kosik used to form Ciavarella’s punishment.
The Supreme Court’s decision, effectively cementing the fate of Ciavarella, comes at a time a movie about the judicial scandal “Kids for Cash” opens in theatres around the nation.
Ciavarella's projected release date is Dec. 30, 2035, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons website.
“The consequences for the defendant in this case were severe, but his crimes were severe and the impact on Luzerne County was severe,” Smith said.
After Ciavarella was first charged in January 2009, federal prosecutors continued an ongoing public corruption probe that snared more than 30 people, most of them elected officials. Smith said he hopes all the prosecutions, including Ciavarella’s, made a difference in the community and helped deter corruption.
“We’re always going to hopefully be able to pursue any allegations of corruption. And that’s going to continue,” Smith said. “If there is any change for the better as a result of this case, that will be one good outcome.”
Smith said his office worked closely with the U.S. Solicitor General’s Office to file a response after Ciavarella’s attorney filed an application for an appeal with the Supreme Court.
“We're happy the government prevailed,” Smith said. “The trial team and investigators worked long and hard on this case.”
Since Ciavarella could file post-conviction appeals with lower courts regarding different issues, Smith was reluctant to say the case is over.
“It’s probably premature to say this is the end,” Smith said. “But we’re pleased with the outcome.”
bkalinowski@citizensvoice.com, 570-821-2055 @cvbobkal
CIAVARELLA TIMELINE
November 1995: Ciavarella first elected to the Luzerne County bench.
January 2002: Ciavarella named juvenile court judge by President Judge Michael T. Conahan.
Oct. 9, 2002: Conahan announces closing of county-owned juvenile detention center.
January 2003: First $1 million payment to Ciavarella and Conahan from Robert K. Mericle, builder of a private juvenile detention center, PA Child Care center, in Pittston Township.
Feb. 5, 2003: County begins placing juveniles in PA Child Care center.
January 2004: PA Child Care co-owner Robert J. Powell makes first of $770,000 in payments to judges.
July 2005: Second $1 million payment from Mericle after a second juvenile detention center is built in western Pennsylvania.
January 2006: Ciavarella elected president judge by his peers.
May 2008: Amid criticisms of his practices and investigation, Ciavarella removes self as juvenile court judge.
May 29, 2008: A Citizens Voice’ investigation reveals financial interest between judges and Powell in Mountain Top housing project.
Jan. 26, 2009: Ciavarella and Conahan charged, agree to plead guilty and serve 87 months.
March 12, 2009: Ciavarella resigns from the bench. Conahan had already retired.
July 31, 2009: Federal judge rejects the plea agreements.
Sept. 9, 2009: Grand jury indicts the former judges on 48 counts.
July 23, 2010: Conahan pleads guilty.
Feb. 18, 2011: A jury finds Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and other charges.
Aug. 11, 2011: Ciavarella sentenced to 28 years in federal prison.
Sept. 23, 2011: Conahan sentenced to 17½ years in federal prison.
May 24, 2013: Federal appeals court upholds Ciavarella’s conviction and sentence.
Oct. 28, 2013: Ciavarella files appeal with U.S. Supreme Court
March 3, 2014: U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear Ciavarella appeal
DA says killing was Pal's choice; defense says Pal had no idea
