Showing posts with label Arizona. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arizona. Show all posts

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Assisted living home manager Bianca Gilmore explains refund policies after complaints

Editor's note: Your ProbateShark believes that the thieves running the Probate Court of Cook County do not have a refund policy.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

Assisted living home manager Bianca Gilmore explains refund policies after complaints


CHANDLER, AZ - The owner of two Valley assisted living facilities is addressing allegations that she withheld security deposits after clients passed away.

Two people complained to us, that they couldn't get theirs from owner Bianca Gilmore.

Val Bongiorno's dad stayed at Gilmore's facility Casa Dora Manor in Chandler.

"It's very poetic he died, on his 63rd anniversary," said Bongiorno.

When his dad passed, he says he asked for the $4,500 security deposit back .

But says he got a check that was no good.

"When it bounced, 'I said what's going on here?," said Bongiorno.

We also heard from Beverly.

She asked for a $4,000 security deposit back after her aunt died. She was living at Gilmore's Casa Maia facility also in Chandler.

Beverly says Gilmore only offered $3,000.

So both Beverly and Bongiorno complained to the Board of Examiners of Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers . The agency regulates assisted living managers.

They also let me know.

We repeatedly reached out to Gilmore about their claims, and recently got detailed explanations. But the answers have been confusing to us.

For example, regarding Bongiorno's refund, in June of 2014 Gilmore sent us an email saying "I did not have a returned check in the amount of $4,500."

However since our last story aired, she writes there was a check and it "was written without regard to the other simultaneous financial commitments made at the time. At that time, there was also a change in financial management."

In January 2015, Gilmore's attorney Raees Mohammad writes "Val may arguably have been entitled to half of his monthly fee, or $2,250." Now in a recent response to us, Gilmore implies Bongiorno was not owed anything per contract, because his dad's death was "unexpected."

After her aunt's death, Beverly says she also asked for a deposit refund of $4000.

In a July 2014 letter to Beverly, Gilmore responded to the request by giving what she called, an "explanation of the refund owed." The letter offers $3,000 instead of $4,000, citing expenses for Gilmore's husband helping Beverly's aunt in moving.

Beverly says a check for $1,500 was enclosed in the letter, with the stipulation that a second check in the amount of $1500 would arrive a month later. But if she cashed them, she would forfeit the additional $1,000 she believes she is owed. Gilmore says she sent both checks.  Beverly says the second check never came and she never cashed the first one.

Beverly also says she responded by offering to allow Gilmore to keep $500 rather than $1,000. Since Gilmore had already sent a check for $1,500, Beverly says she wrote Gilmore a letter asking her to send an additional $2,000 as a remainder of the refund to settle the matter. In it she writes, "I shall be glad to put this matter to rest upon payment of the $2,000 hat I am willing to accept, as full payment."

Beverly says she never got a response from Gilmore about her request.

In recent email to us, Gilmore says "under the agreement, no refunds were due," and that it was simply a "goodwill gesture."  Gilmore also writes "Unfortunately, instead of accepting my goodwill payments, Beverly decided to embarrass and humiliate me, by going on television and making false, disparaging remarks about my businesses and me."

Gilmore also points to a letter Beverly's aunt wrote saying her deposit could be used for her last month there.

But the aunt died just days into that month.

The state Board that regulates assisted living managers investigated Bongiorno and Beverly's complaints, as well as two others involving Gilmore and refunds.

Initially, the Board voted that the complaints had enough "substantial evidence" to go to a formal hearing.

But in February, the Board instead opted to issue "letters of concern."

Saying "while there is insufficient evidence to support disciplinary action, the Board believes that continuation of the activities that led to the investigation may result in further Board action."

It also expressed concern that Gilmore "failed to communicate and resolve financial matters with clients in a timely manner."

It's an accusation Gilmore denies. In a statement to us she writes "the "filed complaints" have all been dismissed, and other than disgruntled family members coming into the picture after their loved one passed away, I cannot posture as to why this sentiment was expressed in the dismissed complaint."

Regarding the refunds, Board Executive Director Allen Imig tells me "the Board has no authority to order restitution."

However after we got involved Gilmore did end up paying Bongiorno $4,500.

Beverly is still fighting.

She's filed a lawsuit asking for a judge to make the call.

In court documents, Gilmore says she plans to counter sue her for defamation.

Gilmore has also threatened to take us to court. She has also asked us to retract "false and defamatory statements."

We stand by our stories and will continue to follow any new developments.

Full Article & Source:
Assisted living home manager Bianca Gilmore explains refund policies after complaints

Monday, April 20, 2015

Disbarred Queen Creek probate attorney gets prison for fraud

Editor's note:  The obvious fraud that took place in the Estate of Alice R. Gore in the Probate Court of Cook County is a prime example why judges and attorneys involved should be imprisoned. But why not? They are protected by a corrupt legal system starting from the Supreme Court's IARDC and working its way down.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Disbarred Queen Creek probate attorney gets prison for fraud

A disbarred Queen Creek probate attorney has been sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison for theft and fraudulent schemes.
 
Maricopa County prosecutors say 69-year-old Rodney Matheson also was sentenced Friday to seven years of supervised probation after serving his prison term.
Matheson was disbarred in September 2013 and arrested by Gilbert police in February 2014.
 
 
He pleaded guilty to one count of theft and one count of fraudulent schemes.
 
Matheson originally was charged with two counts of fraudulent schemes and two counts of theft with investigators accusing him of misappropriating as much as $6 million.
 
Prosecutors accused Matheson of orchestrating a shell game by taking money from two estates to satisfy a court order for payment of $800,000 to the Mayo Clinic, the major beneficiary of a third estate.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Elder abuse: How banks help unsuspecting seniors

 Editor's note: The Estate of Alice R. Gore had a bank representative present at each and every Probate Court of Cook County hearing.  These bankers watched while the judge, GALs and lawyers pillaged Alice's estate.  How can banks help unsuspecting senior?  This Shark does not know.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com


Elder abuse: How banks help unsuspecting seniors


TUCSON (KGUN9-TV) -- Unsuspecting seniors -- scammed out of billions of dollars. It's a growing problem in our state. By 2020 -- it's estimated a quarter of Arizona's population will be elderly.

A reason --The Arizona Attorney General's Office SAFEE (Stop Abuse and Financial Exploitation of Elders) task force held a public awareness campaign on ways banks are stopping this abuse. 

More banks are training tellers because they often get to know their elderly customers -- their routines -- their spending habits. So they can be the first to spot something suspicous.

Case in point.

A teller alerted Tucson Bank Manager Sandi Smithe of a potential scam involving an elderly woman and her gardener. "And she was right at this second window and he was standing next to her and he was instructing her. As she was rifling through her handbag, he said,  'This is the one -- this is the one right here," she said.

It was a $20,000 CD,  a certificate of deposit,  that he wanted her to redeem early and put in her checking account. A red flag -- in banking. So Sandi stepped in. "Oh let me help you with that," she told the elderly woman, "Let's go in my office and chat about this. And I turned around and looked at him and said you need to have a seat right here. Because my objective was I needed to separate these two."  To investigate.

And what she discovered, "He was asking her to buy him furniture, he was asking her to give him money. He was asking for groceries, he was asking her to support his family," she said.

And Sandi noticed something else during the discussion. "She was kind of becoming lucid and then fading -- and then lucid and fading and I realized we have a bigger problem than we thought we had,"  Cognitive decline -- a common issue.

A reason the Arizona Attorney General's Office cracks down on anyone who prey on society's most vunerable -- including those who are the worst offenders -- family members.

"It doesn't matter -- we still make the report to Adult Protective Services," said Sandi Smithe.

So what happened to the gardener? He never got the money and he no longer has contact with the elderly woman.

There's been some concern about banks violating consumer privacy laws, but federal regulators have come up with guidelines for financial institutions.

You can report any suspicious activity  -- call

To report an Emergency Dial 911

Adult Protective Services (APS)-Adult Abuse Hotline:
(877) SOS-ADULT [(877) 767-2385]
TDD: (877) 815-8390
www.azdes.gov/reportadultabuse

Area Agency on Aging - 24-hour Senior HELPLINE:
(602) 264-HELP [(602) 264-4357]

Or call your local police department.

Federal Guidelines on Privacy Laws -- click here.

Full Article & Source:
Elder abuse: How banks help unsuspecting seniors

Monday, May 5, 2014

Disbarred attorney accused of stealing from probate clients

Disbarred attorney accused of stealing from probate clients

SHARE 27 14 4 COMMENTMORE
Eleanor "Dorothy'' Thomas of Tempe lived a good, long life as a minister's wife. She taught high-school English, helped others, loved dogs and always was ready to debate politics until she died last summer at age 94.
But court records and Thomas' confidants point to one major mistake she might have made in her life — hiring Rodney M. Matheson, a now-disbarred Queen Creek probate attorney, to handle her estate.
About $1.2 million of Thomas' estate was supposed to go to a University of Arizona cancer research fund in memory of Dorothy and her late husband, David. But the money never was paid to the ­University of Arizona Foundation, according to court records.
Matheson, 69, was disbarred in September 2013 and arrested by Gilbert police in February. He is charged with two counts of fraudulent schemes and two counts of theft, with investigators accusing him of misappropriating as much as $6 million.
Prosecutors accused Matheson of orchestrating an elaborate shell game by taking money from two estates to satisfy a court order for payment of $800,000 to the Mayo Clinic, the major beneficiary of a third estate, according to court documents.
Lawyers are fighting in the courts for repayment of funds to the proper beneficiaries, if the money can be located. And Lee Stein, Matheson's new criminal attorney, has received more time to evaluate the complicated case and challenge his indictment.
Stein said it would be inappropriate to comment while a criminal case is pending.
Bonnie Rabin of Tucson said Thomas recommended Matheson to all her friends at Friendship ­Village, an upscale retirement community in Tempe.
"She was so thrilled with him. She said, 'He doesn't even charge me,' " Rabin said.
But Thomas and other clients could not have envisioned the ­misconduct Matheson is accused of committing while handling their trusts.
A Gilbert police detective estimated that as much as $6 million was stolen from three trusts and beneficiaries of deceased people. Attorneys working on the case unraveled the alleged thefts by subpoenaing an escrow account that probate lawyers use in administering estates and by combing through financial records, according to court documents. But even they concede that no one knows for certain how much money might have been misappropriated.
Matheson has been released on a $1 million bond and has a trial date set in October.
The case against Matheson started to emerge when Mayo Clinic filed a civil suit to collect $1.2 million left to the hospital as a beneficiary by the Mary Jane Schalow Trust. Maricopa County Superior Court Commissioner Rick Nothwehr started asking questions, as did Judge Andrew Klein, who took over the case.
Court records say Nothwehr and Klein were not satisfied with Matheson's answers on how he administered the trust. Klein eventually instructed Clare Black, a Gilbert attorney who discovered the reported misappropriations after she subpoenaed Matheson's financial records, to file a State Bar of Arizona complaint against Matheson, in addition to filing a police ­report, according to records.
At one point, Nothwehr ordered Matheson to make an $800,000 payment from the Schalow Trust to the Mayo Clinic, according to court documents.
The state Bar investigation found that more than $1 million had been depleted from the Schalow Trust by Matheson, Arizona Assistant Attorney General Joseph Waters wrote in court documents.
Wells Fargo bank records show "the defendant wrote himself checks totaling $988,231.40 as fees for work he claimed to complete for his various clients," even though an audit found he should not have received most of the fees, Waters wrote.
Matheson was acting as an attorney for St. Paul, Minn., resident Roger Manthey in late 2007 or early 2008 when Matheson told Manthey that administration of the trust was virtually complete, ­according to records.
But Manthey ended up as the initial target of Mayo's efforts to collect the money and Nothwehr issued a fiduciary warrant for his arrest at one point. Manthey wrote in court records that he had no idea that Mayo never received the money from his aunt's estate —or that he had been sued— because Matheson never informed him.
Manthey declined comment, citing the criminal case against Matheson, but he made his feelings clear in court records that are ­included in the probate case.
"This whole experience has been very troublesome to me," Manthey wrote. "I am unable to sleep, and I have a constant knot in my stomach. I am a well-respected, retired school teacher who has always tried to do the right thing."
When a court commissioner ­ordered Matheson to verify that Manthey was the source of a $500,000 payment to the Mayo ­clinic, Matheson produced a letter from Manthey as affirmation, but Manthey had no idea what was ­going on in Arizona, according to records.
"Mr. Matheson went as far to create a false letter from Mr. Manthey that he placed in his file that was allegedly provided with the $500,000 payment," Black wrote in the Bar complaint.
Instead, Matheson used funds from the Loehndorf Trust, another estate he administered, to make a $500,000 payment to the Mayo Clinic, according to Waters' court document. Suspicious about the source of the money, Mayo Clinic eventually turned over the funds to Superior Court for safekeeping, according to court documents. A spokesman for the Mayo Clinic ­declined to comment.
The courts are now attempting to sort out where all the money went and to return it to the rightful owners. On March 12, Klein ordered $337,500 that was misappropriated from the Loehndorf Trust returned to its owners.
The criminal charges against Matheson are unrelated to the Thomas Trust, which was left to the cancer research fund. Tucson attorney Lindsay Brew, who represents the University of Arizona Foundation, wrote in court documents that Matheson also misappropriated $1.2 million from the Thomas Trust to pay off his debts from the depleted Schalow Trust to Mayo Clinic.
Brew wrote in court records that he is seeking repayment of $162,500 that he says was misappropriated from the Thomas Trust. Brew also is arguing that Matheson filed a bogus addendum to Thomas' will shortly before her death, cutting out the University of Arizona and naming Matheson as beneficiary.
Tom Asimou, a probate attorney not involved in the Matheson matter, said he has seen similar cases every few years and his advice is simple:
■ If you don't think your attorney is giving a straight answer, get another attorney to take the matter before a judge
■ Name a bank as either trustee or personal representative of the trust
■ The bank will charge a fee but it also provides protection against stolen funds
"People get penny-wise and pound foolish with these things," Asimou said.

Monday, April 21, 2014

Suspended lawyer seeks removal of disciplinary judge

Suspended lawyer seeks removal of disciplinary judge

SHARE 24 3 COMMENTMORE
A suspended lawyer who practiced law extensively in the gay community and who is fighting additional state Bar allegations argued Wednesday that Arizona's top disciplinary judge should be removed from her case because he is biased against gays.
Jane O. Ross testified that presiding Disciplinary Judge William "Bill" O'Neil violated her rights and manipulated a previous disciplinary case against her because she is a lesbian who challenges judicial authority and fought for an anti-discrimination rule on behalf of gay lawyers.
"It is exactly that discrimination I'm alleging," Ross said during a hearing to determine whether O'Neil should be disqualified from the case. "I pushed both of his buttons. ... I challenged judges, and I'm homosexual."
Related: Divorce case stirs ethics allegations about judge
O'Neil did not file a written response to Ross' motion or appear during proceedings before Judge Glenn Davis, who was brought out of retirement to conduct the hearing.
Hunter Perlmeter, staff counsel for the state Bar, said in a closing argument that Ross elicited hearsay statements that were "incredibly inflammatory" but failed to produce credible evidence of bias.
Ross received a four-year suspension of her law license after a hearing before O'Neil in March 2013. She was found guilty of improperly pressuring a client, signing a false document and other unethical conduct. She faces new charges for allegedly practicing law while under suspension, which she denies.
In her motion, Ross accused O'Neil of "illegal conduct" and conflicts in his business, personal and judicial affairs. She argued that his behavior reflects "a pattern of corruption, failure to uphold due process, failure to acknowledge conflicts of interest" and other ethical breaches.
During the hearing, Davis refused to allow testimony about O'Neil's integrity except as directly related to the bias allegation. Davis said other issues should be considered by the Bar or Commission on Judicial Conduct, which already has dismissed many of the accusations in Ross' motion.
Casa Grande resident Mark Dixon, who characterized himself as a former friend of O'Neil's, testified that the judge views gays and lesbians as sinful and repulsive based on evangelical Christian beliefs.
Davis said he will rule on the request at a later date.

Friday, March 7, 2014

ABC15 undercover investigation: Filthy conditions, bed bugs at assisted living facility

ABC15 undercover investigation: Filthy conditions, bed bugs at assisted living facility

An undercover ABC15 investigation has found filthy living conditions, bed bugs and allegations of resident neglect at a Valley assisted living facility that gets thousands of taxpayer dollars a month.
The Lodge at 14th Street houses more than 30 residents who have mental illness, physical disabilities, or both. Many of the residents are on Medicaid.
The ABC15 Investigators went undercover and also obtained photos from people inside the facility. The photos and video show evidence of past and current bug issues, filthy mattresses with stains of dead bed bugs and blood, and residents in tattered and dirty clothing.
Click on the photo tab above to see undercover photos
“I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Mike Wright, an attorney with the firm Udall Shumway, who’s handled hundreds of abuse and neglect cases involving assisted living and nursing homes.
“This is highly unusual. It’s heartbreaking,” he said.
Insider Speaks Out
ABC15 interviewed a staff member who worked directly with the residents. When asked how The Lodge compares to other facilities, the staff member said, “This is the worst I’ve ever seen, ever, by far.”
The Lodge at 14th Street is licensed as a “directed care” facility. The Arizona Department of Health Services states that type of facility provides “programs and services, including personal care services, provided to persons who are incapable of recognizing danger, summoning assistance, expressing need or making basic care decisions.”
Some of the The Lodge’s residents need help with things taking medications, using the bathroom and feeding.
“They live like they are homeless,” the staff member said. “The floors are not clean. On the walls, you can see yellow and black stains. It’s just disgusting.”
The staff member and residents told us that only one or two caregivers work at any given time for all of the patients.
“That’s very low staffing, extremely low,” Wright said. “I think most assisted care facilities will have two caregivers for 10 patients. Maybe at night they will have one caregiver. Thirty patients to one caregiver, I’ve never seen that kind of a staffing level.“
One Resident’s Story
The ABC15 Investigators were invited into the facility by a resident named James. He has physical disabilities. ABC15 agreed not to use his last name.
James said he’s lived at The Lodge for two years and agreed to take us inside to show us his room.
We asked James what it was like to live there. He told us, it was “hell.”
James flipped his mattress and showed us a blood spot and dead bed bugs. He also opened a small container where he was keeping bed bugs he caught the day before.
James’ room was extremely dirty. He told us he couldn’t remember the last time it was cleaned.
“I’m living in bed bugs, just living in torment,” he said.
The staff member we spoke to said many of the residents have no one to turn to. “No one is listening. A lot of them have no family. They don’t have a voice.”
The Owner Responds
The Lodge’s owner and CEO is Austin Coggins.
Coggins said he’s owned the facility for several years. Coggins said some of his population is transient, and he takes in residents other places won’t.
Coggins denied any neglect.
“We deal with behavioral health,” he said. “We deal with some really tough residents here as far as behaviors go.”
Coggins said that they have a daily housekeeping service and regularly spray for bugs.
When we showed him the pictures of a mattress that appeared to have an issue with bed bugs, he told us, “Those are stains of bugs that have been killed. Those are not active bugs. See when the bugs are sprayed it leaves a stain on the mattress. Actually, that mattress should have been thrown out.”
After we spoke with Coggins, ABC15 learned that he had The Lodge sprayed for bugs and replaced mattresses at the facility for some residents.
A History of Issues
State inspection records show The Lodge has had problems in the past.
In 2007, inspectors cited 51 deficiencies in 15 different areas. As a result, the facility’s manager, Steven Martin, was disciplined and placed on probation.
Martin’s “actions, or lack thereof, fell below the Standard of Care for Managers and could have caused harm to the residents and the public,” according to a decision by The Arizona State Board of Examiners of Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers.
Coggins said he still employs Martin.
More recently, the state found the facility had issues with medication administration and bed bugs. But no further action was taken.
Search state inspection history and complaints for The Lodge and other assisted living facilities.
Taxpayer Funded
Coggins said that the majority of the residents are on Medicaid. But he wouldn’t comment on the amount of income he brings in.
Attorney Mike Wright said most assisted living centers take in between $2,500 and $4,000 per Medicaid patient per month.
“They have good revenue, they ought to be able to provide,” he said. “This is a lousy facility just by looking at the pictures. And hearing about the staffing levels, there ought to be something done.”
Contact ABC15 Investigator Dave Biscobing at dbiscobing@abc15.com.

Monday, January 13, 2014

The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion

Editor's note: How true Justice Molloy's words ring...Just one look at the bottom feeders habituating the Probate Court of Cook  County...  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com 


“The once-honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.”
 
-- Justice John F. Molloy


The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion
 
JUSTICE JOHN F. MOLLOY
 
Justice John Fitzgerald Molloy
When I began practicing law in 1946, justice was much simpler. I joined a small Tucson practice at a salary of $250 a month, excellent compensation for a beginning lawyer. There was no paralegal staff or expensive artwork on the walls.
In those days, the judicial system was straightforward and efficient. Decisions were handed down by judges who applied the law as outlined by the Constitution and state legislatures. Cases went to trial in a month or two, not years. In the courtroom, the focus was on uncovering and determining truth and fact.
I charged clients by what I was able to accomplish for them. The clock did not start ticking the minute they walked through the door.
Looking back
The legal profession has evolved dramatically during my 87 years. I am a second-generation lawyer from an Irish immigrant family that settled in Yuma. My father, who passed the Bar with a fifth-grade education, ended up arguing a case before the U.S. Supreme Court during his career.
The law changed dramatically during my years in the profession. For example, when I accepted my first appointment as a Pima County judge in 1957, I saw that lawyers expected me to act more as a referee than a judge. The county court I presided over resembled a gladiator arena, with dueling lawyers jockeying for points and one-upping each other with calculated and ingenuous briefs
That was just the beginning.
By the time I ended my 50-year career as a trial attorney, judge and president of southern Arizona's largest law firm, I no longer had confidence in the legal fraternity I had participated in and, yes, profited from.
I was the ultimate insider, but as I looked back, I felt I had to write a book about serious issues in the legal profession and the implications for clients and society as a whole. The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion was 10 years in the making and has become my call to action for legal reform.
Disturbing evolution
Our Constitution intended that only elected lawmakers be permitted to create law.
Yet judges create their own law in the judicial system based on their own opinions and rulings. It's called case law, and it is churned out daily through the rulings of judges. When a judge hands down a ruling and that ruling survives appeal with the next tier of judges, it then becomes case law, or legal precedent. This now happens so consistently that we've become more subject to the case rulings of judges rather than to laws made by the lawmaking bodies outlined in our Constitution.
This case-law system is a constitutional nightmare because it continuously modifies constitutional intent. For lawyers, however, it creates endless business opportunities. That's because case law is technically complicated and requires a lawyer's expertise to guide and move you through the system. The judicial system may begin with enacted laws, but the variations that result from a judge's application of case law all too often change the ultimate meaning.
Lawyer domination
When a lawyer puts on a robe and takes the bench, he or she is called a judge. But in reality, when judges look down from the bench they are lawyers looking upon fellow members of their fraternity. In any other area of the free-enterprise system, this would be seen as a conflict of interest.
When a lawyer takes an oath as a judge, it merely enhances the ruling class of lawyers and judges. First of all, in Maricopa and Pima counties, judges are not elected but nominated by committees of lawyers, along with concerned citizens. How can they be expected not to be beholden to those who elevated them to the bench?
When they leave the bench, many return to large and successful law firms that leverage their names and relationships.
Business of law
The concept of "time" has been converted into enormous revenue for lawyers. The profession has adopted elaborate systems where clients are billed for a lawyer's time in six-minute increments. The paralegal profession is another brainchild of the fraternity, created as an additional tracking and revenue center. High powered firms have departmentalized their services into separate profit centers for probate and trusts, trial, commercial, and so forth.
The once-honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.
Bureaucratic design
Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system's process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them.
The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed.
The sullying of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer-driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served.
Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low-to-middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America. What would our Founding Fathers think?
This devolution of lawmaking by the judiciary has been subtle, taking place incrementally over decades. But today, it's engrained in our legal system, and few even question it. But the result is clear. Individuals can no longer participate in the legal system.
It has become too complex and too expensive, all the while feeding our dependency on lawyers.
By complicating the law, lawyers have achieved the ultimate job security. Gone are the days when American courts functioned to serve justice simply and swiftly.
It is estimated that 95 million legal actions now pass through the courts annually, and the time and expense for a plaintiff or defendant in our legal system can be absolutely overwhelming.
Surely it's time to question what has happened to our justice system and to wonder if it is possible to return to a system that truly does protect us from wrongs.

A lawyer from Tuscon, Arizona, John Fitzgerald Molloy (b. 1917) was elected to the Superior Court bench where he served for seven years as both a juvenile court and trial bench judge.  He subsequently was elected to the Court of Appeals where he authored over 300 appellate opinions, including the final Miranda decision for the Arizona Supreme Court.  During that period, he also served as president of the Arizona Judge's Association.  After 12 years, Molloy returned to private practice to become president of the largest law firm in southern Arizona.  His book has received widespread praise for its candor and disquieting truths.  (Photo courtesy of Paragon House)
 
Copyright 2004, Paragon House



From an Internet released preview of the book by John Fitzgerald Molloy, The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion, Paragon House, St. Paul, Minnesota, 2004.  Reprinted in accordance with the "fair use" provision of Title 17 U.S.C. § 107 for a non-profit educational purpose.

KawamotoDragon.com

Sunday, December 29, 2013

Krysta M. Douglas accused of abusing 3 adult-care patients

Krysta M. Douglas accused of abusing 3 adult-care patients

 
Posted: 12/27/2013
CHANDLER, AZ - Authorities say an adult-care provider is accused of abusing three women in her care at her Chandler home.
Chandler police say 42-year-old Krysta M. Douglas was arrested Thursday on suspicion of physically and emotionally abusing vulnerable adults.
Court records show Douglas provided care for three adults and helped prepare them for transport to a day program facility.
One of the females got upset about a hair decoration not being in her hair and Douglas reportedly became angry.
Co-workers say Douglas yelled upsetting comments at the woman several times and allegedly shook her.
They say the three adults and two caregivers later got into a van and Douglas drove recklessly.
One woman hit her head on the van's window and reportedly was taken to an urgent care facility to be evaluated.


Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_southeast_valley/chandler/krysta-m-douglas-accused-of-abusing-3-adult-care-patients#ixzz2osihOU9a

Friday, September 20, 2013

This Man's Shocking Story of Elder Financial Abuse Will Make You Hug Your Grandparents

This Man's Shocking Story of Elder Financial Abuse Will Make You Hug Your Grandparents

this, mans, shocking, story, of, elder, financial, abuse, will, make, you, hug, your, grandparents,
This Man's Shocking Story of Elder Financial Abuse Will Make You Hug Your Grandparents
© Flickr

“I should preface this by saying that my brother has always been a sociopath,” Brian Litwak told me. “But I had no other choice than to trust him because the doctor had told him, but not me, that I was supposed to die in six months.”
A former teacher, he tells his tale in a nonchalant, matter-of-fact voice. At 78 he's wrinkled and pale, but his eyes still twinkle and his memory seems precise. I hear flickers of anger as he sits, cane in hand, in an armchair across from me.
He has reason to be upset. 
Brian is a victim of the financial side of elder abuse. His younger brother, he tells me, stole thousands of dollars from him when Brian moved into an assisted living home in Tucson in 2003..
He came to Tucson from California with about $250,000 and ended up with $12,000. The money, which Brian earned over 33 years as a teacher, started to disappear after his brother was granted a power of attorney to take care of his health issues and finances.
Although his brother thought he didn't have much time left, Brian soldiered on. In 2008, he visited his technologically savvy son in San Francisco, who finally uncovered that Brian’s brother had lied to him about how much his California condominium had sold for (he thought it went for $139,000, he says it actually sold for $295,000).

"Feeling there was something wrong" when he returned to Tucson, Brian unsuccessfully tried to broach the subject with his brother. Things took a turn for the worse when he got a letter from Medicare that said that because he hadn’t paid his fees for five months and was suspended from the program. His brother, he said, had been neglecting these payments.
“That’s very scary for an old person, not to have medical coverage,”he said.
Brian is not alone. More than 500,000 adults will be abused or neglected annually, and that number is probably an underestimate because many people are likely too scared or otherwise unable to seek help.

This is especially concerning when you take into account that the elder population is rapidly increasing. By 2050, 20 percent of the population will be made up of people who are 65 and older, and the fastest growing portion of the population is people 85 and up.
Thankfully, Handmaker — the assisted living home where Brian lives — has a policy where if you’ve been living at their facility for at least three years and your money runs out, they don’t kick you out. Handmaker also doesn't look like your typical assisted living home. With long, wide hallways, tall ceilings and a plethora of windows, it almost has a university feel to it.
“Often times, people outlive their money because they live so much longer than they thought they would,” said Lori Riegel, the religious and cultural education coordinator at Handmaker. “In Brian’s case, it was for a different reason.”

When most millennials think of generational justice, what probably comes to mind is the need for society to look out for future generations. This is important, of course, but we also can't forget about our elders.
"Babies need certain things, and at the other end of the scale, we need certain things," Brian said. "It's becoming more prevalent because so many of us are living longer."
For Brian, taking his brother to court proved futile. Through a series of consultations, Brian said he was told that even if his brother did get convicted, "I would be 102 by the time I saw any of the money," he says. "Even I don't count on being here."
Brian lives on a fixed pension. Meanwhile, the price of utilities, rent, and food have all gone up.
But Brian isn't letting his financial woes keep him down. At the end of our conversation, he scoops up his cane, adjusts his Cal baseball cap, proudly rattles off a laundry list of things he's done today and announces that he's off to his physical therapy class.
Though his attitude is inspirational, he shouldn't have to have it. Generational justice isn't just for us — it's for Brian, and our grandparents, too.