Showing posts with label Fla.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fla.. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2016

Scott signs bill aimed at unscrupulous guardians

Scott signs bill aimed at unscrupulous guardians
Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2016 8:51 pm
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (By The News Service of Florida) -- Gov. Rick Scott on Thursday signed a bill aimed at better protecting elderly Floridians from unscrupulous guardians. The measure (SB 232), filed by Sen. Nancy Detert, R-Venice, calls for the Department of Elder Affairs to certify and oversee professional guardians. Under the bill, the Statewide Public Guardianship Office at the Florida Department of Elder Affairs will expand to become the Office of Public and Professional Guardians. It will establish standards for public and private guardians, receive and investigate complaints and penalize guardians who breach the standards. Detert has often cited a December 2014 series by the Sarasota Herald-Tribune, which found that while Florida has an efficient system of identifying and caring for fragile elders, "tapping their assets is a growth business."
In 2003, there were 23 registered professional guardians on Florida. By 2014, the number had grown to more than 440.
Detert said private guardians can sell off wards' assets to pay themselves -- even to fight the wards' grown children in court. Private professional guardians often serve wealthy people, while public guardians serve incapacitated people who don't have anybody willing and able to serve as guardians.
The state has had a more heavily regulated system of oversight for public guardians.
Detert and House sponsor Larry Ahern, R-Seminole, said the bill would propel Florida into a leadership role nationwide in protecting seniors from guardian abuse.

More about

More about

More about

Sunday, June 28, 2015

9 Investigates mysterious hospice death

9 Investigates mysterious hospice death

 
MELBOURNE, Fla. —
The children of a decorated Marine want justice for their father after they learned he died with four times the lethal limit of morphine in his system, yet there was no autopsy performed or thorough investigation into his death.
John McDonough survived the Korean War, and his children said he remained a fighter at age 85.
“Talking about going to Texas for his grandson's graduation,” said his daughter, Moe Roddy.
But three days after that, Roddy, a cardiac nurse, discovered her dad was under hospice care at his Melbourne home.

Raw: Family questions father's morphine overdose death

“I believe he was incoherent because he was drugged," Roddy said.
Patients under hospice care often receive high levels of morphine to make them comfortable before an imminent death.
But McDonough's three children want to know why their dad was even admitted to home hospice just after being discharged from rehab with "improved health."
“There is no record of him being involved in the decision," said McDonough's son, Tim McDonough.
John McDonough's wife signed the hospice agreement using a power of attorney she had gotten two years earlier, while her husband was ill. He had later recovered.
Three days after his home hospice admission, records show his step granddaughter, a nurse, administered double the amount of morphine prescribed by his doctor in one hour and forty minutes.
When the hospice nurse heard the dosage amounts over the phone, she told the granddaughter not to give him any more.
Eighteen hours later, McDonough was dead.
Months after McDonough's death, a toxicology report showed he had four times the lethal limit of morphine for a nontolerant patient, but the medical examiner did not perform an autopsy.
With no autopsy, there is no way to know if the morphine is what killed McDonough.
Channel 9's Lori Brown asked the Brevard medical examiner if someone dropped the ball.
“That I don’t know,” Dr. Sajid Qaiser said. “I have no idea.”
The medical examiner said he's satisfied with the investigation, but the family is not.
They hired Rhode Island's former chief medical examiner to review their dad's records.
"A full autopsy in this case would definitely have answered questions," Dr. Elizabeth Laposata said.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement is now investigating how the medical examiner handled the case.
“This is just the tip of the iceberg,” Tim McDonough said. “If this one is wrong, how many others are wrong?"
Hospice of St. Francis has not returned Channel 9's calls asking why John McDonough did not sign the hospice admission form.
The sheriff's office interviewed officials with hospice and declared the case cleared without charging anyone.
Channel 9 reached out to John McDonough's wife, but she said she would not answer any questions and hung up.

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Corruption Claims Rekindled in Estate Battle

Corruption Claims Rekindled in Estate Battle
     WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (CN) - A Florida lawyer claims he has new evidence that Panamanian Supreme Court justices were bribed into stripping him of control over a $150 million estate.
     Attorney Richard Lehman says he secured an affidavit to help prove the foreign court illegally removed him from his position as executor of his client Wilson Lucom's estate. Lehman was supposed to oversee the estate and donate a portion of it to "needy Panamanian children," but Lucom's widow instead took it over after her legal team bribed several judges, Lehman claims.
     The affidavit is part and parcel of Lehman's latest lawsuit in Palm Beach County court. It's drawn from the statements of a "prominent real estate developer" who heard a post-factum discussion about the bribery, according to the lawsuit.
     "The corruption of the Panamanian judicial system is not mere speculation. The actual meeting ... where [the widow's] lawyer offered and negotiated a $1 million bribe to one of the Justices of the Panel, was reported ... to the prominent real estate developer," Lehman's lawsuit states.
     "Due to the concern for the safety and welfare of Plaintiff Lehman and the Affiant, the Plaintiffs will seek to introduce this Affidavit to the Court in this action under seal and through confidential order," the lawsuit states.
     Lehman's lawsuit marks the latest installment in a legal battle that stretches back to Lucom's death in 2006.
     Lucom, a wealthy American expatriate, appointed both his widow Hilda and Lehman as executors of the estate in his original will. But he made modifications to the document, which, after his death, contributed to controversy over who should control the estate and its coveted tract of land on Panama's Pacific coast.
     For years, Lehman sparred in court with Hilda overseas, arguing that the widow was ignoring her late husband's wish to donate certain estate assets to a trust fund for impoverished kids.
     Meanwhile, Hilda, a well-to-do woman once married to the son of a Panamanian president, filed criminal complaints in Panama, accusing Lehman of "aggravated swindle" and theft of family funds. Hilda's lawyers at one point reported that Lucom's death was caused by heart trouble that he suffered after Lehman tried to whisk him out of the Paitilla Medical Center, where he was being treated for respiratory disease.
     Lehman purportedly ended up on the International Criminal Police Organization's list of wanted men. He was jailed briefly in Panama but was cleared of the criminal charges.
     Back in Florida, circuit judge John Phillips issued a million-dollar judgment against Lehman, asserting that he had improperly removed funds from the estate to fund his courtroom scuffles with Hilda. The judge called Lehman's actions those of an "intermeddling volunteer."
     "Although Lehman attempted to portray himself at trial as a protector of the assets of the overall estate, the credible evidence showed him to be a covetous opportunist," Judge Phillips wrote following ancillary proceedings in Florida.
     Lehman's latest lawsuit seeks to have Phillips' judgment set aside, on the grounds the judge had been misled by the findings of a Panamanian court official named Juan Molina, who Lehman claims was corrupt.
     The malfeasance had not yet come to light, and Phillips never knew that "the Panama Orders placed into evidence by Defendants ... were illegal and obtained through bribery and corruption," Lehman says in his complaint.
     Lehman claims that higher up the ladder, three Panamanian Supreme Court justices were on the take as well. He argues that in 2010, when the justices gave Hilda full control of the estate, they did so in exchange for a massive bribe from Hilda's legal team.
     "In consideration of a several million dollar bribe paid to the three Panamanian Supreme Court Justices ... the Supreme Court of Panama issued the indefensible decision ... that repudiated Plaintiff Lehman's status as Executor ... and nullified Plaintiff Lehman's efforts since July 2006 to carry out his professional duty to defend the Will and implement its provisions," Lehman says.
     Lehman's lawsuit includes one count for fraud, and one for injunctive relief to void Phillips' judgment.
     Hilda passed away in 2011, so her own estate is named as a primary defendant in the lawsuit, alongside Edna Ramos Chue, Hilda's erstwhile attorney. Several parties, including Hilda's children, are named as defendants because they may claim an interest in the Florida action: Valores Globales S.A., Madelaine Arias, Margarita Allinson, Melinda Morrice, Gilberto Arias, Isabel Maria Clark, Robert Clark, Alexander Clark, Delanda Clark, Cassandra Clark and Larry Miller, as curator of the Estate of Wilson Lucom.
     Lehman pursued the bribery allegations previously, as part of a United States federal court case.
     In that case, Lehman sought racketeering damages from Molina, Hilda's family, her lawyers at Infante & Perez-Almillano, and among others, the three Panamanian Supreme Court justices who Lehman says were lining their pockets with dirty money. Lehman lost and then took the case to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against him in August 2013, affirming that his claims were time-barred.
     With the latest lawsuit, Lehman continues the legal battle despite having been unsuccessful in high courts both at home and abroad.
     Conrad DeSantis, a North Palm Beach lawyer speaking on Lehman's behalf, told Courthouse News that Lehman is a "brilliant tax attorney" who has been "slandered and libeled" to no end.
     "The level of corruption was so unbelievable," DeSantis said. "To bring illegal court orders into this country ... it's like bringing cancer into the justice system."
     "There are some strange people in Panama, and sometimes they do strange things," DeSantis said.
     DeSantis would not reveal the identity of the "prominent real estate developer" cited in Lehman's new case.
     Lehman says that in addition to the affidavit from the developer, he is armed with revelations that Hilda long ago had transferred "all of her interest" in the probate matter to a Panamanian organization, causing her to lose her legal standing in the subsequent litigation.  

Monday, January 26, 2015

Millions of genetically modified mosquitoes could be released

Editor's note: This this Shark's fish brain...kinda sounds like the plot for a horror movie. Instead of giant spiders or snakes, genetically modified mosquitoes.  Imagine giant mutant bugs who bite and create zombies. Add to the list of proponents or opponents, the manufacturers of "Backwoods Off ".  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com 

Millions of genetically modified mosquitoes could be released

18 2 LINKEDIN 1 COMMENTMORE
KEY WEST, Fla. (AP) — Millions of genetically modified mosquitoes could be released in the Florida Keys if British researchers win approval to use the bugs against two extremely painful viral diseases.
Never before have insects with modified DNA come so close to being set loose in a residential U.S. neighborhood.
"This is essentially using a mosquito as a drug to cure disease," said Michael Doyle, executive director of the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District, which is waiting to hear if the Food and Drug Administration will allow the experiment.
Dengue and chikungunya are growing threats in the U.S., but some people are more frightened at the thought of being bitten by a genetically modified organism. More than 130,000 people signed a Change.org petition against the experiment.
Even potential boosters say those responsible must do more to show that benefits outweigh the risks of breeding modified insects that could bite people.
"I think the science is fine, they definitely can kill mosquitoes, but the GMO issue still sticks as something of a thorny issue for the general public," said Phil Lounibos, who studies mosquito control at the Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory.
Mosquito controllers say they're running out of options. With climate change and globalization spreading tropical diseases farther from the equator, storm winds, cargo ships and humans carry these viruses to places like Key West, the southernmost city in the continental U.S.
There are no vaccines or cures for dengue, known as "break-bone fever," or chikungunya, so painful it causes contortions. U.S. cases remain rare.
Insecticides are sprayed year-round in the Keys' charming and crowded neighborhoods. But Aedes aegypti, whose biting females spread these diseases, have evolved to resist four of the six insecticides used to kill them.
Enter Oxitec, a British biotech firm that patented a method of breeding Aedes aegypti with fragments of genes from the herpes simplex virus and E. coli bacteria as well as coral and cabbage. This synthetic DNA is commonly used in laboratory science and is thought to pose no significant risks to other animals, but it kills mosquito larvae.
Oxitec's lab workers manually remove modified females, aiming to release only males, which don't bite for blood like females do. The modified males then mate with wild females whose offspring die, reducing the population.
Oxitec has built a breeding lab in Marathon and hopes to release its mosquitoes in a Key West neighborhood this spring.
FDA spokeswoman Theresa Eisenman said no field tests will be allowed until the agency has "thoroughly reviewed all the necessary information."
Company spokeswoman Chris Creese said the test will be similar in size to Oxitec's 2012 experiment in the Cayman Islands, where 3.3 million modified mosquitoes were released over six months, suppressing 96 percent of the targeted bugs. Oxitec says a later test in Brazil also was successful, and both countries now want larger-scale projects.
But critics accused Oxitec of failing to obtain informed consent in the Caymans, saying residents weren't told they could be bitten by a few stray females overlooked in the lab.
Instead, Oxitec said only non-biting males would be released, and that even if humans were somehow bitten, no genetically modified DNA would enter their bloodstream.
Neither claim is entirely true, outside observers say.
"I'm on their side, in that consequences are highly unlikely. But to say that there's no genetically modified DNA that might get into a human, that's kind of a gray matter," said Lounibos.
Creese says Oxitec has now released 70 million of its mosquitoes in several countries and received no reports of human impacts caused by bites or from the synthetic DNA, despite regulatory oversight that encourages people to report any problems. "We are confident of the safety of our mosquito, as there's no mechanism for any adverse effect on human health. The proteins are non-toxic and non-allergenic," she said.
Oxitec should still do more to show that the synthetic DNA causes no harm when transferred into humans by its mosquitoes, said Guy Reeves, a molecular geneticist at Germany's Max Planck Institute.
Key West resident Marilyn Smith wasn't persuaded after Oxitec's presentation at a public meeting. She says neither disease has had a major outbreak yet in Florida, so "why are we being used as the experiment, the guinea pigs, just to see what happens?"

Saturday, April 12, 2014

Political Ties of Top Billers for Medicare

Political Ties of Top Billers for Medicare


The New York Times 
Top-paid Medicare doctors say they have reasons
.
View photo

FILE - This Jan. 31, 2010, file image released by Miami Dade College shows Dr. Salomon Melgen, posing for a photo at the book signing of "Growing American Roots", a book by Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., at the college in Miami. Topping Medicare's list of highest paid physicians from it's claims database was Florida ophthalmologist Salomon Melgen, whose relationship with Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., made headlines last year after news broke that the lawmaker used the doctor's personal jet for trips to the Dominican Republic. Medicare paid Melgen $20.8 million. (AP Photo/Miami Dade College, Phil Roche, File)

Correction Appended
MIAMI — Two Florida doctors who received the nation’s highest Medicare reimbursements in 2012 are both major contributors to Democratic Party causes, and they have turned to the political system in recent years to defend themselves against suspicions that they may have submitted fraudulent or excessive charges to the federal government.
The pattern of large Medicare payments and six-figure political donations shows up among several of the doctors whose payment records were released for the first time this week by the Department of Health and Human Services. For years, the department refused to make the data public, and finally did so only after being sued by The Wall Street Journal.
Topping the list is Dr. Salomon E. Melgen, 59, an ophthalmologist from North Palm Beach, Fla., who received $21 million in Medicare reimbursements in 2012 alone. The doctor billed a bulk of his reimbursements for Lucentis, a medication used to treat macular degeneration made by a company that pays generous rebates to its doctors.
Dr. Melgen’s firm donated more than $700,000 to Majority PAC, a super PAC run by former aides to the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada. The super PAC then spent $600,000 to help re-elect Senator Robert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey, who is a close friend of Dr. Melgen’s. Last year, Mr. Menendez himself became a target of investigation after the senator intervened on behalf of Dr. Melgen with federal officials and took flights on his private jet.
Another physician, Dr. Asad Qamar, an interventional cardiologist in Ocala, Fla., has sent at least $250,000 in donations over the last decade to the political campaigns of President Obama and other prominent Democrats; he has become the target of scrutiny related to cardiovascular treatment centers he runs in Central Florida.
Dr. Qamar was paid more than $18 million in 2012, making him and Dr. Melgen by far the largest payment recipients nationwide, according to the data. A pathologist from New Jersey received the third largest Medicare reimbursement, $12.6 million.
In an interview on Wednesday, Dr. Qamar said any questions about his Medicare bills were unjustified.
“Just looking at the sheer volume of work and billings from a single physician is not a sign of wrongdoing,” Dr. Qamar said, noting that his practice handles cardiac procedures in its outpatient clinics that would be done inside a hospital in many other states, which he said explained the large billable amounts.
The state of Florida was home to many of the physicians who received the largest payments, 28 out of the top 100. California, with a much larger population, was second, with 10 of the top 100.
Doctors in Florida have been frequent targets of Medicare fraud investigations, based on irregular patterns of bills or extremely high bills.
Just last month, two Florida medical clinic owners were sentenced on charges of Medicare fraud, both in cases involving more than $20 million in fraudulent payments. In addition, the Halifax Hospital Medical Center in Daytona Beach, Fla., agreed to pay the government $85 million to resolve allegations that it had billed Medicare for care based on referrals from doctors who had a financial relationship with the institution, a forbidden practice.
Dr. Melgen appeared on investigators’ radar when a Medicare contractor noticed that he, a single practitioner, was billing for Lucentis at a significantly higher rate than his peers, Justice Department lawyers wrote in response to a suit the doctor filed against the Health and Human Services Department.
Each vial of the medication comes with up to four times the amount that a patient requires. Investigators said the doctor was using one vial to treat three or four patients, and billing as if he had purchased a new vial each time. The doctor would be reimbursed $6,000 to $8,000 for a vial that cost him $2,000.
The investigation concluded that in 2007 and 2008 alone, he overbilled by $9 million, which he was forced to pay back.
The doctor, federal lawyers said, “seeks to game the system by seeking reimbursement of three to four times its actual costs.”
Dr. Melgen hired the former head of the Justice Department’s Medicare fraud task force, Kirk Ogrosky, to defend him. In a lawsuit that sought to recover the $9 million, Mr. Ogrosky argued that Dr. Melgen’s billing practice was not illegal and that even if the doctor had not spread the medication out, the government would not have saved any money.
As the dispute dragged on, the doctor reached out to his longtime friend, Mr. Menendez, for help. Mr. Menendez’s aides acknowledged that the senator called the Medicare director at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2009 and brought it up at a meeting with the acting administrator in 2012. Now both Dr. Melgen and Mr. Menendez find themselves under federal scrutiny. F.B.I. agents have raided Dr. Melgen’s clinics twice.
“At all times, Dr. Melgen billed in conformity with Medicare rules,” Mr. Ogrosky said in a statement. “While the amounts in the CMS data release appear large, the vast majority reflect the cost of drugs. The facts are that doctors receive 6 percent above what they pay for drugs, the amount billed by physicians is set by law, and drug companies set the price of drugs, not doctors.”
He declined to discuss the doctor’s relationship with the senator or his campaign contributions.
Dr. Qamar and his Institute of Cardiovascular Excellence in Ocala, Fla., have for at least the last 16 months been subject to what is known as a “prepayment review,” he said on Wednesday. Medicare officials typically take this step, which requires a detailed examination of all Medicare bills before they authorize payment, after they have detected patterns that lead them to suspect there may have been inappropriate or excessive bills.
The money paid to Dr. Qamar in 2012 — $18.2 million — is much more than to any other cardiologist in the United States. The second-highest total is listed as $4.5 million, paid to Dr. Ashish Pal of Davenport, Fla.
Dr. Pal said in an interview on Wednesday that his billing was entirely appropriate and fair, although he acknowledged it was high because he has multiple cardiology-related specialties, and because he works in an outpatient setting and bills the government for facility fees.
Dr. Qamar said his payments were high because his practice, which has 150 employees and a caseload of 23,000 patients, routinely handles complicated procedures like opening blocked arteries in the legs of older patients, which normally would be billed by a hospital.
Dr. Qamar has sent more than $100,000 to the Democratic National Committee and other state-based branches of the Democratic Party around the United States, and has donated to President Obama’s presidential campaigns and groups with ties to Mr. Obama, federal records show. He has also made donations to congressional candidates — almost all of them Democrats — from Nevada, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Iowa and Florida, among other states, the records show.
At the same time some of those donations were being made, the prominent law and lobbying firm Greenberg Traurig — and a former Justice Department official and Capitol Hill aide from the firm named Gregory W. Kehoe — helped Mr. Qamar contact more than a dozen members of Congress asking them to help him address why he was subject to such intense scrutiny from Medicare auditors.
The political donations, Dr. Qamar said, are unrelated to the Medicare scrutiny, but he acknowledged he had reached out to lawmakers in Congress to persuade the federal government to back down.
“The auditors put an astronomical burden on us, in terms of manpower,” he said. “I would just hope there is some end to it.”
Both Dr. Qamar and Dr. Melgen are still certified to receive Medicare payments, although Dr. Melgen at one point was suspended from the Medicare program, which accounts for 70 percent of his practice. He has been reinstated. And an official at the Department of Health and Human Services declined to comment on either physician or to confirm that they were a subject of special scrutiny.
The New Jersey pathologist ranked third among doctors nationwide in terms of Medicare billing, Dr. Michael C. McGinnis, is the medical director of the Pathology Corporation of America in Wrightstown, N.J., which performs analytical work on medical specimens for other doctors, perhaps explaining his high ranking on the list. Dr. McGinnis could not be reached for comment.
Frances Robles reported from Miami, and Eric Lipton from Washington. Michael Strickland contributed research.

Correction: April 9, 2014, Wednesday
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction: An earlier version of this article misidentified a political action committee to which Dr. Salomon E. Melgen contributed more than $700,000. It was Majority PAC, a super PAC run by former aides to the Senate majority leader Harry Reid, not the political action committee of Senator Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat.

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Battle Over Robert Rauschenberg's $600 Million Estate Continues

Battle Over Robert Rauschenberg's $600 Million Estate Continues
By TAMARA LUSH 01/06/14 11:27 AM ET EST AP
CAPTIVA ISLAND, Fla. (AP) — Before he died in 2008, pop artist Robert Rauschenberg asked three of his closest friends to oversee his $600 million estate.
In a lawsuit that has dragged on for years with Rauschenberg's family and charitable foundation, those friends are asking for $60 million in fees as compensation for administering the trust. The case will likely go to trial this year; a hearing will be held in Lee County court on March 31.
At issue is whether the $60 million in fees requested by the trustees is the "reasonable fee" allowed by Florida law.
"Bob Rauschenberg believed the trustees he chose were trustworthy friends who understood that the Rauschenberg Foundation was to be Bob's crowning achievement and legacy," said Robert Goldman, the attorney for the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation. "The trustees' demand for $60 million that would otherwise belong to the foundation is a monstrous affront to Bob's testamentary intent and is not a reasonable trustees' fee under Florida law."
Rauschenberg spent the last days of his life at his 35-acre waterfront compound on Captiva, an exclusive and tropical Gulf Coast island.
He died on May 12, 2008, of heart and lung failure, at the age of 82.
The artist, who also had a home in New York City, was famous for his use of odd and everyday articles in his paintings, and his unusual style earned him fame as a pioneer in pop art, along with Jasper Johns, James Rosenquist and Andy Warhol. In the 1950s, Rauschenberg created his "White Paintings," modular panels which appear at first to be a blank white canvas. He is also known for his "Combines," which are free-standing, mixed media works.
In the 1960s, he began incorporating photographs into his art — memorably, pictures of John F. Kennedy. He won a 1984 Grammy Award for best album package for the Talking Heads album "Speaking in Tongues."
After his death, Rauschenberg's works soared in value. In 2010, one of his "Combine" works — which had been owned by the late author Michael Crichton — sold for $11 million at a Christie's auction in New York.
Rauschenberg was also an avid philanthropist, and while alive he gave money to children's charities and environmental causes. In his will, he stated that all of his assets should go into a trust — which was overseen by his friends, the three trustees — and that the primary beneficiary of the trust was the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, which would manage the art and continue to support charities and emerging artists.
"Based upon the increased value of the Rauschenberg art, the Trustees estimate the current value of the Trust assets to exceed $2 billion," wrote the attorney for the three trustees in a court document dated March 14, 2012.
The trustees are Darryl Pottorf, Rauschenberg's assistant and companion; Bill Goldston, who was partners with Rauschenberg in an art printing company; and Bennet Grutman, the artist's accountant.
Attorneys for the trustees couldn't be reached for comment. But court documents show that the trustees believe they are deserving of the fees because "they have provided extraordinary services that have greatly enhanced the value of the Trust assets," including reintroducing Rauschenberg's artwork to the market in a "prudent manner and under a comprehensive plan, resulting in an increase in value and public appreciation."
The trustees also said they had to deal with copyright issues and analyze complex federal and state tax laws.
The Robert Rauschenberg Foundation suggested the trustees be paid hourly, and two experts hired by the three men said that trust administration fees based on hourly wages weren't reasonable.
"While I have yet to form an opinion about the reasonable fees for administration of the trust," wrote James Myers, a Palm Beach attorney who provided his expert opinion in a court document for the case, "I can state unequivocally that a trustee's fee based on an hourly rate is not reasonable and is not fair to the trustees and would not be customary under these circumstances."
One expert hired by the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation said the trustees' fee request is "unconscionable."
Laird Lile, a Naples, Fla.-based probate and trust attorney who is also on the Board of Governors for the Florida Bar, said in a May 16, 2013, court document that his analysis showed that the three trustees have paid themselves $5.7 million in fees from the trust — a sum Lile called "grossly disproportionate" to the services required of the trustees.
There was no fee agreement between the trustees and the foundation. And the trustees did not keep records of their time served, Lile said, adding that there was little in the way of annual accounting to the foundation.
"The net result of this improper administration is to allow the unbridled expenditure of trust funds with no checks or balances among the three trustees," Lile said.
Rauschenberg's son, Christopher Rauschenberg — who is a Seattle-based photographer — said in a statement that his father wanted to help artists and others after he died. The younger Rauschenberg, who is chairman of the board of trustees for the foundation, said that the organization has given grants to cultural institutions, supported artists impacted by Superstorm Sandy and donated more than 100 works of art to museums across the United States. In the fall of 2013, the foundation supported a citywide dialogue on climate change in New York.
"Our goal in this matter is to ensure that my dad's legacy is protected and that the foundation he created can succeed and make an impact," Christopher Rauschenberg wrote in the statement. "We do not think his philanthropic intentions should be eroded through the payment of tens of millions of dollars to the people he entrusted to implement his wishes. We are confident that the Florida court will make a ruling that is fair and consistent with my dad's intent to promote his foundation and better the world."
___
Follow Tamara Lush on Twitter at http://twitter.com/tamaralush