Showing posts with label JoAnne Marie Denison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JoAnne Marie Denison. Show all posts

Saturday, September 26, 2015

Lawyer gets suspension for blog posts about 'feeding frenzy' of connected lawyers

LEGAL ETHICS

Editor's note: This Shark believes that the FEDs must clean out Chicago's bed of "Sleaze" from the Probate Court of Cook County. An example is GAL Martin in the Estate of Alice R. Gore who died several years ago.  GAL, paid generously from Alice's estate after Alice's death still refuses to provide final financial documents of the estate to Alice's daughter.  The ARDC feels this breach of fiduciary obligation is acceptable.   Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Lawyer gets suspension for blog posts about 'feeding frenzy' of connected lawyers

POSTED SEP 24, 2015 12:46 PM CDT

An Illinois lawyer who blogged about a probate case has been suspended because of her posts alleging a “feeding frenzy” of court-connected lawyers in Chicago’s “sleazy world of probate.”
The lawyer, JoAnne Marie Denison, was suspended for three years, and until further order of the Illinois Supreme Court, the Legal Profession Blog reports. The Sept. 21 suspension follows a May decision in which a review board of the Illinois Registration and Disciplinary Commission rejected Denison’s First Amendment arguments.
Denison had contended her blog posts were true, but the review board cited findings that she had failed to present an objective factual basis to support her allegations. Denison’s posts had impugned the integrity of judges and lawyers involved in a particular probate proceeding, the review board said.
Denison’s blog had alleged a guardian was appointed for an elderly woman though she did not need one, and that the guardian had stolen from the woman and did not take proper care of her. The blog posts referenced a “feeding frenzy” of lawyers, a “classic case of corruption” and a court “being spoonfed BS law by atty miscreants.”
Circuit courts in Cook County aren’t computerized, Denison alleged in her posts, because “politically connected judges and their puppet attorneys … would be exposed for what they are: money grubbing, family strife churning leeches that create nothing but pain and misery in a family while swiping free parking money out of a well funded estate.”

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Suspension recommended for lawyer who blogged about probate corruption and lawyer 'feeding frenzy'

LEGAL ETHICS

Suspension recommended for lawyer who blogged about probate corruption and lawyer 'feeding frenzy'


Image_of_blog
Image from Shutterstock.
An Illinois patent lawyer accused of blogging with a reckless disregard for the truth is facing a proposed three-year suspension.
The hearing board of the Illinois Registration and Disciplinary Commission recommended the suspension for lawyer JoAnne Marie Denison because of her blog comments about judges and lawyers. The Legal Profession Blog links to theproposed suspension, filed Nov. 21, and summarizes the accusations.
According to the hearing board, Denison oversaw a blog about a probate matter in which she alleged corruption in the probate court, both generally and in the probate matter. Specific individuals were identified in a “table of torts,” which Denison described as “TEN PAGES of questionable behavior, corruption, misfeasance, malfeasance, perpetration of misdemeanors and felonies” in the case.
Denison’s blog had alleged a guardian was appointed for an elderly woman at the center of the case, though she did not need one, and the guardian had stolen from the woman and did not take proper care of her. The elderly woman, the blog alleged, had been “fleeced out of her home,” and “court-connected lawyers” were added to the case to “churn the feeding frenzy.”
Denison began blogging after a judge refused her application to represent the elderly woman’s daughter.
A disclaimer on the blog warned that “portions of this blog have to be entertaining so we can get the word out” and readers should do their own investigation of the facts.
The hearing board found that there was no rational basis to support Denison’s allegations about improprieties. In reality, the board said, the lawyers working on the case were not compensated for the vast majority of their work. Despite the disclaimer, other blog sections suggested the unfounded allegations were true, the board said.
In mitigation, the hearing board said Denison “genuinely, though unreasonably, believed something was wrong with the proceedings” in the probate matter and had a “sincere desire” to help the elderly woman.
“From our perspective,” the hearing board said, “it appears respondent has genuine concern for senior citizens and perceives the senior population as vulnerable, especially to financial exploitation. This concern, as a general matter, is a legitimate one, even though respondent had no reasonable basis for believing the judges or attorneys in [the specific] case were corrupt.”
In aggravation, the hearing board cited Denison’s “tendency to inappropriately personalize matters. This tendency was apparent in conduct by Respondent which included filing multiple lawsuits, which had been dismissed, against the attorneys in the [probate] matter.”
Related articles:
ABAJournal.com: “Lawyer’s blog posts about ‘sleazy world of probate’ bring ethics complaint”