Showing posts with label Recusal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recusal. Show all posts

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Judge in Post series moved from guardianship

Editor's note: Your ProbateShark would love to see a Chicago Tribune series on guardianship fraud by the Probate Court of Cook County.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Judge in Post series moved from guardianship cases


By John Pacenti - Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Circuit Judge Martin Colin’s tenure as a probate judge is over in the wake of The Palm Beach Post’s investigation into the the veteran jurist and his wife in the guardianships of incapacitated seniors.
But it remains to be seen whether he still has a role in guardianship through a mediation program he helps coordinate.
Palm Beach County Chief Circuit Judge Jeffrey Colbath, with little fanfare, posted Colin’s transfer on the judicial circuit’s website on Tuesday, moving him from the Probate & Guardianship Division in Delray Beach to the Civil Circuit division in the central courthouse in West Palm Beach.
He is also no longer hearing Family Division cases and will instead hear civil disputes and hold jury trials involving disputes in amounts of more than $15,000.
The move was buried on the circuit’s website and not readily seen without searching an announcement section that appeared blank on the home page.
Circuit Judge Jaimie Goodman will take Colin’s place, hearing guardianship, probate and family cases in the South County Courthouse.
Colin assumes Goodman’s docket as of Monday in the circuit civil division. Colin said he will not seek re-election following The Post’s series, Guardianship: A Broken Trust.
Colin’s transfer comes just as the Florida Senate approved legislation that would give Florida its first regulatory authority over professional guardians. The bill – along with one passed this past year – is in response to complaints of guardians bilking the savings of the elderly as appointed officers of the court.
Many of these elderly seniors — called wards — suffer from Alzheimer’s disease or some other form of dementia.
Colbath did not respond to a request through his spokesperson to comment. He also would not answer repeated queries about whether Colin will continue in his role coordinating the court’s elder care program, a mediation program for guardianship disputes, where many former judges work. Chief Judge Colbath’s father, for example, former Chief Judge Walter N. Colbath Jr., is listed as a mediator for a local company.
Also, it appears that Colbath is not taking any direct action regarding Colin’s wife, Elizabeth “Betsy” Savitt, a professional guardian who has taken tens of thousands of dollars from the life savings of incapacitated seniors prior to court approval in guardianships and in follow-up probate cases.
The couple’s finances improved substantially after Savitt became a guardian in 2011 after years of foreclosures, liens and unpaid loans to private individuals.
As a court-appointed professional guardian, Savitt takes over the lives of seniors and other adults who no longer can care for themselves, managing their finances, medical care and whether they can remain in their homes. She has access to hundreds of thousands of dollars. She was a tennis pro before she became a guardian.
The families of these seniors, backed by reams of court documents, say that besides taking fees without court approval, Savitt double-billed, funneled money to relatives of the ward who are suspected of financial — and even physical abuse. In numerous cases, she was accused by families of creating unnecessary litigation in order to generate more fees for herself and the cadre of attorneys who represent her.
Those attorneys regularly appeared in front of Colin, sometimes seeking his approval for generous fees in other cases. When The Post started investigating, Colin started shedding their cases: 115 recusals from July 1 to Dec. 31.
Colin’s colleagues on the bench presided over his wife’s cases. Currently, she has at least two guardianships but has also been involved in managing special-needs trusts and as a personal representative of estates.
Former Supreme Court Chief Justice Gerald Kogan told The Post for its series that Savitt’s role as a professional guardian created an appearance of impropriety for Colin that put him in jeopardy of violating the state’s judicial canons.
Savitt and Colin have denied any wrongdoing.
Colin didn’t hear Savitt’s cases, but his colleagues do – particularly Circuit Judge David French, a friend who once planned a cruise vacation with the both of them.
French, for now, appears to be staying put in the Probate & Guardianship Division. Earlier this month, Colbath announced a five-point plan that directed all “current” south county judges to recuse themselves from Savitt’s cases so it is uncertain whether Judge Goodman will be hearing Savitt’s cases.
Colbath’s plan also includes training for probate judges and their staff, standardization of billing practices and a wheel system to provide random assignments of guardians to cases.
Dr. Sam Sugar, who has led the charge for legislative reform in Florida as head of Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship, said Colbath has not gone far enough.
“The response from Judge Colbath is an outrage and reinforces the widely held and growing perception that the Florida court system does not deserve the trust of the people,” he said.
“Years of blatant conflicts of interest, looting of innocent people’s entire estates, self serving protection of rapacious guardians and lawyers has resulted in no discipline, no consequences, but every indication that this egregious system will continue.”
For Skender Hoti, Colbath’s actions smack of a whitewash.
Hoti is the restaurateur who in February 2012 watched as Savitt – assisting a family guardian — tried to seize possessions from one of his homes using an order by Colin. Hoti claims he is still missing cash, jewelry and other possessions.
Hoti cared for Gwendolyn Batson for decades before the senior’s brother sought to find her incapacitated and seize her assets.
Hoti said Colbath’s changes are sweeping the problem under the rug.
“We’ve been caught so we will change clothing and continue as usual,” Hoti said. “A septic tank plumbing would be more appropriate.”
While Colbath shook up the judiciary with Colin’s move, lawmakers aimed to do the same to professional guardians. The Senate unanimously passed a bill Wednesday to provide the state’s first real regulatory authority over the burgeoning industry, while the House’s Judiciary Committee unanimously advanced a bill that would do the same.
SB 232,is sponsored by Sen. Nancy Detert, R-Venice, while its House companion HB 403 is sponsored by Rep. Larry Ahern, R-Seminole.
“I think a year from now this is going to be the top issue on 20/20 and 60 Minutes,” Detert said before the vote. “I think with this bill we will have the strongest law in the nation.”
The bill would create the Office of Public and Professional Guardians and give the state the power to investigate and discipline professional guardians. The bill has received support from Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship, Gov. Rick Scott and the Florida State Guardianship Association.
Ahern, speaking to the Judiciary Committee, said reports of guardians taking financial advantage of the elderly person they are sworn to protect are overwhelming. He told lawmakers that they don’t want to read another story of guardianship abuse.
Jodi Rich, whose uncle was in a contentious guardianship under Savitt, said bills are a good sign of change for the industry to hold bad professional guardians accountable.
“It’s a good idea that the state now looks out for seniors’ welfare,” she said.
Not everybody, though, was a fan.
During public comment in front of the House Judiciary Committee, the bill came under fire for not addressing how new standards will be formulated and was called a Band-Aid on a massive wound.
“It is all about the money,” said guardianship reform advocate Douglas Franks of Pensacola, who has fought a professional guardian on behalf of his mother. “Isolate, medicate and steal the estate — that is what these people go by.”
Staff writer Christine Stapleton contributed to this story.

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Chief judge keeps public waiting on details of guardianship shakeup

Editor's note: This Shark has observed that the Chief Judge of the Cook County court system also, "keeps public waiting" for a guardian shakeup...and the beat goes on.... and on... Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Chief judge keeps public waiting on details of guardianship shakeup


By John Pacenti - Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Palm Beach County’s chief judge would not say Wednesday whether he would allow longtime probate Judge Martin Colin to continue hearing cases in the division where his wife makes her living as a professional guardian.
Jeffrey Colbath Tuesday released a list of changes in response to a Palm Beach Post investigation about Colin and his wife, Elizabeth Savitt. But none of his five changes says anything about the fate of Colin and his close friend and probate colleague, Circuit Judge David French, who hears most of Savitt’s cases and approves her fees. Colbath would take no media questions Wednesday.
The Post’s series, Guardianship: A Broken Trust, exposed practices by Savitt, including taking fees without prior court approval, double billing and funneling the life savings of incapacitated seniors to relatives accused of taking advantage of them. Her lawyers practiced in front of Colin, a longtime jurist in the Probate & Guardianship Division.
Among the most significant changes is the chief judge’s plan to rotate “personnel” effective Feb. 15 and the recusal of current south county judges from Savitt’s cases. This presumably will include French, a friend of Colin’s and Savitt’s who once planned a Caribbean cruise vacation with the pair.
Colbath also said he will establish a wheel to provide random assignment of professional guardians to cases, provide in-house training for probate judges and court staff and standardize billing practices for guardians and attorneys.
Colbath’s office said on Wednesday that the judge’s rotation will be announced on Feb. 12 but that other details of the overhaul were still being worked out. Circuit spokeswoman Debra Oats said, “It is too early to describe the details related to the implementation.”
Colbath has not spoken to The Post directly about Colin, Savitt or his reforms, instead speaking through Oats or his general counsel.
The Post’s stories revealed how Savitt’s work as a professional guardian created an appearance of impropriety for Judge Colin, according to a former chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court.
Colin didn’t hear his wife’s cases, but her attorneys appeared in front of him for years, relying on him for approval of sometimes lucrative fees. Families told The Post that other judges — Colin’s colleagues — ignored their complaints and concerns about Savitt.
Colin recused himself of 115 cases involving Savitt’s attorneys in the past six months of 2015 after The Post started investigating. In The Post’s series, former Supreme Court Justice Gerald Kogan questioned how Colbath allowed Colin to remain in the division where his wife makes money for his own household.
Neither Colin’s nor French’s offices would say when — or even if — they were being transferred. The question remains if Colbath is going to allow the judges to remain in the Probate & Guardianship Division. Colin announced Tuesday that he is not seeking re-election.
Another question is whether Colbath is going to allow Colin to continue to run the Courts Elder Care Program that would funnel guardianship disputes to mediation. The mediation arena is lucrative and filled with former judges.
Probate Court Operations Manager Tehera Smith referred questions back to Colbath regarding Colin’s position with the program or whether it came with a pay boost.
Kogan, speaking to The Post on Wednesday, applauded some of the changes while wondering about the lack of details on others.
“There are a lot of things here that I don’t know what he means,” said the former chief justice, specifically mentioning the training.
Kogan said transferring judges can go along way in restoring faith in the adult guardianship system in Palm Beach County.
“Rotation of personnel is a very, very good thing,” he said. “It doesn’t allow anyone or any group of judges to become entrenched where they are actually controlling comings and goings in that one division.”
He also said the wheel is used successfully in criminal court to restore the appearance of fairness.
Besides questions about where Colin will land — sources indicate it will be the civil division — concerns remain from families of Savitt’s elderly wards about what Colbath will do concerning the professional guardian. It is unknown whether the standardization of billing practices means he is cracking down on her for taking tens of thousands of dollars in fees in guardianship and probate cases without prior judicial approval.
The Clerk & Comptroller’s Office said in more than 900 cases it has investigated, Savitt was the only guardian who took fees before judicial approval.
Dr. Sam Sugar, co-founder of Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship, said Colbath should be able to bar Savitt from working as a professional guardian in Palm Beach County.
“The only people who can discipline guardians are the judges who appoint them,” Sugar said.
Sugar’s advocate group is behind this past year’s new state law that addressed favoritism among judges toward certain guardians and a bill currently working its way through the Legislature that will give the state its first regulatory authority over the profession. He was not impressed with Colbath’s reforms.
He said that a guardianship wheel has not protected families in Miami-Dade.
On the issue of training, Sugar said, “These judges and their personnel are experts in probate law.”
As for Savitt, Kogan said attorneys will be cautious about representing her or referring guardianships to her.
“They are going to be afraid because every case she gets is going to be scrutinized,” he said.
And judges will also shy away from appointing Savitt.
“Remember, judges are political animals and they have to run for reelection,” Kogan said. “They don’t want to read more stories about how they appointed Savitt to a particular case and have this blow up again.”


Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Judge Jones case a waste of just about everything

Judge Jones case a waste of just about everything



The Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline on Monday entered its findings of fact in the smoking wreckage that remains of Family Court Judge Steven Jones’ career.
Although it’s a wrist slap compared to what awaits the defrocked judge, the commission also made final its discipline of Jones: a three-month suspension without pay for his unethical relationship with the late prosecutor Lisa Willardson. The commission could have pushed to have him removed from the bench he hasn’t seen in months because of a pending federal fraud indictment.
Instead, it recognized his lack of a prior disciplinary record, “otherwise exemplary” 20-year judicial career, and the “relatively minimal violations” of three of the counts against him to opt for a lesser penalty. (The commission explored only the allegations before it and clearly didn’t wade into other legal swamps in which Jones finds himself mired.)
Truth is, it’s been all over but the shouting for Jones for months. Only he has been denying the undeniable. Backed into a corner in a Jan. 27 hearing, Jones said he planned to withdraw from his re-election bid. The fact he had been making one speaks volumes about the guy.
The notion that he continued to collect his six-figure salary in recent months despite his self-inflicted civil and criminal entanglements is downright disturbing. With his pay finally suspended, you would think even Jones would at last do the right thing and resign from office.
It wasn’t a close call. Ample evidence existed early in the process that pointed to Jones’ inappropriate relationship with a prosecutor who had cases in his courtroom.
“The close relationship of Ms. Willardson, a prosecutor, and Respondent, the judge who presides over their cases caused concern,” commission Chairman Douglas Jones wrote in a unanimous decision. “At least one case had been prosecuted by Ms. Willardson and was still pending through the period when the Respondent’s relationship with Ms. Willardson further developed.”
The judge’s failure to recuse himself was trouble on its face. Parental rights and the future of a child’s custody were at stake.
The commission: “Respondent filed his decision in that case in early December terminating the parental rights of the litigant. Subsequent to the exposure of Respondent’s relationship with Ms. Willardson, that decision was vacated and set aside upon motion for a new trial filed by the mother of the child and stipulation by the parties. The foregoing termination of parental rights case had to be re-tried before another judge as a result of Respondent’s relationship with Ms. Willardson.”
What a waste.
It’s a mindless forfeit of not one but two professional careers, a costly frittering away of commission time and court resources, a senseless spending of precious judicial system credibility and reputation in the community.
Worst of all, it’s a waste of life itself.
Perhaps one day soon we’ll know how Willardson died. Her reputation shot to pieces after her relationship with Jones surfaced, Willardson’s body was found Dec. 26 at her Henderson home. She was 46 and was known as a dedicated prosecutor. No matter the cause of her death, the result is senseless tragedy.
Given its mission and limited jurisdiction, the discipline commission was professionally compelled to acknowledge that as a judge Jones had no previous discipline issues and appeared to have a clean track record. (I believe you will see in the coming weeks and months that those appearances have been deceiving.)
That acknowledgment is a reminder of something important: As a judge, Steven Jones was a very capable fellow. He was bright, well-spoken, and knowledgeable. In short, he had a great deal going for him and easily could have spent the rest of his professional life as a leader in Family Court or another respected jurisdiction.
The fact he’s blown up his career in an ethics imbroglio, a larger federal fraud scandal, and possibly even more felonies as yet uncharged adds up to a staggering fall from grace.
And for what?
Perhaps one day we’ll know the answer to that question, too.
John L. Smith’s column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Email him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call 702-383-0295. Follow him on Twitter @jlnevadasmith.