Showing posts with label CT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CT. Show all posts

Monday, November 16, 2015

New Fairfield veteran returns to renovated home

Editor's note: This Shark heard about a Cook County WWII Vet who was treated in an equally despicable manner. His house and possessions were dispersed among the Cook County Probate Court parasites.  Strangely, his 9mm Luger pistol also disappeared and no police report was made!  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

New Fairfield veteran returns to renovated home

Posted: Nov 11, 2015 3:53 PM CST Updated: Nov 11, 2015 5:04 PM CST

 


United States Army Veteran Lou Russo got to go home on Wednesday. (WFSB)United States Army Veteran Lou Russo got to go home on Wednesday. (WFSB)

NEW FAIRFIELD, CT (WFSB) - A ceremony was held for the reveal of a new home in New Fairfield for a World War II veteran, who said his court-appointed conservator took advantage of him.

MOREAdditional LinksPoll

United States Army Veteran Lou Russo said he was disillusioned after learning how a conservator was spending his life savings. But, countless volunteers pulled together to rebuild his home after it fell into total disrepair.
On Veterans Day, a celebration fit for an American hero kicked off the big reveal of his newly renovated home.
A stream of musicians kicked off a ceremony honoring Russo, who is enjoying his newly-renovated home.
“I can never express enough gratitude for what they've all done,” Russo said.
It all started when Russo was hurt after a fall a few years ago. Court officials appointed a conservator to look out for his best interest.
Russo was placed in a private nursing home instead of a veterans affairs hospital, which would have been free.
The conservator, who later resigned, sold many of Russo's belongings. His home heating system broke, and his home was even rented to strangers.
Russo said he felt like the country he fought for had turned its back on him.
“He built this house with his hands,” said John Hodge with the Steven Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation. “Now we felt like it was up to us to give him a hand, so he can actually stay in this house.”
But a crew of generous volunteers looked to make the situation right. They teamed up with Home Depot and the Steven Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation to help rebuild the 97-year old's home.
“The tough time for Lou Russo is behind him, and this community is behind him,” Hodge said.
“It's changed so much,” Russo said. “It's beautiful.”
One of the most important new features to his home is a plaque honoring his brother.
“Lou lost his brother on the invasion of Normandy in the first wave,” Hodge said. “He was concerned that his brother was never laid to rest properly.”
“I accept humbly everything you've done for me, mainly in honor of my brother,” Russo said.
Veteran's Day is of course a celebration of all our nation's brave veterans. But in New Fairfield, it was declared Lou Russo Day.


Read more: http://www.foxcarolina.com/story/30494706/new-fairfield-veteran-returns-to-renovated-home#ixzz3red7HGM8

Friday, June 5, 2015

Veteran mistreated by court-appointed conservator

I-Team Investigation

Veteran mistreated by court-appointed conservator

Posted: May 22, 2015 12:54 PM CDT Updated: May 22, 2015 5:06 PM CDT
 

 
Louis Russo (WFSB)
Louis Russo (WFSB)

NEW FAIRFIELD, CT (WFSB) - A 96-year-old World War II veteran said he was taken advantage of by a former court appointed conservator.

MOREAdditional LinksPoll

Louis Russo, of New Fairfield, served in World War II and earned a VA pension and social security benefits that he still receives.
Even with those benefits, he owes tens of thousands of dollars for medical bills.
"The whole affair seems to be a nightmare, and shouldn't happen to anyone, let alone a veteran,” Russo said, adding that he just wants to be freed from the court's supervision so he can live the rest of his life on his own, without attorneys or a conservator.
Russo served in the United States Army and fought in the pacific during World War II, and 75 years later he is now fighting his government, after being removed from the home he built.
"It can be described only as a tale of horror,” he said.
He was appointed his first involuntary probate court conservator in 2013.
Russo fell almost two years ago, and around the same time town officials expressed concerns with his living situation.
"Lou lived in the garage for decades. No running water, he burned wood in basement for heat,” said Russo's current conservator and attorney, Dean Lewis.
"He did go to the nursing home for over a year. Brought to St. John Paul because his living conditions, (and) the city of New Fairfield took action through conservatorship to have him removed,” Lewis said.
Russo denies that claim, and was adamant about concerns with some of the people being paid by the state who were making decision for him.
Last Friday, a probate judge agreed, ruling Russo's first conservator did not deal with Russo's property properly.
In 2013, Russo was appointed his first involuntary probate court conservator, a man named Mark Broadmeyer.
"The meanest, most vindictive person on the planet,” Russo said. "He didn't want to let go of the prize he caught, meaning me."
Broadmeyer resigned in the fall, and a judge on last Friday ordered him to return more than $34,000 back to Russo's estate.
New court documents revealed Broadmeyer “failed to properly inventory and protect certain assets,” including scrapping Russo's bulldozer, bucket loader, back hoe, dump truck and pick-up truck for $1,800, and renting Russo's home without proper permission.
"Who knows what happened to the rent, because I certainly haven't seen any of it,” Russo said.
Court documents also show Broadmeyer's fees to fix up Russo's home “failed to meet the standard of what is reasonable.”
All of this happened while Russo was racking up more than $100,000 from a privately owned Danbury nursing home.
He still owes more than $30,000 and said he never should have gone there.
"I wanted to get put in a veteran's hospital and never get charged a penny. And they ignored that from very first day,” Russo said.
Broadmeyer said in an email that he has no comment on this case.
"In my opinion he accounted for all the money he received, I'm just in disagreement with how he spent the money. So I don't personally believe it's criminal. I think he mismanaged it in some manners,” Lewis said.
A criminal complaint has been filed with the Connecticut State Police and is now under investigation.
Former Marine Dan Gaita, co-founder of Operation Vet Fit, is one of Russo's strongest supporters.
"Greed is the cause, but the result is neglect, exploitation and robbing a combat veteran of his dignity,” Gaita said. "Some of us take the phrase ‘leave no man behind' serious. I'm one of them.”
Last fall Gaita, and an army of volunteers he organized, helped Russo with his home repairs, food donations, and much more.
"Here is someone who is disabled, elderly, served the country and has had everything taken from him by people in positions of power and wealth and influence that will circumvent the laws to provide for their own wealth and well-being while turning their backs on the people like this who gave our country a chance to emerge as a world leader,” Gaita said.
Russo has been back in his home since late fall, with care 24 hours per day, seven days per week, and said he now just wants the court involvement to end.
“I want complete severance from the court's jurisdiction... and to resume my life as I had before,” Russo said.
Things are still tied up in court, and the biggest issue is how to get the money to pay the nursing home bill.
Even with the probate judge's order last week, the soldier appeared to feel defeated.
“It doesn't matter because Broadmeyer is broke,” Russo said. “It's encouraging we haven't been forgotten; there is some justice there after all."
Broadmeyer's attorney said he hasn't read the ruling yet or met with his client and cannot comment until then.
They have 30 days to appeal, and the same judge will hand down a decision whether to issue a reverse mortgage to help pay off Russo's nursing home bill.
Anyone looking to make a tax deductible donation can make it payable to The Louis Russo Fund, C/O: Operation Vet Fit, 120 Greenwood Ave., Bethel CT.
The funds are used solely for Louis Russo, his phone, cable, internet, life alert system, food and any other expenses he needs assistance with.


Read more: http://www.wfsb.com/story/29136095/veteran-fighting-for-justice#ixzz3cBn5UIHn

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Probate court supervisory attorney fired for financial improprieties

Editor's note: This Shark believes that Ms. Cohen would fit in well in the Probate Court of Cook County where her behavior is the norm as opposed to the exception.  The prerequisite for employment on the 18th floor is the ability to lie.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

Probate court supervisory attorney fired for financial improprieties (CT)

A supervisory attorney in the state’s Office of the Probate Court Administrator is out of a job after a three-judge panel agreed with a recommendation to fire her for alleged financial improprieties.
Debra Cohen was initially suspended with pay last November after reports surfaced that, at the same time she was helping to supervise and train the state’s probate judges and their staffs, she was also appearing in courts as a trustee of people’s estates and had collected more than $33,000 in conservator fees. That was a clear conflict of interest, according to Probate Court Administrator Paul Knierim.
Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis read the judges’ decision from the bench on Monday, Oct. 6. In addition to the termination, the judges ruled that the last four-plus months of Cohen’s suspension should be unpaid. It’s unclear how much Cohen was paid during her suspension and whether she would have to pay a certain amount back to her employer.
Judges Bellis, Robert Devlin and Maria Kahn were convinced after hearing several days of testimony that Cohen disobeyed supervisors’ order not to continue representing clients in probate court and even tried keeping her bosses in the dark about that trustee work by trying to conceal fees she paid herself.
According to a Judicial Branch spokeswoman, the unpaid portion of the suspension kicked in May 29, a day after Knierim outlined Cohen’s issues in a letter to the judges. He took a rare step of specifically calling for her termination.
Several attorneys told the Law Tribune they couldn’t remember another time in the last two decades that judges were empaneled to decide a personnel matter. Usually, those are handled by supervisors or passed off to disciplinary officials if the case involves allegations of professional misconduct. Experts called Cohen’s hearing “hybrid” – a personnel matter with professional misconduct undertones.
As such, the judges heard six days of testimony in late August and mid-September before issuing a decision.
George Kelly, the attorney who represented the Office of the Probate Court Administrator at the disciplinary hearing, said he hadn’t reviewed a transcript of the decision, and would hold off on commenting. Cohen’s attorney, Marc Mercier, did not immediately return a phone call requesting comment.
Cohen’s misconduct will likely be reviewed by grievance officials. Patricia King, the state’s chief disciplinary counsel, said she was unaware whether a grievance was filed against Cohen.
According to Knierim’s letter, Cohen’s financial stake in four probate matters “constituted outside employment that impaired her independence of judgment” and colored her ability to give judges and court staff “sound, objective and independent” legal advice. Probate courts can approve trustee fees, impose fines for breaching trustee duties and exonerate trustees from personal liability.
In addition, Cohen didn’t provide her employer notice of the conflict of interest, Knierim wrote. On the contrary, she reportedly tried hiding her trustee duties from supervisors, who were alerted only after a probate court staff member found out that Cohen was acting as a trustee for the estate of John DeRosa and questioned whether a staff attorney should be doubling up as a trustee. Cohen was told by supervisors she had to resign her trustee duties immediately.
Despite that order, she continued acting as a trustee in three other matters, officials said. She also attempted to collect fees in the DeRosa matter, after being told not to do so, according to Knierim’s letter. The letter also alleges other financial misdeeds, including an alleged “deliberate attempt” to conceal how much she paid herself while acting as conservator of the estate of Sandra Brozna.
A hearing in East Hartford Probate Court found Cohen was ordered to reimburse $33,500 in conservator fees, but repaid only $10,000.
Attribution:
Probate Court Supervisory Attorney Fired for Financial Improprieties
Isaac Avilucea
October 7, 2014
The Connecticut Law Tribune
http://www.ctlawtribune.com/id=1202672642859/Probate-Court-Supervisory-Attorney-Fired-for-Financial-Improprieties#ixzz3FfKUm8NF

Thursday, September 4, 2014

Probate staff attorney accused of misconduct

Probate staff attorney accused of misconduct (CT)

A three-judge panel will decide later this month whether Debra Cohen should be fired from her post as a staff attorney in the Office of the Probate Court Administrator.
The hearing follows accusations that Cohen, who has been on paid administrative leave since last November, acted as trustee of people’s estates and paid herself more than $33,000 in conservator fees while she was also being paid for her supervisory role in the statewide probate office. She is also accused of keeping supervisors in the dark about that trustee work, going so far as to allegedly conceal fees she paid herself.
If true, the accusations, which are outlined in a letter from Probate Court Administrator Paul Knierim, represent a direct conflict of interest since Cohen was in charge of training probate judges and court staff and providing input to those same people about how to handle probate cases.
George Kelly, the attorney who will represent the Office of the Probate Court Administrator at the disciplinary hearing, declined comment about the pending disciplinary matter. Cohen’s attorney, Marc Mercier, did not return a phone call requesting comment.
In the letter, dated May 28, Knierim asked that Cohen be fired, and in the interim, her paid suspension be downgraded to unpaid while the three judges decide her fate. The hearing before judges Barbara Bellis, Robert Devlin and Maria Kahn is scheduled for Aug. 25-27 in Hartford Superior Court.
It’s unknown if the case has been referred to the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel. Probable cause for a grievance would have to be found before the office would investigate whether Cohen should be punished beyond whatever the judges determine.
The letter from Knierim says Cohen’s financial stake in four probate matters “constituted outside employment that impaired her independence of judgment” and colored her ability to give judges and court staff “sound, objective and independent” legal advice. Probate courts can approve trustee fees, impose fines for breaching trustee duties and exonerate trustees from personal liability.
In addition, Cohen didn’t provide her employer notice of the conflict of interest, Knierim wrote. On the contrary, she reportedly tried hiding her trustee duties from supervisors, who were alerted only after a probate court staff member found out that Cohen was acting as a trustee for the estate of John DeRosa and questioned whether a staff attorney should be doubling up as a trustee. Cohen was told by supervisors she had to resign her trustee duties immediately.
Despite that order, she continued acting as a trustee in three other matters, officials said. She also attempted to collect fees in the DeRosa matter, after being told not to do so, according to Knierim’s letter. The letter also alleges other financial misdeeds, including an alleged “deliberate attempt” to conceal how much she paid herself while acting as conservator of the estate of Sandra Brozna.
A hearing in East Hartford Probate Court found Cohen was ordered to reimburse $33,500 in conservator fees, but repaid only $10,000.
Attribution:
Probate Staff Attorney Accused of Misconduct
Allegations include working secretly as a trustee
Isaac Avilucea
August 15, 2014
The Connecticut Law Tribune
http://www.ctlawtribune.com/home/id=1202666992816/Probate-Staff-Attorney-Accused-of-Misconduct?slreturn=20140717190846

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Connecticut Department on Aging Will Better Serve State's Growing Senior Population

Connecticut Department on Aging Will Better Serve State's Growing Senior Population
User Rating:  / 0
Editor's note: Your ProbateShark wonders if this bill would have assisted Sykes, Gore, Wyman or Tyler in Illinois? He thinks not...not as long as the Judicial-Nursing Home Complex remains in power to ply their flesh trade.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
 
 
 
PoorBest 
Share0
Governor Signs Legislation Establishing the New State Department on Aging
(HARTFORD, CT) - Governor Dannel P. Malloy, joined by Lieutenant Governor Nancy Wyman, state Department on Aging (SDA) Commissioner Edith Prague and members of the General Assembly’s Aging Committee, held a ceremonial bill signing today for Public Act 13-125, An Act Concerning the Department on Aging.  The legislation fully establishes SDA which was statutorily created on January 1, 2013 and will ensure that Connecticut’s seniors have access to the supportive services necessary to live with dignity, security, and independence.
“Under the leadership of Commissioner Prague, this department will greatly improve the quality of life for our state’s growing senior population,” said Governor Malloy.  “Over the last decade, the number of elderly residents living in Connecticut has grown nearly 5 percent and currently makes up more than 14 percent of the state’s population – that number is expected to grow to 21.5 percent of the population by 2030.  This is why it is crucial that we have an office specifically designed to assist these residents and administer the services and programs that they depend on day-in and day-out.”
The department will be responsible for managing a variety of federally funded programs at the state level under the Older American’s Act.  All appropriate functions, programs, and duties within the Department of Social Services’ (DSS) State Unit on Aging and Office of Long Term Care Ombudsman will be transferred to the newly-formed SDA.  In March, Governor Malloy tapped former State Senator Edith Prague of Columbia to serve as the Commissioner of SDA.
“There's much we need to do to help elderly residents in our state and, now that we have a department that focuses specifically on them, we can work on improving the way we deliver those services,” said Lt. Governor Wyman.  “As the past chairman of the State Senate’s Committee on Aging, Commissioner Prague has experience on issues pertaining to elderly services and is well-respected by her colleagues in both parties as a staunch advocate for senior citizens across the state.  I am happy to have Commissioner Prague as a partner as we work towards the Governor’s goal of improving the quality of life and care for Connecticut’s older adults.”
“We know that the demand for programs that serve our seniors will increase dramatically in the coming years,” said Commissioner Prague.  “Having a central office to take the lead on policies relevant to our senior citizens will make services more easily accessible.  I thank Governor Malloy for getting out in front of this issue by creating the Department on Aging and am eager to work together to ensure the programs we offer meet the needs of our elderly residents.”
Thirty-one people will work for SDA, including Commissioner Prague, Pamela Toohey, an executive assistant to the commissioner, 15 staff transferred from the State Unit on Aging formerly at DSS, and 14 staff transferred from the Office of the Long Term Care Ombudsman.