Our mission is to expose and remedy corruption in the Probate Court of Cook County, Illinois. We assist, educate and enlighten families of the dead, the dying, the disabled and the aged to better understand their rights in order to protect themselves from the excesses of the Probate Court of Cook County. ProbateSharks.com is dedicated to networking the human element of people to people. We join together in reforming the corrupt Cook County Probate Court system.
Editor's note: Your ProbateShark would agree...wholeheartedly... Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com Scientific Study Concludes No One Trusts Lawyers By Staci Zaretsky
Many people enter the legal profession with the expectation that the public will see them as members of a noble trade to be revered and admired. Unfortunately, that’s simply not the case at all. For every would-be Atticus Finch, there exists an off-color lawyer joke. If you’d call 5,000 dead lawyers at the bottom of the ocean “a good start,” then you’re not alone.
According to a new study, although lawyers are viewed by the public as part of an “envied” profession, no one really likes them. Sure, lawyers may gain a scant amount of respect from some, but when you’re viewed generally as heartless bastards, no one will trust you…
These are just some of the conclusions drawn from a Princeton University study conducted by Susan Fiske and Cydney Dupree. You may want to have a stiff drink before taking a look at Fiske and Dupree’s warmth v. competence chart to see how lawyers are rated compared to other professions:
While lawyers are perceived as some of the most capable and competent professionals — behind only doctors, scientists, and engineers — they’re almost on par with prostitutes when it comes to warmth. Let that one sink in as you read what Fiske and Dupree have to say about similarly situated professionals:
The [rightmost] corner lists the ambivalently perceived high-competence, low-warmth, “envied” professions: lawyers, chief executive officers, engineers, accountants, scientists, and researchers. They earn respect but not trust. Being seen as competent but cold might not seem problematic until one recalls that communicator credibility requires not just status and expertise (competence) but also trustworthiness (warmth). People report envy and jealousy toward groups in this space. These are mixed emotions that include both admiration and resentment.
Lawyers, of course, can’t blame all of their perceived untrustworthiness on jealousy and resentment. Perhaps if they’d like to stop being seen as “cold, ruthlessly efficient machines,” they should try to pay the same amount of attention to their social interactions with clients as they do their billable hours.
What’s the lesson to be learned here? The next time someone asks you what the difference between a lawyer and a hooker is, it’s not just that the hooker will stop trying to screw you when you’re dead. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States] This Chart Will Show How Respected Your Profession Is [Science of Us / New York Magazine]
Editor's note: Your ProbateShark believes "Family-Friendly" in this article relates to employees of these law firms. This Shark would appreciate the term "Family-Friendly" to also extend the definition to the kindly treatment of families in the Family and Probate Courts. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
Women continue to have a hard time in the law. Whether they’re being told not to show cleavage, dress like “ignorant sluts,” or wear hooker heels, they just can’t the respect they deserve. In an environment like this, where women are perceived as lesser beings and one is expected to bring baked goods to the office just because she happens to have breasts, achieving a sense of work/life balance seems like an incredibly lofty goal.
The Yale Law Women just came out with their annual list of the top ten family friendly firms. We cover this list every year (see our posts from 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008). This year’s list changed very dramatically from last year’s: only three of the firms have returned.
Which firms made the cut? Which firms had the best options available to both women and men? Let’s take a look at the latest ranking for the most family-friendly firms…
Here’s the list of the most family-friendly firms according to Yale Law Women (in alphabetical order):
In 2014, the following firms were booted from the list: Fulbright & Jaworski, Goodwin Procter, Perkins Coie (previously honored for four years in a row; so much for the diaper-changing table in the men’s bathroom), Reed Smith (previously honored for two years in a row), Sherman & Sterling, Sidley Austin, and Squire Sanders. Curiously missing in action yet again was WilmerHale. The Boston-based firm used to be a staple on the YLW list (from 2009 to 2012). Does anyone have any specific info on what happened here?
The three returning firms are Arnold & Porter (an institution on this list; it’s been recognized every year since we began our coverage), Hunton & Williams, and Orrick (both honored for the third year in a row). These three are now joined by Baker Botts, HoLove, K&E, MoFo, Munger Tolles, Paul Weiss, and V&E. Congratulations to all of these firms for their many accomplishments in “developing and implementing family friendly practices and policies.”
Perhaps an even greater accomplishment, however, is being named in not one but two rankings lists for the best firms in terms of flex-time opportunities. In 2013, Working Mother and Flex-Time Lawyers released the list of the 50 Best Law Firms for Women, which included the U.S. outpost of Hogan Lovells, Hunton & Williams, Kirkland & Ellis, Orrick, and Vinson & Elkins. Very nice work.
Vivia Chen of The Careerist has a round-up of useful information about some of the YLW study’s findings:
• Work/life balance is a hot subject at firms. The report finds that an astonishing 83 percent have committees devoted to the issue.
• Part-time and flex-time work are allowed in most firms. But part-time is definitely a women’s thing: They make up 80.5 percent of those who take advantage of the program.
• Firms offer generous paid leaves. Sixteen weeks to primary caregivers, and 5.6 weeks to secondary caregivers. But only about 50 percent of men take the maximum parental leave, while 90 percent of women do so.
That’s really good and well that all of these Biglaw firms are paying greater attention to the family needs of their employees, but we’d love to know what taking advantage of these opportunities does to one’s professional career track. Considering the YLW report says that “[a]lumni expressed skepticism about the likelihood of remaining partner-eligible after taking advantage of alternative schedules,” we obviously have our doubts as to the firms’ sincere intent to offer genuine work/life balance opportunities.
According to the surveys taken by the Yale Law Women, things are supposedly getting better. “[A]bout 40 percent of attorneys perceived their firms to be more family friendly now compared to last year,” says Luci Yang, the group’s chair. We’ll buy into that when legal professionals — women especially — aren’t being penalized for attempting to attain a sense of work/life balance.
P.S. Take this with a shaker of salt: the workaholic cult of Wachtell Lipton somehow has one of the highest percentages of associates working on part-time schedules. 2014 Top Ten Family Friendly Firms List [Yale Law Women] Wachtell Lipton Is Family Friendly? [The Careerist] Only Women and Wimps Work Part-Time [The Careerist] Earlier: The Top Ten Family-Friendly Law Firms (2013)
Editor's note: Your ProbateShark would never recommend any of the lawyers in the Probate Court of Cook County competent enough to trim nails...even their own! Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
Each year, U.S. News and World Report comes out with a ranking of the 100 best jobs in the nation, based on important factors like the number of expected openings, advancement opportunities, career fulfillment, and salary expectations. With criteria like that, it makes sense that each year, the job of “Lawyer” sinks lower and lower in the rankings.
For example, in 2013, U.S. News ranked Lawyer as No. 35 on its 100 Best Jobs ranking, and as No. 4 on its ranking of the “5 Dream Jobs That Aren’t So Dreamy.” Just one year later, in 2014, Lawyer isn’t even ranked in the top 50 of the U.S. News list. Being a lawyer is now a second-tier career. How embarrassing.
What’s even more embarrassing? The list of jobs that are supposedly better than being a lawyer. Why did you spend all of that money on a law degree when you could’ve just gone to beauty school?
We’ve taken the liberty of compiling a list of some of the jobs you should’ve considered taking before embarking upon your miserable career as a lawyer, one that is best described by this U.S. News graphic:
Lovely. But don’t you worry, U.S. News claims that “[t]he job market for lawyers has improved in recent years,” and “an additional 74,800 jobs will need to be filled” by 2022. Upward mobility issues solved, right? Wrong. It’s a pity the editors forgot that more than 40,000 people graduate from law school each year.
Here’s what you should’ve done with your life instead of being a lawyer:
#49 Nail Technician: Because when clients give you the finger, they’re not being mean.
As 2013 draws to a close, let’s look back at the 10 biggest stories in the legal profession over the past year. This is an annual tradition here at Above the Law, which we’ve done in 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2009. We’ll fire up the old Google Analytics machine to get data on our most popular posts, based on pageviews, and share the results with you.
Before turning to specific stories, let’s look at the top general discussion topics here at ATL. For 2013, our most trafficked category page was Biglaw, which bumped Law Schools out of the top spot — a spot that Law Schools held from 2010 through 2012. Now that the word is out about the perils of getting a law degree, leading to plummeting applications, perhaps it’s time to move on from the “don’t go to law school” narrative.
After Biglaw and Law Schools, our third most-popular category page was, as usual, Bonuses. This wasn’t a terribly exciting year for bonuses — there were no spring bonuses, and Cravath and its many followers paid out the same bonuses as last year — but people still want to know the score.
Our fourth most-popular category page was small law firms. Small firms, including boutiques, are an area of increasing focus and readership for us — and also where many of the job opportunities are these days.
Moving on from the topic pages, what were the 10 most popular individual posts at Above the Law in 2013?
Here are our top 10 stories for 2013, in ascending order of popularity, measured in pageviews.[1] Click on the title of each post to be taken to the original story.
10. The Racist Law Firm Ad Update — The Maligned Law Firm Speaks: After a racist law firm advertisement went viral, we played a role in clarifying the situation. We published a statement from the law firm in question — McCutcheon & Hamner, a small personal-injury firm in Alabama — denying its involvement in producing the highly offensive YouTube clip.
9. Did Lamar Odom Cheat On Khloe Kardashian With A Lawyer? Reality TV star Khloe Kardashian recently declared that she’s “excited for this year to be over” — just like her marriage to NBA player Lamar Odom, which ended in 2013. A contributing cause: Odom’s alleged affair with a gorgeous California lawyer, Polina Polonsky, who allegedly asked Odom to help her review client files. Oy!
8. Nationwide Layoff Watch: Major Cuts Come To Weil Gotshal: The Kardashian-Odom split wasn’t the only soap opera that generated headlines this past year. People tuned in for As The Weil Turns — upheaval at the high-powered law firm of Weil Gotshal, kicked off by large-scale layoffs in June. The following months witnessed a slew of partner defections, especially in Texas (although the firm maintains that this is strategic and intentional shrinkage). Can Weil stop the bleeding in 2014?
7. Breaking: Cravath Announces Year-End Bonuses; Let the 2013 Bonus Season Begin! The bonus announcement of Cravath, the extremely prestigious and profitable law firm that sets the market for Biglaw bonuses, always lands in the top 10 stories (last year it was #5). This year, Elie Mystal and I argued over whether the bonus glass was half-empty or half-full.
6. Which State Has the Most Difficult Bar Exam? Professor Robert Anderson of Pepperdine Law developed a methodology for ranking bar exams by toughness. Which state’s test took the top spot? Hint: it wasn’t New York (which didn’t even make the top 10).
5. Lawyer: Apple Should Protect Me From My Porn Addiction: Blocking web users from accessing porn: there’s an app for that? Well, if not, there should be — or so claims lawyer Chris Sevier, who filed a pro se lawsuit that, as Joe Patrice put it, “seeks damages and injunctive relief against Apple for making devices that can display porn, or as the rest of us call it, the Internet.” More recently, Sevier sued President Obama for alleged involvement in the Duck Dynasty debacle.
4. The 2014 U.S. News Law School Rankings: Lawyers love rankings — and U.S. News’s closely watched law school rankings are the biggest game in town. As law schools fight over a shrinking pool of law students, a law school’s position on the prestige totem pole is more important than ever.
3. Biglaw Memo From Top Firm Advises That Women ‘Don’t Giggle,’ Don’t ‘Show Cleavage’: Clifford Chance, a member of the elite Magic Circle, is one of the world’s top law firms — not just in profits and prestige, but also in generating juicy memos. Last year, its famous Law Firm Mommy Memo took the #3 spot; this year, the firm holds on to third place, with a controversial collection of “Presentation Tips For Women” that Staci Zaretsky described as “one of the most sexist Biglaw memos we’ve ever seen.”
2. The ATL Top 50 Law School Rankings (2013): The U.S. News law school rankings might be the biggest game in town (for now), but they aren’t the only one. In our inaugural law school rankings, we stripped out dubious factors like library size or money wasted spent per student to focus on what really matters: employment outcomes, i.e., jobs for graduates. Based on the great traffic and reader feedback we received, our rankings were a huge hit, and we’ll be doing them again in 2014.
1. A Great Response to a Cease and Desist Letter: The cease-and-desist response heard round the world, this rip-roaring rebuttal — a delicious combination of snark and substance — went viral. What could be more satisfying than watching a bullying lawyer get a taste of his own medicine? The letter kicked off a trend of awesome C&D responses — see, e.g., here and here.
We hope you enjoyed this look back at the 10 most popular stories of 2013. If you have a favorite Above the Law story from the past year that didn’t crack the top ten, please feel free to give it a mention in the comments.
And now for a brief programming note: Since Wednesday is the federal holiday for New Year’s Day, we won’t be publishing much (if at all) between now and Thursday, January 2. Happy New Year, and we’ll see you in 2014! [1]For purposes of this listing, intended to serve as a look back at 2013′s biggest stories, we did not count posts published in 2012 that racked up major traffic in 2013 — e.g., Cam Girl Pleasures Herself In A Top Law School’s Library. Earlier: Above the Law’s Top 10 Most Popular Posts of 2012 Above The Law’s Top 10 Most Popular Stories of 2011 Above The Law’s Top 10 Most Popular Stories of 2010 Above The Law’s Top 10 Most Popular Stories of 2009
TV Guide released its annual list of television salaries and, once again, the top spot belongs to Judge Judy.
Someone needs to resolve the nation’s disputes over dogs taking dumps in the neighbor’s lawn. We need her on that wall.
America’s most trusted jurist has the highest-rated show in syndication, so a hefty salary isn’t really surprising.
What is surprising is just how much Judge Judy blows away the competition in the salary market. A-List TV personalities on flagship network programs are begging for table scraps compared to her haul.
Meanwhile, another TV jurist has slipped off the highest paid list…
According to TV Guide, Judge Judy is pulling down a whopping $47 million for her services, up from $45 million last year. Speaking of “whopping,” these figures are probably giving Judge Joseph Wapner, who minces no words in explaining how much damage Judge Judy does to the judicial system, conniptions. Also, Judge Wapner is still alive? Really?
In any event, $47 million can buy a new lawyerly lair to replace the one she just sold. Meanwhile, the million-dollar law degree folks are preparing to send around a press release explaining how Judge Judy proves everyone should go to law school immediately.
Just how much more is Judge Judy making than her fellow TV stars? Jon Stewart comes in second on the list, earning an estimated $25 to $30 million as the host who consistently seizes the 18-49 demographic. America’s most hated TV host, Matt Lauer, is making $22 to $25 million after throwing Ann Curry under a moving train to take over NBC’s flagship news program.
Sadly, it’s not all happy news for courtroom TV. Last year, Judge Joe Brown ranked fifth on the list, with an estimated $20 million a year (though he publicly disputes this, claiming he made a mere $5 million). But he got canceled, so Judge Judy is now the only court on the list.
The Judge Judy show is certainly worth the investment in its star. CNN Money reports:
Stephen Battaglio, TV Guide’s business editor and author of the list, said Judge Judy generates about $200 million in ad revenue for CBS, but costs just $10 million per year to produce, before factoring in Sheindlin’s salary. The show is aired internationally, and some stations air it several times a day.
Editor's note: This Shark in his youth considered U.S. News as a premier business magazine. U.S. News had a section of weekly manufacturing production index that was a bible of business activity. Based on reports of valid activity such as electric generation and freight car loadings, a daily pulse of business was revealed. Now, U.S. News is just another blathering rag. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
It’s tough times over at U.S. News. After shedding nearly all pretense of being a news outlet, U.S. News threw all its eggs in the “telling people where to go to school” basket.
U.S. News enjoyed a virtual monopoly for years before someone came along and created a better law school ranking system. The crux of the ATL Top 50 ranking is focusing on post-graduation results rather than LSAT/GPA inputs.
Now U.S. News seems to be considering a new post-graduation component, but it doesn’t seem all that scientific…
A tipster tells us that U.S. News is sending the following email to every law school head of admissions:
On the recommendation of law school deans, we are asking you, and each of the 194 law schools that were ranked by U.S. News last year, to submit contact information for a maximum of ten persons who have significant contact in the workplace with your recent graduates.
These persons should be able to make judgments about the competence of your graduates in their discipline relative to the general field of graduates in that discipline and hence, by extension, to rate the effective quality of your program. You may submit names and contact information of law hiring partners at firms who hired recent graduates from your school, judges (local, state, federal) who hired recent graduates as clerks, and contacts at businesses, non-profits, or other agencies and organizations that hired recent graduates for legal matters.
This is the first year we have instituted this system and we are hoping that you will aid us in making it successful.
We will use this information in the construction of a respondent sample for a survey to be sent out by mail in October 2013. The survey will use the same Likert scale format that we use for the survey sent to the dean of your law school. Like that survey, this one will ask for quality evaluations on a five-point scale, with a “don’t know” option. Please take steps to ensure that the contact information you supply us is current and valid. The survey is mailed and we cannot use names that do not have a valid mailing address or those with a non-U.S. mailing address.
Thank you for your participation!
U.S. News & World Report
Two thoughts on this. First, why is this going to admissions as opposed to career services? One would hope career services has the closest contact with employers.
Second, isn’t this transparently gameable? Admissions gets to hand-select 10 employers willing to sing the praises of recent graduates. A random survey of employers may not get perfect results, but at least it would avoid this bias.
We’ll have to wait until next year to see how (or if) this survey plugs into the annual rankings. Earlier: ATL Top 50 Law Schools
And now back to our regularly scheduled programing. We join this episode of “My Law School Nearly Got Away With It,” already in progress.
We all know that law schools do all kinds of things to game the U.S. News law school rankings. U.S. News knows this, yet does little to stop this behavior. But rarely do we catch a law school red-handed.
Here, we have a school openly calling upon its students to do something for the express purpose of increasing the school’s U.S. News rank.
Even more embarrassingly, the school is targeting a class of graduates who have generally not had much luck in the employment market. The email suggests that the way to increase the value of their law degree is to give money to the school, since right now it’s not good enough to get them a job…
This email from the Cardozo School of Law alumni office is truly shameful. They sent it out to the class of 2011. The subject line, bluntly and inelegantly, says it all:
Subject: Help Cardozo Move Up The Rankings
The email is actually written by another person in the ‘Dozo class of 2011. You know how these things go. The school thinks you are more likely to give if one of your classmates makes the ask. But you know the alumni office approved this message. Here it is, in part:
Getting down to business, I would like to let you know a little secret about helping out Cardozo move up the rankings.
Did you know that one of the factors that US News considers in its rankings is percentage of alumni who participate in annual giving?
It’s true. Your gift to the law school can actually increase the value of your own degree…
I know money may be tight and, if you are like me, you may still be making a contribution to your legal education in loan payments every month. But, by helping out the school, it increases the value of what we have already put our hard earned time and money into. Something that I know I’m willing to do.
You can read the full email on the next page.
This email is pretty horrible. It’s instructing Cardozo students to give for the express purpose of gaming the rankings… because gaming the rankings “increases the value of your own degree.”
And you know who is going to be most interested in increasing “the value of what we have already put our hard earned time and money into”? People in the class of 2011 who are unemployed, underemployed, or generally disappointed with what the “value” of a Cardozo degree has gotten them so far.
In essence, the alumni office is telling people who haven’t gotten a lot of value out of a Cardozo law degree that the way to correct that problem is to give Cardozo more money. Does that even qualify as “throwing good money after bad”?
But law schools are going to do what law schools are going to do. What is U.S. News going to do? Here, we have direct evidence that Cardozo is trying to game the U.S. News rankings… is U.S. News going to react in any way? Are they going to punish Cardozo? Or are they just happy to continue to have these factors that have no relation to the value of legal education that schools can use to increase the perceived value of their law degrees?
I’ll note that Cardozo did not crack the top 50 in the Above the Law rankings.
And I’ll note that if the Cardozo alumni office sent out an email trying to “game” the ATL rankings, it would have to be sent to Cardozo alumni who are employers, telling them to give jobs to Cardozo students — not money to the Cardozo administration. (If you’re interested, you can see the full letter on the next page.)
Deep inside me there’s a serial killer lurking somewhere. But I keep him amused with cocaine, Formula One, booty calls, and coruscating cross-examination.
Individuals [with psychopathic personality disorder] are arrogant and self-centered, and feel privileged and entitled. They have a grandiose, exaggerated sense of self-importance and they are primarily motivated by self-serving goals. They seek power over others and will manipulate, exploit, deceive, con, or otherwise take advantage of others, in order to inflict harm or to achieve their goals. They are callous and have little empathy for others’ needs or feelings unless they coincide with their own. They show disregard for the rights, property, or safety of others and experience little or no remorse or guilt if they cause any harm or injury to others. They may act aggressively or sadistically toward others in pursuit of their personal agendas and appear to derive pleasure or satisfaction from humiliating, demeaning dominating, or hurting others. They also have the capacity for superficial charm and ingratiation when it suits their purposes. They profess and demonstrate minimal investment in conventional moral principles and they tend to disavow responsibility for their actions and to blame others for their own failures and shortcomings.
Does this sound like any lawyers you know or work for? Or perhaps it sounds like, well, you! It just might, because according to Dutton, these are the top ten most psychopathic professions:
1. CEO 2. Lawyer 3. Media (TV/radio) 4. Salesperson 5. Surgeon 6. Journalist 7. Police officer 8. Clergyperson 9. Chef 10. Civil servant