Showing posts with label Lanre Amu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lanre Amu. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Ever wonder why elder cleansing is one of the fastest growing industries in America?

Take a look at today's WSJ.    Then brose the articles and notice that our democracy is being made a mockery.

 
 
image
 
 
 
 
 
In Chicago, Politicians Battle ‘Ghost Candidates’
Putting forward ‘ghost candidates,’ who have names or backgrounds similar to someone running, is meant to confuse voters. “In Chicago, you put another guy’s name on...
Preview by Yahoo
 

Sedition is becoming a norm.     Even though we have a First Amendment, a lawyer who exposes or protests corrupt judges, lawyers, judicial officials etc can kiss his/her law license goodby; however, a lawyer who pleads guilty to breach of fiduciary relationships, health care frauds in the 100s of millions of dollars is given a pass.      A presidential candidate has zero tolerance for dissension in his audiences, and billionare George Soros is lauded for sending hoodlums to attempt to disrupt rallies.   No one seems to care about the First Amendment.

Tomorrow there will be vote fraud of monumental proportions.     Every senior being elder cleansed can be expected to turn out and vote for ******, if they have not voted early, by absentee ballot etc.    Need proof.    Count the number of signs on homes and businesses for Mrs. Clinton!     Ride by the Auditorm Theater and see the crowd!     Indeed, I am biased!     However, I am not deaf and I am not blind.   

My friend Lanre Amu lost his license for practicing law while black!      I have a bit of trouble reconciling that act with democracy.     Seth Gilman breached a fiduciary relationship, stole from the USA and he is given a pass by the Illinois Disciplinary Commission (ARDC).    JoAnne Denison exposed in her blog criminal action in the Court -  her blog has been found to be akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater by the Illinois Supreme Court and the disciplinary commission!    

We are in real trouble!     


Ken Ditkowsky

Sunday, March 13, 2016

Answering a question for Probate Sharks Blog! A simple answer - Stop Jerome Larkin's cover=up

Editor's note: This Shark appreciates all constructive comments.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
 
 
To:   Justice Department of the United States of America
Date:   March 13, 2016
From:  Ken Ditkowsky
Subject:   The Illinois cover-up of Elder Cleansing
 
Once again I and the thousands upon thousands of citizens who are rising up across America to speak out against the felonies of elder cleansing, to wit:  Kidnapping, the herding and isolation of senior citizens, the theft of savings and assets of the elderly, exploitation, abuse **** and finally the assisted involuntary suicide of the victim (previously call homicide) thank Attorney General Lynch for her prosecution of Seth Gillman and some of professionals (legal and medical) who are gaming the health care system.      Indeed we are grateful, however there is so much more to be done that the miscreants are moving forward and making irreparable gains that threaten America’s future and possible existence.
 
Here in Illinois as an example the First Amendment has literally been abolished.    A lawyer, who is also an engineer, Lanre Amu,  complained to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (and others) when he was shocked to learn that the Judge in a case that he was engaged was allegedly on the Board of Directors of the defendant and her brother was the attorney for the defendant.    Even though it has been reported that a respected business newspaper (Crains Chicago Business) made the same averment,  his majesty the unhonorable Jerome Larkin using his devine wisdom ruled that Mr. Amu, having a dark skin hue was therefore not telling the truth.     Ergo, the Illinois Supreme Court ordered that while Mr. Amu was engaged in the mandated kangaroo hearings he be suspended in the interim.     Apparently Mr. Amu was practicing law while Black.  
 
An icon of the Civil Rights movement, Diane Nash, was barred from a public hearing in which another attorney (JoAnne Denison) was being persecuted in similar kangaroo proceedings.      Interestingly, as I have a light hue to my skin and an Eastern European heritage I and a bunch of people who look like me had no problem obtaining access to the room.    The empty chair next to me remained at all time relevant empty.     Of course this was all coincidence!   Or - ****.     JoAnne Denison, a female with a light skin color, was charged with operating a blog that disclosed judicial corruption.    This judicial corruption has been documented; however, according to Jerome Larkin, the mere exercise of the First Amendment is akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater and it warranted an interim suspension.
 
I mention this not to be repetitious or to beat a dead horse, I am answering a question that the blog Probate Sharks asked, to wit:


 
Editor's note:  This Shark wonders why this kind of crap goes on every day in Chicago nursing homes...and yet nothing is done to the crooks?????  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
 
Mr. Schoolmaster,  as long as the legal profession ignores its ‘oath’ and as long as ‘criminals’ such as Jerome Larkin, the Illinois Supreme Court, the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary commission can demonstrate their contempt for Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution and the First Amendment and still be elected to their lucrative public positions this ‘type of crap’ will continue.    
 
It has been an open secret in Cook County, Illinois that vote fraud is a way of life.     We had an alderman cry out in horror that dead people were no longer going to be able to cast votes.    His cry:  “why should someone lose his franchise just because they died!”        Nursing home residents vote 100% for the dominant political party in early voting, absentee voting etc.    Count the number of nursing home operators who have gone to jail for vote fraud!     Instead, we hear from the political establishment that those who oppose or question such activities are terrible people trying to prevent minorities from voting.    (I know there are few people of color in these facilities – but,  the political elite in Cook County never worry with the facts when they have made up their minds).
 
Cover-up is also a way of life in Cook County.     Starting at page 90 of her evidence deposition, Judge Connors mentioned that if she had been informed that there were deficiencies in the Mary Sykes case  09 P 4585 she would have stopped the proceedings, corrected the errors and come out with same result!    Thus, Judge Connors admitted that the “fix was in!”    What happened – Judge Connors was elevated to the Appellate Court of Illinois and the subpoena for the Mary Sykes file was quashed.    (NB. This file 09 P 4585 reveals that the summons required by statute (and due process) was not served on Mary Sykes, the 14 day prior notice that the Court has ruled was jurisdictional was ignored, and no hearing was held.     No matter – due process is only a technicality!      To the political and judicial elite a bit of flexibility with the true (called lie by the great unwashed)  obviates the problem.    Without a scintilla of evidence Larkin and his co-conspirators rationalized that the family of Mary Sykes must have known of the scheduled date for a hearing and therefore they waived it.     Like all untruths a problem became obvious – there had been no hearing and thus, not due process and no compliance with the statute.     Larkin resolved the problem.    Threats, intimidation, and clout were substituted for honor, honesty and integrity.   JoAnne, and Lanre got three year suspension – I got four as I was not repentant for writing to Mr. Holder (AG).
 
To this day the cover-up is still in full force and effect.      In should be noted that both Mr. Amu and Ms. Denison received interim suspensions.    Interim suspensions are given when there is a danger to the public.    Amu and Denison exposed corruption.    Seth Gillman on the other hand is an attorney who breached his fiduciary relations, stole money and violated his oath as an attorney.     Mr. Gillman has clout so therefor no disciplinary actions have been forthcoming.    He can still practice law.
 
 
spacer image (no content)website information buttonsearch site buttonARDC home button
 
Lawyer Search
Lawyer Registration
How to Submit a Request for Investigation
Rules and Decisions
Ethics Inquiry Program
Publications
Clerks Office, Filings and Public Hearings
Client Protection Program
Resources & Links
ARDC Organization Information
spacer (no content)
 
LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY'S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of March 11, 2016 at 1:26:35 PM:
Full Licensed Name:
Seth Gillman 
Full Former name(s):
None 
Date of Admission as Lawyer
    by Illinois Supreme Court:
November 4, 1993 
Registered Business Address:
vivere, inc
320 West Ohio Street 3w
Chicago, IL 60654-7887
Registered Business Phone:
Illinois Registration Status:
Active and authorized to practice law  - Last Registered Year: 2016
Malpractice Insurance:
(Current as of date of registration;
consult attorney for further information)
In annual registration, attorney reported that he/she does not have malpractice coverage. (Some attorneys, such as judges, government lawyers, and in-house corporate lawyers, may not carry coverage due to the nature of their practice setting.) 
 
Public Record of Discipline
and Pending Proceedings:
None
Check carefully to be sure that you have selected the correct lawyer. At times, lawyers have similar names. The disciplinary results displayed above include information relating to any and all public discipline, court-ordered disability inactive status, reinstatement and restoration dispositions, and pending public proceedings. Investigations are confidential and information relating to the existence or status of any investigation is not available. For additional information regarding data on this website, please contact ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or, from within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625.
ARDC makes every effort to maintain the currency and accuracy of Lawyer Search. If you find any typographical errors in the Lawyer Search information, please email registration@iardc.org. For changes to contact information, including address, telephone or employer information, we require

Sunday, September 27, 2015

Days of Shame

Days of Shame
 
For years the learned profession of the law has come to enjoy ridicule and slander.    What do you call it when a bus load of lawyers crashes off a bridge into the Mississippi River and all are killed?    The answer:  “a good start!”        Metaphors for lawyers are not flattering and you can expect at every gathering someone is going to make a remark that suggests lawyers are dishonest, amoral, and the cause of everything bad in society.      As a lawyer it is always amusing to have one of the most vociferous and obnoxious of the lawyer baiters a day or so later come into my office asking for my help in resolving some legal problem that requires not only discretion but knowledge of facts that my client would blush if he had to disclose them to his wife.
 
That was before I stumbled into the ‘elder cleansing’ scandal and the War on the Elderly and the Disabled.     Prior to that time the lawyers that I dealt with by in large were honest, decent, well read and nice people.     Most lawyers were people who I could take at their word and trust with my deepest confidence.     The relationships were mutual.     The parasites that I ran into in the Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585 were a breed apart.      The worst ‘scum’ were a step up from these lawyers and had much more integrity.      A casual brush with one or more of them in a hallway in the Daley Center made my skin crawl and activated a need for a bath in lye soap.    
 
I had heard of such lawyers but except for Ms. ***** I had never had contact with any.      Exactly how I was so sheltered is a mystery, but most members of the profession (including the most irritating) were people I was not ashamed of.     That is, until yesterday, when the ABA published the article on JoAnne Denison’s suspension, and did not express outrage and a demand for the immediately impeachment of the offending jurists and all who acted in concert to assault the First Amendment.    The article is attached hereto and made part hereof as exhibit 1.
 
The Legal profession has on occasion not covered itself with glory.     The case of the Dred Scott decision the Supreme Court failed to meet its responsibility and stand up for core principals of America – Liberty and Justice.   Again in Buck vs Bell the Court failed to recognize the concept of Equal before the Law.    (This case was the legal justification for the Holocaust.)  In the JoAnn Denison case the America Bar Association and the organized Bar looked the other way as corrupt Illinois jurists rubber=stamped a ‘cover up’ orchestrated by outrageously corrupt lawyer disciplinarians who were openly and notoriously protecting criminals with law licenses who were ravaging the hard earned savings of the elderly and disabled.     In the Denison case the ‘booty’ being protected included but was not limited to a million dollars in gold coins (Sykes) and eighty pounds of silver coins (Gore).     Her blog also referred to large land thefts and the eight million dollar Tyler estate all of which were being covered up.     Most seriously, she was threatening the ‘grab’ of Mary Sykes’ million dollar home (including land) and disclosing the details of the tax evasion scheme that was essential to elder cleansing of Mary Sykes.  
 
The Bar Association with all this information at hand, reported the assault on First Amendment and the Bill of Rights by high ranking judicial criminals as if Denison had been admonished for eating one chocolate cookie too many.     There was no outrage, no call for an investigation (Honest or otherwise), and certainly not even a protest.    What there was however the editing was and cutoff of outrage that citizens expressed when they heard that the Judiciary had abdicated its responsibility and was protecting overt criminal activity?
 
It is no wonder that the public feels that a bus populated with lawyers falling off a bridge and killing all on board is a “good start!”     Indeed, in all candor, lawyers take an oath to defend the Constitution.    The Denison decision demonstrates that even though we require our ‘pre=teens’ to have knowledge of the Constitution prior to entering high school, we apparently do not require our lawyers to have knowledge of the document when charging $500 a hour to honest citizens for legal services.
 
The lawyers involved in the Denison case (including the Supreme Court justices) have demonstrated ‘contempt for the Rule of Law’ and those who attorn to such action are in breach of their oath.    Such individuals are a cancer and enemies of our democracy.       There is no excuse for any lawyer being a party to an assault on the basic and core values of American democracy and in particular the Bill of Rights.     The racism that the Illinois Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) and its administrator orchestrated in the Amu case (and against Diane Nash) is not an anomaly - it is a commonplace staple.    In most situations it is an undercurrent, but Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators are not ashamed of their conduct – they published in the Lanre Amu case that attorneys with a dark skin who complain concerning corruption are not welcome in Illinois to practice law.
 
While the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that it is unethical (sans Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4) for lawyers to voice a call for an HONEST investigation once again I am a large group of lawyers who are afraid to voice opposition to the criminal element of our profession call for an HONEST investigation, and if wrongdoing is found for the most vigorous prosecution of the miscreants.     This is our call for a War Crimes trial of Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 371, 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators.    Justice Jackson is deceased.   But I am certain we can find another advocate for the concept of decency, honor, and integrity by public officials.
 
Exhibit 1:
LEGAL ETHICS
Lawyer gets suspension for blog posts about 'feeding frenzy' of connected lawyers
POSTED SEP 24, 2015 12:46 PM CDT





An Illinois lawyer who blogged about a probate case has been suspended because of her posts alleging a “feeding frenzy” of court-connected lawyers in Chicago’s “sleazy world of probate.”
The lawyer, JoAnne Marie Denison, was suspended for three years, and until further order of the Illinois Supreme Court, the Legal Profession Blog reports. The Sept. 21 suspension follows a May decision in which a review board of the Illinois Registration and Disciplinary Commission rejected Denison’s First Amendment arguments[1].
Denison had contended her blog posts were true, but the review board cited findings that she had failed to present an objective factual basis to support her allegations[2]. Denison’s posts had impugned the integrity of judges and lawyers involved in a particular probate proceeding, the review board said.[3]
Denison’s blog had alleged a guardian was appointed for an elderly woman though she did not need one, and that the guardian had stolen from the woman and did not take proper care of her[4]. The blog posts referenced a “feeding frenzy” of lawyers, a “classic case of corruption” and a court “being spoonfed BS law by atty miscreants.”
Circuit courts in Cook County aren’t computerized, Denison alleged in her posts, because “politically connected judges and their puppet attorneys … would be exposed for what they are: money grubbing, family strife churning leeches that create nothing but pain and misery in a family while swiping free parking money out of a well funded estate.”   [5] 



[1] It should be noted that the Review Panel in its decision misrepresent the holding of United States vs. Alvarez 132 SC 2537.    They adopted an argument specifically rejected by the SCOTUS.      Journalism integrity would have required the author of the Article to note such a grossly Ethical lapse by the conscience of the Illinois Legal authority.    It is normally grossly unethical for a lawyer to misrepresent the law – but when the Lawyer Disciplinary Commission does so it all eyes turn toward Mecca.  
[2] The burden of proof is on the commission – this statement is an admission that the Commission did not follow it own rules as the proof.    A  kangaroo court is not usually part of the American credo.    The statement that follows the admission contradicts the first statement as a matter of law.
[3] This statement is interesting as this is exactly what the First Amendment and Article One of the Illinois Constitution were enacted to protect.    A lawyer professional group should have had kittens when they read this statement!    An ISIS attack on America would be no less and no more unacceptable.
[4] Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4 mandate such reports, 47 USCA 230 protects such posts, and 320 ILCS 20/4 bars disciplinary action.  735 ILCS 1 et seq reinforces the right to make such statements and take such a position.
[5] Interestingly this is the very same charges that the United States of America made (sans the computerization) in the Greylord cases in which several score of jurists and lawyers went to jail.     It is fortunate that the United States Attorney was not subject to the disciplinary process of Jerome Larkin and the IARDC.   The AG would have been disbarred and the more than a score of corrupt jurists would still be preying on the public.
 
Ken Ditkowsky