Downloading and posting the presentation
on exposing judges’ wrongdoing and advocating judicial reform
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline ReformNew York CityDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline ReformNew York CityDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@
This article may be republished and redistributed, provided it is
in its entirety and without any addition, deletion, or modification,
and credit is given to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
in its entirety and without any addition, deletion, or modification,
and credit is given to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for your interest in the presentation that I made as a guest on Ms. Lidya Radin’s radio talkshow program Crooked Doctors.
A. The oral presentation in an mp3 file
1. The presentation is contained in an mp3 file, which can be downloaded through these links:
2. I can also send the file itself through Skype. Search for Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. or DrRCorderoEsq, and after finding me, send me a request for it.
B. The written study of judges and their judiciary in a pdf file
3. I would appreciate it if in close proximity to the presentation links, you would prominently indicate that the research and evidentiary basis for the presentation is my study of the judiciary and its judges, and that it is titled and downloadable as follows:
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting*
Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting*
If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, download either of the following browsers, install it, copy the first link above into the browser’s search box, and hit ‘Enter’. If the file, which has over 810 pages and is more than 53 MB in size, does not download, try using the other links and then the other browser:
Google Chrome: https://www.google.com/chrome/
C. The outline linking the presentation to the study
4. The outline of the presentation is in the study file at * >ol:350. I encourage you to listen to the presentation as you follow it in its outline.
5. The outline has numerous internal links to sections in the study and articles accompanying it. All of them provide supporting and additional evidence and analysis concerning judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform.
6. All links are active so that by clicking any of one of them the referred-to section in the study and accompanying articles is called up to the screen. This greatly facilitates its review, after which you can click the Previous View tool on the pdf Navigation Toolbar, i.e., the icon consisting in a left-pointing arrow inscribed in a circle. If that tool is not installed, click anywhere in the toolbar and go to More Tools >Page Navigation Toolbar and check Previous View.
7. The outline its worth reading on its own to get an overview of the subject. It is also a guide to my novel series of concrete, realistic, and feasible actions identified through strategic thinking to advance such exposure and reform, as opposed to the traditional, tried and failed ways of complaining about wrongdoing judges.
8. This highlights the substantive difference between:
a. complaining against a rogue judge, who, if removed, is merely replaced by another one of his or her ilk by the same conniving politicians, whereby the wrongdoing continues essentially undisturbed; and
b. i. exposing coordinated wrongdoing that has become the institutionalized modus operandi of judiciaries so that an informed public may become so outraged as to pressure politicians to take a stand on such wrongdoing and call for investigations by Congress, DoJ-FBI, and their state counterparts, as well as for nationally televised hearings.
9. The politicians who can be most easily so pressured are those running for election or reelection, who need to appear sensitive and responsive to the public mood. In turn, the ones among them more susceptible to that pressure are those who must stand out in the overcrowded field of presidential candidates.
10. It is such exposure that opens the way to judicial reform. Consequently, it commands most deservedly the joint effort of all advocates of honest judiciaries.
D. Offer to make presentations so We the People may hold our public servant judges accountable
11. I offer to make a presentation, whether in person or at a video conference, to you and your colleagues as a means of informing the public about, and outraging it at, judges’ wrongdoing.
12. Therefore, I respectfully request that you network me to other people who can conceivably network me to top officers of any and all presidential candidates’ campaigns, such as their respective chief of staff and campaign strategist:
a. to present to them, and thanks to them to their candidate himself or herself, a strategy for drawing electoral support from the huge(* >ol:311¶1) untapped voting bloc of the people dissatisfied with the judicial and legal systems.
E. Your choice and opportunity to become a Champion of Justice
13. You can continue being a lonely victim of wrongdoing judges and keep complaining through ways that judges steer to failure for the worst reason, because they can, thus turning your effort into yet another exercise in futility; or you can join a courageous and visionary group of pioneers as they start to expose them through a series of novel, imaginative, and realistic actions(* >ol:349).
14. Thereby you can help yourself and We the People, the masters in ‘government, not of men and women, but by the rule of law’, assert their status and the right flowing from it to hold all their public servants, including judicial ones, accountable and liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
15. By so doing, you can become nationally recognized by the People as one of their Champions of Justice.
So I look forward to hearing from you.
Dare trigger history(* >jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
.
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email accounts and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
******************************
Outline of the Presentation
on how advocates of honest judiciaries can join forces to
pursue a series of concrete, realistic, and feasible actions
identified through strategic thinking
to expose judges’ wrongdoing and lead to judicial reform
that turn advocates into national Champions of Justice*
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline ReformNew York CityDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline ReformNew York CityDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@
This article* may be republished and redistributed, provided it is
in its entirety and without any addition, deletion, or modification,
and credit is given to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
in its entirety and without any addition, deletion, or modification,
and credit is given to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
A. Pragmatic two-fold objective: help parties and reach out to national public
1. Help parties before same wrongdoing judge join forces and confront them
a. Ever more parties are pro se(jur:28fn35, 38, 64)
b. Organize court strikes to protest coordinated wrongdoing in a court
2. Inform & outrage the national public about judges’ wrongdoing(ol:333§G)
a. Turn the issue into a key one of Election 2016
b. Develop a single-issue national movement to hold judges accountable and liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing
c. Tea Party precedent and model for developing single-issue movement
B. Failure to make any progress in holding judges accountable(jur:21§§1-3)
3. Judges’ wrongdoing(jur:5§3): disregard of the facts and the applicable law
4. Only 8 federal judges impeached & removed in the 226 years since 1789
5. 99.82% of complaints against federal judges are dismissed(jur:10-14)
6. 75% of appeals disposed by summary orders + 11% by perfunctory orders
7. Judges cover for each other: systematic denial of en banc review motions
C. The circumstances enabling judges’ wrongdoing(jur:1§1)
8. Secrecy: adjudicative, administrative, policy-making, disciplinary meetings
9. Unaccountability: abused self-disciplinary system; state within state
10. Coordination: among judges & between them and other insiders
11. Risklessness: all gain, no loss, attraction makes wrongdoing irresistible
D. Traditional, tried & failed ways of complaining about judges(ol:336¶68; 340§B)
12. In-court/judges-judging-
E. The need for strategic thinking(Lsch:14§3; ol:8§E; jur:xliv¶C)
13. Dynamic analysis of harmonious & conflicting interests(Lsch:14§2;ol:52§C)
14. Advancing potential allies’ interests; not asking for their help(jur:xxxix, xliii)
15. Creating and undermining alliances according to their interests(dcc:8¶11)
F. The need to inform and outrage the national public(ol:331§§C, G)
16. Out of court, two step, strategy(ol:135)
17. The nature and ranking of outrageous information(jur:5§3)
G. Natural and potential allies(ol:332§F)
18. Victims of wrongdoing judges
a. parties: easy prey pro ses; those represented by solo-medium law firms
b. not ‘well-connected’ lawyers
c. court and law clerks and judges disgusted with the wrongdoing(jur:100¶b.6)
19. Journalists
a. not a monolithic industry
b. scandal sells
c. fiercely competitive: the Nielsen ratings
20. Politicians
a. of different parties
b. incumbent v. challenger
c. top senator v. first term member of the House(ol:231§3)
d. presidential candidates
H. Concrete, realistic, feasible actions: the three at the core(ol:337§2)
21. Auditing judges(ol:274, 284, 304)
a. Identifying 4 or 5 dissatisfied parties before the same judge
b. Searching for commonalities that reveal patterns of wrongdoing
c. Presenting journalists with patterns of wrongdoing, not one case
d. Court strike by parties and lawyers
1) ‘the Spring the Courts’ campaign on social media
22. Presidential candidates(ol:311)
a. Candidates: need to say something to attract media & public attention
b. Outraged voters compel candidates to take a stand on the issue
c. Networking to top campaign officers, e.g., the chief of staff
d. Presentation on their drawing support from the huge untapped voting bloc of people dissatisfied with the judicial and legal systems
e. A candidate’s denunciation(jur:98§2) at a press conference or rally of evidence of, and statistics on, judges’ wrongdoing(jur:21§§1-3)
f. The two unique national stories(ol:191§§A,B; ol:138; 321)
1) P. Obama-SCt Justice Sotomayor: concealment of assets (jur:65fn107a,c) and the Follow the money! investigation
2) Federal Judiciary-NSA: electronic transfer of concealed assets between hidden/declared accounts; interception of exposers’ communications(ol:344§§B,C): the Follow it wirelessly!investigation
g. A Watergate-like(jur:4¶¶10-14) generalized media investigation:
1) Trojan horse-like(ol: 269§1) investigation(ol:194§§1-2) of the two stories leads to enabling coordinated wrongdoing, causing
2) systematic investigation of judges’ wrongdoing, results in
3) pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting(jur:2§2) first at federal, then state, level
h. Turn judges’ wrongdoing into a key issue of Election 2016(ol:269§2)
i. Nationally televised hearings on judicial wrongdoing
23. Radio and TV talkshow hosts(ol:146, 308)
a. holding a meeting of network officers and talkshow hosts
b. making a presentation at each talkshow
c. each host to hold a weekly show on judges’ wrongdoing, how to audit judges(ol:274) & progress thereof; shows as victims’ rallying point
d. forming coalition that becomes a powerhouse of American politics
I. An effort at presentations(ol:197§G)
24. Journalism schools and associations(Lsch:23; ol:319)
a. not even judges can retaliate simultaneously against all journalists
b. investigator can become this generation’s Washington Post Reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of Watergate fame
c. enhance portfolio for student’s first job or journalist’s promotion
d. conducting team investigation of the two unique national stories
25. Law schools(Lsch:1, 2, 21)
a. glut of unemployed law school students and attorneys(a&p:23§W)
b. create a niche market(ol:257§2) for motions to recuse, and vacate orders of, judges who failed “to avoid even the appearance of impropriety”
c. offer a seminar on judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform(ddc:1)
26. Business schools(jur:119§a; ol:324)
a. Fraud and Forensic Accounting Investigation
1) Follow the money! from bankruptcy, tenant, probate courts
2) Statistical analysis of judges’ wrongdoing to detect patterns of individual and coordinated wrongdoing, and trends(jur:131§1)
27. Information Technology schools and institutes(ol:42, 60)
a. Conduct Follow the money! & Follow it wirelessly! investigations
1) concealing assets for tax evasion and money laundering
2) abused access to confidential information in sealed case files
b. Develop commercial software to perform statistical, linguistic, and literary auditing of judges’ writings(jur:132§§2-9)
J. Supporting actions(ol:337¶74)
28. Pitching the judges’ wrongdoing study(jur:1)to book publishers(jur:l)
29. Contacting and coalescing bloggers and website owners; and inducing digital news media start-ups and documentarists(ol:313) to investigate
30. Identifying authors of scandal books & private investigators to persuade (jur:21§§1-3) to investigate judges’ wrongdoing(jur:65§§1-3; ol:191§§A,B)
K. Material and moral rewards(ol:3§F)
31. A scoop, Pulitzer Prize, and interviews on news casts and talkshows
32. Bestseller on the two unique national stories & institutionalized wrongdoing
33. Blockbuster movie, e.g., All the President’s Men & President Nixon’s resignation
34. In-house promotion and advancement to a more prestigious company
35. Appearance on the cover of Time magazine as Person of the Year
L. Your choice and what is next
36. Traditional, tried and failed ways of complaining about judges(ol:347§A) v.
37. Novel, reasonable strategy for appealing to people’s interest in exposing judges’ wrongdoing and advocating judicial reform: the agenda(ol:329)
38. A statement of your contribution
a. experience, qualifications, skills, networkable relations
b. commitment to an action and hours per week
c. money; mass emailing; library research and field investigation
39. Key effort: organizing presentations to colleagues, schools, institutes, etc.
40. Forming a multidisciplinary academic(ol:115; 327) and business venture team of people with professional skills and work ethos(jur:128§4)
41. Building a movement for judicial accountability(ol:201§§J,K)
a. Tea Party-like single-issue the People’s Sunrise movement(jur:164§9)
b. first expose nature, extent, & gravity of judges’ wrongdoing(jur:49§4)
c. then discuss means to detect, punish & prevent exposed wrongdoing(jur:158§§6-8)
1) e.g. establishments of citizen boards that publicly receive and investigate complaints against judges and hold them account-able and liable to compensate their victims(jur:158§§6-8)
42. Exposers & advocates recognized as We the People’s Champions of Justice
Dare trigger history(jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
NOTE 1: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email accounts and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
NOTE 2: Listen to Dr. Cordero’s presentation on judges’ wrongdoing and its exposure through a series of concrete, realistic, and feasible actions in the context of the presidential campaign, at .
or
The outline of the presentation is at * >ol:350:
or
or
[Message clipped] View entire message
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.