Corrupt case of the day

Corrupt case of the day by jmdenison Dear Readers; I am putting this case out there but I have to redact it for two reasons:  1) the ARDC does not like lawyers talking about corruption and their position is there is none....that is despite the fact I receive tons of emails to the contrary; and 2) apparently the goons and thugs have told me "don't name names".  I don't need any more broken windshields or sugar in my gas. so read on below. It has been submitted to askdoj@doj.gov and to the emails for the state's attorneys.  I don't know if I'm not supposed to publish those.  In Ken's trial, LB asked Ken if he was sorry for repeated in an email that was directly out of a GAO report indicating that probate court and guardian abuse were an epidemic after the author investigated.  "Feel sorry?"  Attorneys only present the facts, they are what they are, and then you put them in argument.  Some facts some people like, other facts aren't liked, depending on what side of the fence you're on.  We are not judges.  We don't write opinions based upon how someone "feels."  And most judges write opinions based upon the law not feelings. LB must have taken psychology and thinks it applies to the duties of lawyers and judges. The law is, you have to have jurisdiction, and to do that, you have to have a properly served and noticed summons and complaint, or at least a summons.  The Illinois Probate Act requires much more because the person you're trying to get jurisdiction over is allegedly incompetent, so assuredly the family--adult parents, siblings and children must be timely notified to so the proper guardian is selected and the court is fully advised of all pertinent family members--who is an abuser, who is not; who can be trusted, who can not be; who the ward likes to be around and who they can't stand to be around, etc. All of this is in the law and the caselaw. So read on for another case of corruption.  I am hoping, for the sake of the poor client, we can get a second trial or re do on the summary judgment motion of liability from all of this. JoAnne Dear Ken and Gloria X had a case fixed ($6 million claim) in July of 2011, 10 day trial.   X was told it was fixed beforehand but during the trial it was a blood bath, the judge X ruled against Plaintiffs objections over and over again, sustained 95% of theirs, and then made a ridiculous ruling--even going to far as to blame the Plaintiff's brother for the misdeeds of the defendants! It was fixed by suddenly transferring it from Judge Y who suddenly said "he had no time for a trial" to some case assignment room with a "random judge generator" (which we never saw in operation--they went "to the back room"  and suddenly popped up with a judge. Names involved:  Y for handing off the case and he knew or should have known to a place where they "fix" cases, and that "case transfer room" on the 14th floor was ridiculous too. All of the players involved in this scheme are below, and I'm turning it over to Eric Holder and State's attorneys for investigation of all of these players The X center is filled with dirt and scum at the bar and on the bench. Disgusting. joanne case  200X-L-00XXXX Activity Date: 6/23/20xx Participant: Z TRANSFER TO JUDGE WITHIN DIVISION Judge: X Microfilm: LD000bbbb   Activity Date: 6/23/20xx Participant: X CASE SET ON ASSIGNMENT CALL Date: 7/11/20xx Court Time: 1000 Judge: X Microfilm: LD000bbbb   Activity Date: 6/23/20xx Participant: X ORDER SCANNED   Activity Date: 7/8/20xx Participant: V CASE CONTINUED ON TRIAL CALL Date: 7/11/20xx jmdenison | September 27, 2013 at 4:19 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL:http://wp.me/p209wH-Xl Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:  http://marygsykes.com/2013/09/27/corrupt-case-of-the-day/

Thanks for flying with  WordPress.com