 On interference with emails critical of unaccountable wrongdoing judges; and their drainage by P-e Trump from the swamp of corruption of the Establishment
Click to teach Gmail this conversation is important.
Seethe note below on “joinedwords” and possible interference with theformatting of this email.
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for your comments on email interference and joinedwords.
I have used MS Word to compose my emails for more than15 years without the problem of joinedwords.
For the first ten months of 2015, I used Word 10 to compose my emailsand paste their text in the body of a Verizon.net email client. Joinedwordsnever appeared before I would send them. I could only see them when replyemails contained in their threads the text of my emails.
Some addressees berated me for sending emails withoutproofreading them in order to eliminate words not separated by a blank space.This means that in transit from my computer to theirs those joinedwords wereformed.
The question is whether joinedwords formed due to asoftware glitch or somebody caused them to form precisely for the purpose ofdenigrating my work and dissuading my addressees from reading my emails,communicating with me, and joining forces to advance our common cause, namely, exposingunaccountable judges and their riskless wrongdoing, and advocating judicialreform.
If joinedwords were the result of a glitch, then youwould see them in the emails of other people. Given that Verizon, the gianttelephone company and Internet Service Provider, has tens of millions ofcustomers, it would be reasonable to expect to see frequently both emails fromVerizon users and joinedwords in their emails.
In the emails of how many other users have you seenjoinedwords?
All of a sudden, without my having made any change tomy computer, joinedwords began to appear in my sent emails in October 2015.
On interference with the communications between advocates of honest judiciaries see †>ol2:426§C; and *>ggl:1 et seq.
*************************
NOTE ON THIS EMAIL’S FORMATTING AND POSSIBLE INTERFERENCE WITH IT: The formatting of this email is normal, consistent, and intended to be pleasant to the readers, rather than to be odd, disconcerting, and dissuade them from reading it.
The following are its main features; if they are otherwise, please overlook any oddity and let me know by emailing me at this bloc of addresses: Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
a. 14 point Bookman Old Style type (this NOTE is in Calibri 13) (but this parenthesis is in Bookman 12, a bit bigger than the characters in the Subject line above); and this question is in Bookman 14). Which is just big enough to be easy on your eyes?
b. normal typeface so that italics and boldface are exceptional in paragraphs and no underlining
c. headings that are boldfaced, and sequentially identified and indented in outline style
d. numbered paragraphs with justified margins
e. 12 point white space between paragraphs
f. text carefully spell-checked to ensure that there are no “joinedwords” when the email goes out.
On interference with the communications between advocates of honest judiciaries see †>ol2:426§C; and on The Dissatisfied With The Establishment see below.
† http://Judicial-Discipline-
*************************
HTML may have been initially developed for Internetpages. Since then, like everything else, it has evolved and been adapted forother uses. One of them is emails sent and received over the Internet.
If HTML had anything to do with joinedwords in myemails, then joinedwords would be a frequent occurrence on the Internet.
Precisely because it would consequently be a frequentsource of complaint, many Internet Service Providers and email clientdevelopers would have applied their know-how and technical resources toeliminating them. They would have done that motivated, if by nothing else, bycompetitive considerations, that is, to offer a better product that attractedmore customers to themselves. The mentality of “There is an app for that” wouldhave seen to it that joinedwords are eliminated.
Sending the text of my emails as a pdf attachment isnot a solution to joinedwords. For one thing, there are email servers that donot accept emails that have attachments. The reason for this is thatattachments are a vehicle for malware.
In turn, this explains why people who are aware of theworld around them know that they should not open attachments from people thatthey do not trust. Since I send my emails to many people, I do not expect themto open my attachments, just as I hardly ever open attachments to emails.
Whether joinedwords in my articles on exposingwrongdoing judges are caused by a software glitch or malware, the result is thesame: Joinedwords are an obstacle to Advocates of Honest Judiciaries joiningforces to expose unaccountable wrongdoing judges and advocate judicial reform.
Considerable professional legal research and writinggo into each of my emailed articles such as the one below on P-e. Trump draining the swamp ofcorruption of the most established of the Establishment: the life-tenured judgesof the Federal Judiciary. They contributeto informing Advocates and pro ses about the law and its handling by judges inpractice, rather than as prescribed in the theory of laws and codes of judicialconduct. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.
Acquiring such knowledge and developing the capacityof thinking through a problem, be it that of joinedwords as shown above, worksagainst judges disparagingly dismissing us as a bunch of “disgruntled losers”with a tenuous grasp of the law, if any at all, beyond that applicable to ourpersonal, local case.
Therefore, I respectfully encourage you and all otherAdvocates to join the effort to share and distribute my emails widely. Theirtext or their substance can be seen collected in my study of judges, which istitled and downloadable thus.
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting*†
* Volume 1: http://Judicial-Discipline-
† Volume 2: http://Judicial-Discipline-
Visit the website at, and subscribe to its series of articles thus:
www.Judicial-Discipline-
Dare trigger history!(*>jur:7§5)...
Trying to pick a fight with me if I do not appear tohave seen or answered your emails is hardly a way to encourage anybody toanswer your emails, for it betrays an inability to see the big picture and alack of public relations skills, that is, to try to win people over to ourcommon cause and grow our audience so that by joining forces we develop oureffectiveness as advocates of honest judiciaries.
Sincerely,
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
******************************
Dear President. Harrold-Claessonand Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you very much for youremail and kind wish for 2017.
I in turn wish you and theorganization that you preside over, the Nordic Committee for Human Rights NKMR/NCHR - For theProtection of Family Rights in the Nordic countries- successful involvement inadvancing family rights by joining the effort both to expose unaccountablejudges who engage risklessly in wrongdoing, and to advocate judicial reform.
To that end, I would like toencourage you to read an article that sets out how organizations inside andoutside the U.S. can join that effort. It is at *>ol:127. I wrote it in response to a queryfrom an organization in Scotland.
.
Thematerials corresponding to the (bluetext references) herein are found in my study ofjudges and their judiciaries, titled and downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting* †
*Volume 1: http://Judicial-Discipline-
†Volume 2: http://Judicial-Discipline-
Moreover, since you seem to befamiliar with judicial corruption in American courts, I would like to draw yourattention to a pertinent article on how pro ses as well as represented partiescan join forces to audit the writings of judges –such as their decisions- insearch of the most persuasive evidence of their wrongdoing, namely, patternsand trends of wrongdoing. It is at ol:274-283.
The tables and templates forparties to organize the audited writings and subsequently present theirfindings to third parties, such as journalists, are at ol:304-307.
Consider the window of opportunitythat is opening for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform by the ascendancyof The Dissatisfied With The Establishment. They elected Trump, voted forBrexit, are supporting Far Right Populist Marie LePen in France, have developeda strong opposition to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, defeated Prime MinisterRenzi in Italy, have assumed a decisive role in the Spanish government, andfirst manifested themselves in the Arab Spring.
A powerful component of theDissatisfied is the dissatisfied with the judicial and legal systems(ol:311¶1). Imagine them joining forcesacross borders in order to create an international movement that asserts thestatus of We the People as thesovereign source of all political power and, thus, the masters who are entitledto hold all our public servants, including judicial public servants, which iswhat judges are, accountable and even liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
By joining forces to work towardthat objective, you and your organization could become internationallyrecognized as Champions of Justice.
To that end, I respectfully suggestthat you discuss with the members of your organization the above-mentionedarticles, and share and post the article below as widely as possible.
Visit the website at, and subscribe to its series of articles thus:
www.Judicial-Discipline-
Dare trigger history!(*>jur:7§5)...
Sincerely,
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
******************************
Re: How you can demand that P-e. Trump does not shirk from draining the swamp of the Federal Judiciary, whose life-tenured judges are the most established of the Establishment
See the notebelow on “joinedwords” and possibleinterference with the formatting of this email.
Federal judges with life-tenure are
the Establishment by definition Will President-elect Trump drain the judicial swamp or let it fester
on the advice of the Establishment insiders that
he is bringing into the White House and his cabinet and to avoid judges’ retaliation against his 70 pending business lawsuits, thus leaving exposed to judges’ continued abuse The Dissatisfied With The Establishment and the rest of We the People?
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris Judicial Discipline Reform New York City http://Judicial-Discipline-
Thisarticle may be republished and redistributed non-commercially, provided it is
in its entirety and without any addition, deletion, or modification, and credit is given to its author, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Visit the website at, and subscribe to its series of letters and articles thus:
www.Judicial-Discipline-
***************
NOTE ON THIS
[Message clipped] View entire message | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunday, January 15, 2017
On interference with emails critical of unaccountable wrongdoing judges; and their drainage by P-e Trump from the swamp of corruption of the Establishment
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.