“Claiming the victim is [incapacitated], these parasitic predators then petition for guardianship

Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Claiming the victim is [incapacitated], these parasitic predators then petition for guardianship. The proof of incapacity? Most likely does not exist. The predatory guardian simply has to claim to the probate tribunal administrator, that there is incapacity of some kind. They do not have to provide any proof, no evidence of any kind to substantiate their claim. After all, there is an estate to be exploited”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What it really means to become a “ward of the state”

So how does a living, breathing human being find themselves in front of a probate tribunal? And why should being declared incapacitated, cause you to cease to exist in the law?

Probate supposedly only comes into play upon presentation of the death certificate. It appears that being declared a ward and the accompanying court order, is the de facto death certificate. The entire system is pivots on the targeted victim being deprived of their natural rights and liberties; an impossible task unless by administrative order they are deprived of their own existence.

To become a “ward of the state” means that you lose your identity, all of your natural rights and liberties and everything you own so much so that another person takes over your life, your identity and all of your life’s work contained in your assets. For all intents and purposes, you died. You just didn’t know it.

Guardianship is said to be the fastest growing cottage industry in America. It is, in a nutshell, the complete takeover of another human beings’ life for the purpose of financial exploitation and personal financial gain. The predators in this government sanctioned system are no less insidious, no less of a danger to the public, than any other predator.

Virtually every day of the week, in every state, an elderly individual with sizeable assets is targeted by a professional, for-profit guardian. Claiming the victim is [incapacitated], these parasitic predators then petition for guardianship. The proof of incapacity? Most likely does not exist. The predatory guardian simply has to claim to the probate tribunal administrator, that there is incapacity of some kind. They do not have to provide any proof, no evidence of any kind to substantiate their claim. After all, there is an estate to be exploited and no one is allowed to stop the transfer of wealth that is about to take place. The predator guardian will most likely resign from a case as soon as the estate has been totally depleted and the assets totally converted to their personal accounts.

No one is allowed to refute the claims of the predator guardian. No evidence is allowed into the tribunal record to indicate that anyone presented anything to refute the claims of abuse, neglect or mistreatment the predatory guardian claims.

Probate tribunals are not required to follow the rules of evidence required in a legitimate court of law. Why not? Because these tribunals are not operated according to law, but instead, are controlled by artificially created statues, regulations and codes. These are specially constructed to avoid constitutional protections and an individuals natural rights and liberties. In every state, these statutes, codes and regulations were devised by your handy dandy BAR association, who also incidentally, profit mightily from probate sanctioned guardianship.

The “Separation of Powers” excuse

As anyone who has attempted to end this corrupt system has been told, the separation of powers prevents the judiciary from intervening. Why? Supposedly it is the legislative branch that controls the system. But, if you go to legislators, they claim it is a judicial issue and therefore they have no power to affect change. Are they lying? Yes and no. The truth is, in almost every instance, these administrative tribunals and the acompanying statutes derive their power and existence via the executive branch. In other words, your governor or the president himself . These are executive positions and are usually operating under what is known as an umbrella agency, such as health and human services, social services, among others, and all are contracted to a federal agency of the same kind. These agencies both on the state and federal levels are executive appointments.

There are instances of violations of the separation of powers, such as in Illinois where somehow probate tribunals have been deposited under the oversight and control of the district courts. As tribunals are not concerned with the common law, and rely on the civil death of the victim in order to avoid natural rights and liberties and the common law, I have to wonder how Illinois accomplished this. Administrative statute and actual law are two very distinct concepts.

Not to mention one is of the judicial branch and the other is of the executive branch.

And of course those administrative appointees we like to call “judges” are most likely members of the ubiquitous BAR association in their area. This is to make sure that the control of the system stays in the hands of those who stand to profit from it.

Human trafficking for profit

I have been told that when speaking to legislators most especially, I should never use the term “Human Trafficking” in reference to the stalking, kidnapping and imprisonment of elderly individuals for the purpose of raiding their estates by these protected predators. They will supposedly just hang up or walk away from me.

If I am speaking in person and use this term, I will most likely make them mad and they will retaliate. Really? So let me make sure I understand this:

Its okay if through these probate tribunals an elderly person with assets is targeted by one of these professional predators, stalked, kidnapped, imprisoned, forcefully medicated, possibly neglected, abused, and isolated from the people they know and love. And, its okay if the guardians, attorney’s, doctors, psychiatrists and administrators continue to access the estate with bogus billing for services most likely never rendered. Its okay for the predatory guardian to bill hundreds of dollars per phone call, letter writing, frivolous motions in court, or for visits to the ward that never occurred while using the ward’s money to pay their own personal expenses and to live a rather lavish life at the ward’s expense. And, its okay that seldom is an annual accounting ever produced to verify the expenses claimed by these predators as they drain the estate.

And last but not least: To force the ward to pay the fees, charges and expenses of the predators who targeted them.

I call this human trafficking for profit. Go ahead. Retaliate. I’m not going anywhere.