WHY CAN WE NOT GET AN HONEST INVESTIGATION OF THE ASSAULT ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT by Jerome Larkin and the elder cleansers?
Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
Click to teach Gmail this conversation is not important.
Click to teach Gmail this conversation is not important.
Inbox
| x | |||
|
1:00 PM (16 hours ago)
 | | ||
| ||||
With this labor day weekend dump of data by the FBI it is difficult to tell the friends of Hillary from her enemies as both appear to appalled by her demonstration of a lack of moral compass to the FBI and the attornment of the FBI to the cover-up. Such is refreshing and indicates that many in America still will stand up against miscreants who hold us in contempt and figure that we are so stupid that we do not know the flim/flam from the facts! Even organs that have heretofore defended even the most outrageous of the Clinton escapades have lump in their throats as they focus on a public figure that reeks of corruption and deceit.
However, this is not true when America and every citizen therein is threatened by a personal threat that can (and will) reduce them to irrelevancy. Yes, I am speaking of the elder cleansing scandal. Lurking out in the weeds if the fact that everyone gets old and vulnerable! Sickness, last illness, cancer, et al can be in the future of every citizen. No matter how much we are loved, how good our doctors are, or how rich you might be YOU will get old and at some time in your life vulnerable. What happens to you when the hospital says to your family - Mr. ***** has to go into a "skilled nursing home" for rehabilitation?
What happens if you say: "no" I have no intention of lying in my own urine ****. Will a well meaning member of your family go to Court to have you declared incompetent after you resist every reasoned effort by family? What happens when you become a burden? *****
As illustrated by the Mary Sykes case (Cook County, Illinois 09 P 4585) a corrupt judge and two guardian ad litem joined by a greedy daughter (or son) can gain control over YOU and YOUR MONEY! Yes, were all read 755 ILCS 5/11a - 3 and following. Yes well all read the Bill of Rights and Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution. Yes, we all read the elderly protection acts in USCA and the Illinois Complied Statutes. THEY MEAN NOTHING! Judge Connors in her evidence deposition admitted that she was wired (on page 91) and thus, no matter what you desire or are entitled to you are NOW a non-person. As happened in the Sykes case, your life savings (about 3million dollars) soon will disappear and the wired judge and the local police will enforce the ban on your loved ones visiting you. They excite you and you lash out that you want to return to your life! This cannot be tolerated as you have not been fully elder cleansed - i.e. isolated, humiliated,stripped of you humanity and property ****. Thus, == this is all reported on the MaryGSykes, Probate Sharks, and NASGA blogs.
This scenario is horrible and reminds us of the Nazi concentration camps, the Gulags etc - BUT the government has documented some of this horror story in four GAO reports and the blogs MaryGSykes, Probate Sharks, NASGA, AAAPG (Florida) **** have all detailed more as well as pleas for help. All of this has met with benign neglect!
To day, Jerome Larkin continues to spend public money with great abandon to silence lawyers and complainants from voicing publicly their dismay and horror. The media is very loudly silent. The government has made at best token efforts to address these clear violations of human and civil rights ***** (The government recently has indicted Philip Esformes for stealing a million dollars from Medicare and accepted a guilty plea from Seth Gillman for stealing hundreds of millions of dollars in hospice scams). Considering the scope of this problem and the money involved, the Hillary Clinton scandals are junior varsity! Considering that this scenario is a threat to me I take it damn seriously!
The threat to America and its core values is everywhere. The League of Women Voters pointed out that Democracy is not a spectator sport - if we do not rise up and protect it, our rights, and the rights of all other citizens we will lose it. I am cheered that even Hillary's friends and those who bend over to give her the benefit of the doubt are in arms over her obvious lying to the FBI and her being above the law. Yahoo even listed *****, to wit:
The 5 most outrageous things Hillary Clinton said in her FBI interview
Jake Novak
Mark Makela | Getty Images
Hillary Clinton was already having a bad week as polls show Donald Trump closing the gap between them and, in a few polls, even pulling ahead. It got worse Friday after the FBI released Clinton's answers to investigators' questions over her use of a private email server, revealing some pretty damaging responses from the former Secretary of State.
Here are five of the most outrageous statements Clinton made in that three-and-a-half hour FBI interview:
1. She cited her 2012 concussion as the reason that she cannot remember details of briefings during her "transition out of office."
2. She said she never even thought whether emails she exchanged on a future U.S. drone attack should be classified.
3. She said she thought the "C" before a paragraph indicated alphabetical order. The C actually stands for "classified."
4. She said no one ever raised concerns to her about her use of a private email server.
5. She said she could not recall any training on how to handle classified information.
What's more, Clinton aides told the FBI that the Secretary of State frequently replaced her Blackberry phone and the whereabouts of her old device would become "unknown." The FBI report suggests there were at least 13 different devices used.
You're going to hear on the mainstream media all weekend a lot of supposedly objective pundits insist the above revelations offer no "smoking gun." And that may be true from a legal standpoint, but we're in the middle of an election and these statements are poison for Clinton and cannon fodder for Donald Trump.
She conducted official State Department business while suffering from a concussion that may have impaired her memory? The report suggested she was only working for a few hours a day at the point based on doctor's orders but if it was that bad that she couldn't remember important briefings, she should have been on medical leave.
No. 2 stretches the limits of credulity. We're supposed to believe Clinton never even considered a discussion about a future drone attack should be kept secret? Saying "I never thought," basically sounds like a dodge on a charge of possible pre-meditation.
As for the claim that no one ever talked to her about any concerns about the private server, that's dangerous territory. Because it's probably not going to be hard to find someone at the State Department, or formerly at the State Department, to contradict this claim. In fact, there are many statements just now released from this FBI interview that are likely going to be refuted and in short order.
The "I could not recall" response to the question about prior training is a classic defendant's dodge. It works great because even if Clinton did get training, it can be argued that it doesn't matter because she doesn't remember it. But while it's a good legal dodge, it's potentially lethal in the midst of an election where you're trying to look like a competent and alert leader.
FBI Director James Comey may have decided not to indict Clinton, but the public revelation of this transcript today does a lot of damage. While you can expect most of the mainstream media pundits to pour cold water on the severity of the facts contained in them, the transcripts put the email scandal right back into the center of the news cycle. The last time that happened, Clinton's poll numbers wilted badly and it took a series of Trump missteps to reverse the decline.
She was already slipping in the polls — this could turn out to be very damaging for her and very good for Trump.
Commentary by Jake Novak, CNBC.com senior columnist Follow him on Twitter @jakejakeny.
Ken Ditkowsky
-----
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.