While I do not subscribe to the throw the baby out with the bathwater approach to dealing with the corruption in the legal system, it does appear that if it is not in crisis today, it will be shortly. The ‘riots’ /demonstrations in Baltimore and other America cities have their genesis in the conception that Justice cannot be obtained in the Courts by people of a particular ‘color,’ ‘ethnic or racial ‘ and/or some other artificial criteria. Whether one is ‘conservative’, liberal, no nothing and care less, or something else in their political view all have to admit that indeed the protests have credible justification.
Racism does today is not the BULL CONNOR variety or characterized by night riding thugs dressed in white sheets and hoods. It is much more subtle and is disguised with the mantel of respectability. The disciplinary case in Illinois of Lanre Amu is a poster board example of official racism of the State of Illinois courtesy of the Illinois Supreme Court, its administrator of the “disciplinary commission” Jerome Larkin, and other officials and employees. So blatant is their arrogance that in the kangaroo disciplinary proceedings involving Attorney JoAnne Denison they had the temerity to bar an Icon of the Civil Rights movement from the hearing room. (Diane Nash – an organizer of the Selma March!)
The ‘racism’ is not limited to discrimination or exploitation based upon color. The infirm and the elderly are prime victims. The assault on the Constitutional Rights of the infirm and the elderly is not a new problem. Indeed, Congress passed the Americans With Disabilities Act to address the problem. Of course, here in Illinois we have the Illinois Supreme Court, its administrator Jerome Larkin of the “disciplinary commission” Jerome Larkin, and other officials and employees hard at work undermining the act, the Constitution, and the core values of Illinois and America. The evidence is proudly exhibited in the In re: Alice Gore case, In re: Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585, *****. The Gore case is highlighted by the revelation that such avarice was exhibited by the judicial officials acting in concert that even the gold in Alice’s teeth was no safe. Illinois officialdom have no problem with the fact that the gold was harvested and not inventoried. According to Jerome Larkin and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission they could find no ethical violation in the act, however, they did find that lawyers complaining of such conduct were in violation of the Canons of Ethics.
In the Mary Sykes case, the exploitation, abuse, isolation and deprivations of Constitutional rights by a cadre of clout heavy lawyers and judges was approved by the Illinois Supreme Court and its disciplinary commission (09 P 4585) however, maximum penalties were meted out to lawyers who complained of the outrage by demanding an investigation. The Courts sat mute but approvingly as Mary’s daughter Gloria was physically beaten up, chained to a chair in a courtroom so that (without jurisdiction) attorneys acting in total violation of law could extort and garner her personal money and assets. Over a million dollars in gold was wrongfully removed from a safety deposit box *****.
In Ohio, Florida, Indiana, New York, Colorado, California and most other States a similar pattern of discrimination, exploitation, abuse, isolation, and theft under judicial supervision continues unabated. Justice for the Elderly and the Disabled is an oxymoron! I called and am calling for an HONEST complete, intelligent, and comprehensive investigation of these assaults on our core values. Yes, I know that the Illinois Supreme Court has suspended my law license for four years for making this call for an Honest Investigation, and yes I now that other Lawyers who have echoed my call have been and are being similarly disciplined, but, as an American I cannot and will not be quiet as our own brand of National Socialism cancer metastasizes and destroys our core values. Is it any wonder that citizens are demonstrating with vigor and disorder because of their frustration.
NB. It is ironic that 18 USCA 4, and professional Rule 8.3 requires that lawyers report felonies (such as elder cleansing) to law enforcement, yet, professional organizations such as the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission openly and notoriously punish attorneys who report felonies by favored lawyers and judges.
NB. The following piece has gone viral – it is worth reading, to wit:
"The Fixer" Tackles Corruption of U.S. Judiciary
|
NEW YORK---The United States legal system is built to be corrupt and not to make justice.
So says Teddy Moore, author of the book "The Fixer", a book which chronicles what he says is the most-kept secret in U.S. history----extreme corruption of the U.S. Judiciary. A television interview with Moore will air on cable on Tuesday, Dec. 6 at 6.30 p.m. on Channel 56 in Brooklyn and Manhattan, and on Dec. 20 at 3.30 p.m. on Channel 34. For those who cannot watch it in New York, the interview can be accessed via the Internet athttp://www.cinemazo.com/ The interview addresses major issues plaguing the judiciary, the court of appeals, lack of supervision by the congress. Moore offers his opinions as to how to overhaul the system. Moore says the main problem with the legal system as he sees it is that the legal system doesn't admit to the obvious which is that the legal system is corrupt. "You don't know about the corruption because the media doesn't report it", Moore says. "They call it a single bad apple but the bad apples are everywhere…on the top of the barrel, in the middle, on the bottom….everywhere…they refuse to report it for what it is". The legal system is built to be corrupt and not to make justice. Moore says. "This is the uniqueness of the US legal system. The U.S. legal system created a system to make money for attorneys and judges. In order to do so, they created a kind of extortion of attorneys…an extortable attorney. An extortable attorney to the judge has to comply with everything the judge asks him to do and can only be explained as the extreme means of greed of the judiciary". "Attorneys fear the judiciary because the system is built in this way…so they can be easily be extortable to the judge….the judge can easily accept money from the other parties for the extortion. People who believe that they come to court to decide their case based on the facts and the law are terribly mistaken. It's a mecca of just siphoning money to the judges", Moore asserts in his book. He says that Congress is part of the problem. "Most of the Congresspeople are attorneys that are afraid of the judiciary, afraid to be disbarred and sanctioned, look forward for the time they are out of Congress and join the corruption and make a buck for themselves. Therefore they cannot be part of the solution". The Court of Appeals allows the corruption to continue and money to flow, he says. "The Court of Appeals is a phony show in the US. The outcome of an appeal is well known. The only one who doesn't know the outcome of an appeal is the client who paid the money for the phony show. Had he known it was a phony show, he wouldn't have paid the money". Moore says. "The facts in my book suggest that the legal system in the United States is terribly corrupt because the hypocrisy of the United States, the rich and powerful are interested in the system giving them the judgment they want for the price they can afford". "The US Supreme Court supervises the racket of extortion, bribes and extreme corruption." The author claims that the US judiciary is liable for more damage and injuries to US people then the Nazis. Moore is currently working with others on an adaptation of the book into a screenplay, which he says eventually will be produced into a feature film like "Civil Action " which starred John Travolta, or a kind of Erin Brockovich type of movie. No shooting date for the movie has been decided yet. For more information about the book and the movie, seehttp://www.thefixer.info/ 12-1-05
© 2005 North Country Gazette
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
It is rarely that someone writes a book to expose all the secrets of his profession. but when it comes to the judiciary system, this is like an uncharted territory:
This book is a Giant ! "THE FIXER", by Author Teddy Moore, is likely the first bombshell, to expose the true problem of the corrupt system of the U.S. Judiciary. We were all told that the system is "not perfect", but deep inside we all suspected that the problem is bigger, especially if you have any experience of your own, dealing with the system, either as a lawyer, or a law-abiding citizen. This book will bring you not only personal stories, but also links to many others, who have suffered from the way the system has treated them. On a personal level, you must know whats in this book, before you go to any trial. (Just look at how many innocent people were sitting in jails for 10 and even 15 years, before DNA tests came to their rescue!)... But on the broader level, time has come, and as the word is out, there is a big revolution coming up on the horizon, started by this book, against the corruption of the U.S. Judiciary. and thats why you must have this book ! You can also get it from [...] and i certainly recommend this excellent book for reading ! |
US Establishment Embraces the Book 'The Fixer: Why U.S. Judiciary is So Corrupt?'
Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York, calls the book "Fascinating and gripping read. A foray into the underbelly of our judicial system." http://judgekormancorruption. blogspot.com/
·
Fresh Meadows, NY (PRWEB) February 11, 2006
The book "The Fixer: Why US Judiciary is so corrupt?" received unexpected thumbs up from the US establishment. Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York calls the book: “Fascinating and gripping read and a foray into the underbelly of our judicial system.” The author of the book Teddy Moore chronicles what he says is the most kept secret in US history: The extreme corruption of US judiciary.
Moore says the main problem with the legal system as he sees it is that the legal system doesn't admit to the obvious, which is that the legal system is corrupt. "You don't know about the corruption because the media doesn't report it", Moore says. "They call it a single bad apple but the bad apples are everywhere…on the top of the barrel, in the middle, on the bottom ... everywhere ... they refuse to report it for what it is."
The legal system is built to be corrupt and not to make justice. Moore says. "This is the uniqueness of the US legal system. The U.S. legal system created a system to make money for attorneys and judges. In order to do so, they created a kind of extortionate attorneys. An extortable attorney to the judge has to comply with everything the judge asks him to do and can only be explained as the extreme means of greed of the judiciary."
"Attorneys fear the judiciary because the system is built in this way…so they can be easily be extortable to the judge…. the judge can easily accept money from one party and extort the attorney of the party opponent and so close a case without knowing or hearing anything about the facts or the law. People who believe that they come to a court to decide their case based on the facts and the law are terribly mistaken. It's a Mecca of just siphoning money to the judges," Moore asserts in his book.
He says that Congress is part of the problem. "Most of the Congressmen are attorneys that are afraid of the judiciary, afraid to be disbarred and sanctioned, look forward for the time they are out of Congress and join the corruption and make a buck for themselves. Therefore they cannot be part of the solution." Recent polls support his claim that show that most of US citizen believe that their congressman or senator takes bribes.
These kinds of fellows he claims cannot clean up the corrupt judiciary.
"The Court of Appeals is a phony show in the US. The outcome of an appeal is well known. The only one who doesn't know the outcome of an appeal is the client who paid the money for the phony show. Had he knew it was a phony show, he wouldn't have paid the money," Moore says.
"The US Supreme Court supervises the racket of extortion, bribes and extreme corruption." The author claims that the US judiciary is liable for more damage and injuries to US people than the Nazis.
For more information about the book and the movie, seehttp://www.TheFixer.info [could not find 12/10/13]
Who or what is 'The Fixer'
A fun and practical book to read
·
(PRWEB) August 7, 2005
Teddy, is a published author of the book, ÂVictimization by justice, and two screenplays, ÂBlack wall of silence and ÂAmerican flight 587, as well an ex-appellate attorney in New York.
The book exposes the unimaginable: a corrupt judiciary, which is up on the prowl for the money and not for dispensing justice.
The book presents facts and brilliant analysis to show how the people lose their life, liberty and property because the judiciary needs their money, this is a jungle in which somebody has to eat and therefore somebody else has to be eaten.
This unique book illustrates, the effect of the atrocities on everybody including the culprits themselves.
ÂThe Fixer presents as a natural consequence an industry of mental health providers who feed, on the corps of the people that had fallen pray to US judiciary and he explains why the congress or the president will not solve the problem.
ÂThe Fixer shows how the knowledge of the rules of survival in this jungle can be utilized by you or by your attorney, for a favorable outcome, and so expose the silence of the media, which is gagged by a criminal judiciary and thus they report the atrocities as ÂSingle bad apples" only when the entire barrel is rotten to the core.
ÂThe Fixer provides great ideas of how to overhaul the corrupt system and offers a platform for reform to be utilized by political parties in their political campaigns.
This is the only book that dares to open our eyes to the obvious, which we do not see or hear because the media do not report it.
This is a perfect book for litigants to get some practical advice about the system that is about to crash them, gives a good perspective for attorneys who still believe that the facts and the law determine the outcome of legal proceedings, and a practical guide for everybody who cares for justice in USA.
The book holds 232 pages, published by DoItProse.com Inc and is a fun and practical book to read.
READING THE BOOK THE FIXER:http://www.openisbn.com/isbn/ 193357027X/#review
HEARING ON AMERICAN JUDICIAL CORRUPTIONVIDEO
|
THE JUDICIAL MAFIA ARE THE ROYAL MAFIA'S THIEVES
|
UK COURTS OVERHAUL PLANNED TO HELP JURIES BAFFLED BY JUDGES
|
AMERICAN JUDGES PLEAD GUILTY IN SCHEME TO JAIL YOUTHS FOR PROFIT
|
At worst, Hillary Transue thought she might get a stern lecture when she appeared before a judge for building a spoof MySpace page mocking the assistant principal at her high school in Wilkes-Barre, Pa. She was a stellar student who had never been in trouble, and the page stated clearly at the bottom that it was just a joke.
Prosecutors say Judges Michael T. Conahan, and Mark A. Ciavarella Jr., above, took kickbacks to send teenagers to detention centers. Instead, the judge sentenced her to three months at a juvenile detention center on a charge of harassment. She was handcuffed and taken away as her stunned parents stood by. “I felt like I had been thrown into some surreal sort of nightmare,” said Hillary, 17, who was sentenced in 2007. “All I wanted to know was how this could be fair and why the judge would do such a thing.” The answers became a bit clearer on Thursday as the judge, Mark A. Ciavarella Jr., and a colleague, Michael T. Conahan, appeared in federal court in Scranton, Pa., to plead guilty to wire fraud and income tax fraud for taking more than $2.6 million in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers run by PA Child Care and a sister company, Western PA Child Care. While prosecutors say that Judge Conahan, 56, secured contracts for the two centers to house juvenile offenders, Judge Ciavarella, 58, was the one who carried out the sentencing to keep the centers filled. “In my entire career, I’ve never heard of anything remotely approaching this,” said Senior Judge Arthur E. Grim, who was appointed by the State Supreme Court this week to determine what should be done with the estimated 5,000 juveniles who have been sentenced by Judge Ciavarella since the scheme started in 2003. Many of them were first-time offenders and some remain in detention. The case has shocked Luzerne County, an area in northeastern Pennsylvania that has been battered by a loss of industrial jobs and the closing of most of its anthracite coal mines. And it raised concerns about whether juveniles should be required to have counsel either before or during their appearances in court and whether juvenile courts should be open to the public or child advocates. If the court agrees to the plea agreement, both judges will serve 87 months in federal prison and resign from the bench and bar. They are expected to be sentenced in the next several months. Lawyers for both men declined to comment. Since state law forbids retirement benefits to judges convicted of a felony while in office, the judges would also lose their pensions. With Judge Conahan serving as president judge in control of the budget and Judge Ciavarella overseeing the juvenile courts, they set the kickback scheme in motion in December 2002, the authorities said. They shut down the county-run juvenile detention center, arguing that it was in poor condition, the authorities said, and maintained that the county had no choice but to send detained juveniles to the newly built private detention centers. Prosecutors say the judges tried to conceal the kickbacks as payments to a company they control in Florida. Though he pleaded guilty to the charges Thursday, Judge Ciavarella has denied sentencing juveniles who did not deserve it or sending them to the detention centers in a quid pro quo with the centers. But Assistant United States Attorney Gordon A. Zubrod said after the hearing that the government continues to charge a quid pro quo. “We’re not negotiating that, no,” Mr. Zubrod said. “We’re not backing off.” No charges have been filed against executives of the detention centers. Prosecutors said the investigation into the case was continuing. For years, youth advocacy groups complained that Judge Ciavarella was unusually harsh. He sent a quarter of his juvenile defendants to detention centers from 2002 to 2006, compared with a state rate of 1 in 10. He also routinely ignored requests for leniency made by prosecutors and probation officers. “The juvenile system, by design, is intended to be a less punitive system than the adult system, and yet here were scores of children with very minor infractions having their lives ruined,” said Marsha Levick, a lawyer with the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center. “There was a culture of intimidation surrounding this judge and no one was willing to speak up about the sentences he was handing down.” Last year, the Juvenile Law Center, which had raised concerns about Judge Ciavarella in the past, filed a motion to the State Supreme Court about more than 500 juveniles who had appeared before the judge without representation. The court originally rejected the petition, but recently reversed that decision. The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 that children have a constitutional right to counsel. But in Pennsylvania, as in at least 20 other states, children can waive counsel, and about half of the children that Judge Ciavarella sentenced had chosen to do so. Only Illinois, New Mexico and North Carolina require juveniles to have representation when they appear before judges. Clay Yeager, the former director of the Office of Juvenile Justice in Pennsylvania, said typical juvenile proceedings are kept closed to the public to protect the privacy of children. “But they are kept open to probation officers, district attorneys, and public defenders, all of whom are sworn to protect the interests of children,” he said. “It’s pretty clear those people didn’t do their jobs.” On Thursday in Federal District Court in Scranton, more than 80 people packed every available seat in the courtroom. At one point, as Assistant United States Attorney William S. Houser explained to Judge Edwin M. Kosik that the government was willing to reach a plea agreement with the men because the case involved “complex charges that could have resulted in years of litigation,” one man sitting in the audience said “bull” loud enough to be heard in the courtroom. One of the parents at the hearing was Susan Mishanski of Hanover Township. Her son, Kevin, now 18, was sentenced to 90 days in a detention facility last year in a simple assault case that everyone had told her would result in probation, since Kevin had never been in trouble and the boy he hit had only a black eye. “It’s horrible to have your child taken away in shackles right in front of you when you think you’re going home with him,” she said. “It was nice to see them sitting on the other side of the bench.”
SOURCE
|
MILLIONAIRE BUSINESSMAN WHO ATTACKED ARMED ROBBER JAILED AS THUG FREED
|
AMERICAN JUDGES ADMIT TAKING BRIBES
|
THE FIXER FOR AMERICA'S CORRUPT JUDICIARY
|
The Fixer: No Lawsuits or Proceedings are Won Until You Have Found the Person Who Pays the Judge
Disbarred attorney Teddy Moore tells America in his book why judges never look at the facts of a case. all proceedings are pre-determined according to the "fixer" - the person who gets the settlement/judgement to pay the judge for his/her services. The FIXER by Teddy Moore This is a tell all book about the unimaginable; the US people have never been exposed in a movie or a book, to a corrupt judge, certainly not a corrupt judiciary. The reality is beyond any fiction or stretch of the imagination or dream, that those who dispense Justice in USA, the Judiciary, are the real culprits and the ordinary- criminals and the rest of us, are just victims of the Judiciary. This is the reality, which is more bizarre than any fiction. The supporting evidence to prove this reality comes from the Internet, which has a short history of about a decade, and without it, the real criminals would have probably gotten away with this untold story. Still the people do not get it yet . In his book “Constitutional chaos” Judge Andrew Napolitano tries to tell us everything, about several instances of injustice committed by the government. Unfortunately, by telling us so much about each injustice, we ultimately know everything about nothing. Judge Napolitano describes a tree here and a tree there but he fails to tell us the story of the forest, and why it has grown wild . In “Men in Black”, Author Mark Levin also tried to describe America’s wild judicial jungle, Mr. Levin tells us that judges are not God, but he fails to tell us who they are. He toys with the question of whether or not we can trust the courts but at the end he is not quite sure. He reviews a number of Supreme Court decisions and he tells us that he doesn’t like some of them, but so what? The problem is that even those judges and authors who expose defects in the alleged “The best legal system in the world” will only describe those defects as aberrations and abnormalities. They will not tell you that under the current system, justice is the exception not the rule. They will not tell you that the judiciary is responsible for the wild injustice in USA.They will not tell you that the entire system is corrupt. It means that if you are innocent you might go to jail and vice versa, it means that you may lose your home, your children, everything you have by a whim of the real criminals for no good reason, except that the criminals need your property and your life to make a bigger buck for themselves. If you ask American attorneys about the judiciary, they’ll tell you that the system is “Not perfect” This admission is actually a great compliment to a system, which is fundamentally broken and corrupt. Unfortunately, this is the only criticism that licensed attorneys are allowed to make about this allegedly great system (Do Attorneys have a right of free speech? Yes, if they freely praise judicial corruption as if it is a gift from God.) Unlike other books that criticize the American judicial process, ‘The Fixer’, will show you how the system really works, why it cannot make a right decision and why justice in the system is so rare. ‘The Fixer’ will show you that the legal system in USA is operated by two parties, one who is a fixer-attorney and the other is an extortable-attorney, appearing before a presiding Judge, who makes knowingly unjust decisions in favor of the attorney fixer , and any appeals on those atrocities are approved by the court of appeals, all the time (99.99%) This is the broken mechanism of justice . The American balance of justice is broken, the judiciary does not weigh anymore anything on the scale of justice, they just abuse their power to make a fast buck on it . In a tribal society in Africa the chief of the tribe hears evidence and dispense justice based on the facts, that he has learned from the witnesses, and there is no appeal on his decision. This “primitive” form of justice is far better than what the corrupt US Judiciary has to offer, the tribal Judge need not the fixer and the extortable, the litigants appear pro se and the outcome can not be worse then in the alleged “Best legal system in the world”, because the alleged best system in the world, is just best in corruption and in concealing the facts of the extreme corruption. It is just a racket of extortion to make a quick buck. The Bar or judiciary won’t endorse, ‘The Fixer’ because this book probes beneath the judicial façade, to expose the lies and endemic corruption which provide the American judicial system it’s real foundation. ‘The Fixer’ will show you why neither congress nor the constitution can control the judiciary, and why the media will not tell you about it... THE EXTORTIONATE ATTORNEY The extortionate (Extortable) attorney is a unique creation of the US legal system. An attorney is a crucial part of the process providing justice in the western world, because he is trained in and supposed to know the law and should be able present it properly to the judiciary. However, in USA the judiciary, admits attorneys to practice law, and discipline attorneys, as a result American attorneys fear the judiciary, and are therefore trapped in a built –in conflict of interest between the duty to represent properly their client in court, and on the other hand the fear of summary retalitation, sanctions, disbarment and even summarily jail for just doing their faithful job for their client. The American judiciary has extreme abusive power against attorneys, and in many cases they abuse even the abuse of power against attorney, which caused the untenable situation where an attorney who is paid well to bring his client’s case to the judiciary, is silenced by a powerful and corrupt judge who frustrate his job. (Some of these corrupt judges call themselves “justices of the court”) These corrupt judges coerce attorneys to give up their client’s case to the attorney of the party opponent, this extortion is called in US courts “Settlement”,” Stipulation” etc., no matter what they call it ‘The Fixer’ will show you that it is just an industry of injustice to make a quick buck of it. ‘The Fixer’ will expose to you an industry of judgments in exchange for bribes, organized by judges and executed by their close confidants, the attorney fixer, who can extort easily the party opponent and his attorney by threatening him with the pending judicial abuse of power, which cause the closure of cases in favor of the attorney fixer without any evidentiary hearing at all. When an attorney can not present to a judge, without fear, his client’s case, in such system by definition you can not get justice, because the judiciary do not know the facts and sometimes the law, and some believe that the judiciary do not want to know the law and facts. So what’s going on here? Why is it legal in America to pay an attorney fees for misrepresentation of his client? The simple answer is that it is part of the show. This is a simple act of consumer fraud that was institutionalized. Does this happen in the western world? Well, in England attorneys are independent of the judiciary, judges cannot discipline them, they are not admitted to practice law by the judiciary, English attorneys are independent from the judiciary, they care in court for their clients only and are not concerned with themselves. They are admitted by attorneys and disciplined by attorney, and so have the respect of the judiciary and their clients. In USA an attorney may be disbarred, bankrupt, and on the way to jail by any judge within ten minutes, when the judge acts, as complainant, prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner brings his pretexts, allegations (Charges) against the attorney and execute him. This kind of action is possible only in a military regime, or in a nazi type regime. The most popular terrorist- acts against American attorneys by US judiciary is a charge by the Judge that the attorney raises frivolous allegations or behaves in a frivolous manner . This is the prelude for any and every judge to impose, severe penalties, for each and every such alleged misconduct, which may cause the bankruptcy of the attorney. (When judges are on the prowl for more money, there is no point, to tell them about first amendment rights of free speech, or tell them about the attorney’s duty to his client.) Another act of coercion, by the judiciary, against an attorney may be a simple declaration on record, that the judge had enough with this attorney and do not desire to see anymore this attorney in his courtroom. If this is drafted as an order of the court, the appellate division will disbar the attorney from practicing law by “Reciprocal discipline” and no appeal by the victimized attorney will be successful, to save the attorney from this terrorist act. A judge may summarily imprison an attorney for contempt of court...
SOURCE
|
# # #
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Justice
Gerald Phillip "Gerry" Garson | |
New York Supreme Court Justice
| |
In office
1998–2003 | |
Personal details
| |
Born
| |
Political party
| |
Spouse(s)
|
Judge Robin Garson, Brooklyn Civil Court
|
Relations
|
Justice Michael J. Garson, New York State Supreme Court (cousin)[2]
|
Children
|
Four
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.