I am indeed disappointed

I am indeed disappointed that Senator Kirk was not responsive in the Gore case.    I hope that at this point in time he realizes that was a mistake and will act to put the miscreants out of business.    So far my score is not very good.   All I asked for was an HONEST investigation and you can measure the results.    When we first approached Senator Kirk we did get a response and that was encouraging.   It was double discouraging when the response I got from Senator Durbin was to get a copy of one of his silly speeches on social security.     Just about every other public official felt abused by being asked to request law enforcement to do an HONEST investigation.   Gloria Sykes traced the problem directly to "liberal political powerhouse" ****** and found financial tie-ins.   The Brewer case disclosed to me a relationship to the 'heath care industry.'      When the trail revealed where and the amount of money involved, I understood that my days as a licensed lawyer were numbered unless I retreated.    I made a choice.    

Kirk is running for re-election and it is in his best interest right now to stand up and be counted.   If he wishes to play dead he will not be elected as the Civil Rights of the ordinary man are a real consideration at this point in time.     His opponent lost two legs fighting for America - this gives her a "leg up!"   Even though Kirk was in the military he is a person who has to meet the question: "what have you done for me today!"     His opponent's legless body answers the question of her dedication.

There is another reason I have faith that Kirk will take a leadership role in protecting our Bill of Rights.    He is a potential victim.    It is in his own personal best interests to wrap himself in the flag and become an advocate for Illinois to not abandon Article 1 of its Constitution or its adherence to the Bill of Rights.     A North Korean democracy may be profitable for the political class - but, some members will be scarified  

Under the current scenario (as illustrated by the Sykes and Gore case) it would not surprise me to have PS show up as the lawyer for a person who decides that Kirk is a potential victim.    Obviously, a probate court jurist will be appointed as guardian ad litem to inform the court as to how mentally incompetent Senator Kirk has become because of his stroke, and Dr. A or Dr. S can be counted on to not only provide testimony but the certificate.   The roster of guardians has been disclosed on the blog Probate Sharks.     Any one or more of the individuals will suffice to provide the distraction that will allow for the 'elder cleansing.'   In Sykes the decision as to incompetency was made by the two guardian ad litem and the attorney for the petitioner.    The judge just rubber stamped.    (Thereafter, the cover up continued unabated to this day).

Thanks to Mr. Larkin's intimidation of lawyers who might complain about such technicalities as jurisdiction, venue.appropriateness, statutory compliance etc,  as in Sykes no hearing is necessary and Senator's family need not be notified in accordance with the statute - By clairvoyance a corrupt jurist will determine that they had knowledge.   This will suffice - as remember we are dealing with a 'wired case.'      By hindsight it is very clear that the family members will have knowledge - they will be fighting tooth and nail to send some time with their loved one!     They certainly will have knowledge when the Senator disappears from sight into a convenient nursing home or similar facility.     By the time the Senator's loved ones find out the railroad is complete,  it will be too late and the Senator will be isolated, his assets with be redistributed, and his liberty and humanity will be a thing of the past.    NB.    Any one of us is a potential victim!     This criminal enterprise in light of the interim suspension of JoAnne Denison may reach right into the Supreme Court.    If anyone doubt it, let them explain how the blog MaryGSykes is a danger to the public!!!!!!!!    47 USCA 230 bars the action that the Illinois Supreme Court has taken even it is ignores the clear mandates of the United States Supreme Court in reference to the First Amendment.    320 ILCS 20/4 give JoAnne Immunity for disciplinary action ( me too!) 

I am certain at this point in time that the Senator is aware of the Gore case and the Sykes case and exactly how the 'railroading' occurs and how easy it is to accomplish.   The fact that Mr. Kirk is a senator makes the process a little more difficult to occur, but, it appears to few lawyers are not intimidated by the threat that Mr. Larkin will institute disciplinary proceedings if they interfere.   (Adam Stern made that very clear the first time he saw me raise my ugly head in the Sykes case.    Judge Connors also made it clear.   The difference between me and most other lawyers is that from day one it was hammered into me that if a 'bully' wanted a piece of me, I should allow him to have it.   Of course, I want something in exchange =  I broke my share of noses *****     I learned that backing down to a bully is an efficient way to perpetuate the problem.    

This brings us to the issue of preventing the victims to obtain legal assistance in their fight.    As most lawyers are cowards and buckle when they receive a IARDC complaint letter concerning something that they did or not do in our scenario - DO NOT EXPECT  a spirited fight for your rights.    All I did was ask for an HONEST investigation, and all JoAnne did was write it about in her blog.    

The net is Senator Kirk should realize that he = just like the rest of us - is vulnerable to the American Holocaust and if he does not stand up and address this assault on the First Amendment ******.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.    It also guarantees that today you might be "hot stuff" but tomorrow you might have MS in your future!    

I've sent a bcc copy to Matt Abbott in Senator Kirk's office.     I hope that he will forward a copy to Senator Kirk and he will read the blogs Probate Sharks and MaryGSykes.    It is time to put Jerome Larkin and his cronies out of business.    

NB.    In both Gore and Sykes there is over a million dollars of assets that are unaccounted for and which I believe were never listed on any disclosure of income tax forms i.e. 1040 or 1041.     As conspirators each has a joint liability.    Thus, all co conspirators have the responsibility to pay or see that the income tax liability to the State and the USA are paid.    Larkin and his group of miscreants thus had better filed tax returns disclosing the missing money in the Sykes and Gore estate!     If they are prosecuted as a civil matter Mr. Larkin and his co-conspirators have the burden of proof!     Removing the profit of corruption is poetic!

 

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com