From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 15, 2013 7:36 AM
To: JoAnne Denison , Cook Sheriff
Cc: Peter Schmiedel , Eric Holder , matt senator kirk , NASGA , probate sharks , Harry Heckert , Lawrence Hyman , "
IllinoisLawyerNow@isba.org" , JoAnne Denison , GLORIA SYKES , mary richards
Subject: Service on Mary Sykes of process, copy of petiton to hold her incompetent etc. Aug 31, 2009
Sheriff Dart,
I received a disturbing communication. We are investigating whether or not in reference to Mary Sykes there was service of process and apparently our further investigation has been thwarted by the statement from your office that the records are 'secret.' I do not understand why the Sheriff's office had been so co-operative and shared with us (office of JoAnne Denison) the fact that there was no return of service on Mary Sykes would suddenly turn away and refuse to further elaborate.
Let me lay out the facts, Mr. Schmiedel , who is the attorney for the 'de facto plenary guardian' has pointed out that there is a memo on a document that he found that indicates that a deputy 1065 may have served summons on Mary. As no return (under oath or certification) is of record, and the previous contact with the Sheriff's office furnished a print out showing that there was no service on Mary Sykes as she did not appear we have a loose end. This loose end is important as we are in a search for the truth. If the information that we previously received were to be wrong, we have to know it and correct the record. (If the deputy filed a return under oath we would also like to known why it was not filed with the Court).
In the late spring or early summer of 2009 Mary Sykes was spirited off by her older daughter who has kept her a virtual prisoner for the last four years. Mrs. Sykes has been almost totally isolated and kept from having contact with her two surviving siblings and her younger daughter. Her substantial estate has been pillaged and a safety deposit box containing hundreds of good and mint condition Au coins has been removed and not inventoried. (Ms. Sykes' husband and another relative were collecting these gold coins and purchasing them at auctions and at a local coin shop). The short story is that some very unusual events have occurred and our investigation has indicated that the provisions of 755 ILCS 5/11a -10) have been totally ignored. Thanks to your office we confirmed that the basic element of jurisdiction - i.e. the service of process was also ignored. This means that for four years without a warrant of authority Mary Sykes has had her liberty and property taken from her under color of statute.
As you are aware from the Conference that you sponsored 'elder cleansing' has become a National Scandal. Here in Illinois there are dozens of seniors whose families (and in some case - they themselves) aver that they have been deprived of their liberty and property by 'judicial officials' who enjoy clout and the ability to pervert the Justice System. I invite you to examine the Sykes case. No human being can walk away from that case without saying: "how could this happen in America!" I invite you to examine the Gore case. It is alleged that Mrs. Gore was even stripped of the gold in her teeth!
The only way to end this "elder cleansing" and prevent the retro-active abortion of senior citizens is to pick one case and fully investigate it, leaving no loose ends, and make an example out of the miscreants. The Sykes case is a perfect vehicle as it has all the elements. This is the reason that we have copied you on so many e-mails and we are so annoying in making certain that Mary Sykes was indeed not served with process, even though your records affirm that she was not afforded such an 'enjoyment.'
Thank you for your efforts in this matter.
Ken Ditkowsky
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.