From Atty KDD–case synopsis
by jmdenison
Thank you for submitting a formal complaint to the DOJ in Chicago regarding the cases you have or have learned of. I have not seen the HHS response.
If you forward it to me I will respond immediately and answer fully and completely any question they have. The Sykes case is a bell weather case as it has all the elements of abuse.
The Illinois ARDC has reservations concerning lawyers complaining about the corruption in the Courts, but I have no concern. The ARDC filed a complaint against me for exercising my first amendment rights and even presented into evidence my letter to the Attorney General of the United States complaining about the extra -judicial acts in the Sykes case. As a citizen of the United States of America I can and will continue to speak my mind and file complaints when I see the liberty of a person is taken from them.
The facts of Sykes are quite simple.
Mary Sykes had two daughters. The older daughter took her to a lawyer and when they emerged the older daughter pursuant to a power of attorney had control of the Mary's estate. The documents were written in deceptive manner and Mary was clearly taken advantage of. When Mary found out what occurred she tried to unwind the transaction.
Mary first tired to obtain copies of the documents that she signed but the older daughter and the attorney refused her copies. Thereupon Mary sought help from the civic authorities and she went to the Court to obtain an order of protection.
The daughter countered with an incompetency proceeding. She enlisted the co-operation of two of the court favorites: Cynthia Farenga and Adam Stern. With their aid she was able to thwart any hearing on the petition for an order of protection and was able to avoid the jurisdictional criterion of 755 ILCS 5/11a - 10 --NOTICE REQUIRED BY STATUTE. this jurisdictional necessity was and is being totally ignored by the lawyers, the judges, law enforcement and the Illinois ARDC. No one is concerned that without the 14 day prior notice required by statute every order ended is void.
Under color of statute Mary's estate has been looted and Mary has been isolated from her family, her neighbors, and her activities. We believe that she lives under the constant threat of being placed in a nursing home to live in a pool of her own urine. Gold coins valued at approximately a million dollars have not been inventoried. Cash that was in a mattress has not been inventoried. The younger daughter has not been allowed communicates with her mother for periods in excess of six months. A younger sibling (of Mary's age 80 plus) has been denied communication with her sister (Mary) for extremely long periods of time. Three years have gone by and no effort has been successful in obtaining Mary's liberty rights, property rights, civil rights or human rights.
To expedite the vesting of the unlawful benefits anyone who questions the actions of the older daughter is subjected to punishment. The younger daughter has had her life disrupted and her assets attached and taken from her under color of statute. A court without jurisdiction on the mere whim of Faranga and Stern even tied up property out of the Illinois jurisdiction.
As you are aware even I have been subjected to harassment. Knowing that there was no jurisdiction ( a fact affirmed by the Appellate Court of Illinois) the two guardian ad litem (Farenga and Stern) joined by the older daughter prosecuted a sanction motion against me for attempting to investigate this travesty. The Appellate Court found that the Probate Court was acting without jurisdiction; however, the Illinois ARDC decided to investigate me and is presently prosecuting me for being unethical in questioning the majesty of a Court acting without jurisdiction and in concert with Farenga, Stern, and the plenary guardian in intentionally denying senior citizen Mary Stern of her liberty, her property, civil and human rights. Mary Sykes for three years has been in such condition!
If you wish to forward my e-mail to HHS I would be honored for your do so. Everyone who has heard of the Sykes case has one question, to wit: HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Unfortunately it has happened and is happening to dozens of senior citizens and other disabled people today and no one is interested. The seniors are in need of their own Martin Luther King! We have substituted a wrinkles for a darker hue to the skin as the criteria for second class citizenship. It is ironic that many of the very people who obtained first class citizenship by the heroics of Doctor King are active in the persecution of the disabled and the elderly. (The ARDC prosecutor, and the Sykes judge are all African American - how quickly we forget)
Let me say one thing - even though those given the responsibility to ensure that every American citizen's liberty, property, civil rights and human rights are fully protected a disinterested in the disabled and the elderly - we still in America and we still have Rights, privileges and immunities. I intend to exercise each right to the fullest and I expect all my friends to do the same. On December 7, 1941 citizens from all walks of life gave up their lives to join in the fight to protect these rights, privileges and immunities and thus today there is no excuse for us not to do the same. America is worth saving.
The year 2013 is going to be our year and the miscreants who seek to deny the disabled and the elderly their property, their liberty, their civil rights and their human rights are all going to pay the piper. In the Sykes case the miscreants are at the very least going to pay the income taxes, interest and penalties on the gold coins and cash not inventoried and (we assume) not reported as income on their Federal and State tax returns.
Ken Ditkowsky
| Comment | See all comments |
Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://marygsykes.com/2012/12/ |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.