Summary of Procedural Errors in In Re Mary Sykes

Summary of Procedural Errors in In Re Mary Sykes


by jmdenison



From KDD:

I wonder if another letter to Judge Evans, Judge Stuart, the two Illinois Senators, the Judicial Inquiry Board, the ARDC. Gov Quinn and the Chief Judge of the Illinois Supreme Court might cause a stir!

Maybe you could ask as a concerned citizen how the actions in the Sykes case can be reconciled with the Sodini case. For instance the Petition does not comply with the statute. It is missing the names several people who are required to be named; i.e., Mary's two sisters. The petition requires the disclosure of 'powers of attorney'. There are none. 755 ILCs 11a - 7. Of course 755 ILCS 11a -10 (f) requires service on the 'near' relatives. These are Gloria and her two aunts. Neither was served.

If we get more basic, how come the proceeding was brought in Cook County - at the time of the filing Mary was residing in DuPage County. (755 ILCS 11a -3) The statute uses the world 'shall!'

Sodini mandates that these technicalities are jurisdictional. No jurisdiction means no valid court orders could issue after Dec. 7, 2009.

If you look at section 18, the treatment of a disabled person is mandated - Isolating a disabled person from her younger daughter, he siblings, her friends, her activities is beyond the scope of authority. Indeed, the statute appears (section 18) is very clear that the plenary guardian is specifically prohibited from denying a disabled person her liberty, her property, her civil rights and her human rights. The affidavit of Mr. Evans that was attached to my answer demonstrates how perverted the process has become in Illinois.

What is scary is the fact that if the process that was followed in Gore, Tyler, Wyman and Sykes as examples were to be followed in the case of Romney or Obama each of our presidential candidates could have Carolyn Toerpe as their plenary guardian. Adam Stern could then and there tell the Court that Mr. Obama and Mr. Romney did not wish attorneys, Dr. ****** or **** could testify that he administered the mini-mental examination and combined Mr Romney and Mr. Obama scored 12 out of 44 and therefore neither has the capacity to care for themselves and need ReHab assist to look out for them 24/7. Cynthia Farenga can tell the Court with the same degree of certainty that she exhibited in the Sykes case that Mr. Obama was delusional when he said that he was the President of the United States and Mr. Romney has a vivid imagination when he claimed to have been nominated by those imaginary Republicans to be their nominee. After all - it is unethical to confuse her with the facts - she has made up her mind, and besides everyone knows that there are no Republicans in Cook County.

In all seriousness we need an 'honest' comprehensive and complete investigation now! I really would have trouble with Mr. Obama having Carolyn as his plenary guardian.

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/