Saturday, December 31, 2016

[Lawsters:28497] What went wrong with the Electoral System

[Lawsters:28497] What went wrong with the Electoral System
 
 

kenneth ditkowsky

10:46 AM (20 hours ago)
 
Corruption is subtle.   All the hype events are interesting but usually mean nothing except a few peons are in trouble.   The real movers and shakers are protected by more layers of protocol.  For instance - who can complain when a land owner decides to take a portion of his/her land and dedicate into perpetuity for public purposes.   Who can complain if there is a bit of a tax break so that our children can enjoy ****.   Indeed, the fact that conservation easements turn out to be 'welfare for rich political people' is irrelevant.

A big question mark comes to the fore when the laudable purpose is accompanied by tax incentives - such as tax credits - followed by government condemnation of the very same land.   Another question arises when the President of the United States suddenly wants to condemn this land for a Federal Monument.   Everyone obviously is aware that private land that happens to be taken for a Federal purpose must be condemned and the government has to pay the highest use valuation for the land.   Of course everyone also has to be aware that certain Democratic Donors to the Hillary Clinton campaign are very upset that so much money was spent on the campaign with not result.   Maybe it is a coincidence that some of the land condemned for the two new Federal Monuments just happens to be suggested to belong to certain of the disenchanted donors to the Democratic campaign.

Of course, I am speculating - I do not know if a single parcel an inch square is part of the conservation easement (or trust) belonging to a donor.   It was however interesting that the Wall Street Journal on page 2 of today edition thought that they ought to explain the conservation easement!   Maybe that was also a coincidence!

I do know that certain Hollywood people purchased last tracts of land previously referred to as "waste land" and these parcels became conservation trusts or easements.
One media outlet laughed about the purchase of 'death valley' by one of those liberal high minded movie stars!    

Maybe - it is time for we - who are the great unwashed - to educate ourselves and stop being naive children.    I found an article that casts light on the subject of welfare for the rich and may shed some light on the receive environmental bent of our outgoing President!

Easement deals lead to inquiry

20071124_113407_easement.jpg
Easement deals lead to inquiry
PUBLISHED:  | UPDATED: 
A state investigation into possible abuses of the conservation easement program is focusing on deals involving five ranches and an Arvada land trust.
The investigation aims to ensure that the federal government and cash-strapped Colorado aren’t losing out on millions of dollars in tax revenue.
Documents obtained by The Denver Post show the investigation involves transactions in which Noah Land Conservation, based in Arvada, and Denver tax attorney Rodney Atherton were participants. Of the five ranches, two are in Adams County, and the other three are in Arapahoe, Elbert and Huerfano counties.
The conservation easement program allows landowners to get tax deductions and earn tax credits in exchange for restricting development on their land. Among the reasons for the easements are preserving scenic views, land for outdoor recreation and natural habitat. Such deals can only be done by going through an intermediary, such as a land trust.
Abuse of the program can occur when landowners obtain excessively high appraisals for property they place in easements, allowing them to take higher tax deductions and obtain more tax credits than they would otherwise get.
Last week, the Colorado Division of Real Estate issued about 30 subpoenas to people involved in the deals in an effort to determine whether appraisals of the properties were inflated or other possible violations occurred, said Erin Toll, director of the state Division of Real Estate.
“We expect to receive reams of documents,” she said.
Toll said one reason for the subpoenas is to find out who was involved.
Atherton, of Denver-based Zakhem Atherton LLC, said the subpoenas in connection with the five land deals were unnecessary.
“If they would have asked, (the documents) would have all been supplied,” he said. “Everybody’s pretty confident their appraisals will hold up.”
The Division of Real Estate also subpoenaed records from Noah Land Conservation, now called Colorado Natural Land Trust, which has about 200 parcels under easement, said Paul Geer, president of the trust’s board. “We feel pretty comfortable with everything that is going on,” Geer said. “We’ve got nothing to hide, so it’s fine for someone to come in and look at our records.”
The people being subpoenaed include investors in the five ranches. Each investor bought a ranch parcel sized anywhere from 23 acres to 244 acres between 2005 and 2007.
After their parcels were appraised, the investors put conservation easements on their land through Noah.
Conservation easements have been booming in the state in part because of changes to state law that allow the tax credits to be sold. In 2001, there were $2.3 million in tax credits issued. Last year $85.1 million in tax credits were issued.
Documents obtained by The Post include a list of transactions that are being investigated and a business plan for a company managed by Atherton.
The business plan lays out how the investment process works — and explains the potential for a big payoff. The document shows how the company is seeking investors for a sixth ranch in Adams County, and explains how investors can put land under conservation easements.
Atherton said the previous five deals were structured in a similar way but with less valuable tax credits. In one case, the investment vehicle for an Adams County ranch was a hunting club established through the Bluffs Destination Resorts, Atherton said.
The deal described in the business plan involves a company called Rural Broadband Solutions II LLC. The plan outlines how 16 investors in an Adams County ranch will realize a nearly 400 percent return on an $80,000 investment through the sale of wireless franchises, the sale of water, land development and the use of conservation easement state tax credits.
The $80,000 investment gives each investor about 60 acres of property east of Brighton and north of Bennett.
Rural Broadband, which purchased 1,280 acres in Adams County earlier this year, describes the property as “in the current path for development.”
Investors are encouraged in the document to donate conservation easements to Colorado Natural Land Trust. It also proposes to use a “conservative appraiser that has significant experience with appraising conservation easements and has had IRS scrutiny of its appraisals and appraisal process.”
By putting the easements on their land, investors are told they will receive an $850,000 federal tax deduction and a Colorado tax credit of about $375,000, the maximum allowed under the law, according to the document. The tax credit likely could be sold for about $300,000. The company says the figures used in its calculations are based on preliminary indications from an appraiser.
So far, no conservation easements have been filed by the company or any of its members, and no appraisals have been done, Atherton said.
“We came up with a development concept that was smart for the community,” he said. “We’re going to develop some ground and leave some as open space.”
In order for a member to receive the $850,000 tax deduction on the 60 acres, the land must be appraised at that amount, or about $14,167 an acre.
But Jim Capecelatro, a land broker at Fuller Real Estate, said without unique amenities, it would be difficult to justify prices of more than $5,000 an acre.
“It’s definitely (agriculture) out there,” he said. “That is not in the path of development.”
Colorado Natural Land Trust started in 2000 as Noah’s Crib, a group that mentored children coming out of the juvenile prison system. It received two conservation easements in 2002 and another in 2003. Shortly thereafter, it split into two entities: Noah Land Conservation and Angel Spring Mission, which serves Ridge View Academy, a youth corrections facility near Denver, tax records show.
Noah Land Conservation changed its name to Colorado Natural Land Trust earlier this year.
The Division of Real Estate isn’t the only agency investigating conservation easements.
Of more than 400 tax returns involving conservation easements that the IRS is investigating nationwide, 290 are in Colorado. About 60 of those were initiated at the request of the Colorado Department of Revenue.
Since 2001, there have been about $270 million worth of conservation tax credits taken on about 1,500 donations, according to the Colorado Department of Revenue.
Staff writer David Migoya contributed to this report.
Margaret Jackson: 303-954-1473 or mjackson@denverpost.com 
 

Friday, December 30, 2016

Prince Lawyers Haul in Millions Off Death

Prince Lawyers Haul in Millions Off Death
12/1/2016 10:15 AM PST
EXCLUSIVE
1201-prince-fun-art-getty-02It pays to be Prince's lawyers ... they're raking in a ton of cash for handling the late singer's estate and legal issues.
The special administrator handling Prince's estate -- Bremer Trust -- filed docs asking the court to approve more than $2.3 million in bills racked up from July 1 through Sept. 30. As the estate describes it ... handling "the complexity of the problems involved" doesn't come cheap, and requires a bunch of high-priced lawyers.
The biggest expense so far is for the legal services of Stinson Leonard Street at $1,840,895.97. Remember, that's just for 3 months of work. In all, there are 6 firms listed as handling everything from claims by potential heirs to Paisley Park Museum plans. For the record, the lowest tab was for Broad and Cassel ... which only billed the estate for $915.73.
Some of the dough's also going to law firms in Italy and Florida handling copyright suits, plus a lawsuit in Cali to collect royalties.
Prince's estate is reportedly worth 200 million bucks. 

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Peaceful, easy feeling for Eagles co-founder in conservator court battle

Peaceful, easy feeling for Eagles co-founder in conservator court battle

Editor's note: "...you can check out anytime, but you can never leave..." Hotel California.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
 
 

The Eagles in 1972 (left to right): Leadon, Meisner, Henley, Frey. Photo via wikimedia commons
The Eagles in 1972 (left to right): Leadon, Meisner, Henley, Frey. Photo via wikimedia commons
A legal battle over who should serve as a conservator for Eagles co-founder Randy Meisner has been settled as both sides agreed the two men currently serving as temporary overseers of the entertainer’s personal and business affairs should be given permanent roles.
The resolution means that Meisner’s longtime friend, Arthur Ford, will continue to be responsible for getting proper health care for the 70-year-old bassist and that Meisner’s accountant, Thomas DeLong, will remain in charge of his financial issues.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William Barry extended the temporary conservatorships of Ford and DeLong until Dec. 30, but their roles are scheduled to become permanent as soon as the lawyers present the judge with the proper paperwork to sign.
Meisner’s wife, Lana, suffered a fatal gunshot wound March 6 when she lifted a rifle that accidentally discharged in the couple’s Studio City home, according to police. Meisner’s lawyer, Bruce Fuller, filed a petition on his client’s behalf five days later asking that a conservatorship be established to provide for Meisner’s care, maintenance and support.
Fuller stated in his court papers that his client was “in a profound state of grief” and “barely able to accept the sudden and tragic loss” of his 63-year-old wife.
In April, the judge found that Meisner was of sound mind when he agreed to have Ford and DeLong as his temporary conservators. But their selections were criticized by James Newton, who filed a competing petition. Newton said he has known Meisner for years and that he speaks often with the musician’s children.
The settlement came on the day trial was scheduled to begin on the dueling petitions. Newton’s lawyer, Troy Martin, said the issues were resolved to the satisfaction of all parties, but he declined to elaborate.
Martin previously said that Newton preferred that Donna Bogdanovich be appointed to oversee Meisner’s medical needs and his estate. Martin said Bogdanovich is a former social worker and case manager who specializes in mental health issues.
Martin told Barry in a previous hearing that Newton was concerned that Meisner may not have had a sound mind when he agreed to the temporary conservatorships. He said Newton worried whether the singer-guitarist was getting proper medical care.
Martin said Meisner has a history of substance issues and mental health problems and that the musician once said he wanted to kill people with an AK-47 and then take his own life.
The Eagles were founded in 1971 by Meisner, the late Glenn Frey, Don Henley and Bernie Leadon. Meisner co-wrote and sang the hit, “Take it to the Limit.”
–City News Service 

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Ex-employees allege nursing home tried to mislead inspectors on abuse

Ex-employees allege nursing home tried to mislead inspectors on abuse

Editor's note: A report to Your ProbateShark advises that a member of the Esformes-Faskowitz cabal involved with the looting of the Alice R. Gore estate is in a state of turmoil.  Evidently, the frenzy is caused by some of Phil Esformes's  cohorts who are singing like canaries and may implicate many others.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com


Two social workers allege they were fired from a suburban nursing home after refusing to fabricate medical records related to incidents of patient abuse, according to their pending lawsuit in Cook County Circuit Court.

Some of their patient-abuse allegations were investigated separately by the Illinois Department of Public Health, which cited the facility for safety breaches, government records show.

Once called Burnham Healthcare but now known as Bria of River Oaks, the 309-bed home serves geriatric and bed-bound patients alongside younger adults with mental illness, substance abusers and convicted felons.

"There was no structure. It was dangerous," one of the social workers, Kenneth Allen, told the Tribune in an interview.

Avrum Weinfeld, CEO of the nursing home, declined to comment on specific incidents but called the allegations made by social workers in the lawsuit and in Tribune interviews baseless.

Weinfeld told the Tribune that administrators never attempted to mislead state inspectors. "There was no directive (to alter records), nor was there any proof of that," Weinfeld said. "Nothing has been proven and nothing will be proven."

The unadorned three-story brick building in Burnham has withstood years of state citations for violence, patient neglect and filth. Last year it received $16.5 million from Medicaid and Medicare while reporting $1.38 million in profits.

Records show that some of those federal health-care dollars went to Weinfeld's uncle, nursing home magnate Morris Esformes, whose son and close business partner, Philip Esformes, is being held without bond in a Miami federal detention cell on charges that he orchestrated a $1 billion Medicaid kickback scheme in Florida.

Morris and Philip Esformes in 2012 sold the Burnham home and three other Chicago-area facilities to companies run by Weinfeld and Weinfeld's brother-in-law, Daniel Weiss, but those homes continued to pay consulting and real estate fees to companies managed by Morris Esformes, state records show.

The Burnham facility faced allegations of violence both before and after that sale. The Chicago Tribune's 2009 "Compromised Care" investigation revealed the death of Thomas Donovan, who used a wheelchair. Donovan died in the home after a fellow resident allegedly beat Donovan, 63, with a chair. Preliminary Burnham police reports list 16 alleged assaults and batteries inside the facility since 2013, as well as two criminal sexual assault reports. None of those cases resulted in a prosecution, those records show.

The civil court allegations made by Allen and Olufunmibi Ogunyipe date to 2011 and continue into 2013, after Weinfeld took over. Paid roughly $13 per hour, the two social workers shared a second-floor office and each handled a caseload of 35 patients, according to court records and their interviews with the Tribune.

Among the accusations in their lawsuit, filed last year:

•Allen alleges that a supervisor told him to falsify the medical chart of a female resident who was hospitalized in 2012 with facial bruises and black eyes. Allen said he believes the woman was beaten by a fellow resident, but he was told to write that she had fallen. A state inspection report later found that the facility failed to properly investigate her family's complaint that she was assaulted.

•Allen alleges that after he documented a resident's rape complaint, a supervisor ripped Allen's report out of the medical file and tore it up. The state health department inspection concluded the facility had failed to thoroughly investigate the sexual assault allegation and to notify authorities.

•Ogunyipe alleges that, in the case of a 60-year-old resident who had repeatedly requested a discharge, a supervisor told him in 2013 to write up medical notes falsely stating that Ogunyipe had tried repeatedly to transfer the man but couldn't find a program with an open bed. A state health department inspection cited the facility for failing to assist the resident's request for a discharge.

About four days after that incident in summer 2013, Ogunyipe was terminated, records show. The facility alleged in its answer to the pending lawsuit that he failed to complete job duties and abandoned his post during work hours. Ogunyipe, initially hired as a security guard, started working at Burnham in 2009.

Allen worked at the facility from February to November 2012. The facility said Allen was not rehired in the transition of operational control from the Esformeses to their relatives.

In the lawsuit, Ogunyipe alleges that a supervisor tried to deceive state inspectors by removing disheveled residents who might trigger state scrutiny because they appeared neglected.

A supervisor gave him $30 to $50 to take the residents out of the building, buy them cigarettes, feed them at a McDonald's and claim they were going on a field trip, saying: "They can't be in the building," the suit states.

The facility denied the allegation in court papers.

Ogunyipe said in an interview that the administration wanted to conceal residents with untrimmed hair and soiled clothes because "you would know that they were not being cared for."

He also told the Tribune he witnessed fellow guards entice physically aggressive residents back to their rooms with a cigarette or snack, then punish them. "They would just close the door and — boom, boom, boom! Deal with the resident. Beat him up. Spit on his face and then walk out, close the door," Ogunyipe said.

In an interview, Weinfeld said: "Making up these kinds of allegations is horrible. We categorically say, no, those things did not happen."

The allegation about guards punishing residents is not mentioned in the lawsuit.

A 2012 state inspection report said two residents alleged guards beat or roughed them up in separate incidents. The report says that at least one guard at the home was fired as a result.

State inspectors have cited the facility for abuse-related incidents after Ogunyipe and Allen were terminated.

In 2014, a male resident entered a woman's room and exposed himself, saying, "I got to have that," then jumped on her bed, according to a state inspection report. She fought off the man and he was subsequently arrested, the state report said. The report said the facility could provide "no written evidence" that it immediately notified the state of the incident as required when residents are in jeopardy of harm.

That year the facility also failed to properly investigate or report altercations in which one resident suffered a black eye and another had an abrasion on his nose, state inspections say.

Amid these allegations of violence came citations for loose and peeling floor tiles, brown-stained ceiling panels and a buildup of dirt, dust and grime around air vents. "It would be nice to have a dresser that is not missing a drawer," a longtime resident told a state inspector in July 2015.

The inspector also reported that a bathroom shared by four residents "had a strong urine odor. The lights to the bathroom did not work and the tiles were cracked and in disrepair. The surrounding tile around the toilet area had a thick encrusted layer of unidentifiable stains."

In a corridor, the inspector noted an exposed, rusted ceiling pipe wrapped with an incontinence pad.

Weinfeld said these citations came amid repairs following a 2015 fire and added that his team has improved facility conditions by raising workers' wages, reducing the number of aggressive residents and investing "tremendous amounts of dollars" in upgrades and refurbishments.

"Today, you'd see a calmer place," he said. "It is a different building."

The home also switched to an electronic record-keeping system that can identify workers who try to alter or backdate records, he said.

Weinfeld worked his way up through the Esformes organization starting in 2001, serving as a registered agent and financial officer of their Chicago-area facilities before he teamed up with Weiss to purchase the four former Esformes homes.

According to state records, the Esformeses continued to manage a company that kept title to the home's underlying real estate after they sold the Burnham operation to Weinfeld's firm. That company drew $7.5 million in rent payments during the three years from 2013 through 2015, the records show.

But Weinfeld, who is a registered agent of the Esformes' real estate company, said he erroneously listed Philip Esformes as a manager of the firm in records he filed with the state.

He said the company is managed by Morris Esformes. Philip Esformes sold his interest in the company in 2012 and does not take a share of the rent, Weinfeld told the Tribune. "It was an oversight," Weinfeld said of the records.

Morris Esformes' attorney Harvey Tettlebaum said the rent payments were proper and standard for the industry.

Two of Morris Esformes' companies separately received $275,000 in consulting and administrative fees from the Burnham home in those three years, state records show. Weinfeld told the Tribune he bought one of those companies last year and stopped using the other.

The rent and back office expenses paid to the Esformes companies were necessary to patient care, Weinfeld added. "We're cognizant of the fact that it's taxpayer dollars," Weinfeld said. "It is a fair use of the money."

Weinfeld holds a 1.5 percent ownership interest in Harmony Health Center, one of the Miami-area facilities named in Philip Esformes' alleged kickback and fraud scheme, according to Florida Agency for Health Care Administration reports. Weinfeld said he is a "silent partner" who has no role in that facility's operations.

Federal prosecutors allege that Philip Esformes shuttled disabled patients through two dozen of the Esformeses' Florida facilities, billing the government for services never delivered. The Justice Department says it is the largest health-care fraud case against an individual in U.S. history. Morris Esformes, who co-owns several of the Florida homes named in the indictment, has not been charged in the case.

"Philip Esformes continues to strenuously assert his innocence," his attorney Michael Pasano told the Tribune. "He is fighting these charges and looking to clear his name and the reputation of his nursing homes, which he insists deliver high-quality care."

Full Article & Source:
Ex-employees allege nursing home tried to mislead inspectors on abuse

See Also:
Nursing home operator from Chicago jailed as feds allege $1 billion scheme

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Which came first the chicken or the egg.

Which came first the chicken or the egg.

In

Which came first the chicken or the egg.

Inox
x

kenneth ditkowsky

2:01 PM (16 hours ago)
to Ditkowsky, Ben, Deborah, Elenna, Naomi, Elizabeth, Keith, Benjamin, JoAnne, me
 
 
Which came first – the chicken or the egg.     For most of us, the issue never becomes relevant until we start looking back as to our origins.       I was asked today, how I was maneuvered into the profession I chose.    My first reaction was hostile – no one could maneuver me, I thought.    I was a free agent who followed the line of least resistance.   I was always free as a bird – in fact,  I am still *****.    Of course this is delusional – the restraints on me are sometimes tighter that need me.
 
As the issue, grinded at me, I realized that while my father pushed at me to follow in his footsteps at every juncture the sabotage was present.     My material grandfather introduced me, from day one, to interesting people who just happened to speculate in products associated with the Real Estate industry.   It was no accident that he made the cumbersome legal descriptions make sense to me, or that even after his death his friends would seek me out to accompany them on viewing trips.      Indeed, I was even exposed to the profit incentive and taught how learning a few basic principles could make my observations valuable and earn me a few dollars.   Medicine was by comparison a grind, while the path set before me was like sliding down a gentle slope.
 
I recall my first solo “purchase” of a parcel of property, however, long before I was sent out on my own I was trained in the most gentle manner, to wit:
 “Kenny, you do me a favor and run over to the Title company and check this legal description is correct”
Of course, the description was correct.   It came off the Chicago Title and Trust Company report of title.     I was being sent across the street to learn about the Tract book, grantor/grantee index, and get practice in asking ‘stupid questions’ with a straight face.     It was not long before the question asked of me was:
“Kenny, could you get me a legal description for the address ******.”      
As I learned these simple lessons I was allowed and encouraged to talk to real people in real situations.    Piece by piece and step by step I was weaned and initiated into a world that ultimately became mine.   
 
Why were these people interested in me?    I do not know.     I am however very grateful.      I do know that I learned that ‘fun’ and ‘work’ need not be diametrically opposed.      It was fun driving all over the City with Joe Ronsley.    I enjoyed meeting “real” people, who had real problems and were working out real solutions.     I was amazed at some of the things he said, and even more amazed that people took him seriously.    I was once with him when he negotiated the purchase of a $250,000 mortgage.      With a straight face, he offered $25,000.00 and with an equally straight face the owner of the mortgage accepted the offer.     An hour later he sold the very same note and trust deed (mortgage) for $100,000.00 to a buyer who thought he had the biggest bargain in history.      When Mr. Ronsley told me that he was the title holder of the subject property my head began to spin.    
 
Piece by piece Ronsley, Harry Eager, Elliot, Eaton**** taught me how the ‘priorities’ of title could not be overlooked, and just how important searching not only the title but the premises themselves was as part of the deal.    I walked through numerous basements and apartments looking for dry rot, insect infestation, mold, settlement, deterioration, faulty utilities and odors.    I got to the point where I developed a second sense that I relied upon 100% of the time.     I also learned the art of keeping up a banter so as disguise my observations and always appear to know less than every one else the room when such ignorance was required.  
 
Clifford Eaton, had the most patience with me.    Mr. Eaton arrived from Mississippi with almost nothing in his pocket, and a burning desire to make something out of himself.    He approached Ronsley, et al with the prospect of purchasing from them the buildings that were most difficult to sell.   He would take over these properties, manage them, pay the debt service (at a severely discounted rate) and any profits would be equitably shared.    Eaton turned out to be ‘gold mine!’ for my friends (and me).      I was ‘given’ to him to be trained.    On a Sunday morning (during the season to purchase real estate) Eaton would appear with his disreputable vehicle and he and I would travel though the target area and look at properties.     Sunday morning was also rent collection time.   
 
Eaton, who spoke the Queens English with more precision than my mentors – or anyone else – suddenly became a down home black man who looked and sounded as if he had just stepped off the cotton plantation.    It was a lesson that I never forgot.   Eaton never talked down to anyone but he was at the same time genuine.    He could say NO and make the recipient feel grateful.     I never was able to be his equal.     He also could spot a deficiency in a property and estimate its cost of repair down to the penny.     Nothing got by him.    He also could do magic with tradesman’s tools.    There was nothing he could not fix.
 
Bit by Bit, I was tutored and taught to be whomever I turned out to be.   Medical School was not to be, even though my father’s friend at the University of Illinois got me an acceptance.     I really did not want to go, and when Judy told me that I did not have to go to Med School, a large weight was lifted off my head and suddenly I felt FREE!      Indeed, I was free.    I negotiated a couple of deals on my own and I dreamt the large and impossible dreams.   
 
Fortuitously, Ronsley had gotten into some legal problems and he dragged me to see the lawyers.    Let me tell you – my impression of the profession was not stellar.     One practitioner lit up a cigar, put his feet on his desk and gave us advice that my 9-year-old grandson would laugh at.    I however, sad quietly, listened to the advice, and when the lawyer finished, took his cigar from his mouth, put his feet on the floor and waited for the kudos to come.   I stood up, thanked him, and said we will be in touch.    Joe smiled and joined me.     When we were totally out of the office, Joe said: “one of us has to go to law school!”      I immediately volunteered to help him in his studies.     It was shortly thereafter that I wandered over to Loyola University School of Law to ascertain what was required.     Somehow, I found myself signed up for classes.
 
Law school is another story.     I got married to Judy, and graduated from Law School.     I even passed the Bar Exam on the first try.   However, all the plans beyond that did not pan out.    Some took a while to peter out, but, I was on a straight path leading to being a lawyer.     For instance, Joe Ronsley suffered a fall which left him paralyzed from the waist down and he became depressed and requested that I assist him in ending it all.    I was not diplomatic and bluntly refused.    He fired me on the spot, and I was now officially engaged in the Practice of Law.     (Joe did end it all and left another big hole in my life and career.)
 
The lessons I learned kept me alive during the warm up period when young lawyers either make it or break it.    I had everything going for me, except they neglected in law school to teach me how to bill for services rendered, and how to collect my billings.     For five decades, I tried to learn the ‘art’ and was never successful.   Billing was my Achilles heel.    I knew exactly how to make the process an ordeal and a disaster.      Fortunately, my partner took over that problem and ******.   (that also is another story)
 
If you are not ‘good’ you must be lucky.     I was lucky.    I was at a party one evening and someone said:
“If someone would offer me $50.00, I would sell them this ‘Bear lake’ property.”  
 I was in earshot, and I cannot tell you what possessed me, but, I said: “I offer you $50.00!”    To my surprise, he said “sold” I gave him the $50.00 and later on he gave me a deed.       A month or so later, Judy and I went down to Bear Lake Michigan to view the property.     It was 12 acres of nothing!     It was not on the lake, and it had nothing growing on it.     It was indeed a disaster.
 
Undaunted a short while later I contacted a Real Estate broker in the area, asked him what his commission rate was and offered him double the rate.   My terms – collect enough down payment to pay the title charges and your fee, and  I would finance (on contract for deed) the balance.     A month later he did exactly that.     Two happy buyers paid me  (over the next couple of years) the balance in full at a 6% simple interest rate and I had the money to pay my office rent.     Subsequently, I got a commission from the Town of Manistee to develop a parcel of land.   This project is one of my most glaring  failures – I could not put together the deal.
 
Rent expenses were not my only expense, and I needed a supplement to my remuneration from the practice of law.     Unlike most people,  when I needed help, it came fortuitously.     Mr.  Elliot rejected a deal on a property on Halsted Street.   The property was a mess.    It had been (and still was) a rooming house with enough violations to choke a horse.    The mortgages due on he real estate were seriously in default and my friend could see no way other than forgiveness to get the mortgages current.    To make the circle complete, he could not communicate rationally with either the “owner” or his “attorney.”     Elliot was willing to sell his position in the transaction for $2,000.00.     I snapped at the offer.   The principal balance due was $20,000.00.    The interest in arrears was outrageous.   The saving grace was the fact that the Real Estate Taxes were current.    The premises was without insurance and there could be no insurance purchased.
 
My first step was to contact the attorney.    I made a proposal.    I would forbear on foreclosure if the owner (Karlis S ****) would bring the building in full compliance with the City Code and immediately purchase hazard insurance.    In addition, I would reduce all mortgage payments by 50% and waive all the accrued interest making a new balance of $20,000; provided that every future payment be made on time and when due without exception.   If one payment was late, or there was a single building violation on the premises effective **** Mr. S***** owed all the discounted funds plus the new balance.     As a further consideration, I wanted credit life insurance on Mr. S***”s life.    
 
Karlis S**** who to Elliot only spoke guttural German called me to ask me if I was serious.    I affirmed, and the next day he and his attorney met with me and the deal was signed.      S**** complied fully!    The building violations were cured, a credit life policy was purchased, and payments started.     Mr. S*** however suffered a heart attack and died, leaving me with the proceeds of the life insurance and a satisfied mortgage.
 
My friend Lloyd Elliot was delighted = as was I.   I had the seed money for my practice and I was on my way to a ½ a century career.   
 
  
 
x