Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Illinois' lawyer disciplinary commission and its administrator lacks a moral compass!

Illinois' lawyer disciplinary commission and its administrator lacks a moral compass!

Inbox
x

kenneth ditkowsky

6:01 AM (7 minutes ago)
 
The total lack of moral compass exhibited by the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission and in particular Mr. Larkin as exhibited by these proceedings and in particular the response to the Petition for a Rule is demoralizing and an example to the public that our legal system is no infected with the cancer of corruption that our Democracy is endangered.

What is so amazing is that the IARDC violated the law.    When the public (you and me) discovered the violation instead of making restitution and amends they lied!    They intentionally lied to the Supreme Court of Illinois and then continue to compound the untruths with more untruths.

Now lets look at this situation from another angle.   What is the American Bar Association doing when it finds that a lawyer disciplinary Commission lacks a moral compass?    

So far - nothing!    Lying to the public is apparently politically corrected in 21st Century America!    
 
What a legacy our current crop of political and judicial elite are developing!    SHAME, SHAME, SHAME.

If we allow liars and opportunists with no moral compass to prevail America and our heritage is lost!     It is very depressing!     It is TIME for all good people to rise up and toss the corrupt and dishonest political and judicial operators OUT!     

Ken Ditkowsky


From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
To: JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@denisonlaw.com>

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: ARDC/USPTO documents

JoAnn,

The objection to the Petition for a Rule contains a very serious admission and strong evidence that Jerome Larkin has no respect for the Rule of Law.    

Because these admissions are so serious, I have pursuant to Rule 8.3 forwarded them to the Attorney General of the United States, the Attorney General of Illinois, the States Attorney of Cook county, and the Governor of the States of Illinois.    In particular in his petition Larkin admits that he hired and paid unlicensed court reporters in direct violation of Illinois Statutes.    Instead, of acting in an ethical manner, Larkin tries to disguise his perfidy and what apparently has been a long standing violation of the Law by writing his objection as an excuse by the Court reporter.    The excuse - she did not receive a bill from the State of Illinois!

When you add this to the fact that Larkin misrepresented the Rule of Law as stated by the SCOTUS to the Illinois Supreme Court (in particular the Alvarez and Sawyer cases) and ignored the First Amendment to the US Constitution (and Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution) he should be disbarred and charged criminally for his Breach of the Public Trust.    Larkin knows or should know that dipping into public funds to make illegal payments if not only a taxable event, but it is embezzlement.    The fact that Larkin fails to own up to the act demonstrates that the criminal embezzlement of public funds WAS INTENTIONAL and not an error.
 
I sent a copy of this e-mail along with the documents you forwarded to the Governor of the State of Illinois as the Governor has a resonsiblity to protect the Citizens of the State from corrupt public officials who do not take their oath of office seriously.    Larkin in arguing that a blog that exposed corrupt Judicial Officials was akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater is a very dangerous terrorist whose very presence as a public official sends chills through our democracy.  47 USCA 230.    


New law extends statute of limitations in financial exploitation cases involving elderly, disabled

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

New law extends statute of limitations in financial exploitation cases involving elderly, disabled

Editor's note: This Shark believes that the new law is well-meaning and may be effective.  Unfortunately, the Probate Court of Cook County still has the power to harm elders without accountability.  Alice R. Gore, a disabled ward, had a court appointed guardian who was court adjudicated insane.  Makes one wonder what kind of a judge appoints an insane person as guardian for a 99 year old disabled ward?  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 
BENTON —Gov. Bruce Rauner signed a bill into law this week that extends the time period that charges can be brought against individuals accused of financially exploiting older adults or people with disabilities.

The law extends the statute of limitations for such crimes from three years to seven years, according to a news release from Sen. Gary Forby, D-Benton, a co-sponsor of the legislation.

The measure was signed into law by Rauner on Monday and is effective immediately.

“Unfortunately, the financial abuse of seniors and the disabled is on the rise,” Forby said in a statement. “It can force these vulnerable populations into dire financial situations, robbing them of their savings, their financial security and even their homes.

“It’s important that we continue to make necessary changes to our current safeguards to help prevent this type of abuse from occurring.”

Reported rates of elder abuse in Southern Illinois are higher than state and national averages. David Mitchell, the adult protective services unit director at Shawnee Alliance, a nonprofit that serves area seniors, recently told the newspaper that the rate of abuse of seniors and people with disabilities in Shawnee alliance’s 13-county catchment area is about 15 per 1,000 people. The statewide and nationwide rate is about 3.5 per 1,000 people, Mitchell said.

While recognizing elder abuse as a serious problem across the country, Mitchell also noted that this area may experience higher rates, in part, because of the awareness that has been created by Shawnee Alliance. The agency’s extensive outreach and education efforts on the issue of elder abuse are a positive for the region, he said.

Abuse can take many forms, including abuse that is physical, emotional or financial abuse or exploitation. It can rise to the level of a criminal offense, in which case that must be reported to the authorities, though Mitchell noted that often times the abuse is more subtle and involves exploitation by a family member that uses sob stories that may or may not be true, or threats not to visit an older person that is lonely, to convince her to fork over funds, sometimes funds she doesn’t have to give.

In a June interview, on the eve of World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, Mitchell said in an interview that by far the most common form of abuse cases reported to Shawnee Alliance involve financial exploitation. The most likely abuser is a family member or other trusted caregiver, he said.

Shawnee Alliance’s protective service unit investigates reports of abuse to adults age 60 and older, as well as adults with disabilities, broadly defined, ages 18 to 59.

The measure was House Bill 5805. It was co-sponsored by Rep. John Bradley, D-Marion, in the House. The vote to change the statute of limitations was unanimous in the House and Senate.

Full Article & Source:
New law extends statute of limitations in financial exploitation cases involving elderly, disabled

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Key figure in red-light cameras scandal gets 10 years

Key figure in red-light cameras scandal gets 10 years

Inbox
x

kenneth ditkowsky

7:34 PM (10 hours ago)
to Tribune, FBI-,
According to one of Chicago cabal of 'song birds' with ties to the Chicago nursing home operators, and a policeman from Miami,  the red light cameras are part of an operation funded by and controlled by the Chicago cabal of nursing home operators.   (I could not tie him down as to who in the miscreant group was the prime mover - however - as both nursing home operators who are taking singing lessons obviously know who we are talking about - they will share with FBI and the IRS if the question is asked.

I cannot say more as I do not wish to endanger anyone.   The infamous nursing home cabal is very dangerous.
 
Ken Ditkowsky



From: Tribune Alert <chicagotribune@e.chicagotribune.com>
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 1:20 PM
Subject: Key figure in red-light cameras scandal gets 10 years

BREAKING NEWS ALERT
August 29, 2016
John Bills, the central figure in a massive corruption scheme at City Hall, was sentenced Monday to 10 years in prison for taking up to $2 million in bribes and gifts in return for steering tens of millions of dollars in red-light camera contracts to an Arizona company.

Monday, August 29, 2016

Government attorneys implicated in ethics scandal (IL)


Government attorneys implicated in ethics scandal (IL)

November 5, 2013
A scandal is brewing in Chicago which threatens to make Operation Greylord look like a dress rehearsal for a cotillion. Starting with a seemingly innocuous question, tendered to press liaison Jim Grogan at the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) in Illinois, a boil of corruption got inadvertently pricked, which threatens now to reveal a subterranean cancer in the legal system in Illinois.
For those who are unaware of Greylord, here is a bit of history: back in the eighties, a collaborative effort by the FBI, IRS and a couple of outraged judges and attorneys resulted in one of the biggest takedowns of public officials in the history of Illinois. At the end of the 3 1/2 year undercover operation, a total of 92 people were indicted, including 17 judges, 48 lawyers, ten deputy sheriffs, eight policemen, eight court officials, and state legislator James DeLeo.
The extent of the takedown might have mitigated further predatory acts by those in the legal system. Thirty years later, however, the corruption that was supposedly expunged by Greylord has simply become systemic.
Back to Jim Grogan. Grogan, who is an attorney as well as ARDC press liaison, declined to reply to questions from this reporter as to why no statements of economic interests could be found for the attorneys who work for the ARDC. The law governing economic interests reporting is in place to ensure that those working in government capacities are not being influenced by financial lures and temptations. These statements are mandated by 5 ILCS 420 to be filed every year for nearly everyone who works in a government capacity.
Here are relevant clauses from the law, with pivotal sections underlined:
When Grogan failed to respond to the query, Press Secretary Jim Tybor at the Illinois Supreme Court was contacted and astoundingly told this reporter that this law did not apply to the judicial branch. (See 6 and e, above).
Michelle Burton, a paralegal at the ARDC assured this reporter that the ARDC employees are not state employees. However, the website for the ARDC announces that the Commission is an arm of the Illinois Supreme Court.
The ARDC is in a particularly pivotal position. As the Commission responsible for disciplining attorneys, the ARDC functions as a gatekeeper. In that sense, the ARDC defines the legal climate in Illinois. Right now, the ARDC has taken upon its shoulders the regulation of an attorney’s right to free speech. Attorney Ken Ditkowsky, who has been practicing law in Chicago area since 1961, is facing disciplinary proceedings for sending emails to federal authorities asking for an investigation of corrupt practices in Illinois courts.
Shades of Greylord . . . Except this time, the feds are turning a deaf ear to evidence of legal malfeasance in Illinois. And Ditkowsky may in fact lose his license to practice law, due to his incisive perceptions and requests for investigation.
Attorney Ken Ditkowsky’s concerns about judicial and attorney misconduct began with the adult guardianship of Mary Sykes, an elderly woman who was placed under a guardianship without due process. Another Illinois attorney, JoAnne Denison, is also under disciplinary proceedings due to her maintaining a blog about the Sykes guardianship. (Source)
Ditkowsky soon realized that the phenomenon of what he is calling “elder cleansing” is going on nationwide. And for his act of speaking out against a pervasive assault on a vulnerable demographic group—the elderly and incapacitated—the ARDC has recommended a four year suspension of his license to practice law.
As it turns out, the ARDC attorneys appear to have quite a bit to hide in terms of their economic interests.
If you want to bribe someone, there are only a couple of ways to do this that would not trigger the red flags that are built into the banking infrastructure. One way would be to give someone a big envelope stuffed with cash. Brian Mulroney, a former Prime Minister of Canada, was caught red handed receiving such a bounty and a scandal ensued. (Source)
The other way is through a “loan.” The mechanism is simply and virtually opaque—Mr. X takes out a loan, such as a mortgage and Mr. Y pays it back. There are no banking flags to trigger and no embarrassing wads of cash, a la Mulroney, to explain.
The use of such property loans to funnel payola to judges was exposed in a 2009 article, which first appeared in the San Bernardino County Sentinel. Now it seems that those in the Illinois legal system, specifically attorneys at the ARDC, have climbed onto the dinero express.
Jerome Larkin, the Administrator of the ARDC and the individual who has signed the complaint against Ken Ditkowsky, has funneled several million dollars through his property in the last ten years. For example, Larkin took out a loan for $450,000 in December of 2001 and paid it back in exactly five years. In the meantime, he had taken out another $450,000 loan—in October of 2006, which he paid back in just a tad over four years, in January of 2011. In the meantime, he had taken out yet another mortgage—this one for $101,000—in November of 2009, which he was miraculously able to repay in just about a year.
But his unusual loan behavior doesn’t stop here. In January of 2011, Larkin took out a whopping $750,000 mortgage on the same piece of property. Larkin must have a direct line to lottery bucks, because he was able to repay this loan by January of 2013.
In the meantime . . . are you getting the picture yet? . . . he took out another $750,000 loan in December of 2012.
Neither Jerome Larkin nor his wife, psychologist Antoinette Krakowski responded to telephone inquiries concerning the amount of money being funneled through their home.
Larkin is the big cheese over at the ARDC. There are other attorneys in the employ of that powerful, shadowy, not-government, not private – commission whose loan history is also questionable, including attorneys Melissa Smart and Sharon Opryzcek.
Apparently, the word about the loan trough is getting out. A check was run on the loan history of attorneys and guardians ad litem, Adam Stern and Cynthia Farenga, whose actions first alerted Ken Ditkowsky to the predatory nature of probate guardianships. Lo and behold, Adam Stern’s loan history looks like that of a hyperactive kid in a Ritalin store.
A review of the Cook County recorder’s website reveals that Stern has run over a million dollars through his property loans in roughly the last ten years. A couple of examples of quickly repaid large loans taken out by Stern include a $272,000 mortgage taken out on 9/13/2004 and paid back on 2/17/05. Stern also took out a $51,000 mortgage on 9/13/04 and paid it back May of 2005. On October 4, 2004 Stern took out an $80,000 mortgage which he paid back less than three months later.
Adam Stern also has a federal tax lien on his home for $60,000. Stern, who is parenthetically serving as guardian ad litem in the Sykes guardianship and is thus in the responsible position of looking out for OPM—other people’s money—can’t even pay his own taxes.
Attorney and guardian ad litem Cynthia Farenga’s loan history is similarly manic. Farenga is also a guardian ad litem in the Sykes case. For example, Farenga took out a $385,000 loan on 11/09/2006 and paid it off on 6/12/2007. A loan of over a half million dollars – $575,000 to be exact – was paid off by Farenga within five years, on 6/24/2013. Farenga took out a smaller, $244,000 mortgage on 10/16/2003 and paid it back within two years, on 9/28/05. In the meantime, she had taken out another mortgage, this time for an even $300,000 on 9/07/2005, which she quickly reconveyed in less than a year and a half, on 1/08/2007. All told, over two and a quarter million dollars have been funneled through Farenga’s property in the last ten years.
The head of a private investigator’s firm out in the Southern California area confided in me that judges were coming to him to inquire how to hide their property, so that public searches for these records would not result in transparency. Recently, Judge Ronald Christianson, formerly the Presiding Judge in San Bernardino County, changed the name on the records of his primary residence to “Property Owners.” Such tactics will make determinations of suspicious activity increasingly more difficult.
Ditkowsky has filed a complaint with the ARDC referencing the impropriety of Adam Stern working as a GAL when he has failed to fulfill his own tax liabilities. At the time of going to press, other records detailing suspicious financial activity by ARDC attorneys and others are being turned over to a Grand Jury.
The Director of the Administrative Office of the Illinois Supreme Court, Michael Tardy, did not respond to queries from this reporter concerning the economic interests and reporting requirements of the ARDC, which is an arm of the Illinois Supreme Court.
Attribution:
Government Attorneys Implicated in Ethics Scandal
Janet Phelan
October 28, 2013
Activist Post
Government Attorneys Implicated in Ethics Scandal

Sunday, August 28, 2016

Chicago priest accused of taking $500,000 from parishioner with dementia

Chicago priest accused of taking $500,000 from parishioner with dementia
Standing before the religious icons that line his Ukrainian Orthodox church in Humboldt Park, the Rev. Nicholas Chervyatiuk has ministered to followers who arrived in Chicago as refugees after surviving Nazi Germany's prison camps.

Now the Cook County public guardian is accusing the priest of improperly taking more than $500,000 from the savings of one of those displaced persons, a 93-year-old former church secretary diagnosed with dementia.

Chervyatiuk has not been charged with a crime, and he denied any wrongdoing during a sworn probate court examination and in a Tribune interview.

He says Nelly Bridgeman wanted him to have her money, which he saw as payment for the care he provided as her health and mental faculties failed.

"It's for my work," Chervyatiuk testified during the court examination. "It was for 14 years and I think it was time for me to get paid. ... Nelly wanted it that way."

He told the Tribune he estimated those services were worth "about $25,000 per year."

Chervyatiuk, 55, allegedly used Bridgeman's money to support two restaurants he ran with a convicted drug dealer, his Brash & Sassy Inc. hair salon and his portfolio of Chicago-area rental properties, according to probate court papers and separate land, business and court records.

He has held power of attorney over Bridgeman's affairs since March 2015, when she was diagnosed with dementia and moved into a nursing home, records show.

Public guardian Robert Harris said: "It's another example of how elderly people get ripped off by the most trusted people."

The priest's private attorney, Dmytro Kurywczak, said Chervyatiuk "is working with the Office of the Public Guardian to come up with some kind of a resolution that will be in the best interests of Nelly Bridgeman."

Chervyatiuk's Holy Patronage Church, at 900 N. Washtenaw Ave., is part of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyivan Patriarchate, one of three major Orthodox groups in that country.

A North American church leader, the Rev. Victor Poliarny, told the Tribune it was "not acceptable" for a priest to take a parishioner's funds in a private transaction. Church authorities are seeking "official documents substantiating the accusation," Poliarny said. "Once we secure the official documents regarding this matter, the higher authority of the Kyiv Patriarchate will ensure proper punitive measures for the alleged behavior."

A native of Ukraine, Bridgeman had been a German World War II prisoner, and Chervyatiuk in his court examination acknowledged signing his name to her reparation checks from the German government.

In the court examination, Chervyatiuk said: "It belonged to me, everything. She knew that and she told it to everyone."

Suspecting fraud, a bank official in December contacted the public guardian's office. In March, Associate Cook County Judge Shauna Boliker authorized the office to gather financial records and determine how much of Bridgeman's money Chervyatiuk spent on her care and how much he allegedly converted for his own use.

The agency, which now is Bridgeman's legal guardian, says it will seek court permission to recover any funds wrongly converted by Chervyatiuk. As the probate case proceeds, Boliker has ordered financial institutions to freeze $170,000 of the priest's personal and business bank accounts.

At the public guardian's request, a doctor this year examined Bridgeman and determined she "was totally incapable of making financial and personal decisions."

After coming to America in 1950, Bridgeman married a U.S. service member and would serve for more than two decades as secretary of Chervyatiuk's church, court records show. Her husband died in 2004 at 79. The couple had no children.

"In church I was her priest and at home I was her beloved son," Chervyatiuk testified during the June 24 probate court examination. Chervyatiuk was born in Germany and raised in Ukraine, he said.
During the past five years, Bridgeman had been unable to cook, wash or shop for herself, Chervyatiuk said. "She kept a lot of stuff in the house. So you couldn't really walk in the house. You had to find a path," he said.

In March 2015, Bridgeman fell and injured a hip, records show. At the hospital she was diagnosed with dementia. Chervyatiuk then placed her in a Chicago nursing home, records show.

A day later, Chervyatiuk met with Bridgeman and lawyer Julian Kulas at the nursing facility and Kulas drafted papers that gave Chervyatiuk power of attorney for Bridgeman, according to the public guardian.

"That power of attorney made him responsible to use her money for her good and in her best interest, and not for himself," Harris said.

Kulas' son, Paul Kulas, is acting as his father's attorney in the case and said there was no improper conduct on Kulas' part. Kulas is "cooperating fully" with the public guardian and the court, his son said.

In the next 12 months, Chervyatiuk cashed in two CDs worth $170,000 and transferred other funds to accounts he alone controlled, probate court records filed by the public guardian allege. Chervyatiuk used his legal status to control Bridgeman's accounts, worth at least $540,000 and perhaps as much as $625,000, according to the public guardian.

During that period, Chervyatiuk put at least $22,000 of Bridgeman's funds into two restaurants he ran with Alban Tase, 41. He also directly gave Tase two checks from Bridgeman's account totaling $6,500, probate court records show.

Tase pleaded guilty in 2010 to federal drug conspiracy charges after an undercover operative met with him in a Chicago nightclub and steakhouse to trade shipments of stolen cigarettes for Ecstasy pills.

He was among more than a dozen defendants convicted as part of a global Balkan crime operation that laundered money and trafficked in heroin, guns and contraband consumer goods, federal court records show.

Authorities tracked the crime ring's deals from New Jersey to Canada, then the Netherlands, Albania and regions of Macedonia, Serbia and Kosovo.

Tase completed three years of supervised release in May following a federal prison term that is not specified in public records. Attempts to reach him for comment were not successful.

In Chervyatiuk's June 24 examination, he said Tase was his business partner in two Chicago-area pancake house restaurants, both since closed. Chervyatiuk said he did not know Tase was a convicted felon.

"I just know one thing. He stole money from me too, and I don't know where he is," Chervyatiuk testified.

Chervyatiuk later told the Tribune that Tase was involved with only one of the pancake houses.

Chervyatiuk also wired thousands of dollars to a Western Union office in Ukraine, authorizing local contacts to pick up the money, records show.

"We were helping the church," Chervyatiuk said, adding that the funds were for an iconostasis — one of the panels of icons and religious paintings that adorn Eastern Orthodox churches.

Asked in the court examination if the money wasn't instead spent on the Ukrainian-Russian military conflict, Chervyatiuk said: "I don't really want to talk about it now."

In the case of one $26,000 Bridgeman check, Chervyatiuk testified: "I don't recall what I did with that, possibly for my own things."

One of Bridgeman's home health care aides allegedly told the public guardian that Bridgeman sometimes seemed confused and treated Chervyatiuk like her deceased husband.

The aide said she saw Chervyatiuk pretend to be Bridgeman's husband and kiss her on the lips, according to court papers filed by the public guardian.

Chervyatiuk also took title to land Bridgeman had owned in Texas, saying in his court examination that Bridgeman gave him the property. "One day she did a surprise to me. She took me to a restaurant and gave me those papers," he said.

Bridgeman was not the only parishioner who gave Chervyatiuk large personal gifts, records show. Another church follower, Maria Lewczenko, died in December at 93 and made him executor of her estate with $20,000 in accounts and $100,000 in real estate.

Chervyatiuk declined to discuss that matter with the Tribune, saying only: "I had many women who I tried to help."

Full Article & Source:
Chicago priest accused of taking $500,000 from parishioner with dementia

How are public officials able to get away with elder cleansing, assaults on the Constitution, and not having a moral compass

How are public officials able to get away with elder cleansing, assaults on the Constitution, and not having a moral compass.


Inbox
x

kenneth ditkowsky

6:14 AM (1 hour ago)
 
Every society has to make choices as to what is important and what is not.   Nit picking appears to the hallmark of the 21st Century along with dishonesty.

Pages and pages of media coverage is given to promoting a distorting facts that everyone known not to be the facts.   Childlike distortions of statements that everyone understands are given prominence so political candidates not in current favor with the establishment are made to appear extreme, stupid, etc - while real criminals running for political office are given a pass on real felonies.

As an example, we all are aware that the FIRST AMENDMENT protects the Right of Citizen to speak out freely and candidly as to any content related or political issue.  Censorship is not only wrong but a serious violation of law.    However, here in Illinois a lawyer who pursuant to Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4 reports the felony of a Judge being 'wired' and/or a citizen being railroaded into a abuse, exploitative elder cleansing guardianship is subject to extreme discipline such as suspension or loss of a law license.    The First Amendment right is protected not only by the Constitution but rules, statutes, customer, and tradition; however, as the Establishment has evolved its interests in the pursuit of more and more treasure -- anything that stands in it way is crushed.

No treasure is too small for the elder cleansing fraternity.   In the Alice Gore case the miscreants pulled 29 of her teeth to recover a few grains of Gold.   Alice's daughter protested and was immediately sanctioned and forced in a Bankruptcy.    The GAO's four reports to Congress attest to the National disgrace, and the blogs Probate Sharks, MaryGSykes, NASGA, AAAPg **** are provide more and more examples of just how perfidious the assaults on the elderly, disabled, and the Constitution have become.

Worse yet, it appears that except for some rare prosecutions the miscreants who promulgate these outrages are given a pass.    Elder Cleansing is even given a special dispensation from State and Federal Taxes.     In recent months reluctantly the mainstream media has disclosed that Seth Gillman (an Illinois attorney who appears to be still licensed to practice law) in a Hospice scheme stole hundreds of millions of dollars from Federal Health Care programs.   Phillip Esformes allegedly stole a billion dollars in Medicare frauds in Florida.  Omnicare was pharmaceutical discrepancies and was fined about 150,000,000 dollars.   (This company allegedly controlled by the nursing home cabal was then sold to CVS pharmacy for 12.4 billion dollars)  *****

A young sailor took some photos on his cell phone of a submarine in violation of Navy rules -- he has in his future years in prison.   A Secretary of State operated a personal server and was subject to disclosing America's vital secrets to foreign enemies - she got a pass.    Homeless people were literally kidnapped off the street and placed in nursing homes operated by a prominent local rabbi to be turned into zombies.   Not only did this rank criminal receive public honors and public recognition, but the Office of the Public Guardian is reported to have assisted him in his quest to increase the profits of his nursing homes and the State of Illinois and the United States of America turn away as he and those associated with him are given a pass on the criminal conspiracy that continues.   The 700% surcharge on health care that the miscreants have attached is considered business as usual.   The Administration in Washington is very clear in telling us that we are too stupid to have he basic understandings.

What are we as a civilization doing to re-mediate these assault on our liberty?   Today's Wall Street Journal gives up a clue:

Starbucks Sippy Cups for Lawyers


Yep - we worry and file lawsuits alleging that Starbucks puts too much ice in our coffee!    

I am aware that Jerome Larkin and the Illinois Supreme Court have ruled that a lawyer asking for an HONEST INVESTIGATION of the criminal enterprises flourishing in the Probate Division AND the jurists who act in concert with them is unethical, but as a citizen I do not recognize government's ability to deny me my First Amendment Rights and once again call for an HONEST INVESTIGATION and EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW.    I do not understand who Jerome Larkin's conduct of acting in concert with the elder cleansers does not require him to pay his joint and several obligation to pay INCOME TAXES on the benefits derived from the Conspiracy.    I do not understand how certain members of the ESTABLISHMENT are more equal that you and me!

I could care less how much ice Starbucks puts into it lattes = I do care there are too many political and judicial establishment figures who lack a moral compass!   I do care that Justice is being denied to us - the great unwashed!   I do care that our government considers us TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND what they are doing to us.  
   
 

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Chancellor Zimmer's shot heard round the world

Editor's note: Let's hear it for Chancellor Zimmer! Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Chancellor Zimmer's shot heard round the world

Inbox
x

kenneth ditkowsky

11:27 AM (19 hours ago)
to me,
The American principle of FREE SPEECH embodied in the FIRST AMENDMENT and ARTICLE 1 OF THE ILLINOIS CONSTITUTION OF 1970 is not dead.     Amazingly in an era in which one of the major political candidates for President has advocated amending the First Amendment to advance parochial agenda, and a Lawyer exposing judicial corruption is equated to yelling fire in a crowded theater  - with full approval of the Supreme Court of the Illinois and no protest from the American Bar Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, or any other professional or civil rights organization Chancellor Zimmer of the University of Chicago had the temerity and courage to write:
 
Free speech is the basis of a true education
http://on.wsj.com/2ccvCST
 

Free Speech Is the Basis of a True Education

A university should not be a sanctuary for comfort but rather a crucible for confronting ideas.


Free speech is at risk at the very institution where it should be assured: the university.
Invited speakers are disinvited because a segment of a university community deems them offensive, while other orators are shouted down for similar reasons. Demands are made to eliminate readings that might make some students uncomfortable. Individuals are forced to apologize for expressing views that conflict with prevailing perceptions. In many cases, these efforts have been supported by university administrators.

ENLARGE
Photo: Getty Images/Hero Images
Yet what is the value of a university education without encountering, reflecting on and debating ideas that differ from the ones that students brought with them to college? The purpose of a university education is to provide the critical pathway by which students can fulfill their potential, change the trajectory of their families, and build healthier and more inclusive societies.
Students learn not only through the acquisition of specific knowledge, but also through the attainment of intellectual skills that serve them their entire life. Students come to appreciate context, trade-offs and data. They master how to recognize complexity, to argue effectively for their positions and to reconsider and challenge their own beliefs.
Students discover, too, that seemingly straightforward phenomena can have complicated cultural, historical and situational contexts that are critical to understanding their meaning. They realize that actions inevitably have multiple implications and that many decisions involve not simply choosing between “good” or “bad” but evaluating a set of consequences and uncertainties, both desired and undesired.
Students grasp the complexity of collecting, analyzing, interpreting and deriving meaning from evidence of multiple forms. They learn to imagine alternatives, to test their hypotheses and to question the accepted wisdom. A good education gives students the intellectual skills and approaches essential to success in much of human endeavor.
One word summarizes the process by which universities impart these skills: questioning. Productive and informed questioning involves challenging assumptions, arguments and conclusions. It calls for multiple and diverse perspectives and listening to the views of others. It requires understanding the power and limitations of arguments. More fundamentally, the process of questioning demands an ability to rethink one’s own assumptions, often the most difficult task of all.
Essential to this process is an environment that promotes free expression and the open exchange of ideas, ensuring that difficult questions are asked and that diverse and challenging perspectives are considered. This underscores the importance of diversity among students, faculty and visitors—diversity of background, belief and experience. Without this, students’ experience becomes a weak imitation of a true education, and the value of that education is seriously diminished.
Free expression and the unfettered exchange of ideas do not always come naturally. Many people value the right to express their own ideas but are less committed to granting that right to others.
Over the years, universities have come under attack from a range of groups, both external and internal, that demand the silencing of speakers, faculty, students and visitors. The attack is sometimes driven by a desire of an individual or group not to have its authority questioned. Other times it derives from a group’s moral certainty that its particular values, beliefs or approaches are the only correct ones and that others should adhere to the group’s views. Some assert that universities should be refuges from intellectual discomfort and that their own discomfort with conflicting and challenging views should override the value of free and open discourse.
We have seen efforts to suppress discussion of Charles Darwin’s work, to insist upon particular political perspectives during the McCarthy era, to impose exclusionary acts of racial and religious discrimination, and to demand compliance with various forms of “moral” behavior. The silencing being advocated today is equally as problematic. Every attempt to legitimize silencing creates justification for others to restrain speech that they do not like in the future.
Universities should be clear about their core educational mission—to provide students with the most enriching education possible. We cannot shortchange our students. This means that questioning and challenge must flourish.
Universities cannot be viewed as a sanctuary for comfort but rather as a crucible for confronting ideas and thereby learning to make informed judgments in complex environments. Having one’s assumptions challenged and experiencing the discomfort that sometimes accompanies this process are intrinsic parts of an excellent education. Only then will students develop the skills necessary to build their own futures and contribute to society.
Mr. Zimmer is president of the University of Chicago.

 
Even more surprising Chancellor Zimmer was not publicly castigated by the mainstream media, the Political and Judicial Establishment or either the Presidential candidates.      The WSJ analysis of the event is:
 
The Chicago School of Free Speech
http://on.wsj.com/2bDOMMh
 
Of course everyone knows who radical the University of Chicago is and how they were in the forefront of one revolutionary concept after another.    The University’s School of Business is a notable example.
 
The world was not born 8 years ago, and most of us did not just fall off the turnip truck.     Zimmer’s revolution is also not new – what is new is the fact that so many of us and the rest of the citizenry have been so lax in allowing others to defend OUR rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America and the State Constitution.     When Jerome Larkin wrote the Illinois Supreme Court that JoAnne Denison’s blog exposing the grossest and most venal corruption in the Circuit Court of Cook County (and elsewhere) was akin to yelling Fire in a Crowded theater few of us raised a hue and cry demanding that Mr. Larkin be pilloried for his ISIS assault on the most precious of America’s core values.    The American Bar Association carried the story and demonstrated its distain for the RULE OF LAW when it censored the stream of comments abhorring Larkin’s and the Illinois Supreme Court’s demonstration of disrespect.     The loud silence of the 2nd oldest profession, civil rights organizations, political leaders et al was an American nadir.     
 
Unfortunately, as college campuses followed their National Socialist policy of political correction applauded by the Political and Judicial Establishment, few voices were heard in protest.    The cancer grew like Topsy and it was not long before silent efforts to limit opposition speech were being echoed as policy.    Mr. Larkin and the Illinois Lawyer Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) in the JoAnn Denison case and others had the temerity to actually fabricate opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States.     For instance, in the Alvarez case (wherein the defendant claimed to be a Medal of honor winner and was not) Larkin resurrected a rejected argument and represented that it was the Rule of Law in the case.    In the Sawyer   case he just purged the last paragraph of the decision so as to misrepresent the holding.     The Supreme Court of Illinois abdicated its position and rubber=stamped Larkin’s misrepresentations and aided and abetted him in the ‘cover up’ of Judicial corruption.     In the Amu case, even though Crain’s Chicago Business made the very same averments concerning corruption by Judge Egan, Amu was stamped as a ‘liar’ and disciplined for practicing law while Black.      Of course, political correctness advanced along racial lines to punish the appearance of not being a good Nazi!     Civil Rights icon Diane Nash was actually denied entry into the public hearing room in which a Kangaroo proceeding against JoAnne Denison was being held.   MS Nash’s crime – supporting Ms. Denison’s right to expose Judicial Corruption of a Judge who subsequently committed perjury and a judge who admitted on page 91 of her evidence deposition to being ‘wired’ (fixed etc.).   
 
Today’s action by Chancellor Zimmer in a perfect world would be footnote, however in today climate in which so many of our political and judicial elite lack a moral compass – it is a screaming headline.      It is also a call to arms!     It is time for each of us to pick up our computer keyboard, smart phone, or whatever and demand that the POLITICAL and JUDICIAL elite be governed by the very same laws and principles are YOU and ME.     This means we all against the proposition of today’s political and judicial elite that RIGHT is LEFT, UP is DOWN, TRUTH is FICTION.      It means that the miscreants both Rich and powerful as well as Meek are all subject to HONEST LAW ENFORCEMENT and the Elder Cleansing conspiracy has to not only account for the thefts from Medicare, the Insurance companies, and the victims of Elder Cleansing.     It means that the Elder Cleansing miscreants pay the taxes interest and penalties on the money and benefits that they obtained from their breaches of the fiduciary and public trust that they voluntarily assumed.