Wednesday, September 30, 2015

U.S. state regulators unveil plan to protect seniors from scams

Editor's note: This Shark believes the well-meaning plan would not work in the Probate Court of Cook County.  As long as judges such as ex-judge Kawamoto who appointed a court adjudicated insane person who resided in 54 institutional settings as guardian, seniors will continue to be scammed.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com


U.S. state regulators unveil plan to protect seniors from scams
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (Reuters) - A proposal unveiled by U.S. state securities regulators on Tuesday could lead to more uniform state laws aimed at protecting seniors, people with dementia and other vulnerable adults from financial exploitation.

The plan by the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), would establish a model law whose provisions would include allowing firms to temporarily hold off on disbursing funds or securities when they suspect potential financial abuse.
NASAA, a group of securities regulators from U.S. states, Canada and Mexico, expects to have a final version in place by year-end, said Judith Shaw, who became NASAA's president on Tuesday. Shaw, who is also Securities Administrator at Maine's Department of Professional and Financial Regulation, unveiled the plan at the group's annual meeting.
The group is requesting input from the public and financial advisory industry about the proposal through Oct. 29.
The plan follows efforts by some U.S. states that have already adopted or are considering similar measures. On June 12, Missouri became the third state to enact a law to protect senior citizens from scams and other types of financial exploitation. Washington and Delaware also have similar laws.
More than five million Americans over the age of 65, or 1.5 percent of the U.S. population, have Alzheimer's disease, the most common form of dementia, according to the Chicago-based Alzheimer's Association. That could balloon to 7.1 million by 2025.
These people can become easy targets for scams. U.S. seniors lose as much as $2.6 billion per year to financial exploitation, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a trade group.
A model law, which state legislators could choose to adopt, would lead to more uniformity, Shaw said in an interview.
Brokerages and investment advisory firms could then expect consistency when developing their procedures and programming software, Shaw said.
"They know they can follow the same process and procedures state by state in order to protect seniors," Shaw said.
The NASAA plan would allow firms to report suspected abuse to adult protective services and securities regulators without fear of legal actions, such as lawsuits, for violating privacy, among other things, Shaw said.
Firms would also have to make reasonable efforts to get the name and contact details for a trusted contact person when opening a customers' account.
The NASAA effort, in the works for about a year, is similar to a Sept. 17 proposal announced by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Wall Street’s industry funded watchdog.

(Reporting by Suzanne Barlyn; Editing by Frances Kerry)

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Elder Lawyer Abuse

Elder Lawyer Abuse
     "We have met the enemy and he is us."
     For you whippersnappers out there, that's a quote from Walt Kelly, a cultural icon from days gone by, who knew what he was talking about.
     As an official spokesman for old people, I have to agree: We are the enemy.
     If you don't believe me, you haven't been reading all the articles on this newfangled Internet computery thing about the real problem with law firm advancement and technical evolution in the modern era: old people.
     See, for example, "The Legal Industry Generation Gap," or "What If the Associates Ran the Asylum," or "A Lateral Boom of Older Lawyers."
     Codgers either can't keep up with new technology and/or they don't want to leave and make way for younger lawyers.
     What's to be done with this population of annoying elderly lawyers?
     Murder, obviously, is a tempting option. Many poisons can produce heart attack-like symptoms. The chance of an autopsy is slim.
     Still, I have to rule that out as a recommendation. It violates ethics canons in most states and you'll have to deal with litigation over splitting the dead guy's share of the firm.
     You need to be more subtle and imaginative. Try to see things from the ancient ones' point of view.
     Here a few things to keep in mind:
     1. Before doing anything, check to see if the senior partner is still alive. A partner may seem to be acting normally, but could be simply propped up on a one of them newfangled chairs. It's not always easy to tell.
     2. Many old people don't realize that they're old. Years ago, one of my college friends told me he went to a high school reunion and was shocked to see that instead of his classmates, their grandparents showed up.
     A lot of us see the people around us withering away and wonder what the heck happened to them. We look so much better than they do.
     A lot of us see young, attractive people smiling at us and think they want our bodies. This may be true in my case, but all those other old guys are deluding themselves.
     You can take advantage of this by challenging old lawyers to tennis matches and/or signing them up on Tinder.
     They'll need weeks to recuperate.
     3. Old people like to think they know more than you do.
     This is also true of young people - hence, the problem.
     Smartypants young'uns, however, can take advantage of the situation by pretending to agree with the codgers and then writing blogs about how old partners get in the way of progress.
     The old guys will never see the blogs.
     This brings a question to mind: If the old farts don't know what they're doing and the tech-savvy guys do, why don't the young lawyers just leave and form their own firms?
     Come on. Let's you see if you kids can earn your money where your mouths are.
     And stay off my lawn!
    
     Quote of the Week: From a complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court:
     "On or about September 14, 2013, Plaintiff was attempting to locate and provide assistance to an injured and pregnant stray cat. ... At or about that time Defendants screamed at Plaintiff, threatened Plaintiff, slapped Plaintiff while she was within her car, punched Plaintiff in the face while she was within her car, pulled Plaintiff out of her car, threw Plaintiff to the ground, and continued to punch Plaintiff in the face until she was unconscious because they did not like cats."
     We still have a long way to go in the fight for civil rights for all species.

The fight against White Collar Crime was indeed changed

Editor's note: This Shark has witnessed first hand the protectionism of the IARDC for its "favored" lawyers. It has been several years since the daughter of Alice R. Gore has requested the final financial dispersal documents from GAL David Martin and those documents have yet to be delivered.  The IARDC does not find anything amiss with this conduct...  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
 
 
 
The fight against White Collar Crime was indeed changed.   In fact it has been lost!

If you read the American Bar Journal post of last week concerning the suspension of JoAnne Denison you have have immediate recognition of exactly what I am pointing out.

As a citizen and as an attorney, JoAnne Denison is entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizenship.   This right includes the right to comment in a negative manner as to any elected official including a judge.   The right is about as broad and unlimited (subject to defamation laws as you can get).   In fact the recent Supreme Court of the United States cases have given new teeth to the right.

All attorneys when they obtain their licenses to practice are required to take an oath to defend and honor the Constitution.   In essence this is a promise to follow the Rule of Law, act honorably and at the very least tell the truth to the Court.   

One of the most serious white collar crimes is the crime that isolates, abuses, exploits or otherwise abrogates the civil rights of the elderly and the disabled.   Preying on the elderly and the disabled for profit (breach of fiduciary relationship) is one of the lowest endeavors of white collar crime imaginable.    However, it is also one of the most common and one of the most protected.    In fact attorneys who complain about specific instances of this white collar criminal activity (elder cleansing) are punished by long suspensions of their law licenses.   Forget about lawyer rule 8.3.   Reporting the crime causes disciplinary action and in the case of Attorney Grant Goodman FRCP 11 sanctions.

JoAnne Denison reported in her blog (protected by 47 USCA 230) the abuse, isolation, exploitation and the theft of several million dollars in assets from the Mary Sykes estate 09 P4585 (Cook County).    She also reported other similar criminal endeavors, and along with yours truly demanded an Honest investigation.    

Jerome Larkin the administrator of the Illinois attorney disciplinary commission (I ARDC) is thus is the lawyer I would nominate.    Larkin and his gang of 18 UsCA 242 and 18 USCA 173 co-conspirators rigged a facade of kangaroo hearings first to intimidate in frighten lawyers not to speak out, and then when the words and phrases started to be echoed by many in the public discipline the lawyers who spoke out.    The First Amendment was abrogated and here in Illinois the Supreme Court of Illinois not only disciplined attorney Denison for speaking out in accordance with 18 USCA 4, 430 ILCS 20/4,**** and her moral duty on an interim basis but as the ABA pointed out in its recent article - gave her a 3 year suspension. 

The ABA has done its part also in protecting white collar criminals.   It has not raised a scintilla of protest!    It is demonstrated the the professional associations that have been created by laws are not only impotent but apparently disinterested in the Civil Rights of its members.   The 'cover up' created by Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 (242) co-conspirators has been so effective that the 'elder cleansing' has become a National scandal and a criminal enterprise that rivals the Gulags, and North Korean justice.

Larkin and his co-conspirators also are leaders in the promulgation of tax evasion.   You of course are aware that breach of a fiduciary relationship is a taxable event, and the bounty (booty) obtained is taxable income.   It appears that Larkin has not included dime one on his Illinois ethics statement and we have it on good authority that his 1040 does not disclose it either.   

As Larkin and his co-conspirators are getting away with their white collar activities of coverup and fraud in violation of Federal and State law  - and government turns the other cheek - they deserve nomination.    Moral behavior may be totally lacking, but their success and continued exploitation and elder cleansing of senior citizens and disabled people speaks for itself.   
 
Ken Ditkowsky

Monday, September 28, 2015

EXILE now available as an ebook,

EXILE now available as an ebook, only 5.99!
 
http://www.thebookpatch.com/BookStore/exile/a02d07e3-82ae-4dab-942b-bed32f224566?isbn=9781620309575



In the year 2000, an out of work reporter is approached by a man who is not whom he appears to be. Lured into a romantic affair with him, the reporter is soon to lose everything—her family, her home, her country and nearly her life. 


EXILE is the true story of Janet Phelan, who fled the US after the attempts to permanently silence her went awry. The lengths to which the intelligence community will go to cover their tracks is revealed in this memoir. The ultimate question—what is the meaning behind this grave assault on an American citizen—unfolds as the story is told. 


Has big pharma gone too far this time?



Dear Newsmax Reader,
Dr. Ronald Schwartz, M.D., was found shot to death in his
Jupiter Farms, Florida home, on Sunday, July 19th, 2015.
Schwartz's murder comes in the wake of a slew of curious
deaths that began on June 19, with the death of Dr.
Jeff Bradstreet. Bradstreet, a renowned autism researcher from
Florida, then practicing in Georgia, was found with a gunshot
wound to his chest. Authorities almost immediately ruled his
death a suicide, but his family suspects foul play.
Then came the death of Dr. Bruce Hedendal, the same day as
the unexpected death of Dr. Baron Holt, 33, while on a trip
to Jacksonville, Florida.
Only a few weeks ago, Dr. Teresa Seivers, a renowned and
respected doctor known as the "Mother Teresa of South
Florida," was found savagely murdered with a hammer in her
home on June 29. Then on July 1, Lisa Riley, D.O., 34, was
found murdered in her residence, in Lee County, Georgia,
with a gunshot wound to the head.
Do you think these deaths are simply a strange coincidence
or that perhaps something more sinister is transpiring?
More details disclosed here.
http://www.nutrio2.com/emailimage/dead-doctors.jpg
 
Has big pharma gone too far this time?
What were they trying to cover up?
Were controversial cures the reason behind the deaths and
disappearances of these natural health doctors?
It's a fact. The big pharmaceutical companies reap billions of dollars
every year from expensive medications that they sell.
Here are some profits these big companies made in 2014.
Novartis - $47.1 billion
Pfizer - $45.7 billion
Merck & Co - $36 billion
Johnson & Johnson - $32.3 billion
GlaxoSmithKline - $29.5 billion
It's highly likely your medicine comes from either one
of these big companies.
Think about it for a second...
There is no money in finding a real cheap cure to any illness.
They don't get to reap the benefits and recoup on their
research investment.
These doctors didn't have to die for nothing.
 
To your good health,
Kevin Richardson

If you no longer wish to receive this offer, please write to:
616 Corporate Way | Suite 2-4665
Valley Cottage NY 10989

Sunday, September 27, 2015

Days of Shame

Days of Shame
 
For years the learned profession of the law has come to enjoy ridicule and slander.    What do you call it when a bus load of lawyers crashes off a bridge into the Mississippi River and all are killed?    The answer:  “a good start!”        Metaphors for lawyers are not flattering and you can expect at every gathering someone is going to make a remark that suggests lawyers are dishonest, amoral, and the cause of everything bad in society.      As a lawyer it is always amusing to have one of the most vociferous and obnoxious of the lawyer baiters a day or so later come into my office asking for my help in resolving some legal problem that requires not only discretion but knowledge of facts that my client would blush if he had to disclose them to his wife.
 
That was before I stumbled into the ‘elder cleansing’ scandal and the War on the Elderly and the Disabled.     Prior to that time the lawyers that I dealt with by in large were honest, decent, well read and nice people.     Most lawyers were people who I could take at their word and trust with my deepest confidence.     The relationships were mutual.     The parasites that I ran into in the Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585 were a breed apart.      The worst ‘scum’ were a step up from these lawyers and had much more integrity.      A casual brush with one or more of them in a hallway in the Daley Center made my skin crawl and activated a need for a bath in lye soap.    
 
I had heard of such lawyers but except for Ms. ***** I had never had contact with any.      Exactly how I was so sheltered is a mystery, but most members of the profession (including the most irritating) were people I was not ashamed of.     That is, until yesterday, when the ABA published the article on JoAnne Denison’s suspension, and did not express outrage and a demand for the immediately impeachment of the offending jurists and all who acted in concert to assault the First Amendment.    The article is attached hereto and made part hereof as exhibit 1.
 
The Legal profession has on occasion not covered itself with glory.     The case of the Dred Scott decision the Supreme Court failed to meet its responsibility and stand up for core principals of America – Liberty and Justice.   Again in Buck vs Bell the Court failed to recognize the concept of Equal before the Law.    (This case was the legal justification for the Holocaust.)  In the JoAnn Denison case the America Bar Association and the organized Bar looked the other way as corrupt Illinois jurists rubber=stamped a ‘cover up’ orchestrated by outrageously corrupt lawyer disciplinarians who were openly and notoriously protecting criminals with law licenses who were ravaging the hard earned savings of the elderly and disabled.     In the Denison case the ‘booty’ being protected included but was not limited to a million dollars in gold coins (Sykes) and eighty pounds of silver coins (Gore).     Her blog also referred to large land thefts and the eight million dollar Tyler estate all of which were being covered up.     Most seriously, she was threatening the ‘grab’ of Mary Sykes’ million dollar home (including land) and disclosing the details of the tax evasion scheme that was essential to elder cleansing of Mary Sykes.  
 
The Bar Association with all this information at hand, reported the assault on First Amendment and the Bill of Rights by high ranking judicial criminals as if Denison had been admonished for eating one chocolate cookie too many.     There was no outrage, no call for an investigation (Honest or otherwise), and certainly not even a protest.    What there was however the editing was and cutoff of outrage that citizens expressed when they heard that the Judiciary had abdicated its responsibility and was protecting overt criminal activity?
 
It is no wonder that the public feels that a bus populated with lawyers falling off a bridge and killing all on board is a “good start!”     Indeed, in all candor, lawyers take an oath to defend the Constitution.    The Denison decision demonstrates that even though we require our ‘pre=teens’ to have knowledge of the Constitution prior to entering high school, we apparently do not require our lawyers to have knowledge of the document when charging $500 a hour to honest citizens for legal services.
 
The lawyers involved in the Denison case (including the Supreme Court justices) have demonstrated ‘contempt for the Rule of Law’ and those who attorn to such action are in breach of their oath.    Such individuals are a cancer and enemies of our democracy.       There is no excuse for any lawyer being a party to an assault on the basic and core values of American democracy and in particular the Bill of Rights.     The racism that the Illinois Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) and its administrator orchestrated in the Amu case (and against Diane Nash) is not an anomaly - it is a commonplace staple.    In most situations it is an undercurrent, but Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators are not ashamed of their conduct – they published in the Lanre Amu case that attorneys with a dark skin who complain concerning corruption are not welcome in Illinois to practice law.
 
While the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that it is unethical (sans Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4) for lawyers to voice a call for an HONEST investigation once again I am a large group of lawyers who are afraid to voice opposition to the criminal element of our profession call for an HONEST investigation, and if wrongdoing is found for the most vigorous prosecution of the miscreants.     This is our call for a War Crimes trial of Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 371, 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators.    Justice Jackson is deceased.   But I am certain we can find another advocate for the concept of decency, honor, and integrity by public officials.
 
Exhibit 1:
LEGAL ETHICS
Lawyer gets suspension for blog posts about 'feeding frenzy' of connected lawyers
POSTED SEP 24, 2015 12:46 PM CDT





An Illinois lawyer who blogged about a probate case has been suspended because of her posts alleging a “feeding frenzy” of court-connected lawyers in Chicago’s “sleazy world of probate.”
The lawyer, JoAnne Marie Denison, was suspended for three years, and until further order of the Illinois Supreme Court, the Legal Profession Blog reports. The Sept. 21 suspension follows a May decision in which a review board of the Illinois Registration and Disciplinary Commission rejected Denison’s First Amendment arguments[1].
Denison had contended her blog posts were true, but the review board cited findings that she had failed to present an objective factual basis to support her allegations[2]. Denison’s posts had impugned the integrity of judges and lawyers involved in a particular probate proceeding, the review board said.[3]
Denison’s blog had alleged a guardian was appointed for an elderly woman though she did not need one, and that the guardian had stolen from the woman and did not take proper care of her[4]. The blog posts referenced a “feeding frenzy” of lawyers, a “classic case of corruption” and a court “being spoonfed BS law by atty miscreants.”
Circuit courts in Cook County aren’t computerized, Denison alleged in her posts, because “politically connected judges and their puppet attorneys … would be exposed for what they are: money grubbing, family strife churning leeches that create nothing but pain and misery in a family while swiping free parking money out of a well funded estate.”   [5] 



[1] It should be noted that the Review Panel in its decision misrepresent the holding of United States vs. Alvarez 132 SC 2537.    They adopted an argument specifically rejected by the SCOTUS.      Journalism integrity would have required the author of the Article to note such a grossly Ethical lapse by the conscience of the Illinois Legal authority.    It is normally grossly unethical for a lawyer to misrepresent the law – but when the Lawyer Disciplinary Commission does so it all eyes turn toward Mecca.  
[2] The burden of proof is on the commission – this statement is an admission that the Commission did not follow it own rules as the proof.    A  kangaroo court is not usually part of the American credo.    The statement that follows the admission contradicts the first statement as a matter of law.
[3] This statement is interesting as this is exactly what the First Amendment and Article One of the Illinois Constitution were enacted to protect.    A lawyer professional group should have had kittens when they read this statement!    An ISIS attack on America would be no less and no more unacceptable.
[4] Rule 8.3 and 18 USCA 4 mandate such reports, 47 USCA 230 protects such posts, and 320 ILCS 20/4 bars disciplinary action.  735 ILCS 1 et seq reinforces the right to make such statements and take such a position.
[5] Interestingly this is the very same charges that the United States of America made (sans the computerization) in the Greylord cases in which several score of jurists and lawyers went to jail.     It is fortunate that the United States Attorney was not subject to the disciplinary process of Jerome Larkin and the IARDC.   The AG would have been disbarred and the more than a score of corrupt jurists would still be preying on the public.
 
Ken Ditkowsky

Prattville caregiver steals cancer patient's identity

Prattville caregiver steals cancer patient's identity

 
Posted: Sep 24, 2015 9:57 PM CDT Updated: Sep 24, 2015 10:48 PM CDT

 
(Source: WSFA 12 News)
(Source: WSFA 12 News)

AUTAUGA CO., AL (WSFA) - An Autauga County woman has learned her fate after stealing the identity of the elderly cancer patient she was hired to care for.
Sherry Walters was sentenced this week on charges of identity theft and financial exploitation of an elderly person.
The victim was identified as an 82-year-old Prattville man who is a disabled veteran.
“She had been a caregiver in the victim's residence. He was an elderly cancer patient. While caring for him in his residence, she gained access to his identifying information and was able to use his personal information for her personal benefit,” said Jessica Sanders, Assistant District Attorney with Alabama’s 19th Judicial Circuit.
Prosecutors say Walters used the victim's identifying information over a period of six months during a time when he was traveling out of state for cancer treatments.
Walters was placed on 18 months of supervised probation after receiving a suspended prison sentence. She was fined and ordered to pay restitution.
“This type of crime that occurs with someone who you trust to care for you and work in your residence does cause you to feel violated. I think they were disappointed that she could have done this or that she would have done this and they were disappointed to have been placed in this situation at all,” Sanders added.
John Matson with the Alabama Nursing Home Association says elder abuse can take many forms, including physical and mental abuse as well as financial exploitation.
He pointed out that in-home care is different from nursing homes and assisted living facilities where there are many people every day, including employees, other residents and volunteers. If something does happen in one of those locations, it's often much more easily spotted and much more quickly reported.
When it comes to hiring an in-home caregiver, he recommends using an established company.
“If you do go the route of hiring someone on your own or maybe placing an ad in a newspaper or somewhere to find someone to take care of your loved one at home, it's important to do a background check, specifically a criminal background check. You will want to get several references and follow up on those references. Those things can help give you a little peace of mind as you get to know this new caregiver for your loved one,” Matson explained.
He stressed to importance of reporting abuse or neglect to local authorities.
Alabama prosecutors say they are seeing more elder abuse cases because the number of people 60 and over in Alabama and across the nation continues to increase and because of new statutes geared at fighting crimes against the elderly.
In Autauga County, Sanders says around five cases of elder abuse have been prosecuted this year. In early 2016, a high profile elder abuse case is set to go to trial involving Glen Glassmeyer, who police and prosecutors say conned a Prattville woman in her 80s out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.  According to authorities, Glassmeyer weaseled his way into the victim’s life acting as a caretaker and they formed a relationship. He later gained power of attorney, putting his name on her accounts and transferring money into them, Assistant Chief Diane Hamm revealed after his arrest. He also allegedly made different purchases and was trying to get the victim to buy him a house. Glassmeyer even married the victim.
Last week, an Alabama woman who admitted to stealing an elderly dementia patient's identity and using it to steal her money was sentenced to four years and nine months in prison.
Shostocka Keya Ward, 43, stole more than $300,000 from the victim's bank and credit accounts when Ward worked at a senior citizens living center in Hoover.
According to Ward's guilty plea, she wrote more than $70,000 in unauthorized checks to herself and used the victim's credit cards to finance her wedding, someone's prison account, private school tuition payments and trips.
The Montgomery County District Attorney's Office has prosecuted eight cases this year where defendants were charged with financial exploitation of an elderly person and one case of elderly physical abuse. Another 8-10 are in varying stages in the criminal process. A majority of the financial cases have involved in-home caregivers, either family or contract.
Seth Gowan, Deputy District Attorney with Alabama's 15th Judicial Circuit and and member of the Montgomery County Elder Justice Task Force, says the number of complaints of elder financial exploitation per year has steadily increased since the Protecting Alabama’s Elders Act was passed. He added that the aging population, as well as the public awareness effort by the District Attorney's Office and the Montgomery County Elder Justice Task Force partners, and the training law enforcement and prosecutors have received regarding the new law have resulted in more focused attention.
Task force officials suggest that when it comes to using businesses and services that provide in-home health care assistance to seniors, you should ask about the employees being paid through the business, not directly by the senior and/or family.
"Regardless, you need to make sure the person has been vetted as much as possible, having good references and work history," Gowan added.
Other tips and things to look for include:
- The caregiver should never be allowed to become familiar or know about senior's financial affairs, ie., where the checkbook is, credit, debit cards, etc.
- Always be cautious and guarded with financial information and personal identifying information such as date of birth and social security number.
- If the caregiver is asking for extra money, to borrow money or help paying bills, these can be red flags and opportunities for the elderly person to quickly become a victim.
Contact the Montgomery County District Attorney's Office at 832-2550 or the One Place Family Justice Center at 262-7378 with any questions or concerns.
There are other agencies that can assist seniors and/or their family including:
  • Central Alabama Aging Consortium, 240-4666 
  • Montgomery Area Council on Aging, 263-0352 
  • DHR Adult Protective Services, 293-3100
  • Alabama Department of Senior Services, 877-425-2243 

Saturday, September 26, 2015

THE INCOMPARABLE YOGI BERRA

THE INCOMPARABLE YOGI BERRA
(5/12/1925 - 9/22/2015):

I usually take a two-hour nap from one to four.

Never answer an anonymous letter.

I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did.

You can observe a lot by watching.

The future ain't what it used to be.

If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.

Why buy good luggage? You only use it when you travel.

The towels were so thick there I could hardly close my suitcase.

When you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded.

It gets late early out here.

I think Little League is wonderful. It keeps the kids out of the house.

I don't know if they were male or female fans running naked across the field. They had bags over their heads.

Take it with a grin of salt.

It ain't the heat, it's the humility.

A nickel ain't worth a dime anymore.

We made too many wrong mistakes.

So I'm ugly. I never saw anyone hit with his face.

If the people don't want to come out to the ballpark, nobody's going to stop them.

Baseball is 90 percent mental. The other half is physical.

All pitchers are liars or crybabies.

We were overwhelming underdogs.

Bill Dickey is learning me his experience.

He hits from both sides of the plate. He's amphibious.

I always thought that record would stand until it was broken.

I can see how Sandy Koufax won 25 games. What I don't understand is how he lost five.

I want to thank everyone for making this night necessary.

I didn't really say everything I said.

You should always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
 

Lawyer gets suspension for blog posts about 'feeding frenzy' of connected lawyers

LEGAL ETHICS

Editor's note: This Shark believes that the FEDs must clean out Chicago's bed of "Sleaze" from the Probate Court of Cook County. An example is GAL Martin in the Estate of Alice R. Gore who died several years ago.  GAL, paid generously from Alice's estate after Alice's death still refuses to provide final financial documents of the estate to Alice's daughter.  The ARDC feels this breach of fiduciary obligation is acceptable.   Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Lawyer gets suspension for blog posts about 'feeding frenzy' of connected lawyers

POSTED SEP 24, 2015 12:46 PM CDT

An Illinois lawyer who blogged about a probate case has been suspended because of her posts alleging a “feeding frenzy” of court-connected lawyers in Chicago’s “sleazy world of probate.”
The lawyer, JoAnne Marie Denison, was suspended for three years, and until further order of the Illinois Supreme Court, the Legal Profession Blog reports. The Sept. 21 suspension follows a May decision in which a review board of the Illinois Registration and Disciplinary Commission rejected Denison’s First Amendment arguments.
Denison had contended her blog posts were true, but the review board cited findings that she had failed to present an objective factual basis to support her allegations. Denison’s posts had impugned the integrity of judges and lawyers involved in a particular probate proceeding, the review board said.
Denison’s blog had alleged a guardian was appointed for an elderly woman though she did not need one, and that the guardian had stolen from the woman and did not take proper care of her. The blog posts referenced a “feeding frenzy” of lawyers, a “classic case of corruption” and a court “being spoonfed BS law by atty miscreants.”
Circuit courts in Cook County aren’t computerized, Denison alleged in her posts, because “politically connected judges and their puppet attorneys … would be exposed for what they are: money grubbing, family strife churning leeches that create nothing but pain and misery in a family while swiping free parking money out of a well funded estate.”

I can speak on any portion of the problem of elder cleansing



I can speak on any portion of the problem of elder cleansing and abuse of the disabled that you desire.

My involvement in this problem runs back to the 1960's when I did work for the Juvenile Protective League.   I became intimately involved in parens patrie.   (The obligation of the government to protect the people within the society who are unable to do so for themselves).   By reason of this Chancery (English) tradition to make the garnering of services more efficient laws were passed to protect each group of individuals.   In the case of the elderly and the disabled the Federal Government as part of title 42 passed the Americans With Disabilities Act.   Each state passed similar and consistent laws with the same expressed intent.   To provide the reasonable accommodation that the ADA and the Constitution required guardianship laws were passed.   In particular a guardian was to be appointed to provide the disabled person with the assistance that was actually needed.

The State recognized that the appointment of a guardian was an infringement on fifth and 14th amendment rights so each statute provided that the guardian was only to be appointed to provide assistance where the disabled person was unable to function.   In simple terms the guardian - a fiduciary - was very limited in power and held to the highest standard.   This standard was to be applied by the clear light of hindsight.   In Illinois 755 ILCS 5/11a - 3b lays forth the standard.   The due process protections are stated in 755 ILCS 5/11a - 10.

Unfortunately every good deed will be properly punished and a cadre of dishonest jurists, dishonest lawyers, dishonest judicial officials and dishonest public figures grew up and what was intended to be a reasonable accommodation became a travesty.   Guardians for profit developed and the disabled and the elderly (having a few dollars in the jeans) were herded into guardianships wherein they were isolated, abused, exploited, had their liberty and property rights terminated and finally assisted into involuntary suicides.   

The Mary Sykes case was particularly venal.   755 ILCS 5/11a - 10 was totally ignored.   There was a letter from the Sheriff that he had no record of Mary ever being served with process.  The court file 09 P 4585 is consistent with the fact that there was no service of process.   The summons that is required by the act was not even printed by the Court clerk.   The requirement of notice to Mary and her siblings (and daughter) was never provided.   The requirement of a hearing on Mary's competency never occurred.    All of these are jurisdictional.    However, a venal corrupt judge ignored all of this and tried to silence any mention of this or any demand for an HONEST INVESTIGATION.   In fact the cover-up was broadly based and extended to the Lawyer disciplinary Board and to the Illinois Supreme Court.  It continues to this day.   Mary is dead, and several million dollars of assets have never been accounted for or inventoried.   complaints have been made Federal and State authorities and appear to have reached deaf ears.

What is interesting is the fact that a breach of fiduciary relationship is a taxable event.   Thus, the miscreant guardian when she stole a million dollars in gold coins in 2008 or 2009 whe had an obligation to pay taxes on all she did not inventory.   We reported this tax evasion and/or tax fraud to the Attorney General and the United States of America.   Pursuant to 18 UsCA 371 and 18 USCA 242 all who acted in concert with her have joint and several liability (including taxes).    Thus we have all the corrupt individuals who have attempted to silence the calls for an Honest investigation liable for Federal and State Income taxes, interest and penalties.  

The theft of assets seems to be common situation in many of these guardianship estates.   Florida is probably the worst State in the Union.   California is the most venal and Illinois is the most corrupt.     Florida's corrupt is institutionalized,  California has developed a bureaucracy to thwart inquiry, and Illinois makes no bones about the fact that Greylord is not dead.

I practice law for over half a century.   My cases have taken me into every type of case from jury trials to courts of law resort including but not limited to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois and the United States.   (I argued Terrazas vs. Vance before the Supreme Court of the US).

In short - I am at your disposal.  

America does not take lightly to fiduciaries who steal from their wards or those public officials who aid and abet such conduct.   Next time you hear a political figure complain about the State of the State and how broke they are tell him/her to collect the taxes due from the corrupt lawyers, corrupt jurists, corrupt judicial officials et al.    
 
Ken Ditkowsky