Monday, August 31, 2015

Ex-lawyer accused of hypnotizing women indicted on 27 charges

Ex-lawyer accused of hypnotizing women indicted on 27 charges

August 30, 2015
By JOHN SEEWER - Associated Press , Morning Journal News
TOLEDO - A former Cleveland-area attorney accused of hypnotizing women for his sexual pleasure has been charged with kidnapping, sexual battery and gross sexual imposition following an investigation that began last fall.
Michael Fine was taken into custody Friday afternoon and charged with 27 counts before being released on bond, according to sheriff's records.
Police in the northeast Ohio village of Sheffield began investigating Fine after two women told investigators they believed they'd been hypnotized after losing track of time and being unable to recall meetings and phone calls with Fine. Police said they later recorded Fine using explicit language while talking to the women.
Fine's attorney, Robert Housel, said on Saturday that he was surprised by some of the charges. He also said that Fine had been undergoing medical treatment for quite a while.
Fine likely will be arraigned within the next week, Housel said.
Just over a week ago, Fine, 58, agreed to permanently surrender his law license, which means he no longer can practice law in the United States.
One woman told authorities she thought Fine hypnotized her numerous times on the phone and during meetings in his office and at conference rooms at the Lorain County Justice Center. She said she hired Fine in February 2013 for a custody dispute.
The woman decided to record phone conversations with Fine.
According to a motion filed by the Lorain County Bar Association, Fine used sexually explicit language during the calls, which ended with Fine and the woman discussing legal matters. She then took the recordings to Sheffield Lake police. According to the motion, she told investigators she didn't go to police earlier because she feared not being taken seriously.
Police officers and investigators from the county prosecutor's office wired the woman with video and audio recording equipment for a meeting in Fine's office last November, the motion said. Investigators said they entered the room when Fine began discussing sex acts.
A second woman, who hired Fine in September to represent her in a divorce, told investigators that Fine discussed relaxation and meditation techniques during their first meeting and suspected that he tried to hypnotize her. The same thing happened in their next three meetings and afterward, according to the motion, the woman felt as if she'd lost time.
The second woman went to Fine's former law firm in early November when she learned he had not filed any paperwork in her case.
She told authorities that when she learned Fine was no longer with that firm, she told an attorney about her suspicions. The attorney advised her to contact authorities.
- See more at: http://www.morningjournalnews.com/page/content.detail/id/566734/Ex-lawyer-accused-of-hypnotizing-women-indicted-on-27-charges.html?nav=5006#sthash.0GYSC6gu.dpuf

Sunday, August 30, 2015

Is Someone Casing Your Estate?

Editor's note:  This Shark has only to point to the Solo-Faskowitz fraud discovered by the Florida Attorney General's office on the Estate of Irving F. Faskowitz to reveal how cleverly this type of crime can be committed.  Also, Alice R. Gore had to disclose all of her assets and their locations in an Esformes Senior Living Apartment application.  We all know the fate of Alice's estate at the hands of the Probate Court of Cook County criminals.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com


Is Someone Casing Your Estate?

Unintended ‘heirs’ might pounce.


You likely have money, property and other items of value that you plan to leave to loved ones or charity. But do they know your plans?
It’s important that you tell them — and sooner rather than later. Why?
Because communication is one of several ways you can protect yourself from an insidious, all-too-frequent crime that is both underreported and underprosecuted, and which victimizes families of all social and economic levels.
I’m talking about inheritance theft.
No matter how smart you are or how stable your family, no one’s estate is entirely safe. Thieves are known to siphon assets from healthy, highly educated people about as often as they do those of the infirm and feeble-minded. And they get away with it because the thieves usually know the victims — and know the victims won’t prosecute.
In other words, the thieves are likely to be members of your own family. Inheritance theft can be hard to detect because thieves use whispered lies, fraud, psychological manipulation and forgery — acts hard to uncover and even harder to prove in court.
Some people never discover they were victimized or the thief convinces them that no theft occurred. Other victims are ashamed to reveal that a family member or close friend stole from them, and others don’t report losses to avoid publicity.
There are two types of estate hijackers:
Family members. Some steal because they want revenge after a lifetime of feeling neglected or abused; others feel compelled because of drug addiction, their own marital or family needs or financial strife; and some simply are greedy.
Outsiders. These include overly friendly strangers, some of whom assist the elderly or infirm to gain their trust; club or church friends; spouses from second marriages; caregivers or healthcare workers; someone who constantly criticizes or tries to portray someone as incompetent; anyone entrusted with handling another person’s money or financial affairs; anyone with a power of attorney; unethical executors of wills or trustees of trusts; and salespeople pushing financial products that are not in a client’s best interests.
How can you protect your estate and intended heirs from thieves and interlopers? While nothing can make you invincible, here are four ways you can help yourself and your parents avoid becoming victims of inheritance theft:
1. Prepare an estate plan. Documenting your desires for the disposition of your assets is the first step in preventing people from claiming you made verbal promises to them. Hire an estate attorney that you’ve vetted personally or who is referred to you by a trusted source.
2. Choose a trusted friend or family member to serve as your executor and/or trustee. And to help make sure he or she follows your instructions, distribute copies of your will and trust documents to at least one other heir — and preferably to all of them. If you feel uncomfortable letting others see your plans, require your executor or trustee to retain the services of an estate attorney (at your or your estate’s expense) to oversee matters. Instruct that the attorney be paid on an hourly basis rather than as a percent of the estate’s value. (Note: We don’t recommend that you name an attorney, bank or trust company as executor or trustee because they typically charge exorbitant fees, often as a percentage of the estate’s value. And they can be difficult or even impossible to fire — leaving your heirs helpless if they are unhappy with the costs or service.)
3. Keep all your legal and financial documents in a safe place, such as a safety deposit box or a fire-resistant home safe. Create digital backups.
4. If you make changes to your documents, inform all concerned. And that includes your independent, objective, fee-based financial advisor.
Originally published in Inside Personal Finance July 2012

How to conduct your own Real Estate Scam.

How to conduct your own Real Estate Scam.    (Three examples)
 
The Elder Cleansing cases (and in particular the Mary Sykes case) contains a text book example of how to separate a senior citizen from his or her real estate.
 
1.        Quick shot deed.      Take mother to a lawyer under the guise of helping her engage in estate planning and suggest a ‘living trust.’   This is a trust in which mother declares herself as trustee and beneficiary of a necessary trust.    The successor trustee is the person who desires to absorb the assets to the exclusion of mother and the other heirs.      With the help of an unprincipled and co-conspirator lawyer, mother is declared incompetent and the miscreant successor trustee is now the trustee and in control of the real estate.        As trustee the miscreant now can create deficiencies that allow the property to be sold at a bargain price and through a series of mesne transactions the proceeds find their way to more deserving beneficiaries.
 
a.        For this transaction to be consummated you need a series of strawmen.     It has been suggested that one of the guardian ad litem had (or has) a husband who regularly engages in such activities and that the real estate track book reveals a large number of such transactions.  The strawman provide for legitimacy appearance.    At the end of the transaction all the conspirators are rewarded with a generous payout reported on the 1040 tax form as a capital gain.   (No corrupt judge is required to cover up the perfidy.

b.      There are some interim steps.     Maintenance costs increase, mortgage payments fall into semi-defaults, esthetics are neglected *****.    A ragged throw rug, or a smelling rag left on the sink can turn off a prospective purchaser.     A broken window in the bathroom can reduce the value of a home to a prospective buyer by a $100k.   The smell of urine also does wonders.
 
2.        Poor mother has run out of money scam.      With the co-operation of a corrupt judge, corrupt judicial officials, corrupt lawyers the home of a person who has been subjected to a guardianship can be sold off by a judicially managed sale at a bargain price.    The difference between the Quick shot deed transaction and this transaction is that a corrupt judge provides the cover.    The Judge acts out of pretended compassion so that grandma will not have to be evicted from her exploitative nursing home or similar facility.     In Sykes money was short because about two million dollars escaped inventory.   Protests have gone unanswered.
 
3.       Friendly foreclosure.      In the Sykes case, Gloria’s payments were allegedly escrowed by the HOlder of the mortgage at the request of one of the attorneys for the guardian.    The escrowed funds were not credited to the mortgage and thus the mortgage went into default.     The guardian ad litem used her clout and a series of statements that were unfounded to tie up Gloria’s funds.    Thus, the mortgage holder was quite content.    It has the money and the security.    The lawyers having special relationship with the holder of the mortgage either purchased the note, or made a special fee relationship with the holder.    The net was the mortgage foreclosed and title cleared by the decree of foreclosure.     Again a series of mesne transactions yielded full value to the dwelling.     Of course a deficiency judgment is available to stop overt complaints by the victim as the miscreants are aware that in most instances the only bidder at a judicial sale is the holder of the mortgage.    If the property is particularly valuable you might obtain outside bidders.   At that point in time, the bank just bids in its mortgage, accrued interest, attorney fees and other costs and the chips fall where they may.
 
There are variation on these schemes including contesting title, lien claims etc.


    Right now in Florida Kevin P’s mother in law’s property in South Florida is being primed for such a sale.    Like the Mary Sykes case the property has value for high end development   The guardians for profit recognize the potential and you can bet your bottom dollar that a judge is going to order the property sold and bargains are going to obtained.    Why pay a fair price for a senior’s property when it can be stolen?       Offering the Judge’s family members such as the wife, daughter in law, et al a piece of the actions speeds up the transaction.     (This is what Janet is finding in California).

JUST TO MAKE THE RECORD CLEAR - THE BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP IS A TAXABLE EVENT.   THE TRUSTEE AND/OR THE GUARDIAN ARE FIDUCIARIES.    WHEN THE FIDUCIARY TAKES CONTROL OF THE CORPUS OF THE TRUST OR THE GUARDIANSHIP ESTATE WITH THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAUDING THE WARD, THAT IS THE TAXABLE EVENT AND HE AND ALL HIS 18 USCA 371 CO CONSPIRATORS INCUR TAX LIABILITY AT THAT POINT AND HAVE TO DISCLOSE THE TRANSACTION TO THE TAX PEOPLE ON THEIR TAX RETURNS FOR THAT YEAR.   THE PROCEEDINGS OF THIS FRAUD IN NOT A CAPITAL GAIN, BUT IS ORDINARY INCOME.

As the guardian for profit or the trustee has a continuing obligation that fraud continues every day until it is cured.

Why do the taxing authorities ignore the collection of taxes due from these corrupt lawyers, corrupt judges, corrupt judicial officials?
 
Ken Ditkowsky

Gray wolf possibly spotted in California, only second since 1924

Gray wolf possibly spotted in California, only second since 1924

Reuters 
By Dan Whitcomb
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - California wildlife officials believe that a gray wolf has found its way across the border into the state from Oregon, becoming only the second gray wolf to have ventured into California since the 1920s.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), in a document released late on Monday titled "Evidence of a Wolf in Siskiyou County," said it began investigating after Californians reported seeing a wolf-like creature earlier this year.
The department said it deployed a number of cameras along trails in remote areas of Siskiyou County, in northernmost California along the Oregon border, and captured images of the animal.
Biologists also studied fresh tracks in the area and took DNA samples from scat, although the results of that testing were inconclusive due to the poor quality of the genetic material recovered.
"Based on the photographic images and tracks, CDFW biologists believe that this lone animal is a gray wolf," the department said. "The animal's tracks are significantly larger than those of a coyote, and a comparison of the images with photos of an adult coyote captured at the same site indicate the animal is significantly larger than a coyote."
Prior to 2011 there had been no gray wolves in California since the last one was killed in 1924.
But in December of that year a lone gray wolf, ultimately dubbed 0R7, was found in the state and was quickly celebrated by environmentalists who hoped that the species could re-establish a foothold in California.
The Fish and Wildlife department said they had determined that the wolf spotted recently in Siskiyou County was not OR7, which has not been in California for more than a year and is currently the breeding male of a pack in southern Oregon.
"Biologists believe that if the animal photographed on the trail camera is a wolf, then like OR7 in 2011, it is probably an animal that has dispersed from a pack in Oregon," the CDFW said. "Dispersing wolves generally attempt to join other packs, find a mate and carve out new territories within occupied habitat or form their own pack in unoccupied habitat."
Gray wolves, which were once hunted to the brink of extinction, are protected in California under the federal government's Endangered Species Act.

(Reporting by Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Sandra Maler)

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Affidavit: Woman steals $30,000 exploiting the elderly

Editor's note: Your ProbateShark has discovered chilling similarities between the present treatment of the elderly  by the Probate Court of Cook County and the ongoing Armenian Genocide committed by the Turks in April of 1915 onward.  In both instances, murders and mistreatment of the helpless were covered up by the ruling governmental bodies.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Affidavit: Woman steals $30,000 exploiting the elderly

Laura Vasquez, 41, charged


Laura Vasquez, 41, gained the trust of an elderly woman, then convinced her to hand over more than $30,000 to her, according to an arrest warrant affidavit.

San Antonio police began investigating the case in May, but believe Vasquez took money from the 76 year-old woman as far back as October of last year.

The affidavit stated that the victim told police soon after she met Vasquez, who was cutting her grass, Vasquez asked her to loan her $5.  During the next seven months, Vasquez continued to ask the victim for money—sometimes thousands of dollars at a time, the affidavit stated.  In all, police said, she took more than $30,000.

The affidavit stated that she gave the elderly woman various reasons why she needed the cash, including to pay her rent, buy medicine and pay her own bail when she wasn’t even incarcerated.

The victim told investigators that she hoped that by continuing to loan Vasquez money, she would keep her engaged and willing to pay her back, the affidavit stated.

Detectives said Vasquez admitted borrowing money from the woman, but told them it was only a few thousand dollars.

She was arrested Thursday on charges of exploitation of the elderly and theft involving the elderly.

MB Financial Bank Completes Acquisition of JPMorgan Chase Illinois Court-Appointed ...

Editor's note:  This Shark's experience with banks holding guardianship revolves around the bankers looking the other way to the criminal activities perpetrated by the Probate Court of Cook County.  Bank employees were present at every court hearing during the fleecing of the Estate of Alice R. Gore. ...and the bank's lawyers were protected by the IARDC. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com



guardianship
Daily update  August 28, 2015
NEWS
MB Financial Bank Completes Acquisition of JPMorgan Chase Illinois Court-Appointed ...
“MB has established an expertise and commitment to the guardianship and special needs trust business. This purchase represents a significant ...
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/mb-financial-bank-completes-acquisition-of-jpmorgan-chase-illinois-court-appointed-guardianship-and-special-needs-trust-business-2015-08-27

CHICAGO, Aug 27, 2015 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- MB Financial Bank recently completed its acquisition of the Illinois court-appointed guardianship and special needs trust business of JPMorgan Chase, according to Mitchell Feiger, president and CEO of MB Financial, Inc. MBFI, +0.44% parent of MB Financial Bank, N.A. Terms of the deal were not announced. The acquisition added approximately$200 million of assets under management to MB Financial Bank’s existing guardianship business. Approximately five years ago, MB completed its acquisition of the Illinois guardianship and special needs trust business of U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management.
“MB has established an expertise and commitment to the guardianship and special needs trust business. This purchase represents a significant increase to our current portfolio, and further solidifies our strong position in this important market. We are confident that clients’ needs will be well served at MB through access to an experienced team dedicated to this customized, proactive service,” says Mitchell Feiger.
The Illinois guardianship and special needs trust business is headed by Alan Teraji, senior vice president, personal trust and guardianship group. His team will expand with the addition of Kim Bahna, Josie Sanchez and Sharon Franta, formerly of JPMorgan Chase.
About MB Financial Bank
MB Financial Bank N.A. is a Chicago-based commercial bank with approximately $15 billion in assets and a more than one hundred year history of building deep and lasting relationships with middle-market companies and individuals. MB Financial Bank offers a full range of powerful financial solutions and the expertise and experience of bankers who are focused on their clients’ success. MB Financial Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MB Financial, Inc. MBFI, +0.44%
Learn more about MB Financial Bank at www.mbfinancial.com.

SOURCE: MB Financial Bank
MB Financial Bank
Karen A. Perlman
Senior Vice President
847-653-1788
kperlman@mbfinancial.com