 LOOK NOW April 9 2017 Today on Full Measure TV on Guardian Abuse Pass it to more people hurry
It is time to take a look at:
Dr. Sugar has laid out the problem, and the cause for all to see. The time to act is now! The moron in North Korea and the bastard in Syria are threats to others, however, the miscreants portrayed at , AAAPG – Educate – Advocate – Legislate
Probate Sharks, MaryGSykes, NASGA et al are more than potentially targeting you and me - everywhere you turn they are having a profound effect on our daily lives. The high cost of health care and its 700% surcharge should not be lost in the shuffle. The corruption in our courts is aided and abetted by the profitability of this corruption and the fact that the booty is given immunity from taxation.
Three million dollars escaped all taxation in the Mary Sykes case. One million five hundred thousand dollars escaped taxation in the Alice Gore case ******. Eight million escaped taxation in the Tyler case and the list continues. In fact the criminal enterprise is so profitable that Lawyer Disciplinary Commissions such as the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission are devoting hundreds of hours protecting dishonest lawyers and judges from the victim public!
All that we have ever asked the Establishment for was an HONEST INVESTIGATION! We have a better chance of having the butcher of Syria or the monster of North Korea give a positive response than we have in getting an honest shake from the 18 USCA 371 breachers of the public trust!
Ken Ditkowsky
From: kenneth ditkowsky < Sent: Sunday, April 9, 2017 4:39 PM Subject: Re: LOOK NOW April 9 2017 Today on Full Measure TV on Guardian Abuse Pass it to more people hurry
let us define terms.
A judge determines if a litigant has met the standard of proof. It is up to the petitioner to present evidence that proves by a preponderance of the evidence that a particular individual is incompetent and the extent and nature thereof. If the petitioner has not met the standard of proof (clear and convincing in the case of an alleged disabled person) the judge has only one responsibility - DISMISS THE PETITION.
A wired or fixed judge is one who is induced by some non-relevant incentive= such as money, friendship, promises et al to render a decision that the petitioner has met a standard of proof which the aforesaid petition has not done so.
An Incompetent judge is a judge who is biased or does not have the capacity to make an HONEST determination if the standard of proof has been presented. An incompetent judge is not venal - however, the questioning of just how such a judge reached the bench.
The distinctions are important. The guardianship appointment is necessary in many cases - not the hundreds of thousands in which it is being used for elder cleansing and unjust enrichment of certain criminal health care providers/ An easy test of competency is to ask three questions:
Thus, if Mary Sykes knew that her husband had died and she had two daughters surviving - she met the test criteria 1. (Mary met this test when she filled out a Petition for a Protective order against her older daughter (who also was appointed her plenary guardian as the Petition for a Protective order was hidden). Mary met test 2 with color's flying when she on her own ascertained correctly that her older daughter had stolen several thousand dollars from her. She met test 3 when she figured out how to obtain a Petition for an order of Protection and also when she personally did her own banking.
As the standard is so high - due to the Constitutional protections of both the State and Federal Jurisdiction - Judge Maureen Connor's culpability is also noted from the Common Law Record (court file) as not only did she shirk her basic responsibility by ignoring these facts and by allowing one of the guardian ad litem to recommend a doctor who had no qualms about perjury and open and notorious violation of Civil Rights. This subordination of perjury should be noted in the August 2009 Transcript of Proceedings in case 09 P 4585. (Obviously - Jerome Larkin knew or should have known of this intentional violation of Mary Sykes' Constitutional Rights - and his overt act of trying to intimidate both JoAnne Denison and I not to call this perfidy, fraud and clearly wrongful behavior to the attention of Law Enforcement)
If Mary knew that she had a Bank account, a Safety deposit Box, owned her own home, etc - she met the test criteria 2.
Ken Ditkowsky
| |||||||||
Showing posts with label Dr. Sugar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Sugar. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
LOOK NOW April 9 2017 Today on Full Measure TV on Guardian Abuse Pass it to more people hurry
Thursday, July 14, 2016
The battle lines have been drawn
Inbox
| x | |||
|
12:52 PM (17 hours ago)
| | ||
| ||||
The battle lines have been drawn. If you are exposing corruption of the privileged political and judicial elite you are "toast!" No matter where you turn there is an concerted effort to abrogate the core values of America and in particular the First Amendment.
In Florida the Helen Stone case is a beacon of horror. The extra-judicial judicial treatment of Barbara Stone sands as hallmark of corruption. Dr. Sugar is now under attack again as he stands up against the illegal guardianships for profit that are so lucrative to Florida judicial miscreants. Apparently, Dr. Sugar is making headway. Mrs. Smith had to fight off a guardian and a court the found that her objection to the exploitation of Col Smith warranted the annulment of her marriage. Mrs. W objected to a guardian seizing her personal monies. The Circuit Court saw nothing wrong with a confiscation penalty being imposed. The Appellate Court reversed, so the trial court just assessed the confiscation penalty as the guardian's attorney fees.
In Illinois we have Jerome Larkin totally lawless misconduct and precedent. Indeed, Larkin usurped the Illinois Constitution and the US Constitution by ruling that it was not unethical to harvest the gold in Alice Gore's mouth, the million dollars of gold coins in Mary Sykes' safety deposit box, *****, but it was ethically challenged to make the same public in the MaryGSykes blog. He described the disclosure of Judicial corruption and in particular giving public the information as to where to find the evidence of Judicial corruption as akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater. (in particular, at page 91 of her evidence deposition Judge Connors admitted to being 'fixed' and or "wired" - and in the unaltered transcript of Judge Stuart's testimony she admits to perjury) Indeed, so necessary to the quest to destroy America's First Amendment and Right of Free Speech that even the Supreme Court of Illinois is apparently willing to look the other way and allow Larkin to misuse public funds (embezzlement) to pay unlicensed court reporters for their 'services rendered' even though the Illinois Legislature in paragraph 13 of the Court reporter licensing Act prohibits such activity.
I do not know if any of the other claims as to similar action are accurate, but a full court press is in full force and effect to protect the business of elder cleansing, to wit: isolation of the elderly so that a guardian can be appointed to with corrupt Court supervision individual elderly can be stripped of their liberty, their property, their humanity and every dollar that they saved or amassed in their lifetime. (The Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585 is a text book example of exactly how the dastardly deed is done)
Ken Ditkowsky
----- Forwarded Message -----
From:
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:44 AM
Subject: Senate Democrats Attack Our Free Speech
 |
Dear Reader,
You may not have seen it atop the headlines this week, but a group of 19 Democratic Senators have spent the past two nights publicly shaming and threatening The Franklin Center and dozens of other taxpayer groups. Due to policy differences, they are waging an ideologically-motivated scare campaign designed to silence anyone who disagrees with them, and mocking our “so-called” commitment to government and public integrity.
In other words, we’re on their “enemies list.”
The Senators’ message to Franklin Center and our allies is simple: fold - don’t offer counterarguments to a Big Government agenda, don’t engage in meaningful public debates, don’t resist any legal witch hunts into your organization. This is the last thing we need in today’s polarized political climate.
As this incident reminds us, the Franklin Center is not without its critics (we wouldn’t be doing our jobs if we didn’t make people in government angry from time to time), but we would never begrudge them the right to disagree with us and share their side of the story. If Sheldon Whitehouse, Harry Reid, Elizabeth Warren, and their other 16 cohorts in the Senate want to dispute our reporting, they should do it with arguments and facts, not legal intimidation tactics that verge on outright tyranny.
It doesn’t matter what position you take on the policy in question here. We must defend the underlying principle that every American has the right to support causes he or she believes in. It’s not the government’s job to monitor the private opinions of regular citizens by keeping tabs on what groups you or I support.
In Liberty,
Nicole Neily
President
|
Follow Franklin Center on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube! 
This message was intended for: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
You were added to the system January 9, 2015. For more information
click here.
Update your preferences | Unsubscribe
You were added to the system January 9, 2015. For more information
click here.
Update your preferences | Unsubscribe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)