Showing posts with label court appointed guardian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court appointed guardian. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Restitution for wards may be long fight

Restitution for wards may be long fight



By The Columbus Dispatch  • 
  •  34
  •  98
Enlarge Image Request to buy this photo
Brooke LaValley | Dispatch file photo
Lawyer Paul S. Kormanik
When news of Paul Kormanik’s death reached Phil Metoyer, there was no watershed moment.
No feeling of relief.
No justice.
On many nights, Metoyer had thought about what he’d say to Kormanik, a lawyer who had been appointed as guardian to Metoyer’s father, Albert.
In his final years, Albert Metoyer lacked proper medical care because Kormanik failed to file the right paperwork to enroll him for Medicaid, according to Franklin County Probate Court records. Kormanik liquidated the man’s assets and even interfered with the family’s plans for funeral arrangements.
It has been six weeks since Kormanik was found dead in his Upper Arlington home — the same morning that the longtime lawyer and guardian was supposed to appear in Probate Court on contempt charges for failure to pay restitution to a ward he had victimized.
Attorneys and friends close to the Kormanik family said he died by suicide. Official autopsy results are pending with the county coroner’s office.
His death brings more heartache and legal battles for families such as Metoyer’s who say that Kormanik victimized their loved ones.
Now, those who want restitution must spend thousands of dollars for attorneys and probably years in court proceedings, said several probate lawyers.
“People will usually have to file a claim against someone’s estate in these instances,” said John Mashburn, a probate lawyer.
Guardians such as Kormanik who oversee assets are required to be bonded or insured. Families also have the option to pursue action with those bonding agencies, attorneys said.
Before his death, Kormanik transferred his largest assets, such as his home, to his wife, according to county documents.
Probate Court officials declined to discuss what actions they are taking to ensure that families get their day in court, saying they can’t comment on cases that are before the court or might come before it.
Before Kormanik’s death on Oct. 5, the court had stripped him of his wards, and he surrendered his law license and pleaded guilty to 10 felony counts, including theft from an elderly or disabled person and tampering with records. He was to be sentenced on Oct. 20 for those crimes.
Two years ago, Kormanik had more wards — people deemed by probate courts to be unable to care for themselves — than any other lawyer in Ohio’s history.
Dozens of families came forward after The Dispatch found during a yearlong investigation that Kormanik and other attorneys were not taking proper care of wards and were misspending their money.
Investigations by the Probate Court and Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien also found that Kormanik was stealing items from wards and, in some cases, giving the items to his staff members.
Hundreds of those things are unaccounted for.
Kormanik’s roster of about 400 wards was a byproduct of probate judges being overburdened by the demand for guardians. Several judges expressed concern to the Ohio Supreme Court about Kormanik’s actions as early as 2007, the Dispatch investigation found, but he kept accumulating wards.
Franklin County Probate Judge Robert Montgomery assigned wards to Kormanik until The Dispatch presented its findings.
Kormanik’s family has said he did nothing wrong. His daughter, in a written response after his death, said the Probate Court and the newspaper made Kormanik a scapegoat for a system in need of fixing.
Kormanik’s wife also has confronted court officials to express those sentiments.
His family members have asked The Dispatch never to contact them again.
Phil Metoyer carries the pain of his father’s final days as only a son can. He wanted control of the funeral for his father, a veteran of World War II, Korea and Vietnam, but Kormanik interfered.
“I pray for his family, but I wish Kormanik would’ve stood up and been a man about this,” Metoyer said.
Some wards’ families, such as the relatives of Richard E. Roberts, have hired attorneys who have been able to extract a few thousand dollars from the bonding company that insured Kormanik.
In the Roberts case, Kormanik stole a couch, lawn mower and rocking chair. Authorities found the lawn mower at the house of a former employee of Kormanik’s.
Roberts died on Oct. 20. With the help of an attorney, his relatives were able to do what Phil Metoyer couldn’t: bury their father and husband the way they wanted.
Julie Crum, Roberts’ daughter, said her father’s death and Kormanik’s suicide brought a blunt end to years of turmoil.
But the bitterness remains.
“All the heartache and tragedy over the last two years, and it all came crashing down in a two-week period,” Crum said. “My father’s case is coming to a close, and I hope that all the other families have found some closure as well.”
Judge Montgomery is still sorting out Kormanik’s wards. Court officials have reached out to relatives of his former wards to see if they are willing to take care of their loved ones.
Montgomery also created what he said is Ohio’s first public guardian in early October. He founded a Guardianship Service Board and appointed Jack R. Kullman Jr., a former magistrate in the state’s 10th District Court of Appeals, as the board’s director.
Kullman was appointed guardian of four wards on Oct. 1.
Other board members include Columbus defense lawyer Larry James. The board meets monthly; the next meeting is scheduled for 2 p.m. Dec. 17 on the 11th floor of 373 S. High St.
lsullivan@dispatch.com
@DispatchSully

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Convicted guardianship lawyer died of suicide, attorney says

Editor's note:  No comment.

Convicted guardianship lawyer died of suicide, attorney says



By The Columbus Dispatch  • 
  •  87
  •  1604
Enlarge Image Request to buy this photo
Brooke LaValley | Dispatch file photo
Lawyer Paul S. Kormanik
Paul S. Kormanik, a Columbus lawyer who was convicted of bilking people he was paid to protect, was found dead on Monday morning in his Upper Arlington home.
The Franklin County coroner confirmed his death and said that her office is investigating the cause.
A Columbus attorney who took over some of Kormanik’s wards said Kormanik died of an apparent suicide.
Kormanik, 65, was to appear in Franklin County Probate Court on Monday to answer a charge of contempt of court for not following a court order to pay back one of his victims. Court officials did not return a call seeking comment.
In August, Kormanik pleaded guilty to four counts of stealing from people for whom he was a court-appointed guardian, and to other charges connected to taking taxpayers’ money and falsifying records.
As late as last year, Kormanik had served as a guardian for about 400 wards and boasted that he had the most wards of any guardianship attorney in the nation.
His sentencing had been set for Oct. 20 and he faced multiple years in prison.
Upper Arlington Fire Chief Jeff Young confirmed that paramedics went to Kormanik’s home on Monday morning, but said he did not have any details about the call.
Kormanik’s family issued a statement after his death became public:
“We are devastated at the loss of Paul — a loving husband, father and friend. Despite The Dispatch’s woefully misguided and misleading stories about the guardianship program and Judge Robert Montgomery’s vendetta to make Paul a scapegoat, he was a compassionate attorney who worked tirelessly on behalf of his clients for decades.”
Kormanik, who gave up his law license last year, was one of several guardians highlighted in “Unguarded,” a five-part Dispatch investigative report in May 2014. The series raised questions about how county probate courts across the state handle the care of children, the elderly and people with mental disabilities who are deemed unfit to care for themselves.
The Columbus Bar Association brought 15 charges of misconduct against Kormanik and he was stripped of several wards by Judge Montgomery before Kormanik gave up control of the rest about a year ago.
Kormanik said in spring 2014 that he was trying to help hundreds of Ohioans who had no one else to handle their affairs. He said he was the person the court turned to when no one else cared.
In addition to spurring legal action against Kormanik, the stories caused state legislators, probate judges and the Ohio Supreme Court to enact reforms for the guardianship system.
Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine also created new guidelines in a handbook that must be available to every guardian in the state.
Linda Gomez said she was stunned to hear of Kormanik's death. Kormanik served as the guardian of Marcia Pendleton, Gomez’s mother, until about 18 months ago.
“I know his family must be in a lot of pain, like the rest of us who have gone through this nightmare, and I really feel for them,” Gomez said. “Mr. Kormanik knew he was guilty.”
Dispatch Reporter Encarnacion Pyle contributed to this story.
lsullivan@dispatch.com
@ReporterSully
mwagner@dispatch.com
@MikeWagner48

Monday, May 11, 2015

Attorney charged with theft from wards gives up law license

Attorney charged with theft from wards gives up law license


  •  0
  • Google +0
  •  14
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A central Ohio attorney accused of taking large amounts of money from his wards is giving up his law license.
Sixty-five-year-old Paul Kormanik submitted his application to retire or resign to the Ohio Supreme Court in December, but The Columbus Dispatch reports (http://bit.ly/1zPxFBX ) it was just unsealed this week.
Kormanik served as a court-appointed guardian for hundreds of people in central Ohio. He has pleaded not guilty to 11 felony counts including theft from an elderly or disabled person, records-tampering and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity
The Columbus Bar Association last month also brought 15 charges of professional misconduct against Kormanik, including misrepresentation of clients, misusing their money and making false statements.
His attorneys have requested to postpone the trial, which is scheduled to begin June 22.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Forbidden: The Fool’s Challenge

Forbidden: The Fool’s Challenge

harrassmentAll you people claiming to advocate for the elderly and disabled, just who do you think you are to challenge judicial decisions, facilities, attorneys, conservators, guardians and fiduciaries?  They are, after all, proven, by their positions, to be above reproach.  How dare you challenge their intent, actions and/or character!
Judges, attorneys, CEO’s and others in charge have proven by the stations they have risen to, to be of perfection… the elite of the world… the all-knowing… and the all honest.  Never do they take advantage of their positions for personal financial gain nor to have a personal agenda in play.  Never do they do anything beneath their position.  To suggest otherwise is to be singled out to be disgraced and to possibly be labelled a threat or even mentally unbalanced.
I’m not sure what has happened to common sense and healthy thought process, but some kind of virus has been on the attack, it would seem.  Facts seem to be subjective or totally irrelevant.  It’s almost as though we are living in the “mad house” out here in the everyday world.  Too many things, arguments and decisions are outright crazy.
We have various Courts that worry about individuals taking advantage of the elderly or disabled, while signing off on outrageous fees for attorneys, appointed guardians and so forth.  What is the difference between the latter and the former?  Oh, is it because the latter is condoned by the courts and protected by some carelessly written law or skillful misinterpretation?  That somehow makes one right and the other wrong?
Worse than the money drain by the courts and appointed anointed-ones is the power to isolate the victims.  (Yes, victims.  What else would you call the people, who suddenly are imprisoned and forced to be and have done unto them what they would not, and do not, want done unto them and theirs?)
How can someone that robs another of companionship, enjoyment, freedom, money, property and simply an existence called living, be considered humane?  Animals are treated better than many of the elderly and disabled thrown into the system, because they could be thrown into the system — even if by a wrongful technicality in the law or by a court that is complicit due to bias or simply doesn’t look beyond the surface or listen to the bothersome advocates or nobodies that dare speak against the supposed “perfect” attorneys, professional guardians and such?  They never lie or steal or do unethical things, now do they?
In recent news, we have heard…
“WASHINGTON — Three central Ohio nursing homes were among 33 in 11 states cited for improper care and billing practices yesterday as part of a $38 million settlement among a major nursing-home company, the U.S. Department of Justice and the state of Ohio.
“The announcement in Washington and Columbus resolved an investigation by the federal government, Ohio and seven other states into charges that Extendicare of Canada provided services at those 33 homes that were “materially substandard” or “worthless” because the company did not provide care to residents that meets federal standards, according to the settlement agreement.”  (Federal investigation finds three local nursing homes lacking )
Now wait a minute.  I thought “all” facilities provided only the best of care and that complainers were just making things up or exaggerating.  They weren’t?
More recent news…
“The Ohio Supreme Court has suspended Akron attorney Rami M. Awadallah from practicing law after ruling that he fraudulently and deceptively represented several of his clients — including some in Lorain County — during court proceedings.”  (Ohio Supreme Court suspends area attorney)
What’s that?  An attorney “fraudulently and deceptively represented several of his clients”?  But… but… but… I thought that was impossible?  I thought “all” attorneys “always” spoke nothing but the truth and “always” acted in the best interest of the client or ward.  He didn’t?  What’s up with this?
More in the news…
“Paul S. Kormanik, a Columbus attorney considered up until two months ago to be legal guardian to more incompetent people than anyone else in the nation, was indicted today on theft charges by a Franklin County grand jury.
Prosecutor Ron O’Brien and Attorney General Mike DeWine will announce the charges this afternoon after the grand jury determined there was sufficient evidence that Kormanik stole about $41,000 from two of his wards.”  (Lawyer indicted for theft from those he was supposed to protect)
An attorney — a legal guardian — was indicted for what?  Stealing?  Stealing from people he was the guardian for?  Oh my!  Bubble buster!
While we are talking about a system lacking perfection and often tilted towards the powerful, though not necessarily the righteous or side with the cleanest of hands, let’s return, for a moment, to discussion involving isolation of the wards.  What judge or guardian or facility could possibly think isolation of a non-violent, non-contagious person is a good thing?
Decades ago, researchers found there is such a thing as “failure to thrive”.  It actually exists.  There is no question.   Why then, would anyone place another person in isolation and risk that person dying due to “failure to thrive”?  Why?  How can it be justified?  It can’t!  Therefore, I believe, anyone involved in isolating a non-violent, non-contagious person, should have to answer why they should not be charged with kidnapping and abuse or even murder, should the person die as a result.
I can think of numerous cases where people have been thrown into isolation and the ironies surrounding it all is out there in a suburb of the Twilight Zone.  Yes, so amazing is it all that I’m surprised a “duh” isn’t permanently imprinted upon both the perps and the out-of-touch — can’t get it — zombie followers that go around drooling false talking points, as though it is gospel, while alleging the truth-tellers are the liars.
 When a ward is put into isolation, who is the threat?  The one that ordered the isolation or the one challenging it?
When a petition is presented to starve & dehydrate a ward, who is the threat?  The person who did the petitioning or the one that fights for life, visitation, rehabilitation and stimulation?
The answers should be quite easy to figure out, but instead, it looks as though too much power and trust has been placed where not deserved.  It would seem, according to recent news, that we can’t always assume the courts and appointed anointed-ones are of perfection and holier than thou after all.  Maybe sometimes they are up to no good and their word isn’t worth what comes out of a donkey’s rump.  And, maybe sometimes people are wrong, but without any ill-intent.  Maybe they just lost sight and are blinded by self-preservation and inability to admit error.  But how do we know?  How do we know, if we don’t inquire and investigate behind the curtain, especially a curtain pulled tightly, as if to keep any from peeking in?
Advocates are necessary in a world that seems to have lost its way.  A world with too many who have come to believe good is evil and evil is good.  People that see the lie as truth and the truth as lie.  People who often admire the wrong-doer and find fault with the victim and the victim’s advocates.  People who aren’t even aware any longer that they might be wrong, because they are somehow “entitled”.  Aren’t they supposed to get more and be treated better than those they treat so poorly?
No?  Who says?  Who dares to challenge the new rule of they who control the lives and assets of vulnerable ones ordered to be incompetent, even though they — the vulnerable — might not be as incompetent or alone as decreed by a court?
Who dares to give challenge?
The advocates, whether they be professional advocates or family or friends or even concerned citizens made aware of someone’s plight — that’s who dares give challenge!
Yes, true advocates are necessary as long as the madness and wrongness reigns.  May the war be quickly won and the vulnerable-victims placed in the hands of those who dare to truly and unselfishly care!
It’s time to challenge!  It’s time to win!  It’s time to give lives back to those who have been violated by a system gone wrong!

Monday, June 9, 2014

Law inspired by I-Team investigation arrives on governor's desk

Law inspired by I-Team investigation arrives on governor's desk

Law would offer more protection for wards

A bill providing new protections for our most vulnerable citizens arrived on Gov. Rick Scott’s desk Thursday. 
 
The protections were inspired by an ABC Action News I-Team investigation.
 
The law, which is expected to receive the governor’s signature at any time, affects tens of thousands of Floridians who have lost their rights and have court-appointed professional guardians.
 
Sen. Jeff Brandes sponsored the bill after learning about Willi Berchau.
 
We first reported last September that Berchau, 99 years old at the time, was in a locked-down unit for Alzheimer’s Disease patients even though he didn't belong there.
 
After we got involved, he was moved out of the unit and eventually had all his rights restored by the court.
 
Berchau recently celebrated his 100th birthday with friends and supporters. He now lives independently and free from a guardianship program.
 
The new law will give more power to local clerks of courts to investigate issues with guardianships and will provide better oversight.
 
It will go into effect on July 1.

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Brevard court has doctor shortage to help with guardian cases

Brevard court has doctor shortage to help with guardian cases

Retirement puts Brevard in need

Nov. 23, 2013   |  
1 Comments
Chief Judge John Harris of the 18th Circuit Court said that members of any family could find themselves in a situation requiring a court-appointed guardian for an older relative or an injured one. / ANDREW FORD/FLORIDA TODAY
VIERA — The court needs more doctors who are willing to examine people in Brevard County, as a part of a process to appoint guardians, to see if they are able to make decisions on their own.
If someone is unable to make decisions, the court can authorize a guardian to do so on his or her behalf. But with an increasing caseload and the retirement of one of the two doctors typically called upon for the process, Brevard is in need, according to court spokeswoman Michelle Kennedy.
Chief Judge John Harris explained such a situation could impact any average family. Typically, it involves an elderly person dealing with issues of dementia, but it could also be someone who suffered a head injury. The court can then appoint a guardian to make that person’s financial or medical decisions. The process to appoint a guardian includes having a doctor make a report after examining the person — looking at medical records, talking to the patient, their primary physician and their family.
Hundreds of people every year require this sort of help from the court system — attorney William Johnson described one recent case where a woman in her 80s needed a guardian. She lives in Eau Gallie and she’s adamant about staying in the home her father built in the 1950s, but she began wandering away from home. Her son, who is in his 60s and has health issues of his own, was “at his wits end,” trying to care for her, Johnson said. Her home had been broken into, the police have been there about six times in the past month and strangers started drinking beer on her porch.
Johnson said the Department of Children and Families was called. They determined the situation was unsafe. A professional guardian assessed the woman and agreed with DCF. The son consented, agreeing that he could no longer be her caregiver, Johnson said.
A judge appointed Johnson to represent the woman. An emergency guardianship hearing was held Wednesday afternoon, and a guardian was put in place. The full panel examination will take about 60 days.
“It’s very important,” Johnson said of the guardianship process. “You know, because in a case like this, the system worked.”
Johnson said Brevard is the second oldest county per capita, behind Pinellas, and the population is getting older. The 18th Judicial Circuit serves Brevard and Seminole counties, but Seminole doesn’t have a shortage of doctors like Brevard does.
Judge Harris explained that serving on the panel is a service to the community rather than a money-making venture for the doctors.
“We can’t make a determination on incapacity without a report from the committee,” he said. “And we have to have a doctor on the committee. So, I don’t know what we would do if we didn’t have an MD willing to serve. It would be potentially tragic to a lot of people who are desperately in need of a guardian.”
Contact Ford at
aford@floridatoday.com or 321-242-3601. Follow at Twitter.com/AndrewFordNews.