Wednesday, July 31, 2013

WEEK 8 SINCE THE CLOSING OF THE ESTATE OF ALICE R. GORE ON JUNE 7, 2013


Editor's note:

WEEK 8 SINCE THE CLOSING OF THE ESTATE OF ALICE R. GORE ON JUNE 7, 2013. STILL, THE DAUGHTER OF ALICE HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY FINANCIAL DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENTATION FROM THE PROBATE COURT OF COOK COUNTY. OTHER ALICE R. GORE HEIRS HAVE RECEIVED THEIR DOCUMENTS.  JUDGE KAWAMOTO AND COURT HANGERS-ON WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?

LUCIUS VERENUS, SCHOOLMASTER, PROBATESHARKS.COM

A Response letter to Loyola University–please help us lawyers protect the elderly!

A Response letter to Loyola University–please help us lawyers protect the elderly!

by jmdenison
Cc: Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>, matt senator kirk <matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov>, "illinois.ardc@gmail.com" <illinois.ardc@gmail.com>, Cook County States Attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>
Subject: Re: A day to reflect and give thanks
Date: Jul 31, 2013 9:48 AM
Thank you for your communication.
It is indeed a day to reflect and give thanks.   It is a day that closer to the eradication of 'elder cleansing' (the sister of ethic and racial cleansing).    It is a day closer to the legal profession recognizing that when a senior citizen such as Mary Sykes is 'railroaded' into a guardian ship and deprived of her liberty and property by a Court lacking jurisdiction such is a terrorist act assaulting the core values of America.    Indeed, we are lucky indeed  (and grateful) that citizens such as those who have banned together in NASGA, Probate Sharks, et al are staying the course to keep alive the opposition to the American gulag that has enveloped so much of the national probate judicial system.     As Dr. King stated:  everything that Hitler did was legal!   It was immoral but legal.   Elder cleansing aided and abetted by miscreants not wearing 'brown shirts' is still amoral and wrong.
Governor Quinn is reported to have set up an agency to deal with elder abuse and Financial exploitation (elder cleansing is  when the finances are redirected from the senior citizen - Like Mary Sykes - to the miscreants .    The victim is then kept isolated from those she loves, such as  her sisters, her younger daughter, her friends, her activities and her home (which has now been sold).   Mary Sykes ( senior victim) is thus placed in a nursing home warehouse to die!  - In the Sykes case one of the GALs was reported to have informed the Court of the wonderful progress Mary was making - until interrupted by an unauthorized visit from Mary's elderly sister, her neice, her younger daughter and a family friend.    Of course the GAL and the plenary guardian immediately acted to stop Mary Sykes' visit with her family and the local police terminated the unauthorized visit.    Rest assurred Mary has been once again moved to a secret location so that her isolation can continue unabated!)    We pray that this is not just another bureaucratic cemetery.
I want you to know that my three years at Loyola Law School taught me to stand up for the First Amendment.  Thus even though the Illinois ARDC considers it unethical for me to exercise my First Amendment Rights and be critical of the new American Holocaust  I have copied them  on this e-mail just to make certain that they are aware that I am not repentant for being an American and following the principles that Loyola embedded in me more than a half century ago.
If I never properly expressed my appreciation to Loyola I do it now.
Ken Ditkowsky
jmdenison | July 31, 2013 at 3:02 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p209wH-UB

Comment   See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

MAN KILLS SELF AFTER FIRING GUN AT LAW OFFICE

MAN KILLS SELF AFTER FIRING GUN AT LAW OFFICE
US VIDEO
BUY AP PHOTO REPRINTS
COVINGTON, La. (AP) -- Police say a man killed himself after firing numerous shots inside and outside of a law office in Louisiana.
Acting Covington Police Chief Jack West identified the suspect as 47-year-old Roderick Rist of Slidell. West says police began receiving numerous emergency calls about 1:15 p.m. Tuesday about a man standing in a parking lot and firing a weapon.
The man eventually went into the law office, where more shots were fired.
Police entered, rescuing one office employee who had hidden as the shots were fired. West says the body of the shooter was found inside.
The motive for the shooting was unknown.
West says it appears at least 60 shots were fired. Police also have recovered two .22-caliber handguns and two 9mm semi-automatic handguns.

Again, we ask, why does not the court and GAL’s do their jobs and protect the vulnerable elderly?

Editor's note: The last  of Alice R. Gore's GALs selected by Judge Kawamoto of the Probate Court of Cook County, after collecting tens of thousands of dollars in fees, NEVER VISITED ALICE.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

 

Again, we ask, why does not the court and GAL’s do their jobs and protect the vulnerable elderly?

by jmdenison
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jul 31, 2013 9:17 AM
To: rudy bush , JoAnne Denison , Janet Phelan
Cc: NASGA , probate sharks , j ditkowsky , Harry Heckert , Cook County States Attorney , Eric Holder , matt senator kirk , "60m@cbsnews.com" <60m@cbsnews.com>, "zamirkatan@aol.com" , "ildbambic@govabuse.org" , "illinois.ardc@gmail.com"
Subject: Re: Trustee's Rights to own trust property
Dear R***    Just for the record:
The government of the sovereign States of the United States of America have adopted the English Common law and added to it.    To facilitate investment they have allowed entities to be developed that would shelter the investment from creditors of the individual.   Amongst these entities are: corporations, partnerships, trusts, etc.    A trust is not an evil thing - it is device to accomplish a particular purpose.   One of the purposes is to avoid probate expense and interruption.
If you have ten dollars and want to invest it in a widget making operation, but do not wish to risk you home which has a value of twenty dollars you can create a 'business trust,' a limited liability corporation, business corporation etc.   This entity using your ten dollars as capital can purchase a manufacturing plant, hire workers and commence business as if it had an independent existence.    If it makes a million dollars it pays the taxes on the million dollars at the corporate rate.   Pursuant the Citizens United it can even contribute to the political campaign of ****.
If you have ten dollars and you wish that the ten dollars be used to care for you in your old age you can declare yourself or appoint a trustee to take your ten dollars, invest it and use the principal and interest to take care of you in your old age.    If you do not wish the trust to be available to creditors etc all you have to do is provide the trust with spendthrift provisions.     There is nothing sinister.   Your trustee is a fiduciary and as long as he/she acts as a prudent investor and a prudent person he/she incurs no liability.    However, if the trustee misdirects a penny it is a very serious problem that could result in serious liability or even jail.    Within these parameters a trustee has great discretion and the beneficiary has little to say about it.   The trustee corpus (i.e. the property of the trust) is owned by the trustee subject to the trust declaration or agreement.
The conservatorship is a horse of a different color.    Its derivation is 'parens patrie.'   This is the doctrine of English law intended to protect those people could not take care of themselves.    This included children, the disabled, the elderly etc.     The Chancellor (Church) would administer the State and private assets so that these disabled people could have useful and comfortable lives.     To facilitate the protection of the disabled probate acts were enacted so that the administration could be more efficient.   For instance in Illinois we have title 11a of the probate act.   This is a comprehensive code that 'covers the waterfront' in detailing the protections to be afforded those person who are alleged to be disabled.    755 ILCS 11a - 3 set forth the credo of the act.   To protect the disabled person from being railroaded into a guardian ship 11a - 8 requires certain disclosures and 11a - 10 sets out the method of obtaining jurisdiction.   11a - 17 and 11a - 18 provide for the administration.
Unfortunately, the one problem that no society has been able to solve is how to deal with the miscreant element who 'game'  the system.    In the Sykes case we have two guardian ad litem and a bunch of regulators who claim to operate under the system of 'hear no evil' 'see not evil' and 'cover-up all evil'   Thus Mary Sykes has had her estate ravaged (over a million dollars has not been inventoried) and her liberty rights separated from her.   She has been totally separated from her two siblings, her younger daughter, her friends, and her activities.    So obscene is the situation that Adam Stern (GAL) has been heard to brag of the progress that Mary is making.    Indeed, she is making progress toward the Alice Gore scenario - i.e. stripped of her liberty and property and having her filings removed and the gold therein *****.     The GAO report to Congress indicates that this is not an uncommon situation, but is fast become the new norm.   Elder cleansing is as much of a fact North Korea, the Gulags of Soviet Russia, and the National socialist movement.
Yes, R*** I realize that the Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission is attempting to separate me from my law license for   exercising my First Amendment Rights and responding to your inquiries; however, this is still America and I am not going to be intimidated by bureaucrats who are offended by the Bill of Rights!     I requested law enforcement to do an HONEST intelligent, complete and comprehensive investigation of these 'elder cleansing cases' and I expect that it will occur and justice will be served.    It is sad that it will be too late for your mother, Ms Cooper's mother, Mary Sykes and the thousands of seniors who are not subject to American Holocaust!
Dr. King pointed out that everything Hitler did was legal!     I want to point out that what has happened in the Sykes case and similar cases is still contrary to experience of a large segment of the America public.    The Sykes case is a post-board case of elder cleansing!    The miscreants represent a minority.    However, like any cancer left untreated this minority has created a terrorist attack on the 'core values' of the United States of America.   Those who protect these miscreants and aid and abet them are equally culpable.   (see Estate of Lieberman 391 Ill App 3d 882)    Like the trustee, the GALs, the plenary guardians, and the public officials all a fiduciaries to the public and to the persons subjected to the act.    They are held to a high standard of conduct which they do not seem to recognize; however, they will.
Ken Ditkowsky
jmdenison | July 31, 2013 at 2:58 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p209wH-Uy

Comment   See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Thanks for flying with  WordPress.com

"Wiesenthal Center Calls for Closing of German Magazine It Says Glorifies Nazism"

 Breaking in today's New York Times:
July 31, 2013
A Simon Wiesenthal Center special investigative report  has found that a magazine published by Bauer Media Group, Europe’s largest publisher, has been glorifying the infamous SS and members of Totenkopf units responsible forcarrying out Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’. 
Photo: Glorifying Nazi war criminals in Der Landser magazine

Renowned German expert on Nazi war crimes and long-time Wiesenthal Center consultant, Dr. Stefan Klemp’s special SWC report, Glorifying the Waffen-SS and Nazi War Criminals, found that, “… the stories in the Der Landser magazine sanitize the Third Reich… They methodically reduce the war to stories of German heroes, purposely ignoring the crimes committed by their units as if they are irrelevant.”
“The Wiesenthal Center has urged both the German Justice and Interior Ministers to investigate the possible violation of section 86 of the German penal code, which specifically prohibits glorifying Nazism,” said Rabbi Marvin Hier, adding, “Our call to action comes at a time when 20 percent of all Germans still harbor anti-Semitic attitudes, when crimes committed by the far right rose to 17,616 and anti-Semitic attacks increased 10.6 percent.”

A breaking story in the New York Times and International Herald Tribunereads: [Bauer Media] ...has come under fire from a prominent American Jewish group [Simon Wiesenthal Center] ... German Interior Ministry Officials said, "They took the Wiesenthal Center complaint "very seriously" and would investigate.
READ FULL NYT ARTICLE HERE...
The Simon Wiesenthal Center will not allow the glorification of Nazism in Germany to go unchallenged.
The SWC has:
1. Protested to Germany’s Ministers of Interior and Justice urging an immediate investigation into Der Landser followed by appropriate action thereafter - Ministry officials reported that an investigation would be launched.

2. Written to Amazon Germany asking that they immediately stop distributing Der Landser magazine - Amazon Germany replied in a letter to Rabbi Hier that they have decided to continue selling the magazine.
“The post-war German generation, forced to face the reality that history’s greatest crime was committed by fellow Germans, were right to protect themselves against a reoccurrence by enacting tough laws against glorifying the Third Reich. Der Landser magazine clearly violates the letter and spirit of those laws. It offers succor to neo-Nazis, skinheads, and jihadists avoiding the uncomfortable truth that there was no honor or nobility ever attached to the Third Reich other than the simple fact that Nazism and her supporters were the apex of evil and the enemies of mankind,” warned Rabbi Hier.
  
Please continue your generous support of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and its efforts around the world to stand up to those who want to re-write history and debase the memory of the Shoah!

© Copyright 2013 Simon Wiesenthal Center 1399 South Roxbury, Los Angeles, CA 90035. (310) 553-9036
Your privacy is important to the SWC. Please review SWC's online
 Privacy Policy.

Highland Park hires firm to promote city's image

Editor's note: Highland Park has been ruled by a "Shadow Government", the League of Women Voters for many years. This "Shadow Government has shoved  expensive downtown real estate deals and ridiculous gun ordinances down the throats of H.P. citizens for as long as your ProbateShark can remember.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

Highland Park hires firm to promote city's image

$75,000 branding campaign approved

  • print
  • Email
    Share
    3
A view looking west on Central Street at Sheridan Road in downtown Highland Park Friday, May 6, 2011. (Chris Walker, Chicago Tribune / May 6, 2011)
 
What exactly are people saying about Highland Park behind its back?
No matter. As part of its Economic Development Strategic Plan, the city has approved a $75,000 branding initiative to help it control the message.
Such an initiative, officials think, will distill the essence of what makes the city special and promote that in the marketplace with the zeal of Billy Mays pitching Jupiter Jacks on late-night TV.
From a field of about a dozen firms, the city chose North Star Destination Strategies. The 18-year-old, Tennessee-based firm claims to have helped develop community brands for more than 150 communities in 37 states.
"Your brand is what people say about you when you're not around," said Don McEachern, chief executive officer of North Star. "In other words, your reputation."
McEachern described how "people have chosen to move to a city — without ever visiting it — based wholly on the word of mouth about it. Branding is what you do to change or refine that message."
Carolyn Hersch, Highland Park's economic development coordinator since 2006, said this image shaping idea isn't new.
"It dates back 20 years, requests for something like this," she said, adding that various entities in the community had scrounged around for such an identity. "What we're looking for is to discover and find a design about what makes the city special, so it can stand out in the marketplace. We're finally (focused on) looking for a unified message."
The endgame, said Hersch, is "we're looking to attract new business, retain our existing businesses and attract customers as well as residents."
Recent figures are that Highland Park's sales tax revenues account for over 40 percent of the city's general fund. Branding, officials feel, will bring focus to this integral generator of city revenues.
In a May 2013 prospectus to the city, North Star said it expects "to guide (the city) toward inspiring a critical mass of public and private sector businesses and organizations to create things — laws, signage, art, products, entertainment, etc. — that support and promote your brand. That is when the real buzz about Highland Park will start to be heard."
A business summit Oct. 2 at the Highland Park Country Club will seek more feedback on the branding initiative, said Hersch.
"The first part of the process, 80 percent of the work, is the research North Star is doing," she said. "Their research tells them what our existing story is but also what direction to go in for our future story."
Spreading the message could involve billboards on Michigan Avenue or the Illinois Tollway, said Hersch.
"It won't only be us (Highland Park officials) deciding (on a final branding)," she said. "It will be city staff, property owners, business owners, residents and people in the community. We won't be able to please everybody."
The branding could even involve a tag line.
"It may be like 'I (heart) New York,' but on a Highland Park level," Hersch said.
"This important initiative is a collaborative effort by our staff, business stakeholders, commissioners and City Council so that we continue on a path to economic success," said Mayor Nancy Rotering. "By following our crafted road map to economic growth, we open the door to even greater opportunities for our community."

The Difference Between Sharks And Soda

  • Editor's note: Let's hear it for Gov. Cuomo.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
  • 30 Jul 2013 at 4:08 PM
  • Animal Law, Drinking, Food
  • The Difference Between Sharks And Soda


    ‘Man, I could really use a soda.’
    It turns out that I care about the global population of sharks way, way more than I care about the epidemic of obese people in New York. Not only that, but I have much more faith in the ability of laws and governments to do something to protect sharks than they can protect fat people from themselves.
    Today has been an interesting day for the nanny state. An appeals court has once again knocked down knocked down New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s overbroad soda ban. And New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation banning the sale of shark-fin soup in New York.
    I couldn’t be happier with both developments…

    In general, the nanny state is bad at regulating human behavior. It has no business trying to impose “good health” or “personal restraint,” and it’s not even very good at inculcating us with morality. The soda ban has a laudable goal, I suppose. Large sodas make people fat! But regulating how much soda we can drink is a big governmental overreach. And practically, all the soda ban accomplishes is that it makes poor people pay a greater percentage of their income to have way too much soda than rich people. And so it needed to be stopped. From Fox News:
    “The Board of Health overstepped the boundaries of its lawfully delegated authority,” the court said in its decision.
    The state Supreme Court Appellate Division, with its opinion, upheld an earlier ruling that stopped the ban from taking effect in March. The rule would stop many eateries from selling non-diet soda and other sugar-laden beverages in containers bigger than 16 ounces.
    The beverage industry and other opponents say the measure is riddled with exceptions, unfair and ineffective.
    The nanny state is marginally better when it’s acting to prohibit something rather than merely regulating it. Telling people, “Oh, you can do this, but only in here and in this way,” drags the government down to the level of proscribing personal actions. Out-and-out banning something is a much cleaner way of saying, “We find this activity to be antithetical to a properly functioning society, and so nobody can do it.” It doesn’t create unintended exceptions for the rich, it just lays down the law, no pun intended.
    And that’s what the shark-fin soup ban is trying to go. From the Daily News:
    “Every year, an estimated 73 million sharks are killed to supply the growing global demand for their fins,” Gov. Cuomo said. “Not only is the process inhumane, but it also affects the natural balance of the oceanic ecosystem. With this new law, New York will be doing its part to help preserve this important species and maintain a stable environment for them.”
    Patrick Kwan, director of grassroots organizing for The Humane Society of the United States, said shark fin soup is still available in almost every major restaurant in Chinatown.
    “We are actually the largest market for shark fin currently in the United States,” Kwan said. “We tracked over 60 restaurants that have it on the menu.”
    Don’t regulate it, don’t make a deal with it, don’t act like my mother and tell me what’s good for me. Prohibit the stuff. It’s a much cleaner and more sensible law. If Bloomberg wanted to ban the sale of sodas, I wouldn’t support it, but at least it would be an enforceable (ish) law that made sense.
    In the end, it’s a nanny state law that actually protects something that can’t protect itself. People can make decisions as to whether or not they want to drink sodas that will make them gain weight and cause health problems. Sharks, for the most part, cannot make decisions as to whether or not they should be in a soup. The personal behavior Cuomo is restricting has nothing to do with the person and everything to do with the shark.
    Like I said, fat kids can defend themselves from sodas. Sharks can’t defend themselves from soup lovers. Fat kids can’t defend themselves from sharks, but I also support Aquaman’s authority to ban sharks from eating fat kids.
    Appeals court rules against NYC soda ban [Fox News]
    No (Shark Fin) Soup For You! Gov. Cuomo Outlaws Taking Of Shark Fins [Daily News]

    Man's Death After Confrontation With Police Ruled a Homicide

    llinois State Police Public Integrity Unit is reviewing Friday evening incident

    Monday, Jul 29, 2013  |  Updated 3:58 PM CDT
     
    |
    Emai
    |
    Print

    Man's Death After Confrontation With Police Ruled a Homicide

    The Victory Centre of Park Forest
    advertisement    
    Saturday's death of a 95-year-old nursing home resident who was shocked by a Taser and struck with bean bag rounds during a confrontation with police has been ruled a homicide by officials in the Cook County Medical Examiner's Office.
    An autopsy showed John Warna died of blunt force trauma to the abdomen from being hit with the bean bags.
    Officials at the Victory Centre of Park Forest, the south suburban home where Warna lived, said the man was displaying "unusually aggressive behavior" on Friday evening. When police arrived, they said Warna was threatening paramedics and staff with a cane and a metal shoehorn.
    Police said they struck him with a Taser and bean bag rounds after he threatened officers with a 12-inch butcher knife.
    Warna was taken to Advocate Christ Medical Center where he later died. Police said he was conscious and communicating when he was transported.
    The Illinois State Police Public Integrity Unit was reviewing the incident, the SouthtownStar reported.


    Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/john-warna-victory-center-nursing-home-park-forest-217441891.html#ixzz2acrQoHw6

    I made a small change

    Back Next
    Courtesy of Tara Wilson

    "I Made a Small Change"

    Attorney Tara Wilson of Andover, MA, had many of her own estate planning documents in order. But after her grandmother fell ill at 84 and her relatives disagreed on her care, the court appointed a stranger as guardian, overruling her grandmother's wishes.
    "The guardian kept her from her loved ones, put a reverse mortgage on her house, moved her to a nursing home and squandered her savings. From all this I learned that I needed to name a second and third choice for healthcare proxy and power of attorney, and add a provision to my will that the court is not to appoint anyone else to represent the interests of my children. And I keep my will up to date."
    • Back
      3. Create your will
    • 5 of 6
    • Next
      Financial Expert
    Restart Slideshow

    Related Links



    Read more: Healthcare Proxy - How to Write a Will