Elder lives Matter

Elder lives Matter

 

If a man from Mars were to visit North Korea and then visit Illinois what differences would he see?

 

1)      Corruption:     If our Man from Mars visited the 18^th Floor of the Daley Center and if he stumbled upon one of the hearings held in relation to the guardianship cases the level of corruption in North Korea and in Illinois would tip toward Illinois.     Historically the Communist countries are careful to observe all the non-essential procedural procedures.    In the Sykes case 09 P 4585 the miscreants were careful to observe virtually none.    In Korea there would have been ‘show trial’ and the drugged Mary Sykes would have been displayed.    In Illinois not only were the notices ignored by so was the hearing.     Attorney Peter Schmiedel when asked specifically if there was a competency hearing he told the truth.   There was a hearing on some care plan – no competency hearing was every held.     In North Korea only a few party members are involved; however, in Illinois everyone and his brother is involved.    Even the IARDC (administered by Larkin) is involved.

 

2)      Free Speech.     Once again the edge goes to Illinois.    Our restriction on speech is much more draconian.     When I tried to do a preliminary investigation the two guardian ad litem, the attorney for the guardian, and the corrupt presiding judge tried to intimidate me not to do so.    The fact that they did not have jurisdiction did not bother them.    When they were called on the issue and I wrote the Attorney General of the United States, and requested an Honest Investigation, Jerome Larkin and his co-conspirators stepped up and the Illinois Supreme Court took suspended my law license for four years.    No pretense - pure unadulterated assault on the First Amendment and Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution.    

 

(In North Korea there would have been some diversion - after someone looked at the Sykes file and discovered the lack of jurisdiction was obvious, an obvious fiction was invented.   The fiction – the people who were entitled to prior notice had knowledge.   NB – not prior knowledge, but knowledge.    Unfortunately, unlike the North Korean propaganda machine the fiction was obviously outlandish.    No hearing was held.     Thus, Free Speech does not exist in Illinois.

 

In Illinois the deprivation of Civil Rights is not an isolated situation.    Larne Amu echoed an expose of Crain’s Chicago Business’       someone who pulls Larkin’s strings objected and Amu was charged with lying about the integrity of a judge.     The fact that the judge could not and did not deny the averment was irrelevant.    Mr. Amu has a black skin so that his complaint allegedly created a clear and present danger and he received an interim suspension.   

 

JoAnne Denison as a private citizen and as a lawyer operates a blog.    In that blog she reprints the call for an HONEST investigation and embarrassing facts.     Amongst the facts she has reported on is

·         Each of the miscreants has a very discouraging and embarrassing biography.

·         Mary Sykes was competent at the time that she was seized, isolated, stripped of her liberty and property.     The blog even displayed videos in which Mary demonstrated her competency.

·         Calls for an HONEST investigation.   (Strongly objected to as unethical by the two guardian ad litem and Mr. Larkin)

·         Facts of similar indiscretions by the miscreants

·         Fact of atrocity and other assaults by persons acting in conspiracy with the Sykes miscreants and/or acting on their own to commit other heinous crimes.     In particular the exploration and the harvesting of gold from the mouth of victim Alice Gore.

·         Cover=up by Larkin and his co-conspirators and participation in criminal activities by said 18 USCA 371 conspirators.   

·         Making public 18 USCA 4 and Rule 8.3 reports to law enforcement and the IARDC.

 

3)       Lack of Due Process.     Using the Sykes case 09 P4585 the two elements of due process – i.e. Notice and hearing are both missing.      In Gore and other cases there appear to be some notice and a sham hearing.     Declare a person to be incompetent – with or without perjured testimony of a medical expert – and there is a total loss of all civil rights.    The fact that Americans with Disabilities Act and 755 ILCS 5/11a – 3b prohibits this scenario elder lives and rights are forfeit.    Taking property without due compensation and/or due process are par for the course.    These are the very elements of the elder cleansing and guardian for profit scheme.

 

4)      Special privileges for special people.     If you look at the Sykes case, Cynthia Farenga was obviously upset when she read in Probate Sharks that Ms. Denison and I were calling for an honest investigation.    She wrote a letter to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) claiming the call for an Honest investigation was unethical and even sent to the IARDC a copy of the page of the blog.     Almost immediately disciplinary proceedings were commenced against me.    Shortly thereafter they were commenced against Attorney Denison.

 

Like proceedings in North Korea no action was taken by the IARDC to investigate, court rules that apply to every lawyer were ignored, and intentionally false pleadings were filed by Mr. Larkin and by his co-conspirators.    All safeguards - such as the requirement to present competent evidence – were ignored.      In fact when Judge Stuart was caught perjuring herself no problem existed – the transcript was altered to delete the admission of perjury.        Serious crimes = including crimes against Nature and against humanity that occurred in many of the guardianship cases and in particular in the Gore were ignored by authorities.     When a favored guardian ad litem, who was responsible for horrible crimes against Alice Gore and others, filed in a Florida courtroom a totally perjured claim and such was reported the Mr. Larkin and the IARDC the reporting citizen was told that such was not unethical in Illinois.     On a blog quite frequently the perfidy of the favored lawyer guardian is referred to and reported for another criminal act – the IARDC (and apparently law enforcement can care less)

 

5)      Predetermined determinations and sentencing.     Again Illinois has an edge.    It is my understanding that even though the Supreme Court of Illinois has not affirmed the ethically and morally offensive proceedings orchestrated by Jerome Larkin against JoAnne Denison, JoAnn Denison has been suspended from the Practice of Law in Illinois on an interim basis.    This summary suspension occurs only when there is an imminent danger to the public.      Amu was suspended on this basis as he has the wrong color skin!      I was not granted an interim suspension as my skin is lily white and I live in a Chicagoland community in which may political heavyweight reside.    I had also been cycling with a former special agent of the Department of the Treasury and our wives were friends.

 

The interim suspension is a harsh and procrustean punishment intended only to be used in the emergency situation when a real hazard to the public exists.     Larkin’s stooges and co-conspirators alleged that Attorney Denison authored a blog.   (Protected by 47 USCA 230).    In this blog she informed law enforcement of Americans With Disabilities violations, civil rights violations, human rights violations and other felonies  18 USCA 4, Rule 8.3, 340 ILCS 20/4, 735 ILCS 3, 755 ILCS 5/11a 0 1 et seq,  18 USCA 241, 18 USCA 242, 42 USCA 1983, 18 USCA 1341 etc).   Larkin claimed that this act of complying with the aforesaid statutes constituted something similar to crying fire in a theater.      Larkin then patently lied claiming that recent Supreme Court cases provided him with authority to silence citizen (if the citizen was a lawyer) exposure of criminal acts by judges, lawyers, judicial officials et al.     He cited the Alvarez case improperly failing to note that his argument had been specifically rejected by the Supreme Court.

 

The Supreme Court of Illinois rubberstamped the interim suspension.     HOWEVER, it has come to my attention that the Supreme Court now having all the phony, perjured, and wired proceedings that Larkin dreamed up before it, it has not affirmed Larkin’s gang rape of America’s justice system.     This action by the Supreme Court in not doing its job as disreputable and disingenuous.      They thus would fit right in in North Korea or a radical Islamic state (ISIS).

 

The leader of North Korea could set up shop in Illinois and most of us would notice the difference.     In many ways even though he is ‘insane’ and badly in need of a Illinois guardian for profit,  his benign and intolerant leadership would be consistent with Illinois moral and fiscal bankruptcy exhibited almost daily on the 18^thFloor of the Daley Center here in Illinois.      

 

Genocide as a public policy has a certain ring to it.     Now that we have people of color being cleansed in certain communities,  immigrants no longer welcome on our shores,  law enforcement people available for target practice in other communities and ****  maybe the elimination of the elderly (whose bodies and riches have some interest to the corrupt judges, lawyers, judicial officials  et al) is consistent with the Illinois sovereignty.       Kim ***** (the leader of North Korea) endorses genocide and certainly the lawyer disciplinary commissions of Illinois agrees – BUT,  I have a problem with the concept and the operation of the program.     It is this problem that caused Mr. Amu, Ms. Denison and yours truly to be suspended from the practice of law – WE EXERCISED OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PROTEST!      The political elite, the judicial elite and the savior of North Korea all objected to the protest.      Except in the case of JoAnne Denison the Illinois Supreme Court rubber stamped – they have Denison in limbo in an effort to dishearten and intimidate her.      All for her saying the words:  “Elderly lives matter!”   

 

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

Madoff/Sykes

The Madoff case came up in conversation last night and a fact was brought up that is an embarrassment - the whistle was blown on Madoff ten years prior to the scandal was broken by the press!     The whistle was blown on Sykes over four years ago!    The only governmental action that is known to the public is the whistle blowers are being prosecuted!

Just like is occurring now, the media was not interested and law enforcement was slow, and in the case of the regulators - such as the SEC they were complicit.    In the elder cleansing cases the State of Illinois instructions such as Office of the public guardian, the Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission, the Department of aging etc are quick to defend the miscreants or actually aid and abet them!    

Unfortunately the elements of 'elder cleansing' i.e  elder abuse and financial exploitation are life threatening to fatal to hundreds of seniors affected by the miscreant elements.   Madoff was not killing people, but his mentors in public service killed millions with their holocausts, gulags *****.     During the Christmas season in particular it is very difficult to see how public officials can profess to be honorable and virtuous when they know all about the deprivation of Mary Sykes, Alice Gore *****.      In light of the damage Madoff was able to do when public officials played hear no evil, see no evil, and do plenty of evil it is difficult to explain why AS, PS, MS, JL, LB, SF and the crew are not in the 'dock!' = it is even more difficult to understand how the State of Illinois in light of 735 ILCS 110/5 and 320 ILCS 20/4 is still paying salaries for public officials to act in total derogation of the stated Public Policy of the State of Illinois and United STates of America.

Virtue is its own reward!   Illinois needs more sources of revenue!      Maybe Governor Quinn can license the gold mining in the teeth of senior citizens!    AS, PS, MS, JL, LB,SF are most certainly prospects!

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

From Gloria Sykes–the status of her case–and a new denial of contempt

Editor's note: Your ProbateShark has made numerous complaints against attorneys involved with probate issues.  Without exception, these complaints were unanswered or dismissed. Certain attorneys, especially those involved with probate are considered "bulletproof" by the ARDC. It is time for our FEDs to indict some of these ARDC officials.  Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com   From Gloria Sykes–the status of her case–and a new denial of contempt by jmdenison From: GLORIA Jean SYKES Sent: Dec 19, 2013 7:07 PM To: kenneth ditkowsky Cc: JoAnne Denison , "illinois.ardc@gmail.com" , "lawrence@Lhyman.com" Subject: Re: Filed today Dear Ken, I told my mother what you were doing when she last contacted me and asked me to help her get out of the Sunrise Senior Living in Naperville. She said to me that she had forgotten what you look like but remember your name. as you recall me and other witnesses reporting the June 22, 2013 visit, the first thing my mother said to me when she saw me was, (and this is a direct quote and one that will haunt me the rest of my life), "I knew you didn't abandoned me. I knew you'd come save me." [my comment: she actually said that several times and was thrilled to see Gloria again.]  That any human being, and in particular the judicial as well as the agency (IARDC) created to protect the public from attorneys such as Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern, Peter Schmiedel, Deborah Jo Soehlig, Amanda Bryne, Joel Brodsky, and Harvey Jack Waller-- to mention a few-- is in fact creating criminals such as the attorneys listed, and going after you, Ken, my mothers attorney of choice, is remarkable. That law enforcement agencies are also protecting these attorneys who are blatantly perpetrating fraud on not just the Probate court, but also the Federal Courts is outrageously obscene! The fact that I've and other victims of illegal/wrongful foreclosures and/or evictions, victims of court sanctioned abuses of the elderly and disabled have filed complaints against the attorneys listed above and Mr. Larkin has managed to erase all complaints from the record is sinful: that he instead has gone after you, Ken, as stated the attorney/Friend my mother asked me to find and retain is unconscionable! [were you able to confirm the complaints are gone from the agency.  can we put together a set of those?  Ken, I'm sure you kept yours, and perhaps Scott and Kathie have theirs and we can publish "copies of complaints" the IARDC told Gloria that never were. I think the public should know about this] So much so that I and others have contacted the FBI and it appears that there is an investigation on going that involved the law firm ******** and in particular attys *******.  As I filed two complaints with the ARDC against Soehlig and received one letter back stating that my complaints fall into a civil matter (apparently the complaints were never read), but there's no record of those two complaints, is of interest to the authorities especially because as with all my complaints I also file certified transcripts. [When jurisdiction is lacking, and the court knew it and destroyed your home, your mother's civil, human and property rights, and your property rights were ignored repeatedly and a million in gold coins is missing--that should be a criminal case and I don't give a ****** if the IARDC doesn't like me to say so.] Recently Deborah Jo Soehlig admitted that Judge Stuart never issued a court order to sell my mothers home: Soehlig admitted the cash sale of $238,000 was not listed as assets to my mothers estate: and, as important, it is on two records that attorney Amanda Byrne LIED to Judge Stuart reporting that Judge Murrey entered a order purging Carolyn Toerpe of the initial contempt order: there is not. [Gloria, you will recall that Judge Stuart herself explained this herself one day in court after the last accounting was presented and accpeted.  If there is a separate trust that need not be brought into the estate and does not affect the probate matter, she does not have to get into it.  HOWEVER, if allegations are made (you made plenty), and the trust itself is threatened (CT taking control as "successor trustee" when the trust required Dr. Patel's certification of incompetency) should have first triggered that event.  Next, and equally as serious, was the fact THE TRUST AND PROBATE ESTATE WERE NOT OPERATING INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER.  Even Judge Stuart pointed out that either the trust is separate and there are no issues and the trust is self sustaining, but this one was not because the home in trust had a mortgage that the estate way paying.   OR the trust must be brought into probate and all issues, claims and allegations determined there.  She herself mentioned that the payment of mortgage from the Estate for the Trust property was very disconcerting when the trust was not part of probate.] I believe that all this was erased from the transcript (do you have it?) The law firm of Fischel and Kahn have thus far succeeded in not only destroying evidence showing that their client Carolyn Toerpe has successfully stole over $500,000 of my assets and valuables held in two safety deposit boxes but have inside people at Chase Bank and US Bank that destroy legal documents such as sign in cards to enter the safe deposit vaults as well as documents showing who entered and closed boxes. This inside person at US Bank actually produced a fraudulent signature card that claims that Toerpe was with mother and I in May 2009 and opened the safe box: she was not and reasonable so as Mother and I intended to protect our valuables and legal documents from Toerpe. About one month later to secure protections and stop Toerpe, mother filed a petition for an order of protection naming Toerpe the financial exploiter and abuser! Then Toerpe has the recently retired supervising Judge Gloria Coco of the domestic relations courts for Cook County make a phone call to Judge Kirby and with the help of Fred Toerpe's son, Du Page County deputy sheriff Robert Toerpe, the Cook County Sheriff's department helped Toerpe kidnap mother in June 30, 2009 and the rest is history! The law firm of Fischel and Kahn have great connections with top Chicago Aldermen and in fact, Mr. Larkin has a relative --Jane Larkin -- whose partner is part of a condo foreclosure scam and represented by Deborah Jo Soehlig. The SYKES case is so top heavy with political clout calling the shots that even three jurists on the Appellate Court have dismissed every appeal I've filed just because attorneys from Fischel and Kahn say the law of the case exists!!! These three appellate court judges are not on one panel but three different panels one being on the same pane as Judge Maureen Connors. Jurisdictional issues cannot be ignored and must be adjudicated and void orders can and should be vacated by the appellate court: again if Deborah Jo Soehlig and or attorney Peter Schmiedel say the sky is made of green cheese then Judges like Connors or Stuart say, indeed the sky is made of green cheese: but when you have appellate court judges, which Maureen Connors is now, also follow Schmiedel's fraud on the courts, then all of us, the public are in serious trouble! There is well established laws and statutes that rule the Probate and FED divisions but thus far and in particular Judge Connors and Stuart and including Flemming, have gotten away with treason against the Constitution! It's the Holidays again and for the fifth year my mother cannot associate with or talk on the telephone with family or close friends, the people she loves and trusts. ARDC Jerome Larkin has a giant rock coming down on his head and he thinks that if he keeps the same route as he's traveled he'll avoid prosecution, but....... It is unlikely Chase and US Banks who think they're too big to fail, along comes the Friends and family of Mary G. Sykes -- with new friends joining hands with us every day! Judge Stuart just stated in the Dec. 6, 2013 proceeding where attorneys Schmiedel and Byrne are demanding the turn over of the over $200,000 of Lumbermen's settlement funds into their clients hands so Fischel and Kahn can be paid that I, as a pro se, doesn't understand the Probate rules: that she Judge Stuart can slander another courts final order and vacate it and make the determination who the money belongs too!!! Let me be clear that I will not stop and I am heading to the federal court on this matter. I've copied the JIB on this email as it should join the many complaints on Judge Jane Louise Stuart and Judge Maureen Connors. But now I'm ahead of myself Ken. Toerpe testified that mother is living with her in Naperville so it's time for another wellness check. More so, it's time that law local enforcement stop being lead by their **** and if Adam Stern says that I have stollen $1.3 mil or even $1 then they should ask for the criminal judgement against me: that when Toerpe reports to the local police that I have weapons and guns and that I'm a prescription drug abuser and bi polar and mentally ill, they should ask for firm proof!!! but now you understand how Adam Stern became my guardian!!!!!! In any event, Ken, my mother asked me to find you and retain you to represent her .. That Attorneys Schmiedel, Soehlig, Stern and Farenga are behind this ARDC scam evidences the clout calling upon Larkin to cover up the complaints against them and instead move for your disbarment should be of public concern! Maybe this holiday someone will do the right thing and my mother will live out her life with the people she loves and trusts! Sent from my iPad Gloria Jean Sykes, younger daughter of Mary Sykes On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:48 PM, "kenneth ditkowsky" wrote: This is what we filed with the Supreme court. A courtesy copy has been e-mailed to IARDC. Tomorrow after Court, if the electronic filing is accepted, I will make the required number of hard copies and send them out as required by statute. For the record I consent to the distribution and publication of this document and the appendix. As an American I take very seriously my obligations to report elder cleansings and violations of the law. It is also my belief that pursuant to Himmel I had and have a responsibility to report the actions of the miscreants and the violation of Mary Sykes' liberty and property rights. As it is so obvious that the actions taken against Mary Sykes were wrongful and the sums involved well beyond the threshold of a felony, it is my opinion the 18 USCA 4 applies and my reports to law enforcement were mandated. The other side of the coin is that all attempts at silencing me are violative of 18 USCA 3, 18 USCA 1341 and 18 USCA 173 (conspiracy). (Illinois laws may also be violated). With the current scandals now part of the Illinois landscape it grieves me that this late in my career I have to fight being a victim of Greylord 2. (Ms. Holtzer in Greylord 1 was in my office to attempt to sell me insurance - when I refused to purchase, the Judge dismissed my case and forced me to appeal) Those who forget their history enjoy the opportunity to relive it! Thank you no!!!! I do not wish to obtain first hand knowledge of the 2013 Holocaust or the 2014 Gulag. The question has been asked - who so many e-mails and why the persistence? The answer is very simple: Mary Sykes and many just like her are hostage victims whose liberty and property have been taken from them! Too many seniors are learning that once they find themselves in the 'guardianship trap' they are sentenced to 'death!' As in Mary Sykes the law is ignored and even the basic jurisdictional criteria is ignored. My vow for the new year is to continue the 'fight' to make certain that the Rule of Law prevails and that no senior citizen is the subject of elder cleansing - i.e. elder abuse/financial exploitation/ involuntary suicide at a nursing home or similar facility. Merry Christmas and success and happiness in the New year for Mary Sykes and all those similarly situated. Oh yes - us too! Ken Ditkowsky http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com jmdenison | December 20, 2013 at 3:53 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL:http://wp.me/p209wH-12e Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from MaryGSykes.com. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:  http://marygsykes.com/2013/12/20/from-gloria-sykes-the-status-of-her-case-and-a-new-denial-of-contempt/

Attorney Amu, The appearance of "over 50 people" to support you

Attorney Amu,

 

The appearance of "over 50 people" to support you in your fight against the assault by Mr. Larkin against your First Amendment Rights, condescending and OTHER actions by the IARDC that I feel to have a 'racial nexus' is an act that all America should be proud.   Ordinary people gave up their time in the middle of the week to demonstrate their support of you and the 'core values of America'

 

These ordinary people were not paid demonstrators or people with any 'skin in the game.'    These people were just interested in demonstrating that American Democracy was not dead and that we do not have second class citizens.  In particular, Attorneys who exercise their First Amendment Rights in derogation of the arbitrary dictates of Mr. Larkin and the political class are entitled to all the privileges immunities and Constitutional Rights of citizens.

 

I would appreciate it if you could personally thank each of the people who gave up time from their lives to demonstrate to the world and in particular the miscreants the fact that Americans are 'stand up' people and we respect and covet our Liberty and are not cowed by the unconscionable and unethical conduct that has been demonstrated by the IARDC proceedings that have been brought against you.  Their sacrifice and demonstration is evidence to the political class that America's core values are alive and well.

 

I've copied Mr. Holder on this e-mail as I as a citizen, like the people who came to the IARDC to support you, would like to know wherein Mr. Larkin feels that he has the authority to censor, impede or limit the First Amendment Rights of American Citizens in derogation of the First Amendment, 735 ILCS 110/5, and Article One of the Illinois Constitution of 1970.    - I, AS A CITIZEN, DEMAND AN HONEST COMPLETE AND COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION OF THIS ASSAULT  ON THE CORE VALUES OF AMERICA.

 

 

 

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/

Archive, today in the field of elder cleansing...

today, in the field of elder cleansing defense the miscreants are give carte blanc to make any statement that they desire and it matters not whether they are accurate or not - we are all liars.     

Therefore,  I wrote up a memorandum that I would like you archive.    When Stern/Farenga forget what they did, we will need it and hopefully one of the blogs will be able to jam this down their throats.

                                                

July 28 memo to file

 

 

Gloria went to her two aunts to obtain their signatures on the Petition for Supervisory order.    Her aunt Yolanda signed immediately, however Aunt Josephine was reluctant.     I previously had made telephone contact with Josephine a 630 950 3897 and we discussed her joining into the Petition.   She informed me that she had previously signed several affidavits to the effect that she never received notice of any hearing in which there were discussions of Mary’s competency, and had no prior knowledge of any competency hearing.

 

She also related that Adam Stern had talked to her family and offered that if she did not sign any documents indicated the fact that she had never been informed of the competency hearing he would personally make certain that she could visit her sister Mary and he would personally supervise the meeting.     Gloria reported that a similar offer had been made by Stern to the Bakkans.    Based upon this information I informed Josephine that she did not have to verify the petition  - the signature of Gloria was sufficient.    I told her I would like her to do so, but it was not mandatory.    Yolanda verified, Gloria verified.

 

Interestingly  when I served Stern, Farenga, and Schmiedel, Farenga was motivated to write me an e-mail suggesting that she believed that Stern had been successful in thwarting Josephine’s co-operation.   As I had talked to Josephine prior to filed and knew of Stern and Farenga’s attempt to tamper with my clients I ignored Farenga’s e-mail.    

 

Today is July 1, 2013 – Gloria and her two aunts are still active participants in the effort to Free Mary from the bondage of Stern, Farenga, Schmiedel et al.

 

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com