From: GLORIA Jean SYKES
Sent: Dec 19, 2013 7:07 PM
To: kenneth ditkowsky
Cc: JoAnne Denison , "
illinois.ardc@gmail.com" , "lawrence@Lhyman.com"
Subject: Re: Filed today
Dear Ken,
I told my mother what you were doing when she last contacted me and asked me to help her get out of the Sunrise Senior Living in Naperville. She said to me that she had forgotten what you look like but remember your name. as you recall me and other witnesses reporting the June 22, 2013 visit, the first thing my mother said to me when she saw me was, (and this is a direct quote and one that will haunt me the rest of my life), "I knew you didn't abandoned me. I knew you'd come save me." [my comment: she actually said that several times and was thrilled to see Gloria again.] That any human being, and in particular the judicial as well as the agency (IARDC) created to protect the public from attorneys such as Cynthia Farenga, Adam Stern, Peter Schmiedel, Deborah Jo Soehlig, Amanda Bryne, Joel Brodsky, and Harvey Jack Waller-- to mention a few-- is in fact creating criminals such as the attorneys listed, and going after you, Ken, my mothers attorney of choice, is remarkable. That law enforcement agencies are also protecting these attorneys who are blatantly perpetrating fraud on not just the Probate court, but also the Federal Courts is outrageously obscene!
The fact that I've and other victims of illegal/wrongful foreclosures and/or evictions, victims of court sanctioned abuses of the elderly and disabled have filed complaints against the attorneys listed above and Mr. Larkin has managed to erase all complaints from the record is sinful: that he instead has gone after you, Ken, as stated the attorney/Friend my mother asked me to find and retain is unconscionable! [were you able to confirm the complaints are gone from the agency. can we put together a set of those? Ken, I'm sure you kept yours, and perhaps Scott and Kathie have theirs and we can publish "copies of complaints" the IARDC told Gloria that never were. I think the public should know about this]
So much so that I and others have contacted the FBI and it appears that there is an investigation on going that involved the law firm ******** and in particular attys *******. As I filed two complaints with the ARDC against Soehlig and received one letter back stating that my complaints fall into a civil matter (apparently the complaints were never read), but there's no record of those two complaints, is of interest to the authorities especially because as with all my complaints I also file certified transcripts.
[When jurisdiction is lacking, and the court knew it and destroyed your home, your mother's civil, human and property rights, and your property rights were ignored repeatedly and a million in gold coins is missing--that should be a criminal case and I don't give a ****** if the IARDC doesn't like me to say so.]
Recently Deborah Jo Soehlig admitted that Judge Stuart never issued a court order to sell my mothers home: Soehlig admitted the cash sale of $238,000 was not listed as assets to my mothers estate: and, as important, it is on two records that attorney Amanda Byrne LIED to Judge Stuart reporting that Judge Murrey entered a order purging Carolyn Toerpe of the initial contempt order: there is not.
[Gloria, you will recall that Judge Stuart herself explained this herself one day in court after the last accounting was presented and accpeted. If there is a separate trust that need not be brought into the estate and does not affect the probate matter, she does not have to get into it. HOWEVER, if allegations are made (you made plenty), and the trust itself is threatened (CT taking control as "successor trustee" when the trust required Dr. Patel's certification of incompetency) should have first triggered that event. Next, and equally as serious, was the fact THE TRUST AND PROBATE ESTATE WERE NOT OPERATING INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE ANOTHER. Even Judge Stuart pointed out that either the trust is separate and there are no issues and the trust is self sustaining, but this one was not because the home in trust had a mortgage that the estate way paying. OR the trust must be brought into probate and all issues, claims and allegations determined there. She herself mentioned that the payment of mortgage from the Estate for the Trust property was very disconcerting when the trust was not part of probate.]
I believe that all this was erased from the transcript (do you have it?)
The law firm of Fischel and Kahn have thus far succeeded in not only destroying evidence showing that their client Carolyn Toerpe has successfully stole over $500,000 of my assets and valuables held in two safety deposit boxes but have inside people at Chase Bank and US Bank that destroy legal documents such as sign in cards to enter the safe deposit vaults as well as documents showing who entered and closed boxes. This inside person at US Bank actually produced a fraudulent signature card that claims that Toerpe was with mother and I in May 2009 and opened the safe box: she was not and reasonable so as Mother and I intended to protect our valuables and legal documents from Toerpe. About one month later to secure protections and stop Toerpe, mother filed a petition for an order of protection naming Toerpe the financial exploiter and abuser! Then Toerpe has the recently retired supervising Judge Gloria Coco of the domestic relations courts for Cook County make a phone call to Judge Kirby and with the help of Fred Toerpe's son, Du Page County deputy sheriff Robert Toerpe, the Cook County Sheriff's department helped Toerpe kidnap mother in June 30, 2009 and the rest is history!
The law firm of Fischel and Kahn have great connections with top Chicago Aldermen and in fact, Mr. Larkin has a relative --Jane Larkin -- whose partner is part of a condo foreclosure scam and represented by Deborah Jo Soehlig. The SYKES case is so top heavy with political clout calling the shots that even three jurists on the Appellate Court have dismissed every appeal I've filed just because attorneys from Fischel and Kahn say the law of the case exists!!! These three appellate court judges are not on one panel but three different panels one being on the same pane as Judge Maureen Connors.
Jurisdictional issues cannot be ignored and must be adjudicated and void orders can and should be vacated by the appellate court: again if Deborah Jo Soehlig and or attorney Peter Schmiedel say the sky is made of green cheese then Judges like Connors or Stuart say, indeed the sky is made of green cheese: but when you have appellate court judges, which Maureen Connors is now, also follow Schmiedel's fraud on the courts, then all of us, the public are in serious trouble! There is well established laws and statutes that rule the Probate and FED divisions but thus far and in particular Judge Connors and Stuart and including Flemming, have gotten away with treason against the Constitution!
It's the Holidays again and for the fifth year my mother cannot associate with or talk on the telephone with family or close friends, the people she loves and trusts. ARDC Jerome Larkin has a giant rock coming down on his head and he thinks that if he keeps the same route as he's traveled he'll avoid prosecution, but....... It is unlikely Chase and US Banks who think they're too big to fail, along comes the Friends and family of Mary G. Sykes -- with new friends joining hands with us every day! Judge Stuart just stated in the Dec. 6, 2013 proceeding where attorneys Schmiedel and Byrne are demanding the turn over of the over $200,000 of Lumbermen's settlement funds into their clients hands so Fischel and Kahn can be paid that I, as a pro se, doesn't understand the Probate rules: that she Judge Stuart can slander another courts final order and vacate it and make the determination who the money belongs too!!! Let me be clear that I will not stop and I am heading to the federal court on this matter.
I've copied the JIB on this email as it should join the many complaints on Judge Jane Louise Stuart and Judge Maureen Connors. But now I'm ahead of myself Ken. Toerpe testified that mother is living with her in Naperville so it's time for another wellness check. More so, it's time that law local enforcement stop being lead by their **** and if Adam Stern says that I have stollen $1.3 mil or even $1 then they should ask for the criminal judgement against me: that when Toerpe reports to the local police that I have weapons and guns and that I'm a prescription drug abuser and bi polar and mentally ill, they should ask for firm proof!!! but now you understand how Adam Stern became my guardian!!!!!!
In any event, Ken, my mother asked me to find you and retain you to represent her .. That Attorneys Schmiedel, Soehlig, Stern and Farenga are behind this ARDC scam evidences the clout calling upon Larkin to cover up the complaints against them and instead move for your disbarment should be of public concern!
Maybe this holiday someone will do the right thing and my mother will live out her life with the people she loves and trusts!
Sent from my iPad
Gloria Jean Sykes, younger daughter of Mary Sykes
On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:48 PM, "kenneth ditkowsky" wrote:
This is what we filed with the Supreme court. A courtesy copy has been e-mailed to IARDC.
Tomorrow after Court, if the electronic filing is accepted, I will make the required number of hard copies and send them out as required by statute.
For the record I consent to the distribution and publication of this document and the appendix. As an American I take very seriously my obligations to report elder cleansings and violations of the law. It is also my belief that pursuant to Himmel I had and have a responsibility to report the actions of the miscreants and the violation of Mary Sykes' liberty and property rights. As it is so obvious that the actions taken against Mary Sykes were wrongful and the sums involved well beyond the threshold of a felony, it is my opinion the 18 USCA 4 applies and my reports to law enforcement were mandated.
The other side of the coin is that all attempts at silencing me are violative of 18 USCA 3, 18 USCA 1341 and 18 USCA 173 (conspiracy). (Illinois laws may also be violated). With the current scandals now part of the Illinois landscape it grieves me that this late in my career I have to fight being a victim of Greylord 2. (Ms. Holtzer in Greylord 1 was in my office to attempt to sell me insurance - when I refused to purchase, the Judge dismissed my case and forced me to appeal) Those who forget their history enjoy the opportunity to relive it! Thank you no!!!! I do not wish to obtain first hand knowledge of the 2013 Holocaust or the 2014 Gulag.
The question has been asked - who so many e-mails and why the persistence? The answer is very simple: Mary Sykes and many just like her are hostage victims whose liberty and property have been taken from them! Too many seniors are learning that once they find themselves in the 'guardianship trap' they are sentenced to 'death!' As in Mary Sykes the law is ignored and even the basic jurisdictional criteria is ignored. My vow for the new year is to continue the 'fight' to make certain that the Rule of Law prevails and that no senior citizen is the subject of elder cleansing - i.e. elder abuse/financial exploitation/ involuntary suicide at a nursing home or similar facility.
Merry Christmas and success and happiness in the New year for Mary Sykes and all those similarly situated. Oh yes - us too!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.