AN OPEN LETTER TO JEROME LARKIN requesting that he resign.
Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
Click to teach Gmail this conversation is not important.
Click to teach Gmail this conversation is not important.
Inbox
| x | |||
|
4:05 PM (13 hours ago)
 | | ||
| ||||
Mr. Larkin,
the affidavit that accompanies the motion that discusses the use of unlicensed professionals by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission creates such an appearance of impropriety that the person who wrote the affidavit as well as all who were consulted in reference thereto surrender their law licenses as severe dangers to the public.
you are aware that professional licensing is the chosen method by which the State protects consumers. Use of unlicensed people by the Attorney Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) is beyond contempt. However, it is consistent with everything that went on in my case, JoAnne Denison's case, Lanre Amu's case ***** and the racial insult heaped upon an Icon of the Civil Rights movement (Diane Nash). Just focusing on the JoAnne Denison case you at this point in time know that the charges made against Ms. Denison (and myself) were totally false and even had they been true they were protected by the Constitution of the United States and the Illinois Constitution. You however told the Supreme Court that the disclosures of judicial corruption was akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater. You further ignored the fact that on page 91 of Judge Connor's deposition she admitted to being 'fixed'/'wired' Of course you before you filed the charges was aware that due process - i.e. notice and hearing were denied Mary Sykes and that one of your panels use clairvoyance instead of evidence to reach its decision. It is also no secret to you that Ruling of the Supreme Court of Illinois were misrepresented and falsely characterized. I trust you have now read the Sawyer and the Alvarez cases.
Naturally you have not apologized or retracted the inappropriate pleadings and documents that you filed. We did not expect the same as we were detailing for the FBI, IRS, IDR and DOJ the fact that your action was intentional. (Had it been an error the same type of misconduct would not have continued unabated until culminated in the attempted intimidation of Attorney Denison and the outlandish fraud of presenting an ex-parte petition for costs that included illegal charges.
It is time, Mr. Larkin, for you to resign and surrender your law license. The damage you are doing to the reputation of the legal profession is horrendous. Few legal practitioners have heaped so my disrepute on the 2nd oldest profession as you. Dishonesty has become the expected norm based upon your total disregard for the oath you took to become the administrator of the IARDC and to become an attorney. How can you explain claiming that Lanre Amu was not telling the truth when independently Crains Chicago Business made the very same averments concerning Judge Egan. How can explain you inaction in the Alice Gore case? Justice Jackson sentenced Nazis to death for what was done to Mrs. Gore yet you would not even investigate. How do you explain prosecutions of Ms. Dension and myself for demanding an HONEST INVESTIGATION?
Mr. Amu, Ms Dension, and yours truly are not naive, nor did we just fall off the turnip truck. We all knew from day one that a fair hearing before the IARDC was impossible and that the 'fix' was in. It is/was sad, but a fact of life. Today, you have crossed the line. There is no going back. By your acting as defined in 18 UsCA 371 you are a co-conspirator. By your thwarting 18 USCA 4 (and a death occurred) you have violated 18 UsCA 241 and 242. This is a felony. As you used the mails to communicate *******.
Do the right thing Mr. Larkin! You and I both went to the same law school - do not disgrace it and yourself further by not owning up to the obstruction of justice and other perfidy that you have committed.
To the IARDC, even though the request of an HONEST INVESTIGATION is offensive to the management of the IARDC, Attorney Cynthia Farenga ***** DEMAND IS MADE PURSUANT TO aba RULE 8.3 FOR AN HONEST INVESTIGATION OF THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF JEROME LARKIN AND EVERY ATTORNEY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE MARY SYKES CASE, THE ALICE GORE CASE, CAROLYN WYMAN CASE and other elder cleansing cases. As Mr. Larkin and others associated with the IARDC are intimidatingly involved in the alleged judicial corruption, I call for an independent law enforcement organization be requested to conduct the investigation.
Ken Ditkowsky
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 3:18 PM
Subject: Affidavit in support of motion by IARDC for more time
The affidavit filed by Larkin 18 UsCA 371 co-conspirator and employee is amazing. She does no know what the ramifications are for 1) a State entity or Public entity using in their professional capacity persons not licensed by the State of Illinois Department of Professional Regulation? and 2) she indeed did use such persons and filed with the Court documents seeking assessment of costs based upon what literally amounts to fraudulent charges - it is axiomatic that if you are required to have a professional license and do not have it, you cannot charge for those services. An employee of an agency regulating such activities should be knowledgeable of said fact.
Thus comes the question - why was a petition submitted to the Illinois Supreme Court that had charges on it emanating from entities that were not licensed to perform professional services? The answer is quite simple. The Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission routinely acts in an improper manner and a case of deliberate fraud and misconduct has been demonstrated in the Petitions filed by the IARDC before the Supreme Court of Illinois.
This particular activity by Larkin and his 18 USCA 371 co-conspirators in light of their other obvious infractions cannot be overlooked or swept under the rug.
I am calling on Mr. Larkin to resign and because of his perfidy surrender his law license. The exclusion of Diane Nash from the open kangaroo hearing as to JoAnne Denison should have been immediately apologized for if there was any part of it that was not intentional. The fact the Larkin in the wake of the Amu case (Practicing Law while Black) failed even make one of those generic apologies is inexcusable and racist.
Ken Ditkowsky
From: kenneth ditkowsky <
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
I have no problem with the filing of formal complaints as they relate to wrongdoing by public officials and judicial officials. In fact I encourage it. There is no question if we keep the criminal activity of the miscreants secret law enforcement will have a valid excuse for ignoring it.
I do not agree with you that writing blogs and voicing complaints to everyone in sight is a waste. Law enforcement listens to the word on the street and so do the political and judicial people. Generic reporting has the potential to create a hue and cry. This has been the method that Donald Trump has used to overwhelm the Republican establishment. Yes, it is a dangerous game - witness his Trump University fiasco. One mis-step could have cost him the illusion that he is the white knight coming to save us from the jaws of a 70 year old lady who lacks ****** and ****** and is incompetent to be dog catcher. It has also distracted him.
Your e-mail essentially says - "why should we make the same mistake" Why don't we use the KISS principle ****. Indeed, your suggestion is well taken; however, the problem is not that simple. It is very hard to be articulate when you are angry with rage. My blood boils every time I think of Mrs. Gore lying in her own urine in a nursing home being ravaged for the few grains of gold in her teeth! How can anyone render a short concise statement of complaint as to that event. When I think of Mary Sykes - who was perfectly competent being literally kidnapped from her home so that she could be elder cleansed - my anger again oils over! When I think of Jerome Larkin barring my friend Diane Nash from the kangaroo hearing involving JoAnne Denison I want to participate in an anti-social event *****. The list continues****, however the net is sitting down to write a formal complaint is like kissing the sister that I do not have.
There is no way that I know to concentrate the outrage and place in dignified form that is easily understandable and formal enough so that I (and others like me) cannot be classified as NUTS.
The frustration builds from stimuli originating everywhere. The Stanford swimmer who was caught raping an unconscious girl who received an unusually light sentence was obviously the product of a 'fix.' The Judge who was 'wired' we all know to have been contacted by a political ally who he owed a favor. ditto for the judges in the elder cleansing cases.******
Please do not discourage anyone from make formal, informal, or outrageously informal complaints. The GOA has send 4 reports to congress and apparently made zero impression.
Ken Ditkowsky
From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein <>
To: 'kenneth ditkowsky' <
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
I mean Ken filing sworn verified complaints with law enforcement, getting complaint numbers assigned and having investigative rights as victims and those reporting criminal misconduct, this is a very easy part of criminal procedure, crime alleged, intake taken case investigated, etc... Calling the PD, Sheriff or FBI or writing them and meeting them is not a formal criminal complaint that you force them to intake according to procedure and dismiss, derail or investigate according to procedure after being accorded due process of law. Without that you have not really made a criminal complaint and they are not really obligated to investigate, I would think you know all this from your many years in law. Further ridiculous is all this time pleading with the civil courts to take actions against them and their cartel legal buds against themselves criminally which they cannot even do if they were so insane in a civil setting. These crimes are criminal and only criminal courts should be dealing with them. Once criminal complaints are derailed and trust me they will try, you have a whole different route, such as IA or OIG and more than give new routes to have these guys criminally tried. Writing blogs, exposing the madness to the victims, yelling at congressional criminals or court criminals is a waste, if someone is robbing you report it to CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES and demand docketing of your complaints despite how many judges, guardians, fiduciaries and lawyers you name in it. eb
From: kenneth ditkowsky [mailto:kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:45 AM
To: Eliot Ivan Bernstein;
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:45 AM
To: Eliot Ivan Bernstein;
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
The problem that is to be faced is no one gives a damn about the murders! These murders echoed the holocaust and in the Alice Gore case even demonstrated the stealing of the gold from the teeth of the victims.
Every day, most of write e-mails up the gazoo to law enforcement, civil rights organizations, and anyone who will accept them - How many guardians do you see even being investigated for their felonies? Routinely I copy the FBI, the Justice Department, and local law enforcement authorities on my e-mails - I leave to you to ascertain whatifany result that has had. (It has had some - that I was able to confirm, however, public officials are afraid.)
Let's take the case of the Judge who sentenced that Stanford swimmer to six months in jail for a rape. We all are adults - we know what happened. The Judge got a telephone call from on to the political people he owes a favor. The caller told him the terms and conditions of the collection effort and when it came time to sentence the miscreant the Judge did as he was told. Some deviant (like you or I) found out about the incident and blew the whistle. As some event was the news of the day was unfavorable to on of the Presidential candidates and a distraction was needed the judge was the diversion. (Hillary's stop staff members were taking the 5th amendment). Bingo **** you know the rest.
Like DONALD TRUMP'S admission that he bribed William and Hillary Clinton the murder of hundreds (if not thousands ) of senior citizens in corrupt guardianship situations is not going to get much media attention. Trump may feel that an honest political operator is one who when bribed stays bribed, but that is not one of his credos that either side of the isle wants the great unwashed to dwell upon. He bribed the Clintons! How would it look for the New York Times to endorse a political figure who was bribed by her opponent? How would it look for the ****** (I could not find a newspaper backing Trump) to endores a political figure who bribed another political figure?
\
I read this morning that we are going to forget about Truth, Justice, and the American way - we are instead going to worry about the definition if the word: "is!" Donald Trump is expected to announce a new definition of the word: "honest" An Honest politician is one who when bribed stays bribed!
Now Mr. Bernstein - why have I suggested that we push the fact that the miscreants are not paying the taxes due on the bootty
The public (electorate) is interested in putting food on the table and purchasing a new car. A few elderly people dying does not mean anything to them; however, government increasing taxes is a prime concern. You, me and other members of the great unwashed have made it very clear - we do not to pay more taxes! How do you legally avoid paying taxes? Have no more taxes assessed is one answer, but we also want all kind of services from government and we have to pay the bill. Answer number 2 - tax someone else. The most attractive people to tax are the political elite. They live high on the hog and get paid more money that we are for doing much much less. They also get paid after they retire. They have generous pensions.
Some of the political elite are not nice people. The most not nice of the political elite are the corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, corrupt guardians, and the 18 UsCA 371 group. Taxing them is attractive! Legislature cannot single out Jerome Larkin for addition taxation - such would be unconstitutional; however, the taxman can single out Larkin for audit and in particular to determine if he reported on his 1040 the remuneration that he received for his cover-up of the Sykes case, Gore case *****. By his cover-up he became an 18 USCA 371 co conspirator and therefore he has joint and several liability for the taxes due.
Yes, Mr. Bernstein and fellow members of the Great Unwashed we are not directly punishing Mr. Larkin for the crime that he committed against Alice Gore and Mary Sykes. BUT this is probably the only remedy the general public will have. Do you have any confidence that someone close to Mr. Larkin will not call the judge who is assigned to Mr. Larkin's criminal hearing and cash in a favor! Judge Connors who admitted on page 91 of her evidence deposition that she was 'touched' and thus ignored the lack jurisdiction, her duties as judge and due process. Her punishment was being elevated to the Appellate Court.
Look at the Clinton e-mail scandal! People with a heck of lot more clout than you and me want to see Hillary receive the very same level of justice that General P received and just as currently. Do you have any doubt that behind the scenes the wheels are turning so that the 'fix' can be accomplished! On the other side of the coin, Donald Trump admitted that he bribed the Clintons. Do you expect Trump or Clinton to be even investigated for the alleged bribes?
Indeed - I would settle for civil tax collection as it many be all that we get. It also will take the profit out elder cleansing and judicial corruption.
Ken Ditkowsky
From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein <
To: 'Rosanna Miller' <
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:42 AM
Subject: RE: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
To: 'Rosanna Miller' <
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:42 AM
Subject: RE: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
Seriously, who gives a shit about tax evasion when people are being murdered for their monies? This group should spend more time filing complaints on behalf of the victims than worrying about some Chicago Capone type takedown, these people will have to be ripped from their benches and cuffed to trial and that should be the focus of this injured groups attention, to not only stop the abuse in these cases before you but to prevent the systematic slaughter of US citizens for profit. I hear there are a bunch of disbarred or close to disbarred attorneys on this e-chain and it would appear that all this rhetoric leads to a RICO CLASS ACTION against the states by the victims, coupled with a handful of individual cases that tie in the predicate RICO acts to prove enterprise and we have more than enough predicates and this could lead to a full take down of the criminal organization you all eloquently describe in these loquacious rants and recovery for the victims. All this time trying to get tax money that goes to further the criminal cartel, like the fines imposed on banks that are never returned to the piggy banks robbed and certainly not used to improve roads or social benefits, just line the pockets further while evading PRISON and for some of these crimes the death penalty.
So really, combine forces, unite in a common legal pursuit together seeking RETRIBUTION for the victims, sue the state and all the state actors that claim judicial immunity why simply file criminal complaints on their asses for their felony criminal misconduct that is ranted on ad nauseam in these mails, including elder cleansing murders, estate thefts in the billions, extortion, false process, etc. Start marching on DOJ to make arrests, start with those Judges who have been exposed in the press and whose victims are speaking out and being retaliated against. Enough of these fanciful ideas, let’s see some real criminal complaints and civil complaints drafted by yeoman like Ken, Barbara, Joanne, Candice, Andy, etc. on behalf of the victims who flail Pro Se without proper pleadings to be shredded alive and for you to report and blog on and send long emails as if sideline reporters. SLAP THEM ALL WITH CLASS ACTIONS, RICO ACTIONS, CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS and DEMANDS FOR JUSTICE and this will be far more effective than trying to have the IRS make a play. By the by, after Capone they co-opted first the IRS to use as a weapon against the people, not an agency for the People and then went on to the courts and legislature to disable them and use as weapons against the people. UNTIL ALL THESE CRIMINALS ARE CUFFED, TRIED under fair and impartial due process under civil and criminal law our country is lost, on our watch. Finally, I think in subject of this email you meant public.
From: Rosanna Miller []
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 9:48 AM
To: Douglas Kinan; kenneth ditkowsky;
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 9:48 AM
To: Douglas Kinan; kenneth ditkowsky;
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
Right... I meant if we had REAL Law Enforcement agencies that weren't supporting criminal corruption in the courts.... sorry...
Did someone say we the people had "representation"? Did I hear that somewhere?
From: Douglas Kinan
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 6:55 AM
To:
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
Rosanna:
File charges? What judge would allow such a complaint? And, if so, who will judge the judge?
From: Rosanna Miller <
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
Subject: Re: breach of the pubic trust is a taxable event
I agree Douglas. It is simply an "enterprise engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity" that discriminate on the disabled elders and commit associational discrimination on their children, and charges need to be filed on the bigot enterprise. That will stop it faster than anything.
Thanks Rosanna
| Reply | Reply to all | Forward |
|
5:23 PM (12 hours ago)
| | ||
| ||||
thank you - also please publish it - it is time to push Larkin to the wall.
If by some chance that he is a decent guy he will not only resign but set the wheels in motion for the HONEST INVESTIGATION THAT WE HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR. This will include firing every one the attorneys involved in this travesty, commencing disciplinary proceedings to disbar each of them, and petitioning to the Supreme Court to reverse the cases against you, Amu and me because of the fraud committed in his name.
Do not hold your breath. He is rotten to core! All of this did not happen in a vacuum.
Ken Ditkowsky
From: JoAnne M Denison
To: Kenneth Ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO JEROME LARKIN requesting that he resign.
I will fax this to Larkin. He already loves me
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.