The JoAnne Denison case should have created a hue and cry

The JoAnne Denison case should have created a hue and cry every where as it is so absolutely obscene.    JoAnne was disciplined by the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) because in her blog she disclosed corruption in the Courts.   47 USCA 230 specifically authorizes such action and makes JoAnne immune from any prosecution.   320 ILCS 20/4 is more specific.    Of Course Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution and the First Amendment specifically decry a prohibition on the IARDC, and government in general from interfering with her postings.   

In broad day light Jerome Larkin and his co-conspirators ignore 18 USCA 4 and Rule 8.3 and bring fabricated disciplinary charges against her that are in direct violation of her civil and human rights.   They tell the Illinois Supreme Court that her blog is AKIN TO YELLING FIRE FIRE IN A CROWDED THEATER.    

How can exposing corruption, required by citizenship and professional conduct be akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater?    Such is absurd.   Janet Phelan wrote a fantastic article on the subject and even the legal professional associations carried comment on it; however, there was no hue and cry and there was no groundswell of indignation!   Indeed, when Larkin and his minions lied as to the record in the Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585 no one was interested.  (Imagine - a woman has all her rights and property forfeited without proper notice and without any hearing.   The Disciplinary panel without a scintilla of evidence made a finding that her family had notice of the non-existent hearing.    Again blogs and just about everyone knew of the prevarication by the IARDC and no one cared!    

Illinois is on the verge of Bankruptcy - however, the taxes that Larkin and his band of miscreants owe not only remains uncollected - but it does not appear that anyone is interested in the collection.   Worse yet, he has been retained in his job as administrator of the IARDC even though he thwarts the Constitution and openly and notorious protects the eldercleansing criminals so that they can prey on the elderly and the disabled.     (Read Probate Sharks - Larkin even protects corrupt judicial officials who exhibit such avarice as to prospect for gold in the mouth the elderly - see Alice Gore case - and complaints filed by Mr. and Mrs. Cooper ****)

 

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/