Editor's note: This Shark believes that there are plenty of rules and laws on the books presently. The problem is the laws are not enforced and entities such as the criminal financial enterprise known as the Probate Court of Cook County abridge the laws for their own profit. Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
Elder Abuse Rules In The Works For Investment Industry
November 12, 2015
Several proposed new laws and regulations would require investment firms and advisors to report on, and prevent, the abuse of seniors.
The proposals, designed to address a growing number of financial-exploitation cases, would make it easier for the industry to report abuse and delay disbursement of funds in such cases.
State eldercare officials want more cooperation from financial firms in identifying victims and their assets. At the same time, financial institutions worry about violating privacy provisions in reporting abuse and hesitate to stop disbursements without court-ordered account freezes.
“There’s a risk of being sued by the account holder … particularly if [a firm’s] suspicions about abuse don’t pan out,” said Judith Shaw, Maine securities administrator and president of the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA).
A model state law, developed by NASAA, would allow a 10-day hold on disbursements when firms and individual advisors reasonably believe financial exploitation of an investor 60 years of age or older is taking place.
Additionally, government agencies would gain broader access to firms’ records in such cases.
Even when they report cases, many financial institutions currently will not provide financial records to protective-service authorities, said Kathleen Quinn, executive director of the National Adult Protective Association, which supports the model law.
“They say it’s because of federal privacy laws,” Quinn said.
Importantly, the model act would also require reporting by advisors and firms to authorities when they see cases of suspected abuse—an idea the securities industry opposes.
Comments on the state law proposal closed last month.
In a related action, Finra last month asked for comment on a proposed new rule that would permit supervisors and compliance people to put temporary 15-day holds on disbursements from accounts owned by people age 65 and older (or otherwise impaired) when financial exploitation is suspected.
Comments on the Finra proposal, Regulatory Notice 15-37, are due November 30.
The Finra plan would allow “enough time to do an investigation, get into court, and really protect” the investor, said Wendy Cappelletto, supervising attorney in the office of the public guardian for Cook County, Ill.
On the Congressional front, senators Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), introduced a bill in October that would provide immunity from federal privacy violations for financial institutions and advisors who report suspected abuse to regulators or adult protective services agencies.
Disagreements Emerge On Details
The proposals, designed to address a growing number of financial-exploitation cases, would make it easier for the industry to report abuse and delay disbursement of funds in such cases.
State eldercare officials want more cooperation from financial firms in identifying victims and their assets. At the same time, financial institutions worry about violating privacy provisions in reporting abuse and hesitate to stop disbursements without court-ordered account freezes.
“There’s a risk of being sued by the account holder … particularly if [a firm’s] suspicions about abuse don’t pan out,” said Judith Shaw, Maine securities administrator and president of the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA).
A model state law, developed by NASAA, would allow a 10-day hold on disbursements when firms and individual advisors reasonably believe financial exploitation of an investor 60 years of age or older is taking place.
Additionally, government agencies would gain broader access to firms’ records in such cases.
Even when they report cases, many financial institutions currently will not provide financial records to protective-service authorities, said Kathleen Quinn, executive director of the National Adult Protective Association, which supports the model law.
“They say it’s because of federal privacy laws,” Quinn said.
Importantly, the model act would also require reporting by advisors and firms to authorities when they see cases of suspected abuse—an idea the securities industry opposes.
Comments on the state law proposal closed last month.
In a related action, Finra last month asked for comment on a proposed new rule that would permit supervisors and compliance people to put temporary 15-day holds on disbursements from accounts owned by people age 65 and older (or otherwise impaired) when financial exploitation is suspected.
Comments on the Finra proposal, Regulatory Notice 15-37, are due November 30.
The Finra plan would allow “enough time to do an investigation, get into court, and really protect” the investor, said Wendy Cappelletto, supervising attorney in the office of the public guardian for Cook County, Ill.
On the Congressional front, senators Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), introduced a bill in October that would provide immunity from federal privacy violations for financial institutions and advisors who report suspected abuse to regulators or adult protective services agencies.
Disagreements Emerge On Details
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.