There are few situations in which there is no argument

There are few situations in which there is no argument.   One of the areas that lacks controversy is the fact that political and content related speech are not subject to any regulation by any government agency or commission.   The recent case of Rosemond v Markham reiterated for the umpteenth time the recent SCOTUS decisions.

How then is Jerome Larkin and his 18 USCA 242 co-conspirators successfully prosecution attorneys (and in particular JoAnne Denison) for disclosing serious Civil Rights violations that have ended in the deaths of senior citizens and the fleecing of their estate?     Even lawyer rule 8.3 prohibits Larkin's action to say nothing of the Americans With Disabilities law, 47 USCA 230,320 ILCS 20/4, 735 ILCS 1 et seq, 42 UsCA 1983.       

We can only speculate on how and why attorneys paid very substantially with public funds can openly and notorious assault the core values of America, The Bill of Rights, the First Amendment *****.    Their terrorism is unprecedented, however, the lack of public indignation is not!    Buck vs. Bell, the Dred Scott Decision, and the separate by equal decisions are part of America's legal history.

Today's Wall Street Journal gives a clue.   An article appeared as to cheating, to wit:

• 802
• 28

• MARKETS

Goldman Firing About 20 Junior Staffers for Cheating on Tests

Exams were internal and used to evaluate employees’ understanding of key policies and industry concepts

PHOTO: LUCAS JACKSON/REUTERS

By 

JUSTIN BAER

Updated Oct. 16, 2015 4:48 p.m. ET

15 COMMENTS

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is firing about 20 junior employees for cheating on internal training tests, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The Wall Street firm found analysts in New York, London and other offices had violated internal rules when they took the exams, which are used to evaluate employees’ understanding of key policies and industry concepts, the person said. The dismissals occurred within Goldman’s securities division.

RELATED READING

• Goldman Earnings Miss as Bond Traders Suffer (Oct. 15)
• Goldman Sachs CIO Says Platform Strategy Making Firm More Like Wal-Mart (Sept. 29)
• Big U.S. Banks Boost Efforts to Recruit, Retain Female Employees(Sept. 30)

“This conduct was not just a clear violation of the rules, but completely inconsistent with the values we foster at the firm,” a Goldman spokesman said.

Bloomberg News reported on the dismissals earlier on Friday.

On Wall Street, analysts are entry-level jobs for employees often just out of college. They typically spend two to three years in the role before advancing or leaving the firm.

Advertisement

First- and second-year analysts earn an annual salary of about $85,000, excluding bonus. The firm hires more than 2,000 new analysts every year.

Goldman employs thousands of analysts world-wide.

Goldman’s online modules test everything from industry and regulatory know-how to the firm’s anti-money-laundering and gift-giving policies, and often take an hour or so to complete, one person familiar with the matter said.

Several current and former Goldman employees described the tests as annoying yet unavoidable chores left to the last minute. Nevertheless, analysts who failed to meet the deadlines or score well enough could risk drawing the ire of their supervisors, people familiar with the matter said. Sharing answers, those people said, became a routine way to save time during an often hectic workweek.

It is unclear how the dismissed analysts’ broke the rules. One person familiar with the matter said Goldman had been explicit in telling employees what wasn’t permissible.

Write to Justin Baer at justin.baer@wsj.com

While we can make no allegation of cheating, the lack of fundamental knowledge by Larkin, Smart, et al in the Denison case is strong evidence (as exhibited in a Wall Street Journal article of today) of at least an HONEST INVESTIGATION of 1) the motivation for the Larkin conspirators assault on the First Amendment, 2) the Denison (and other) prosecutions for speaking out, and 3) the elder cleansing scandal.

Hundreds of senior citizens and disabled people are being exploited, abused, and robbed of their savings by  corrupt judicial officials, corrupt jurists, corrupt lawyers *****.     A thief wearing a black robe is no better than a thief wearing any other garb.    

 

Ken Ditkowsky