5940 W. Touhy Avenue
Niles, IL 60714
September 13, 2014
Mr. Jerome Larkin
Ms. Leah Gutierrez
Attorney Registration
130 E. Randolph Street
Chicago, IL 60601
RE: continued violation of the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1220 3(a).
See Shotz v. City of Plantation, 334 F.3d 1161, 1166, 2003 U. S. App.
LEXIS 18527, 7-8, 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1395, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1067, Accom.Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 11-941 (11th Cir. Fla.2003
Dear Mr. Larkin and Ms. Gutierrez,
I realized a long time ago that you (collectively) do not believe that the protections of the United States Constitution do not apply to lawyers such as myself. However, as has been pointed out by the SCOTUS in recent cases, regardless of what the persons who discriminate, abuse, or exploit the disabled and elderly decree intheir WAR on the Elderly and Disabled think, their elder cleansing is a felony and among other laws violated is the Americans with Disabilities Act, otherwise known as ADA. As you are fully aware, I have and continue to report pursuant to 18 USCA 4 the felonies committed.
This letter is not to admonish you for the past violation of 18 USCA 371 et al, i.e., the aiding and abetting of the serious felonies, or even the numerous violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act that I an numerous other citizens have complained concerning, but to alert you to the current violation of 42USCA 12203(a). It appears that on the anniversary of the day that shall live in infamy, your application for retalization against me for reporting your aiding and abetting the ADA violations against Mary Sykes Alice Gore and others being reported to law enforcement was granted by the Supreme Court of Illinois. As you are aware, Federal Law ‘trumps State Law’ and even if others chosose to ignore the mandates of the United States Constitution and Congress of the United States in its enactment of the Americans with Disabilities law (ADA), it does not exculpate you.
As is my policy, this is a safe harbor letter giving you the opportunity to remediate ths aforesaid violation of anti-retaliation sections of the Americans with Disabilities Act as they apply to me.[1] If within forty-eight 948) hours of the receipt of this letter you cause the retaliatory action to be vitiated, I will waive the damages from that particular violation. As retaliation for compliance with a Federal Statue is a sss matter I have already E-mailed a complaint to the Attorney General of the United States. I realize that you wrongfully consider my communication with Lw Enforcement on the subject of elder cleansing to be ethically challenged but, even if the Supreme Court of Illinois appears to agree with you, I cannot as an Attorney or as a citizen of the United States of America accept your assault on the Bill of Rights and in particular the First Amendment. The Petition for Certiorari that I filed on or about June 6, 2014, states, in detail, my reasoning.
Yours very truly,
Kenneth K. Ditkowsky
Cc: Supreme Court of the United States
[1] If you choose to abrogate your continuing violations of Federal law that you (Mr. Larkin) are continuing against Ms. Denison, I personally would appreciate compliance with ADA; however I do not speak for Ms. Denison and do not directly or indirectly waive any of her rights against you or any other member of your staff. This letter merely seeks to give you a limited opportunity to vitiate the September 11, 2014 retaliation and violation of ADA
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.