The Brave New World
The radical left and the radial right have been suggesting that our government has a campaign to rid America of its elderly. After a person reaches a particular marker in the road, he or she stops being a contributor to society and becomes a taker. If you have too many takers and not enough producers society has a net loss. Add enough net losses and society runs out of assets. Thus, the radicals argue Government is secretly encouraging the exploitation and the extinction of the elderly.
An object view of the Elder Cleansing Scandal and a census of the people directly or indirectly involved gives credence to the radical fears. First, we have a Probate Court populated by some of the most unimpressive Judges. There are some excellent Judges appointed from time to time, but, historically the reputation of Probate Court judges is not one to be envied. Second: Half the people in the world are below average intelligence. The lawyers practicing before the Probate bench do not appear to be drawn from the above average group. Third: This guardianship abuse is not new, and has been going on for dozens of years. In my investigation of the Sykes case 09 P 4585 I discovered that the Probate Clerks office in Cook County did not offer a form for process that meet the direction of the Statute 755 ILCS 5/11a – 10.
I could go on and on, but it is enough to point out that one of the scariest aspects of this entire Elder Cleansing cottage industry is the fact that all the rules that I previously learned are foreign to the people in apparent authority. The various cases that I have reviewed i.e. Gore, Sykes, Wyman **** have one basic truth, to wit: everyone acknowledged that an untrue statement was one that was false and/or had no relationship to reality. However, it was clear that if a statement was made by a favored attorney is was deemed to be true even if the statement was patently false. To be more precise: To the Court, Judicial authorities, miscreants, and even the Lawyer regulators any statement that they did not like is a lie. IARDC it is apparent an untrue statement is one that they do not like. This concept of the world is all new to me and I cannot accept it.
If one examines the various elder cleansing files there appears to be an amendment to 755 ILCS 5/11a – 1 which reads:
Effective immediately: Whatever is considered to be true, right, honest, law abiding, moral, honorable, correct and appropriate is herewith deemed to be untrue, wrong, dishonest, criminal, amoral, despicable, and inappropriate.
The cabal of lawyers and judges who are routinely herding senior citizens into un=necessary and illegal guardianships have also had the foregoing as their credo. The cases that I’ve examined all seem to have in common the following:
1) Herding and railroading a senior into a guardianship administered by a favor entity – usually a lawyer who is part of the ‘tribe.” Even though a finding of incompetency must be proven by clear and convincing evidence if the favored lawyer represents that the targeted senior is deemed to be incompetent that is sufficient. So obscene is the process that due process is suspended, the statutory jurisdictional requirement are largely ignored and a massive cover-up is created to protect the process. This cover-up can include threats to attorneys of loss of license and to person’s objection of their own guardianship or arrest.
2) Once the guardianship is established eliminate from the world of the ward family, friends, church, pre-guardianship activities.
3) Once the guardianship is established commence looting the estate. Supervised visitation is lucrative and creates a cash flow. A nursing home residence yield wonderful kickbacks and other remunerations. Selling property at discounts has long term benefits. With annual accounting by a rubber stamp judges assets can fall in the cracks and be lost forever. Of course expenses can be padded. The Wheel chair ramp *****.
4) Attorney fees are fluid. Irritable family member’s claims have to be defended at $500 an hour. How dare a family member or friend object to the looting of the estate! With a compliant judge who will rubber stamp accountings and allow attorney fees and administrative charges stirring the pot is another money maker.
Few, if any, seniors survive the elder cleansing experience and only a handful are rescued. In most circumstances the target is stripped of his/her liberty interests, separated from her family and friends, and his/her estate is ravaged. If the senior survives, but outlives the Medicare, Medicaid, insurance benefits et al a final solution follows.
Objections to Elder Cleansing are referred to the Honorable J. J. O’Malley.[1] (That dates me). Hundreds of victims are complaining that the Court offers no remedy, the elected official offer no remedy, law enforcement offers no remedy, lawyer disciplinary commissions[2] offer no remedy and victims are frustrated. How do you defend yourself and the love ones from this systemic elder cleansing? Right now the Court is unfriendly to family members who object to their relatives being elder cleansing victims, law enforcement is slow moving and appears ineffective, elected officials label objectors as ‘nut cases.’ Most Lawyers look to what happened to Mr. Goodman, Mr. Amu, myself and others who have refused to go with the program. Black is White, Right is wrong, The Brave New World is here!
The radicals on the Right and the radicals on the Left see a grand conspiracy to eliminate the elderly. Are they correct? Will there be death panel to determine who is to live and who is to die? We are not that point right now, however, we have to break the conspiracy of silence.
Mr. Jerome Larkin thought he could silence Illinois Attorneys with his assault on their First Amendment rights; however, he has been able to silence either Ms. Denison or myself. He has also made himself anAccessory, conspirator, and miscreant in relation to the criminal felonies that constitute elder cleansing. I’ve written him numerous e-mails asking him to disavow his alliance with the elder cleansers. He has not only refused but continued in his personal assaults on our basic core rights and in particular the First Amendment.
Larkin’s disregard for the Constitutional protections of the First Amendment and his alleged misuse of his position as Administrator of the Illinois ARDC points out the problem in a nutshell. Unless law enforcement starts enforcing the law the BRAVE NEW WORLD ban on the elderly will become a reality. The radicals will have predicted the future! As Illinois and every State in the Union (and the Union itself) has financial problem the most efficacious way to stop the spread of elder cleansing is for the Internal Revenue Service to start collecting the taxes that are due from the miscreants. In the Sykes case as an example. In the safety deposit box that was looted, there was about a million dollars in gold that CT removed. The box was in the name of Mary Sykes and Gloria Sykes. This gold was never inventoried. In addition there was cash and other valuables that were taken – these also were not inventoried. Finally the house was sold at a bargain price. It had been valued at over $700,000.00. It sold for less than ½. It sold in a very suspicious manner. If the house follows the pattern it will ultimately yield the miscreants a profit of about ½ million dollars. I would be very surprised if any of the side transactions appear on the tax returns of *******.
This e-mail from Ms. Stone is not unique - it is all together very common. It is so insidious a situation that any one of us could be seized off the street hauled into a court, found to be incompetent and be deprived of our civil rights. The yoke that each victim and his family bears is burden with could be on my or your children. The Taliban are at our door!
[1] Mr. O'Malley was a character in the ground-breaking, intellectual comic strip Barnaby, by cartoonist Crockett Johnson.[1] He was the fairy godfather of five-year old Barnaby.
Jackeen J. O'Malley first appeared in response to Barnaby's wish for a fairy godmother. He was a 3-foot-high (0.91 m), cigar smoking man with an overcoat and four tiny pink wings, and was a member of the Elves, Leprechauns, Gnomes, and Little Men's Chowder & Marching Society. His magic wand was the stub of his half-smoked Havana cigar.
Mr. O'Malley's conceit was matched only by his inability to grant the simplest childhood request, and his misguided attempts never failed to get Barnaby into hot water.
[2] Lawyer disciplinary commissions such as Illinois’ IARDC aid and abet the miscreants and if Mr. larkin’s responses are common probably culpable.
Ken Ditkowsky
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.