Mr. and Mrs. Cooper,
Thank you for forwarding to me the latest response of Ms. Guzman and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.
I had occasion this past week to have discussions with Tim concerning the Americans With Disabilities Act. I had previously read the act, but, I had not previously read the regulations promulgated by the Department of Justice. Briefly the Act is Congress' statement as to protecting the all disabled people including senior citizens such as Alice Gore. The action seeks to prevent exactly what happened to Alice Gore, Mary Sykes, ********.
Pursuant to 18 USCA 4 I am forwarding Ms. Guzman's letter to the Justice Department. The letter is another in a series of Cover-up and aiding and abetting communications designed not to do the job that was delegated to theARDC - i.e. protecting the public and in particular disabled people. As an example - Ask Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman how it accommodates a senior citizen to have her separated from her family, have her assets removed from her, and have her teeth mined for the gold content of her filings!
When Ms. Guzman suggests that the complaints made are disingenuous she and Mr. Larkin (who is her supervisor) are not only being disingenuous, but are aiding and abetting the felonies that you have reported! I do not know where Mr. Larkin and Ms Guzman are coming from in making the statements that they made. Both are fully aware that 755 ILCS 5/11a - 1 et seq. is not a ' carte blanc' delegation of Mrs. Gore's civil and human rights to whomever a corrupt judge wishes to reward. Like ADA the guardianship act is designed to provided whatever limited assistance that Alice Gore reasonably needed and wanted.
The stand to be determined was no "the best interests of the ward" as determine artificially by a avarice inspired political hack who was appointed by a Judge. The standard is what the alleged then and there and there disabled person reasonably wanted as best could be determined. (If the alleged disabled person is not disabled as to the particular subject matter the guardian has no jurisdiction or discretion - without a special court hearing complete with notice and hearing and a finding by the court based upon the notice hearing. Asking Adam Stern or Miriam Solo what the disabled person desired is not compliance with the law - it is another lawless action that violates basic civil rights).
Getting back to the violations of federal law that Ms. Guzman and Mr. Larkinare engaged. (see 18 USCA 371). It is apparent that both Ms. Guzman andLarkin knew that Congress has decreed that citizens with disabilities are no second class citizens. Both are aware that government and others must make reasonable accommodation for the disabled senior citizen and a instrumentality whose actual purpose as demonstrated in a bunch of reports to congress by governmental agencies is pernicious and abusive is not compliance - IT IS A CRIMINAL ACT.
THUS, I am forwarding the letter you received to the ADA administration and the Justice Department and I am advising you that you should do the same. In your complaint you should report chapter and verse and forward copies of all the CYA and other disingenious communications that you reveived from Mr. Larkin, Ms. Guzman et al. What we have in the attached letter is a serious violation of the law that Mr. Larkin and Ms. Guzman knows is such a violation.
As I am lead to believe that both Ms. Guzman and Mr. Larkin are lawyers, pursuant to Himmel I have copied the IARDC. It is their obligation to investigation both Ms Guzman and Mr. larkin and determine why they have violated the clear mandate of the ADA and its regulations and continue to aid and abet the violation of the liberty and the property rights of senior citizens. (I expect that the IARDC will continue the cover-up - but at least the requiredHimmel Report will be made).
For the record - my response is intended to be public and may be reproduced at your discretion and desire.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.