Open letter to Jerome Larkin, Administrator of the Illinois ARDC
Dozens of friends and family of victims of Elder Cleansing have written to your commission and all have received a letter that said that your agency stating that it was not interested in the obviously criminal conduct of a small group of lawyers being reported. Each complaint was essentially the same. A senior citizen was railroaded into a guardianship in which his/her liberty and property were confiscated. The looting of the estate was accomplished by the direct violation of the directive of 755 ILCS 11a – 3 (b) in that the elderly and/or disabled victim was separated from his/her prior life and family members who would not attorn to the artificial arrangement and the unjust enrichment of judicial and other officials. (other officials include guardians and attorneys). After the looting was complete the elderly person was subjected to a sometimes drawn out involuntary assisted suicide.
Some of the citizen complaints that were not investigated and not acted upon related attorney conduct that is so despicable and wrong that you dishonor the entire legal profession with your refusal to investigate. The mining of the teeth of senior citizen Alice Gore orchestrated by an Illinois lawyer and ignored by your commission is illustrate of the neglect of duty that you have exhibited. The attempt to silence attorneys who speak out as to corruption in the Courts is another low point in your tenure and is at the very least the aiding and abetting of the felonies associated with elder cleansing.
I written to you and your commission before and asked for you to join in calling for an HONEST intelligent complete and comprehensive investigation of the cottage industry of elder cleansing and in particular that which occurred in the case of Mary Sykes 09 P 4585. You of course have not joined in or conducted any investigation. The net was you marshalled your kangaroo panels and I am suspended for four years for the exercise of my First Amendment Rights. You then started proceedings against JoAnne Denison who published on her blog some of my First Amendment utterances. Currently, Ms. Denison in response to what appears to be the misreporting of the perjured words and phrases of a Judge you have continued with your ‘cover up’ by refusing Ms. Denison the audio transmission of the testimony. I suggest that you read 18 USCA 371 [and 18 USC sec 4 and know that dozens of attorneys and other judges know what you have done--if they don't report to the authorities, they are equally culpable in all of this].
You have accused me of making false statements but have never articulated a single statement that you claim was or is false. I challenge you and herewith demand for you to instanter provide me and the community with a list of each statement that you claim was false. Then for every statement you claim was false set forth the basis upon which you claim the statement was false.
The foregoing notwithstanding the Friends and family of each of the victims of elder cleansing who have written attorney complaints to your commission want to know why you have refused to investigate the violations of the civil, human, property, and liberty rights of their loved ones who have been railroaded into guardianship by Illinois attorneys. We would like to know why you are protecting certain attorneys and not others. Attorney Miriam Solo has been accused by the family of Alice Gore of what amounts to a [gross] human rights violation. Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel and other have been accused by Gloria Sykes and the family of Mary Sykes of very very serious violations of Mary Sykes’ fundamental liberty rights. This list is endless and each complaining person wants to know why you are not leading the investigation into the series of human rights violations of elder cleansing and why you are aiding and abetting it with State funds.
It has not gone un-noticed that there is no ethics statement that can be found for you. The ethics statements being your disclosure of assets and liabilities required by the State. A person placed in the position of judging the conduct of others should be able and willing to demonstrate at the drop of hat that he is more virtuous than Caesar’s wife.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.