From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: May 13, 2014 6:31 AM
To: Eric Holder , GLORIA SYKES , Janet Phelan , Cook County States Attorney , Cook Sheriff , NASGA , probate sharks , Jo Anne M Denison , "
illinois.ardc@gmail.com" , j ditkowsky , Harry Heckert , scott evans , Kathie Bakken , Chicago FBI
Cc: Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , "
fox2newsdesk@foxtv.com" , "
foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242@newsletters.foxnews.com" , Chicago FBI , "
chicagotonight@wttw.com" , "
illinois.ardc@gmail.com" , DAVID SILVER , Tim NASGA , "
tips@elderabuseexposed.com" , "
tips@cbschicago.com"
Subject: 18 USCA 4 disclosure
The resignation of Judge Jane Stuart opens a new phase to the call for an HONEST complete and comprehensive investigation of the Mary Sykes case, and the role of Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmiedel, Adam Stern and Jerome Larkin.
Let me explain. The representations made the plenary guardian, the two guardians ad litem, and the attorney for the plenary guardian - and Mr. Larkin - have been that the Sykes case is an estate with few assets. The Sykes family has pointed out non inventory of cash that the plenary guardian removed from a mattress, gold coins from a safety deposit box, antique jewelry et al. They also have pointed to the manifestations of wealth that the plenary guardian exhibits and exhibited after her appointment. (Larkin, Stern, Schmiedel, Farenga have attempted to suppress the fact that the plenary guardian was impoverished prior to her appointment (and he husband was among the chronically unemployed).
Now as a parting gesture Stuart is reported to have made some outrageous awards of attorney fees from the Estate of Sykes to the miscreants. For the record - Mary Sykes is not dead - she is very much alive at last report.
The representations that Mary Sykes was a pauper suggests that Government funds were accessed! As an example, why should the public pay for two guardian ad litem for five years? (Remember in Sykes, jurisdiction pursuant to statute was never obtained! Ms. Sykes has been attempting to have a hearing on this subject for five years, but has been thwarted. Mr. Schmiedel has admitted that there was no hearing on Mary's incompetency - only a 'hearing' on a care plan! By statute Mary must have been proven to be incompetent by clear and convincing evidence.
The fact is that Mary was not incompetent at said time and probably for a long time thereafter. The full press cover=up creates felonies pursuant to ADA and the Elder Justice Act. Indeed, if you recall the Castro case in Cleveland - wherein young women were kidnapped and held for years against their will - the public got indignation was manifest - why should the public be complacent when seniors are subjected to the very same kidnapping. Why should state of Illinois funds be expended by Mr. Larkin to cover-up this terrible situation. And - how can attorney fees of the magnitude awarded to the miscreants be awarded when no benefit is obtained for the ward, except the loss of her liberty, her property and civil rights.
Just to make it clear - I am demanding an honest, complete and comprehensive investigation of Judge Stuart, Judge Connors, Peter Schmiedel, Adam Stern, Cynthia Farenga, Jerome Larkin, Leah Black and all the other participants in the Mary Sykes scandal! The railroading of Mary Sykes into a guardianship in which her liberty, her property, her civil rights and human rights were taken from her by a Court lacking jurisdiction is intolerable. The cover-up and the attempt to create a code of silence by Mr. Larkin et al cannot be tolerated in a free society. The war on the elderly and disabled must cease and the assets of the elderly and the disabled cannot continue to be a profit center.
Ken Ditkowsky
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.