Whether this is more go spin your wheels or not - no stone should be left unturned

Whether this is more go spin your wheels or not - no stone should be left unturned.    This is what I sent:

Here in Illinois we have a wonderful legislative scheme for addressing guardianships.   The only problem is that the Courts (and in particular the Court in Cook county) ignores the protections.   Thus, we have cases such as In re: Mary Sykes 09 P 4585.   Therein a guardian was appointed who liberated from Mary Sykes well over a million dollars in assets.   These assets included the contents of a safety deposit box (gold and silver coins of substantial value) cash, antiques, and a lifetime of savings.    

The case commenced as an Petition by Mary Sykes to protect herself from an older daughter who happened to remove $4000.00 from her mother's checking accounts.   When confronted the daughter claimed to have opened an IRA for her 90 year old mother.   Mary and Court employees drafted and filed the Petition - and no - one indicated that Mary was incompetent.

Nevertheless,  the older daughter joined with two appointed Guardian ad litem to thwart any hearing on the Petition for a protective order and to 'railroad' Mary into a guardianship.    This guardianship not only is famous for the fact that Mary's assets have  been lost, but the fact that the jurisdictional requirements of 755 ILCS 5/11a - 10 were ignored.   It appears that even Mary was not properly served with process.

The 'liberated property' (worth over a million dollars was not inventoried.   The two Guardian ad Litem attempted to intimidate each attorney who was engaged to represent Mary's interests, and even Court orders that were entitled to full faith and credit were ignored as part of the intimidation process.

Mary has been almost totally isolated from her younger daughter, her two siblings (of advanced age), her friends, her church, her activities etc.   755 ILCS 5/11a - 3 sets the goal for what the guardianship is to accomplish.    What has been accomplished is a deprivation of Mary's liberty, her property rights, her civil rights and her human rights.

I've personally can attest to the fact to the attempted in intimidation.   When the two guardian ad litem (and the attorney for the older daughter) found out that I was making inquiries as to the fact that Mary's doctor refused to certify her incompetent without jurisdiction they went to Court and obtained a sanction order against me.    When I continued to investigate and wrote the Attorney General of the United States concerning the 42 USCA 1983 violation I was fined $4500.00.    I appealed to the Appellate Court of Illinois.   The Court vacated the trial court order on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction.   

The guardians then complained to the Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission.   I am now subject to disciplinary proceedings.    One of the attorneys for the IARDC asked me on cross examination (holding a letter I wrote to Mr. Holder concerning the Sykes case) if I was repentant for writing the letter.   As you can see from the content of this statement of concern - I am not.

Ms. JoAnne Denison (an attorney) posts a blog, and even though Congress enacted 47 USCA 230 the IARDC is prosecuting her and seeking to liberate her law license.

Unfortunately, this problem is a National problem.   The GAO has written to Congress concerning it, and hundred (if not thousands) of people have written to law enforcement and others seeking help.    IT IS NOT FORTHCOMING.     The eldercleansing continues unabated.    Lawyers who do not honor the 'code of silence' have license problems.    

As I have stated dozens of times - do not believe a single word I write or the victims and their families write.    DO AN HONEST INTELLIGENT complete and comprehensive investigation.    Start here in Cook County - take a look at the Mary Sykes case 09 P 4585.    It will curl your hair!    

After you've rumbled through the Court file, noted the lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, over-reaching, the intimidation of the younger daughter, her attorneys, unusual statements of Judge Connors (doctor shopping), etc take a look at the Alice Gore file and the mining of the gold in Ms. Gore's teeth.   

As the breach of fiduciary relationship is a taxable event, the Department of the Treasury should be happy to assist in addressing this Holocaust directed at senior citizens who are targeted for 'elder cleansing!'    In the Sykes case, the guardian in not inventoring the 'loot' obtained from Mary (and Gloria's) safety deposit box most certainly did not report it as "income!"     With a fraud penalty of 50% and interest et al******.    In the Gore Estate 1.5 million dollars (plus the gold filings) *****.

 

Ken Ditkowsky

www.ditkowskylawoffice.com