From Atty Ken Ditkowsky – Amu’s presumptions contrary to the Rule of Law

From Atty Ken Ditkowsky – Amu’s presumptions contrary to the Rule of Law by jmdenison From: kenneth ditkowsky  Sent: Nov 3, 2013 6:11 AM  To: JoAnne M Denison , "ACLU@ACLU.ORG"  Cc: Atty Amu 'Lanu -- honest atty oppressed by ARDC  Subject: Re: objections to ARDC I welcome all efforts that foster and promote the 'core' values of America.   I learned a long time ago that all the brains did not go in my head. My objection was based upon Mr. Amu's e-mail that I responded to yesterday morning.   An effective defense has to be based upon knowledge of the subject matter and the law.   A defense has to be based upon knowing and understanding the cases and the effect - and most importantly understanding the First Principles of America Law. The National Socialist credo of the IARDC exhibited in decision in Mr. Amu's case is most troubling.  It was not troubling that they found the facts to be contrary to Mr. Amu's version, but, it was horrible that they ignored the 'standard of proof' and created presumptions that were contrary to law.   Like it or not this outrage was and is only the tip of the iceberg. The 'core' values of American democracy are found in the 'Bill of Rights' - the First ten amendments to the Constitution and repeated in Article 1 of the Illinois Constitution.   The fact that the hearing panel repudiated the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment in their condescending writing is my focus and the reason that I wrote the Attorney General of the United States to demand an investigation of the obvious racial nexus of the decision.  Wherefore does any State of Illinois institution treat another citizen as a second class citizen!   Wherefore does any State of Illinois institution deny another citizen his/her First Amendment Rights. A little over a half century ago in Germany people who exhibited similar disrespect for the equality and rights of man plunged the world in war over this very issue.  The Amu decision by the hearing panel of the IARDC demonstrates that Mr. Larkin and his minions have learned absolutely nothing!   42 USCA 1983 has been violated and we all have to call upon the Attorney General of the United States to investigate and punish this outrage. Ken Ditkowsky http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/ jmdenison | November 3, 2013 at 6:43 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL:http://wp.me/p209wH-10l Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from MaryGSykes.com. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:  http://marygsykes.com/2013/11/03/from-atty-ken-ditkowsky-amus-presumptions-contrary-to-the-rule-of-law/