Sunday, November 17, 2013

Ex-judge Hale’s punishment not enough, Supreme Court says

Editor's note: Your ProbateShark wishes to rent the Ohio Supreme court to get rid of some of our Illinois crooks.  Lucius Verenus,  Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com

Ex-judge Hale’s punishment not enough, Supreme Court says

  • Harland H. Hale

    The Daily Briefing

    •  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

    The Columbus Dispatch Friday November 15, 2013 12:16 PM
     
    A six-month suspension of former Franklin County Environmental Court Judge Harland Hale’s law license isn’t punishment enough, the Ohio Supreme Court declared today.

    In an unusual move, the justices rejected the recommended punishment and sent the case back to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for further proceedings, “including consideration of a more severe sanction.”

    Hale has admitted that he committed judicial misconduct by dismissing a speeding ticket in December 2011 for a lawyer who represented him in state and federal lawsuits. The judge, who sat on the bench for a decade, announced his retirement on May 9, one week after the disciplinary counsel filed a complaint against him. He said then he wanted to continue his career as a lawyer.

    Hale had reached a “discipline by consent” agreement with the high court’s disciplinary counsel. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline approved the agreement on Oct. 14 and recommended it to the Supreme Court.

    Hale dismissed a speeding ticket for attorney Patrick M. Quinn, who was representing him in sexual-harassment lawsuits. The judge threw out the ticket “without any involvement from the prosecutor or Quinn” and signed a judgment that “falsely stated: Prosecutor dismisses,” the agreement says.

    About four months later, he engaged in improper communication about the case by contacting Quinn and Chief City Prosecutor Lara Baker-Morrish. He asked each to sign an entry indicating that the ticket was dismissed “with the consent of the Columbus city attorney's office and the defendant.” Baker-Morrish refused.

    Hale eventually vacated the dismissal and removed himself from the case. Quinn pleaded guilty and paid a $55 fine and $116 in court costs on the day that the judge stepped aside.

    Quinn represented Hale in three lawsuits stemming from complaints of inappropriate behavior against the judge by a court employee and a defendant in a drunken-driving case. All three cases were settled out of court.

    He is the first Franklin County judge to be named in a complaint by the disciplinary counsel since 2005, when then-Domestic Relations Court Judge Carole Squire was accused of abusing the rights of those who came before her and not following the law. She was defeated for re-election a year later. The Supreme Court suspended her law license for one year in October 2007.

    drowland@dispatch.com

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Thank you for commenting.
    Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.