SSA whistle-blowers in attorney-judge scheme testify about harassment
Current and former Social Security Administration employees testified Oct. 7 that they were persecuted and harassed for speaking up about alleged collusion between a disability lawyer and a judge.
"Management has been allowed to harass, intimidate, oppress, stalk, discipline, ostracize, monitor and make my life as miserable as possible for the last 7 years," said Sarah Carver, a senior case technician at the SSA's regional Office of Disability Adjudication and Review in Huntington, W.V., before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
According to a report from the committee, David Daugherty, an administrative law judge at the SSA office in Huntington, colluded with Eric Conn, an attorney in Stanville, Ky., to approve at least 1,800 claimants for disability benefits. The bank records of Judge Daugherty and his daughter contain $96,000 in cash deposits that he has refused to explain, while Conn received more than $4 million in attorney fees from his SSA cases.
Sign up for our FREE newsletter for more news like this sent to your inbox!Located in a town of 500 people, Conn's firm was the third highest paid disability law firm in the country thanks to its SSA fees, the report says.
Carver, who still works at the SSA office in Huntington, said at the hearing that it was not difficult to observe the scheme between Conn and Daugherty. "It was done in such openness," she said.
Daugherty, who has retired from SSA, personally assigned himself Conn's cases, holding up to 20 hearing for his clients in a single day, while most judges held 15-20 hearings in an entire week. He approved virtually all of them, "in assembly-line fashion," the report says. Other judges approved disability benefits in about 60 percent of cases.
Jennifer Griffith, a former master docket clerk at the SSA office in Huntington, noted at the hearing that judges are not supposed to be involved in choosing cases, in order to avoid favoritism. She called the proceedings for Conn's clients "sham hearings."
Griffith testified that when she discovered the improper docketing of cases, she thought her supervisors would be glad to hear that she had found the issue and could correct it. Instead, she said, she was persecuted.
"At one point, my supervisor would time every action I took during the day, including how long I spent in the bathroom," she told the committee.
She filed a complaint with the SSA office of inspector general in 2009, after she had left the SSA, but was not contacted until 2011, she said.
Carver testified that she was followed by a private investigator and that former co-workers had been fired for their associations with her. "I have suffered tremendously," she said.
"Where is the accountability in this agency? Why does the agency promote and reward management for this activity?" she asked.
Griffith said that SSA management had incentives to complete large numbers of cases and not enough safeguards to prevent abuse.
The report echoes that assertion, citing an SSA hearing backlog plan that "focused on moving high volumes of cases through the [administrative law judge] level quickly. Numerous ALJs and other SSA employees told the Committee that this plan created significant pressure to move cases as fast as possible."
Conn's firm had doctors sign pre-filled forms, which often contained information that conflicted with other case files belonging to the same claimants.
Sometimes, identical medical evidence was used for multiple claimants.
Conn declined to cooperate with the report and invoked his Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination at the hearing.
Judge Daugherty was also slated to appear at the hearing. Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), the committee chairman, said that Daugherty had left the hearing before he was called to testify, despite having been subpoenaed.
For more:
- go to the hearing webpage (webcast available)
- download the committee report, "How Some Legal, Medical, and Judicial Professionals Abused Social Security Disability Programs for the Country's Most Vulnerable: A Case Study of the Conn Law Firm" (.pdf)
Related Articles:
Federal air marshal wins appeal in whistleblower case
President Obama issues intelligence whistleblower protection directive
"Management has been allowed to harass, intimidate, oppress, stalk, discipline, ostracize, monitor and make my life as miserable as possible for the last 7 years," said Sarah Carver, a senior case technician at the SSA's regional Office of Disability Adjudication and Review in Huntington, W.V., before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
According to a report from the committee, David Daugherty, an administrative law judge at the SSA office in Huntington, colluded with Eric Conn, an attorney in Stanville, Ky., to approve at least 1,800 claimants for disability benefits. The bank records of Judge Daugherty and his daughter contain $96,000 in cash deposits that he has refused to explain, while Conn received more than $4 million in attorney fees from his SSA cases.
Federal IT Priorities: Top executives Look to 2013 and Beyond
In a recent survey on Federal IT Reform, Senior government IT executives laid out their vision for the coming year, detailing challenges and identifying priorities. To read more about these timely results click here to download the summary today.Carver, who still works at the SSA office in Huntington, said at the hearing that it was not difficult to observe the scheme between Conn and Daugherty. "It was done in such openness," she said.
Daugherty, who has retired from SSA, personally assigned himself Conn's cases, holding up to 20 hearing for his clients in a single day, while most judges held 15-20 hearings in an entire week. He approved virtually all of them, "in assembly-line fashion," the report says. Other judges approved disability benefits in about 60 percent of cases.
Jennifer Griffith, a former master docket clerk at the SSA office in Huntington, noted at the hearing that judges are not supposed to be involved in choosing cases, in order to avoid favoritism. She called the proceedings for Conn's clients "sham hearings."
Griffith testified that when she discovered the improper docketing of cases, she thought her supervisors would be glad to hear that she had found the issue and could correct it. Instead, she said, she was persecuted.
"At one point, my supervisor would time every action I took during the day, including how long I spent in the bathroom," she told the committee.
She filed a complaint with the SSA office of inspector general in 2009, after she had left the SSA, but was not contacted until 2011, she said.
Carver testified that she was followed by a private investigator and that former co-workers had been fired for their associations with her. "I have suffered tremendously," she said.
"Where is the accountability in this agency? Why does the agency promote and reward management for this activity?" she asked.
Griffith said that SSA management had incentives to complete large numbers of cases and not enough safeguards to prevent abuse.
The report echoes that assertion, citing an SSA hearing backlog plan that "focused on moving high volumes of cases through the [administrative law judge] level quickly. Numerous ALJs and other SSA employees told the Committee that this plan created significant pressure to move cases as fast as possible."
Conn's firm had doctors sign pre-filled forms, which often contained information that conflicted with other case files belonging to the same claimants.
Sometimes, identical medical evidence was used for multiple claimants.
Conn declined to cooperate with the report and invoked his Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination at the hearing.
Judge Daugherty was also slated to appear at the hearing. Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), the committee chairman, said that Daugherty had left the hearing before he was called to testify, despite having been subpoenaed.
For more:
- go to the hearing webpage (webcast available)
- download the committee report, "How Some Legal, Medical, and Judicial Professionals Abused Social Security Disability Programs for the Country's Most Vulnerable: A Case Study of the Conn Law Firm" (.pdf)
Related Articles:
Federal air marshal wins appeal in whistleblower case
President Obama issues intelligence whistleblower protection directive
Read more: SSA whistle-blowers in attorney-judge scheme testify about harassment - FierceGovernment http://www.fiercegovernment.com/story/ssa-whistle-blowers-attorney-judge-scheme-testify-about-harassment/2013-10-08#ixzz2hKCMco1r
Subscribe at FierceGovernment
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.