Wednesday, June 5, 2013

From Ken Ditkowsky today — a saliva test is deplorable, but removing gold teeth ignored?

From Ken Ditkowsky today — a saliva test is deplorable, but removing gold teeth ignored?

by jmdenison
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 4, 2013 5:43 AM
To: JoAnne Denison , "maryrichards"
Cc: probate sharks , NASGA
Subject: Elder Abuse/financial exploitation cases
As the GAO reports disclose, the plight of the elderly who happened to get involved in the system is a National disgrace.
The pattern is very clear in most of the cases.    A senior citizen who has saved a few dollars (usually a million or more) is targeted.    A guardian is appointed and the estate is dissipated.  In cases like Sykes the theft is not even subtle.   The guardian just goes in and removes anything that she can.   The safety deposit box was easy.    The gold coins were removed, inventories kept in the box were sequestered, and the dishonest companions worked a cover-up.    Unfortunately for the bad guys, family and friends were not lax and were not intimidated and a call for investigation went out.   The legal profession, like the rest of society, was scared off or intimidated.   Oh, Joanne and myself are putting up a fight, but, our cries for an Investigation have not been effective.
The Farenga letter to IARDC attorney Black is a 'smoking gun' as it exposes the tie in between the miscreants and even the IARDC.   In the letter (which I have spread of record just about everywhere) Attorney Farenga asks for the assistance of the IARDC is shutting up the call for an investigation.    - yes, Ms. Farenga (as a guardian ad litem appointed by a court lacking jurisdiction) asked the IARDC to end citizen calls for an investigation.    The First Amendment prohibition on such action by government (including the IARDC) is elementary; however, acting ultra-vires the IARDC ignores the facts of record and files totally meritless proceedings.    (Ms. Farenga and her co-conspirators tried on their own to 'shut up' dissent over their averred abuse and financial exploitation - they filed meritless sanction motions against me.  The Appellate Court noted that the Court lacked jurisdiction and vacated the sanctions entered by the Court acting without jurisdiction)
Not every case has a 'smoking gun' letter.    Ms Farenga makes it very clear that she expects (and expected) the IARDC to come to her aid to intimidate us and prevent further calls for an inquiry into the abuse of Mary Sykes and the financial exploitation of Mary Sykes.   As the servant of Farenga, Stern, Schmiedel and a host of so far undisclosed miscreants preying on 90 plus year old Mary Sykes the Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline commission acted with dispatch and filed disciplinary charges against Ms. Denison and myself.    They (IARDC) made it very clear that to speak out concerning the non-inventory of a million dollars in gold coins  and systematic abuse and financial exploitation of an 90 year old widow is unethical.  Indeed, until the 'smoking gun' letter inadvertently was produced by the IARDC the objectors were castigated and dishonored.
Attorney Farenga in her 'smoking gun' letter strips naked the facade and exposes the perfidy.    Her letter is successful in enlisting the IARDC to ignore the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment to openly and notoriously commit overt acts to intimidate and impede a citizens who happen to have law degrees from requested their government to investigate the abuse and financial exploitation of a 90 year old widow.    In Tyler when the facts come out there will be a similar scenario exposed as the facts in Gore attest.    In Gore, not only was a 1.5 million dollar estate made disappear into a Morris Esformes nursing home by one of his relatives, the greedy **** even removed the gold in her teeth!
 The beat goes on  -  With government almost universally bankrupt, one has to ask why the income taxes due from the miscreants is apparently being ignored?      Why has the press virtually ignored the Sykes case and similar matters?   Why are our 'honest' elected officials not actively and loudly calling for an investigation?    Where is the ACLU?     Yesterday on the news an ACLU attorney was all hot and bothered that a saliva test for DNA was considered by Supreme Court not to offend the 4th amendment; however, removing the teeth of a 90 year old lady (Ms. Gore) does not offend the ACLU, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Times, CBS, NBC, etc.    The Farenga letter  is a 'Charnel House' -
Ken Ditkowsky
jmdenison | June 4, 2013 at 5:42 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p209wH-MI

Comment   See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.