Monday, June 17, 2013

From Atty Ken Ditkowsky this morning–his thoughts and comments on NO SERVICE ON MARY

From Atty Ken Ditkowsky this morning–his thoughts and comments on NO SERVICE ON MARY

by jmdenison
From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Jun 17, 2013 9:24 AM
To: JoAnne Denison , Lawrence Hyman , Don Johnson , "Christine Christine T. Cody"
Cc: GLORIA SYKES , Eric Holder , matt senator kirk
Subject: Information from the Sheriff of Cook County
I received a letter from the Sheriff of Cook County with a copy of his records.   I sent a copy of the Sheriff's material to Mr. Schmiedel.      It appears that this issue is dead - Mary was never served with process as required by law, and she has been illegally deprived of her liberty and property.
The jurisdictional requirements necessary to address any senior citizen disability have been and are being ignored in the Sykes case.      I am forwarding to you, the Honorable Eric Holder, Honorable Senator Kirk, et al copies of the letter that I received this morning from the Sheriff.
The IARDC attorney asked me if I was repentant for sending a letter to the Attorney General of the United States requesting an Investigation of the Sykes case.    I wonder if the same IARDC attorney, Mr. Schmiedel, Ms. Farenga, Mr. Stern et al are repentant for taking away 4 years of Mary Sykes life and depriving her of her liberty and property.    [Selling her beloved home of 50 years, ripping her from her beloved neighborhood and garden club, neighbors, walking in a neighborhood, etc.)
The first responsibility of a Judge, a guardian ad litem, and/or the attorney for a plenary guardian is to determine if the Court has jurisdiction, and in the case wherein a person's liberty and property might be compromised to ascertain if all the protections due that targeted person are complied.    Not only was this not done, but,  intimidation was used to attempt to silence anyone from looking into the situation.
Citizens should ask how this type of situation occurred, and be very worried that the very same thing could happen to them.
 DATE Monday, June 17, 2013
MEMO TO:     Mr. Peter Schmiedel:
Re:     SERVICE ON MARY SYKES - IN RE: CONDUCT OF PETER SCHMIEDEL, ADAM STERN, CYNTHIA FARENGA, AND OTHERS IN REFERENCE TO ESTATE OF MARY SYKES AND LACK OF JURISDICTION ON MARY SYKES.
Dear Mr. Schmiedel,
Enclosed please find correspondence from the Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois.
It appears the Sheriff also has no record of service on Mary Sykes.    What this means, Mr. Schmiedel is that for almost four years Mary Sykes has been subjected to the loss of her liberty and her property without being properly before the Court.
Just for the record, enclosed is a copy of the operating statute, which the Illinois Supreme Court has acknowledged as jurisdictional. This statute is not a suggestion it is mandatory.    Again a search of the file reveals no return of service under oath, no document can be construed as a “The summons shall be printed in large, bold type” containing the appropriate warnings.
Again, I wish to alert you that this is a very serious matter and a senior citizen’s rights have been knowingly violated.     What is going to be done about the grievous harm that was done to Mary Sykes, Gloria Sykes and others?      A copy of this letter is being communicated to law –enforcement demanding an immediate investigation to ascertain how such a terrible situation has occurred in the United States of America.
Yours very truly,
Kenneth K. Ditkowsky
KKD/djm
Cc:    Honorable Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States,  Honorable Mark Kirk, Senator,  Honorable Jane Stuart, Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County.  Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission, Ms. Gloria Sykes, Ms. JoAnne Denison.
755 ILCS 5/11a-10
Formerly cited as IL ST CH 110 1/2 ¶ 11a-10
5/11a-10. Procedures preliminary to hearing
Currentness
§ 11a-10. Procedures preliminary to hearing.
(a) Upon the filing of a petition pursuant to Section 11a-8, the court shall set a date and place for hearing to take place within 30 days. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to report to the court concerning the respondent's best interests consistent with the provisions of this Section, except that the appointment of a guardian ad litem shall not be required when the court determines that such appointment is not necessary for the protection of the respondent or a reasonably informed decision on the petition. If the guardian ad litem is not a licensed attorney, he or she shall be qualified, by training or experience, to work with or advocate for the developmentally disabled, mentally ill, physically disabled, the elderly, or persons disabled because of mental deterioration, depending on the type of disability that is alleged in the petition. The court may allow the guardian ad litem reasonable compensation. The guardian ad litem may consult with a person who by training or experience is qualified to work with persons with a developmental disability, persons with mental illness, or physically disabled persons, or persons disabled because of mental deterioration, depending on the type of disability that is alleged. The guardian ad litem shall personally observe the respondent prior to the hearing and shall inform him orally and in writing of the contents of the petition and of his rights under Section 11a-11. The guardian ad litem shall also attempt to elicit the respondent's position concerning the adjudication of disability, the proposed guardian, a proposed change in residential placement, changes in care that might result from the guardianship, and other areas of inquiry deemed appropriate by the court. Notwithstanding any provision in the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act or any other law, a guardian ad litem shall have the right to inspect and copy any medical or mental health record of the respondent which the guardian ad litem deems necessary, provided that the information so disclosed shall not be utilized for any other purpose nor be redisclosed except in connection with the proceedings. At or before the hearing, the guardian ad litem shall file a written report detailing his or her observations of the respondent, the responses of the respondent to any of the inquires detailed in this Section, the opinion of the guardian ad litem or other professionals with whom the guardian ad litem consulted concerning the appropriateness of guardianship, and any other material issue discovered by the guardian ad litem. The guardian ad litem shall appear at the hearing and testify as to any issues presented in his or her report.
(b) The court (1) may appoint counsel for the respondent, if the court finds that the interests of the respondent will be best served by the appointment, and (2) shall appoint counsel upon respondent's request or if the respondent takes a position adverse to that of the guardian ad litem. The respondent shall be permitted to obtain the appointment of counsel either at the hearing or by any written or oral request communicated to the court prior to the hearing. The summons shall inform the respondent of this right to obtain appointed counsel. The court may allow counsel for the respondent reasonable compensation.
(c) If the respondent is unable to pay the fee of the guardian ad litem or appointed counsel, or both, the court may enter an order for the petitioner to pay all such fees or such amounts as the respondent or the respondent's estate may be unable to pay. However, in cases where the Office of State Guardian is the petitioner, consistent with Section 30 of the Guardianship and Advocacy Act,1 where the public guardian is the petitioner, consistent with Section 13-5 of the Probate Act of 1975, where an elder abuse provider agency is the petitioner, pursuant to Section 9 of the Elder Abuse and Neglect Act,2 or where the Department of Human Services Office of Inspector General is the petitioner, consistent with Section 45 of the Abuse of Adults with Disabilities Intervention Act, no guardian ad litem or legal fees shall be assessed against the Office of State Guardian, the public guardian, the elder abuse provider agency, or the Department of Human Services Office of Inspector General.
(d) The hearing may be held at such convenient place as the court directs, including at a facility in which the respondent resides.
(e) Unless he is the petitioner, the respondent shall be personally served with a copy of the petition and a summons not less than 14 days before the hearing. The summons shall be printed in large, bold type and shall include the following notice:
 
NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF RESPONDENT
You have been named as a respondent in a guardianship petition asking that you be declared a disabled person. If the court grants the petition, a guardian will be appointed for you. A copy of the guardianship petition is attached for your convenience.
The date and time of the hearing are:
The place where the hearing will occur is:
The Judge's name and phone number is:
If a guardian is appointed for you, the guardian may be given the right to make all important personal decisions for you, such as where you may live, what medical treatment you may receive, what places you may visit, and who may visit you. A guardian may also be given the right to control and manage your money and other property, including your home, if you own one. You may lose the right to make these decisions for yourself.
You have the following legal rights:
(1) You have the right to be present at the court hearing.
(2) You have the right to be represented by a lawyer, either one that you retain, or one appointed by the Judge.
(3) You have the right to ask for a jury of six persons to hear your case.
(4) You have the right to present evidence to the court and to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
(5) You have the right to ask the Judge to appoint an independent expert to examine you and give an opinion about your need for a guardian.
(6) You have the right to ask that the court hearing be closed to the public.
(7) You have the right to tell the court whom you prefer to have for your guardian.
You do not have to attend the court hearing if you do not want to be there. If you do not attend, the Judge may appoint a guardian if the Judge finds that a guardian would be of benefit to you. The hearing will not be postponed or canceled if you do not attend.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THE HEARING IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OR IF YOU WANT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PERSON NAMED IN THE GUARDIANSHIP PETITION TO BE YOUR GUARDIAN. IF YOU DO NOT WANT A GUARDIAN OF IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER PROBLEMS, YOU SHOULD CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR COME TO COURT AND TELL THE JUDGE.
Service of summons and the petition may be made by a private person 18 years of age or over who is not a party to the action.
(f) Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by the petitioner by mail or in person to those persons, including the proposed guardian, whose names and addresses appear in the petition and who do not waive notice, not less than 14 days before the hearing.    755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11a-10 (West)
Ken Ditkowsky
jmdenison | June 17, 2013 at 3:30 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p209wH-PE

Comment   See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.